Anyone Want To Know... ???

Re: The THREE Methods - Categorized

Hi Ray,

Ok, so now I understand how/why the shape of the pyramid links to the 3 domains working in unison as one system...


Yes, and here is where we can tie-into other threads where we have dicussed the Merkaba. The important thing to understand about a "real" Merkaba design is not only that it should physically follow the shape of the interlocking tetrahedrons...that is the physical part... HOWEVER, it is also VERY important what sort of FUNCTIONS that this physical device will perform in order to change the Operational timeline.
Click to expand...

I am stuck in what to ask next with this, However. Only - how would we use it to intelligently (consciously) interact with the functional domain....I'm assuming that we are still talking about external technology. Now we have a physical pyramid that we can use in this domain, that is a link to the functional domain thus also the operational measure of time - how do we use it in a productive manner in order to manipulate it?

We want to access the software with our physical hardware. And i take it - in order to write/interact with its 'output' the operational effects of time

We are soon to be at 3c/d/e - Guidance, Navigation, and Control. But i fear we have skipped a few stages.

Before these 3 can be addressed at all, the full system needs to be designed. The Pyramid is all well and good. But a the moment its just sat there looking pretty.

First off - now we have established its link - we need to establish how to consciously tap into that link so we might control the interaction and operational results....

I think the wagon has stalled at the cross-roads, Ray. And chance of a jump-start?

What sort of area would we want to discuss in order to generate ideas in view to intelligently interact with these domains (in order to carry out the original INTENTION), now we have already achieved initial task of proving the link does exist. Or is the wrong sort of question to be asking at this point in the thread?

Olly
 
Re: The THREE Methods - Categorized

Guide the vehicle along the INTENDED flight path
Click to expand...

Scenario #1
Three individuals agree on one goal build a pyramid
Their intentions are not the Same though
They help and contribute until their intentions come into conflict.

Scenario#2
One Physical Body with one Intention: To run as fast as possible
however The Physical body does not allow it to run fast. Example: Out of Shape
Would this not alter my original intention?

Scenario#1 as it applies to building a pyramid
Three individuals agree to build a pyramid but one has the intention to use it
to worship a deity, the other to store food and treasures, the third with the intention
to use it to keep track of time.....the final design will be diffrent unless all three
had the same intention lets say: to worship a deity

Scenario#2 as it aplies to building a pyramid
Ok all three individals agree to build a pyramid that will reach the sky but
manpower and gravity will not let them so they settle for a medium size pyramid....
again the original intention was changed....

Now my Question: how to make all three individulas to have the same intention to achieve
perfection...is this even possible?
 
Re: The THREE Methods - Categorized

Ray, you are correct, the Tetrahedron (Tetra) and the Great Pyramid at Giza are slightly different, but Phi is still found within its innerards and in the placement of the chambers inside it...

Actuallly the Giza Pyramid can be viewed as a Tetrahedron in the sense that if you take a model of a see through glass tetrahedron and look through the bottom of it "on its axes", you get a cube which looks like this:

S3U4L3GL2b.gif


cover.gif


The Tetrahedron (Tetra) is the blueprint of creation and the genesis of all form. It is through this structure that energy patterns in the creation process organizes itself. Every natural pattern of growth or movement conforms inevitably to geometric shapes, the 5 platonic structures - the tetrahedron, hexahedron, octahedron, dodecahedron, and icosahedron (and in that order)

When these shapes are being formed it is also the same principle that goes into creating matter, which turns into form with the combination of atoms forming into molecules and then into cells… The first platonic solid (the Tetrahedron) comes about by the culmination of atoms, molecules into cell form…

Platonic_solids.jpg


Within these platonic structures the Fibonacci sequence (a numerical series found in the natural world, that has always existed) is generated by adding the previous two numbers in the list together to form the next and so on and so on. (1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55...). Divide any number in the Fibonacci sequence by the one before it, for example 55/34, or 21/13, and the answer is always close to 1.61803. This is known as the Golden Ratio/Mean spiral which is reflected though nature in the form of geometry. Geometry is the very basis of our reality, and hence we live in a coherent world governed by unseen laws.

