Well Peter,
If you are going to get all huffy and holier-than-thou, you can bet people are going to get huffy right back at you. For instance:
"If you weren’t hiding behind a mask like a coward, I’d sue you for libel."
Before you do, I think you would do well to do a little boning-up on libel case law, because it is clear you are not a lawyer and do not understand it. First and foremost, libel cases are typically only heard for published media, of which a forum is not. Second, and the biggest thing you clearly do not understand is your burden of proof in bringing a libel case before a court. You, the one claiming to be libeled, must be able to show that the person who you claim of publishing libelous claims about you did so while knowing the statements were false. Therefore, if you are going to try to sue jmpet, you're going to have a lot more evidence up your sleeve than anything you have here. So catch a clue before you start slining idle threats. Second:
"Again, I ask you : if you claim that I am Zeshua and have perpetrated a fraud, then how do you explain all the correct predictions Zeshua made? "
I have yet to see you clearly and unambiguously deny that you acted as Zeshua and/or that you were never involved in any of the hoaxer(s) that came up with Zeshua. How about starting with that one first? And beyond this, you keep asking jmpet, or others, to explain these "correct predictions". I know for a fact that both I and jmpet have made it clear to you that these were NOT Zeshua's predictions. Rather, they were YOUR interpretations of Zeshua's words. And I believe you even admitted to this at least once when Darby suggested as much. So please knock off the endless asking of this question. And perhaps instead of ignoring the various forms of evidence jmpet has put out there for you to address, maybe you could address them? For example, the clear alignment between arrival, departure, and re-arrival dates between yourself and Zeshua. You have conveniently ignored them, haven't you? So I guess it is odd that you expect people to accept your interpretations of Zeshua's words as more than coincidence, and yet at the same time you apparantly ignore the correlations between you and Zeshua, and I suppose you want people to believe that those ARE coincidences.
Finally, I have put forth another statement that I asked of you that you have also ignored. I asked why it is that you can only "find" negative statements about a terrible future in your "interpretations" of Zeshua. Why, Peter? You have heard of "confirmation bias" before, haven't you? Please explain to us how you are so clearly a fatalist, as exhibited by the statements on your own website, and as such explain to us how your "interpretations" of Zeshua's statements are not confirmation bias based on your fatalist views of the future?
So instead of your anagrams, and instead of your ceaseless propping-up of the Zeshua hoax, why don't you start addressing and answering some of the issues that draw suspicion to you like lightning to a lightning rod?
And if you do not like people accusing you of running a hoax (for whatever sick and twisted reason one might have), then you are free to leave and thus never be the object of such ridicule in the future.
Good day, sir.