Re: Reply To JustLurking
I'll be gone soon enough; as I should be pulled back any day now. If I'm not, then I am stranded here until I die or get fragged.
But back in early July you said that you had no way of knowing when you would be "reversed" and that it could come within within a few months to a few years.
I'm also wondering:
Back in the beginning you spiced up the English language with your local idiomatic useages (which came from the 1960's but that's another story). In your latter discussions you've dropped all of the idioms as you've replied to posts. Under stress you fall back on a more natural use of English. It makes me wonder why your handlers chose someone who has a problem with stressful stiuations.
One can always suppose that you'll switch back to your original style now that you've been reminded. That response is OK. It's an assumed response based on past experience with "TT's".
The real drill was to capture the style at a time when you were distracted and unconscious of the fact that you dropped out of character.
One can also assume that the response to the foregoing is that you switched styles for some conscious purpose. That too is OK and expected. The object in that case was not to announce to
you that you dropped out of character.
It's just a reminder that every would be TT who has ever posted for more than a week has made the same error. They start out with a plan, they sketch out a few ideas but they also get their ego involved in the story. Given a sufficient amount of time they forget the plan and get caught up in the effort to go tit-for-tat back at every criticism. They stop playing the role of TT and get caught up in playing the role of Defender of the Faith (defender of the premise "I am a time traveler"). This is very predictible.
They can neither avoid nor resist the temptation. The same internal motivation that forced them to pose the story is the same pathology that ultimately forces them to fall out of character and get involved in defending the faith.
It's at that point when the "TT" self-destructs. The plan, having been tossed out the window, is replaced by defensive counter-posts. The "TT" is under a lot of stress in responding to all of the critical posts, especially when the criticism involves inconsistencies in the story. Now, instead of freely posting, the "TT" has to go back and double-check old posts for the sake of consistency. This takes time and doesn't move the story forward. The ego strokes become fewer and fewer. Its no longer as much fun as it was in the beginning. The "TT" has then entered the "I'll be leaving soon" phase.
A week later and s/he is gone.
In response to my quip...
"You see what I mean? Once every two weeks or so."
back in early July you asked...
"No I don't know what you mean! Pretend I'm REALLY out of touch, and have no idea...
what do you mean?"
I meant that a new would-be time traveler comes along every two weeks or so. That's been the patern for years. You were the would-be TT that arrived right on schedule at the time that you started posting. It's a pattern and it's predictible. Above, in the first part of this post I alluded to another predictible pattern.
Here's the third pattern:
You're in the "I'll be leaving soon" phase of your story, as both predicted by me and stated by you. You'll be gone soon. And you'll be replaced by another "Once Every Two Week Wonder". In a few weeks your thread will fall off the front page of the forum list. You'll be forgotten among all the other forgotten "TT's".
But the rest of us will still be here...and we'll actually continue to enjoy the forum. We're here because we like being here. We aren't here because of some pathology that drives our ego to demand that we be here.
Now, I'm not with Jmpet on the "Shoo" theory. Stay as long as you want to stay. I'll continue not to pay much attention to your thread; the rest will continue to enjoy responding to your thread and you'll continue to be under duress as you attempt to shore up the story. That's no longer much fun for you, but, hey. It's your pathology, not mine.
The funny thing is that in your response to this post you'll be overwhelmingly motiviated to defend the faith...as predicted.