These five 3-dimensional forms - The tetrahedron, hexahedron, octahedron, dodecahedron, and icosahedron - are the foundation of everything in the physical world. The entire periodic table of elements - literally everything in the physical world - is based on these same five forms - but often without the greater context of the spiritual understanding that I‘ve pointed out in my previous post above... If one is open to the connection they will quickly make the ascertation that this is the “foundational form” of the first words that were imbedded into Genesis 1:1 by G-d during His creation process… (as I’ve broken the Hebrew words down in my previous mentioned post). G-d tells us this in a nut shell, and this final proof should give you the true authenticity of its author! What more can we ask of a creator than to share with us how He created?

There is more to be seen… In all types of crystals, natural and cultured... The cornea of our eye... The hexagonal geometry of snow flakes, pine cones, flower petals... Diamond crystals... Nautilus shells, Creatures exhibiting logarithmic spiral patterns: e.g. snails and various shell fish... Birds and flying insects, exhibiting clear Golden Mean proportions in bodies & wings... The way in which lightning forms branches... The way in which rivers branch... The geometric molecular and atomic patterns that all solid metals exhibit... The way in which a tree branches and spans out so that all its branches receive sunlight... The molecules of (DNA) - the foundation and guiding mechanism of all living organisms... The star we spin around... The galaxy we spiral within... The air we breathe, and all life forms as we know them emerge out of timeless geometric codes. Viewing and contemplating these codes allow us to gaze directly into the subtle structure of awareness, the inner workings of the universe and the Mind of G-d.

We live in the 3rd dimension, or the plane of manifestation. The mathematical unit of increase is an intra-dimensional doorway though which matter emerges into manifest 3-D reality (form) by a process of emanations… By first starting out as a Tetrahedron with 4 sides and than multiplying into a hexahedron and than a octahedron all the way to a dodecahedron, and lastly an icosahedron… When we re-create this moving and always expanding sequence, we have in effect - the exact movement (time) of creation in the expansion process.

If there is but one jester of magnificence in all of nature and creation, the Tetra would have to be it! It is remarkable by its very unremarkability and apparentness and logic. What is mysterious is how and why the human eye views the phi proportion as pleasing while it is this same proportion which forms the foundation of the material world that we are capable of seeing. Is our brain just playing tricks on us, or is G-d a jester? Because in reality, the universe is actually nothing but a timeless, formless, directionless mass of jelly that is continually being formed by this function and design…

Before I finish, there is something even more magnificent about this basic foundational form! And if one thinks I’m kidding, than maybe I can show you this principle in action… The “principle” of how manifested form is created by the principles of sound/frequency…

cymatics2.gif


http://www.harmonyera.com/1.2.research.htm (here are some live movies)…

Feeling a bit like Alice… how far down the rabbit hole do you want to go?
 
Re: The THREE Methods - Categorized

Hi CAT,

Nicely structured post there. I think that you would have helped A LOT of people out with that, including me!!

To add another example quickly; Its also interesting to note that certain people (incl the Native American Indians and Balinese) Also have a saying that - The Turtle carries the world on its back. Usually displayed visually with such a picture as such, of the senario (couldn't find a decent link on a quick google search).

Which is quite odd until you notice what the pattern on a turles shell actually is!! Interesting that they already knew all this even in ancient times.

So now that this thread has already covered the main theory behind reality engineering and the current 'evidence' of this worlds link to the 'world beyond'. How do we now look at it all with a view to interacting with the outward design (operational domain), instead of just looking at its magnificance and being subject to its effects.

CATs post was good timing - as the closing of his post showed (with an excellent example), resonance is behind the form. This must mean that the resonance is information sent down from the software (the FUNCTIONAL domain).

Any got any ideas on this, to start the ball rolling?

kind regards,
Olly
 
Re: The THREE Methods - Categorized

wa1ex's is the easiest to answer:
Now my Question: how to make all three individulas to have the same intention to achieve
perfection...is this even possible?
Click to expand...
I think you are approaching it from the wrong direction, wa1ex. It is not about "making" people's intentions match. Rather, the lesson of creation is in establishing your own intention, and then seeking out people with LIKE intention who also wish to express that intention in physical form. Again, using the space exploration example, the president and his administration was simply the force that stated an intention to return to the Moon and send man to Mars. NASA adopted that intention and internalized it amongst themselves. Now us private contractor companies are also adopting the same intention...and we are all working together to manifest that national intention. From here we progress to developing a common Operational vision and design, then to Functional, and finally to Physical. At some point in our future we SHALL manifest this intention when man first sets foot on Mars.

