Re: Answer to Darby
Darby;
Your confounding of some of the simplest of points of observation is parmaount to lunar. Are you so confused with your own personal frame of reference tha tyou need another to conduct a simply experiment.
You asked about my frame of reference: I'll put it as simply as I possibly can...You and I are presently in the same timestream. This means that for each second that ticks off of clock X (of Y number of pulses from this or that substance) that one second elapses for you, and for myself.
My frame of reference is yours: one second of tick on a clock, any clock, it doesn't matter (again I remind you that time is a subjective imposition that humankind has subjected itself to...if you cannot graps that space, time, and existing dimensions are all subjective we can never make any progress).
As you note the clock, you are W seconds old. As the clock clicks through one minute you are W+60 seconds old, and have moved from point T1 to point T1 (plus 60 seconds).
In essence, as time passes, you pass through time.
To try to bait me into some abstract method of relating to measured and liner time is simply a null effort.
You are well aware that as you age each second you also pass into another second. Trying to confound the truth with jargon and systematic implications does not net fsh.