Darby
Epochal Historian
Re: Ride of the Valkyries by Wagner.
TimeNot,
Why do you think that the Democratic Party has Rule 9 "super-deligates" at all? It's the rule of law of the gentle "for the people" party that their convention, if brokered due to a lack of a majority of electors for any candidate, will be decided by the elected politicians of the party and not the rank-and-file delegates. That's because the party of the people doesn't trust The People to make decisions...thus the Democratic Party's elitist noblesse oblige theory of the Cradle-to-the-Grave government baby-sitter for the imbeciles...errr...electorate. (And if you think that I'm wrong in my assessment of the Democrats just answer the question for yourself...why super-delegates in a party that's supposed to be so caring, so loving, so pluralistic...so democratic?)
The nominee will be decided by the super-delegates. Neither Obama nor Hillary has the juice to convince half of the Democrats that they should represent the party, neither candidate has shown that they have the juice in the General Election to win a majority of electoral votes, neither of them will back down and both of them believe that the party owes them this nomination. It's beautiful!. The party of compromise, the party of consensus is going to implode in August because it is neither.
It could be that neither of them will get the nomination. The super-deligates might opt for a third candidate that could actually have a reasonable chance to win in November. I can hear it now from them...Al "The World Just Burst into Flames" Gore for President.
And people just keep on voting Democrat..."Thank you sir...may I have another?" "Like, shut up, bend over and take it like a man, dude."
The only way that Hillary (the Obliterator) would win is if the Super-Delegates let her win instead of the person who had the most vote count - which is Obama right now.(
TimeNot,
Why do you think that the Democratic Party has Rule 9 "super-deligates" at all? It's the rule of law of the gentle "for the people" party that their convention, if brokered due to a lack of a majority of electors for any candidate, will be decided by the elected politicians of the party and not the rank-and-file delegates. That's because the party of the people doesn't trust The People to make decisions...thus the Democratic Party's elitist noblesse oblige theory of the Cradle-to-the-Grave government baby-sitter for the imbeciles...errr...electorate. (And if you think that I'm wrong in my assessment of the Democrats just answer the question for yourself...why super-delegates in a party that's supposed to be so caring, so loving, so pluralistic...so democratic?)
The nominee will be decided by the super-delegates. Neither Obama nor Hillary has the juice to convince half of the Democrats that they should represent the party, neither candidate has shown that they have the juice in the General Election to win a majority of electoral votes, neither of them will back down and both of them believe that the party owes them this nomination. It's beautiful!. The party of compromise, the party of consensus is going to implode in August because it is neither.
It could be that neither of them will get the nomination. The super-deligates might opt for a third candidate that could actually have a reasonable chance to win in November. I can hear it now from them...Al "The World Just Burst into Flames" Gore for President.
And people just keep on voting Democrat..."Thank you sir...may I have another?" "Like, shut up, bend over and take it like a man, dude."