New/Improved RMT
 
Re: The THREE Methods - Categorized

Hi Olly,

Just a few bumps in the road we are passing over. /ttiforum/images/graemlins/smile.gif
I'm assuming that we are still talking about external technology.
Click to expand...
Need it only be external technology? What about the fact that this technology is also INTERNAL to ourselves?

I find it amazing (although I shouldn't) that BOTH wa1ex's AND CAT's post also address this issue of internalization of the triplex model (with much applause for CAT's excellent sharings!). Can you see how we are all really "in sync" and heading towards a common direction... even though we might not see it... it is manifesting before our eyes! Witness the POWER OF INTENTION...multipled! And also think about the quote that begins "when two or more are gathered in My name..."


What sort of area would we want to discuss in order to generate ideas in view to intelligently interact with these domains (in order to carry out the original INTENTION), now we have already achieved initial task of proving the link does exist. Or is the wrong sort of question to be asking at this point in the thread?
Click to expand...
There is no "wrong" in this act of Creation, Olly. /ttiforum/images/graemlins/smile.gif

But what do you say we stick with the internalization aspect of it, for now? Because it should be obvious from these last few posts that it is the INTERNALIZATION of INTENTION that is the first crucial step before anything can be created through the Operational-Functional-Physical process... right?

Let's take a look at the architecture of the human body... a device we all share in common. Can we find a link between the internal architectural elements of the human form and our "secrets of the pyramids" model? I think we can:

The human head - The Operational center of processing of the human species. There is no doubt that the primary metric of the brain is TIME. IOW, our head represents an "Operational triangle", with the brain at the apex of this triangle, and it is the brain that formulates the concept of TIME (passage of events, tracked by Matter in Motion). This is also where we form our INTENTION.

The human chest - The Functional center of processing of the human species. There is no doubt that the human heart is all about MOTION that keeps the human body alive. We can further expand beyond the heart to see how our internal organs represent the "Engine of Functional Transformation". When we model functions in science, there are three elements to this model which must show up for a complete function: (1) The INPUTS, (2) The Transform PERFORMANCE, and (3) The OUTPUTS. So our heart, lungs, and other internal organs are focused on receiving INPUTS in the form of Energy (air, water, food). These inputs are then TRANSFORMED into another form of Energy (biochemical) that is used by the rest of our body to perform its Functions at the direction of our Operational processing center. And the organs will also TRANSFORM the waste products such that they can be emitted as OUTPUTS (solid/liquid waste, perspiration, heat).

The human gonads - The center of our Physical reproduction! Little more needs to be said about this, except to point out that one of the most powerful INTENTIONS that we humans have is to procreate... and to (hopefully) raise our offspring to not only carry-on in our intentions, but to formulate their own intentions and carry out their own creations.

Notice how the same model we have discussed as an "external" model for the pyramids is also "embedded" within our own physical structure! Perhaps EMBEDDING of one form within another might be a good direction for us to explore next? There is certainly a lot that systems theory and systems engineering have to say on this topic! /ttiforum/images/graemlins/yum.gif

New/Improved RMT
 
Re: The THREE Methods - Categorized

http://home.earthlink.net/~tonybadillo/

The Above Link is the Findings of the similarity of King's Solomons Temple Architecture and The Human Body. Example The "Holiest of Holiests" place in the temple resembles the Head in the human body (The Mind)

Interesting Read.
 
Re: The THREE Methods - Categorized

Perhaps EMBEDDING of one form within another might be a good direction for us to explore next? There is certainly a lot that systems theory and systems engineering have to say on this topic!
Click to expand...

Ray,

You got any clues as to where you are hoping to go here?

Are you talking about this system creating new 'bodies', or literally two forms working as one, going up the platonic selection....?

I have two different avenues to go - but i think that you are talking about something else.

Kind regards,
Olly
 
Re: The THREE Methods - Categorized

(major applause for wa1ex's sharing!)
The Above Link is the Findings of the similarity of King's Solomons Temple Architecture and The Human Body. Example The "Holiest of Holiests" place in the temple resembles the Head in the human body (The Mind)
Click to expand...
Nice. It looks to me like wa1ex wishes to steer the wagon for awhile!?


So, if I may be so bold as to ask you wa1ex, how do you think the concept of our 3-D model, expressed as the internal architecture of the physical human body, might also extend to the architecture of the mind which is embedded within the human body?

New/Improved RMT
 
Re: The THREE Methods - Categorized

Hi Olly,
You got any clues as to where you are hoping to go here?
Click to expand...
I do, but I am not necessarily "steering" here. It looks like wa1ex might be able to share some thoughts that might send us in a pertinent direction.

Considering this thought, I would like to point something out here that perhaps some have not figured out: This thread has somewhat a "life of its own". Those of us who have taken an ACTIVE role in this thread are the ones who are Creating it, in that we extend some of our TEEM toward its continuation. None of us "own" this thread, and yet all of us are providing inputs that have an impact on where this thread goes.

Are you talking about this system creating new 'bodies', or literally two forms working as one, going up the platonic selection....?
Click to expand...
In discussing how our model is embedded within the human body, I am simply pointing out that we can all approach an understanding of how Creation works through embedding by examining the COMMON architecture that we each possess in the form of our human bodies. We can (and may) go one level deeper in the embedding process and examine how the non-physical aspects of being human are further embedded within the Crown element of our physical architecture (the brain).

I have two different avenues to go - but i think that you are talking about something else.
Click to expand...
Why not contribute one which you think is pertinent, and see where this input leads the thread? I'm thinking that, since your interest is in understanding how the human entity interacts with the planetary grid, that you might be interested in how the architecture of the human body is, itself, embedded within the architecture of our planet. So if this is one direction you wish to go, is there some way we could apply the "Operational-Functional-Physical" model to our planet as a whole... or, using systems terminology, looking at our entire planet as an isolated system which also has Operational, Functional, and Physical domains.

New/Improved RMT
 
Re: The THREE Methods - Categorized

Yo CATty, 'Sup? /ttiforum/images/graemlins/smile.gif
Feeling a bit like Alice… how far down the rabbit hole do you want to go?
Click to expand...
Let's see where the TEEM of this thread leads us, OK? I have absolute FAITH that it will take us in a direction which we, collectively, need to explore. I mean, doG being our co-pilot, and all!


CAT, did you happen to notice that those THREE SPIRAL threads bubbled up to the top of the heap recently? I wonder if the concepts therein might be related to what you have discussed in this thread!?!? I wonder if the understanding of the Converging/Diverging Spirals, and the Closed-Loop Spiral in between them might have some bearing on where this thread is going? /ttiforum/images/graemlins/yum.gif

I just have a habit of wondering about these things...
New/Improved RMT
 
What Leads to INTENTION?

I feel an especially strong INSPIRATION to share thoughts in this thread today!
As far as INTENTION goes, and I've asked this before, there seems to me that there has to be something that precedes the INTENTION. Character?
Click to expand...
(Iridium, is this perhaps what you were getting at? Does INSPIRATION lead to INTENTION? What do you think?)

In the past few posts some have wondered about how we "internalize" the 3-dimensional model that I have described as one of the "secrets of the pyramids". I have been describing exactly how this model shows up in the complex system that we call a human being. Clearly this system called a human being has an Operational subsystem, a Functional subsystem, and a Physical subsystem. And perhaps we will be examining how this same model can be (and is) embedded within the human body in what we refer to as the human mind (which is, ironically enough, embedded within the human brain).

CAT has brought up the amazing shape of the Golden Mean Spiral. Would it surprise anyone to know that we can match-up the Operational/Functional/Physical 3-D model with a set of THREE interacting, 3-dimensional dynamic spiral VORTEXES (or VORTICIES)?
Imagine a "collapsing vortex" which follows an inward spiral shape such as this:
500059a.jpg

Imagine that this inward, collapsing vortex represents your human head... which is an input portal for Information (via your eyes, ears, nose, mouth) as well as Energy (via food/water into your mouth). So this inward vortex spiral aligns with our Operational subsystem.

Imagine that there is also an "equal but opposite" outward expanding vortex. This one we would align with our body's pelvic triangle for this is where we "outflow" our human waste, as well as "outflowing" the physical elements of procreation (man outflows sperm, woman outflows eggs, which meet to become child, which is outflowed from the woman as a new human being). So this outward vortex spiral aligns with our Physical procreation subsystem.

Finally, imagine that in between these two, diametrically opposing vortexes is a stable, spiral "accretion disk". This closed-loop spiral neatly aligns with the triangles of our chest (e.g. heart-lungs, etc.) which receives inputs from the Inward Collapsing Vortex, processes those inputs to maintain the body, and emits outputs into the Outward Expanding Vortex. So this closed-loop spiral aligns with our Functional subsystem.

In an attempt to tie these concepts directly to concepts that have been outlined in other threads, I will now show a 3-D matrix alignment of our model thus far:

The Human Operational Subsystem (taken from HERE)
*Inward Spiral of System Operation
*Human Head - Center of Inward Spiral of Operational Information
*Operational Information is the focus of Human Cognition
The Human Functional Subsystem (taken from HERE)
*Central, Closed Spiral of System Function
*Human Chest - Central Spiral of Functional Energy
*Functional Energy is the focus of Human Locomotion
The Human Physical Subsystem (taken from HERE)
*Outward Spiral of System Physical Manifestation
*Human Pelvis - Outward Spiral of Physical Forces
*Physical Life Force is the focus of Human Excretion/Reproduction

Question to Olly: Are you aware of a particular physical field that envelops the earth (one might call it a grid) which follows this model of Inward Spiral/Central Focus (axis)/Outward Spiral? Is this not the exact model of the magnetic field that surrounds and penetrates the Earth?

Certainly, this could be a major clue to the functioning of the earth's "grid"...couldn't it?
New/Improved RMT
 
Re: What Leads to INTENTION?

What leads to INTENTION?

The answer that came to my mind was CLARITY. I was considering yet another thread dealing with the concepts of FREEDOM. As people spoke of their view of freedom, I began placing color on each one and perceiving them slighly different from each each other--and in the end, their were so many colors and multitudes of words that the form became BLURRED. Then, the connection was made with blurring of waves which refines to a single particle when focus is applied and clarity shows that a single entity is creating a multitude of forms. Now how does this tie in with the embedded triples mentioned in the 3d model?

This was a very difficult concept to understand and, in fact, literally wore me down to the point where I came to the conclusion that I could not (by searching out) find the answer to the question--how could someone make the leap (physically or otherwise) through the spirals in that same triple system. Basically what I am saying is, how can I access the higher mind, the higher body, the higher world (including time/space). After fully exhausting every source, every clue, every avenue of possible direction, (this was 35 years ago), I completly emptied my mind of it and accepted the fact that I was not capable of understanding it. It was only by abandoning the quest that the answer became crystal clear. It was only by abandoning self that the higher self became accessible. It was only by abandoning expectation that the truth became evident. This is what I saw:

After fully relaxing and laying aside all research materials, I shut my eyes and enjoyed the darkness for a few moments--until the darkness MOVED. It was startling the say the least, but there was a facination as to what this could possibly be. With a bit of clarity, I was able to see that this darkness had a form and it was in the shape of the spiral or vortex--and it was alive and sentient. More importantly, it showed me how it traversed the physical matrix. The "tail" of entity entered within itself, and by the time it had exited on the other side, it was traveling at light speed and then through the accretion disk to the other side. This is what gave me the understanding about how to traverse the "veils" (three of course) of all three embedded realities. India's adepts have found how to literally control bodily functions, for example, and some have traveled the "pathways of the seas", while some Jewish adepts claim that they can manipulate matter. The fact is, all people--whether savants or geniuses--have this capability. We are a wonderfully made species with great gifts that we have not fully comprehended yet.

As to the pyramids, there is a literal mountain of information(pun intended). No matter which view is discussed, here again is the need for clarity. I tend to believe that there was a bit of desperation in the construction. What was so important to involve such a massive effort to relate truths that were expected to span millennia? Was it ego or was it a genuine need to give warning? Was it a genuine effort to cheat time and death, or was it some misguided desire to achieve something physical that really could only be understood trancendentally? Were they arrogant scientists seeking to enshrine their knowledge, or was it an attempt to achieve perpetuity of knowledge in view of the obvious facts today that there were many planet killing events in the past that literally scattered the survivors throughout the world?

These kinds of questions are just as valid as the knowledge posed within the pyramids. It may be about more than just accumulated knowledge--it may be about survival itself--not just the body but perhaps the mind and "spirit" as well. For all we know, we have perhaps been "here" many times before and haven't "gotten it". By the way, don't let me steer this wagon. I was just told by my daughers that I am a speed freak. According to them, I drive very fast. Funny, I just thought I was going the speed limit. Perception does not always = clarity. Now I have six adult daughters that make things VERY clear.
 
Re: What Leads to INTENTION?

Incidently before i start my rant, I think intention is far, far higher then 'character/ego', general observable 'character' in this domain is the construction of the ego, which is born out of a 'collective' or 'combined lattice' of emotional responses to operational information. Hence why 'chracter' - in the personality sense - is not 100% set and will not last beyond a single life. Where as intention can and will last throughout each life-time and will also link their various event patterns respectively.

Hi ray,

I realise that the Tetra/merkaba also works here. But for certain reasons i'd rather use the example of the Octahedon.


I did try and relate this example to the most North and ost South human chakras. In the idea that the Crown chakra is where information comes down from the higher consciousness (and yes, operational system information woud also have to be sent in via this chakra) and the root chakra being where the outward spiral of physical forces occurs. However as is the promblem with modern chakra theory it gets needlessly confusing. In ancient times there were simpler ways of putting it, i debate to what degree 'chakras' are helpful in comparison to them being a complex distraction.

Ray, I certainly like your breakdown of the humand body and its sub-sytems. In older times things were the same albeit more simple version of your [more informed] commentary.

The consciousness, is where higher information comes in (operational 'sensory' informaion included). The genitals, were considered a rooting to the pysical domain and an outward physical expression of interal energy.

Inbetween the two we had the [chi] energy center. This is one of the reasons why 'chi', sex and higher consciousness are closely related (people that might have had dealings with OTO and such orders will note what sort of eventual 'magic' they become adapt in). Out of the 3 domains, the origin of Chi energy would be associated to the functional domain. Chi/Orgone or orgasmic energy as Wilhelm Riech called it, is a creational life force energy - it comes in through the head sub-system and is associated with being expressed outward through the genitals.


If we take the idea of the Earth with its north and south poles indicating its syncronicity with the idea that it is composed in a simliar manner. Then This planetary 'body' is in essence no different in nature and is a living system(s) just like us with its own ENERGY CORE.

A four-sided Pyramid aligned with the North and South poles is the most optimal way to generate or create a doorway into the functional domain.

The Octahedron is a the first form were there are two oposing pyramidal forms. in which case there are two vortices that are generating a 'null point' in the middle. At this point there is no need to have them aligned as it is a self generating system. In otherwords there needs to be this form first, in order to generate Poles on a macro level (such as the planet).

Of course the Merkaba is the same, But i can't help but shake the idea, that the Octahedon - in this current dimension for us - would be more beneficial in view to accessing the functional domain and change the operational effects of time. But i can't back this up much with evidence, currently.

Ray, I think that you might have been descirbing this >< vortice hour-glass shape, rather then the octahedron <> shape? In which case we may differ in opinion. Either that and/or i am talking about something else and working it back to your information, where it may not belong...at this time

I think with what you described in your post there, the system would fit into the octaherdon. With the doorway to the functional domain being created in the center. As this set up is already in use. This is also how we are all already linked to the functional domain already. Some are already pretty adept in using it too!

however the >< shape will certainly generate effects (likely just as powerful), but my guess is they may well be very different to anything constructed with the <> form. Its like the octahedrons reverse form.

Any ideas...?

Kind regards,
Olly
 
Re: What Leads to INTENTION?

Yo CATty, 'Sup?
Click to expand...

I’ll tell you wuzsup! I need to simplify things…

Watch and learn:

treeanim.gif


The Tree of Life is a Qabalistic diagram consisting of ten circles interconnected by twenty-two lines. The circles are called sephiroth. The lines are called paths.

The Tree of Life is a map of reality, or of consciousness (states of consciousness). Like any good map, if one knows how to read it, it can be of great help in both navigating the territory it depicts.

The first sephira, "Kether", represents ultimate reality, ultimate consciousness, nirvana, the source of everything. The rest of the tree and all reality and consciousness emanates from Kether. The tenth sephira, "Malkuth", represents the material world (and the first platonic solid the Tetrahedron), which is the most mechanical level of subjective individual consciousness. Sephiroth two through nine represent spheres or levels of reality or manifestation or consciousness in between Kether and Malkuth.

In other words, the Tree of Life can function as a chart of the relationship between ultimate reality and individual subjective reality, or, if you prefer, between divine consciousness and ordinary consciousness. And thus, to those interested, it can be a useful tool for the exploration and mastery of one's consciousness.

The Tree Of Life diagram:

pic7_7.jpg


The names of the ten sephiroth are:
1. Kether
2. Chokmah
3. Binah
4. Chesed
5. Geburah
6. Tiphareth
7. Netzach
8. Hod
9. Yesod
10. Malkuth

Sephiroth numbers 10, 9, 8, 7, creates the Tetrahedron… numbers 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, creates the Hexahedron/Cube and Octahedron… and numbers 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, creates the Dodecahedron and the Icosahedron…
 
Re: What Leads to INTENTION?

In other words, the Tree of Life can function as a chart of the relationship between ultimate reality and individual subjective reality, or, if you prefer, between divine consciousness and ordinary consciousness. And thus, to those interested, it can be a useful tool for the exploration and mastery of one's consciousness.
Click to expand...
It seems that our wagon is RIGHT ON TIME in reaching this station of our journey! Thanks CAT! :D

And I've got some replies for your post, Olly. The amazing thing about the TOL is that it is a "model of models" or a "map of maps". In my response to your post, we will examine how BOTH the Merkaba AND the Octohedron can be (and are) embedded within our model... and both of them can be used as a map-like reference to the Inward, Central, and Outward spiral dynamics.

NOW we are getting somewhere! /ttiforum/images/graemlins/yum.gif

N/I RMT
 
Re: The THREE Methods - Categorized

Just a few questions before the TTA launches his brand new website and leaves for another break, as long as I don’t encounter any setbacks.

I would like to know; peacefully and respectfully (preferably) from anyone here:

1. What does any of this have to do with Time Travel?

2. What does knowing this gain anyone? i.e. is there any special application for this knowledge other then for the diagrams and mathematical models?

Anyone can feel free to answer if they wish.

Kind Regards,
TTA
 
Re: The THREE Methods - Categorized

At first these seem like simple questions to answer, TTA. However, upon reflection, I really dont know how to provide satisfactory answers for you.

The principles of what has been presented or those you have been exposed too, is merely the surface of something that runs much deeper.

Do these principles of the Tree of Life apply to time travel, yes, they most certainly do.

How they apply to time travel, well, the Tree of Life is a model of creation itself. To explain, in depth, how the Tree reflects creation would be long and exhaustive.

Do you have the time to devote to a string of questions and answers?...the duration as of yet undetermined ?

Many of us have spent years in study and meditation upon the Tree of Life, and to condense what we have become "aware" of will not fit into a simple reply.

What type of commitment are you prepared to make to the study of the Tree and that which evolves around the Tree ?

However, it is late as I write this, so given some time to ponder your questions, I may be able to provide a better reply.

I just wanted you to know that your questions have been read and are being taken seriously. ( and the nature of any reply ). I will post a more in-depth reply when time allows.

P.S. Tell me more on your endeavor ...I would be interested in giving it a look-see.
 
Back
Top