Everything you say is only a basic insight onto a subject. You seem to have no depth in history. You do not know names, dates or even the year of a certain invention. You do not even have an extensive vocabulary or a even good grammar to boot. Your replies to us are jus mere one sentence explanations that give no depth in whatever answer that we really seek. Your motive here doen't seem to be with any relation to history but to lead us on as long as you can to break some hoax record and hoping that we haven't debunked you. (well, we did, but since you refused to own up). You contradict yourself a lot. You cure cancer, but there is still cancer. You cure AIDS but there is still a new strain and besides AIDS isn't jus AIDS, it's jus a simple term for example the common HIV. You do not have any depth. Besides a cure for cancer doesn't mean any cancer, there are so many variations of cancer and they all have different effects on a human. How would there be a all-in-one cure to rid of all cancer cells without amputation or radiation treatment?
You talk about recyling, but how this work? How do you even recyle plastic? 500 years in the future and you still use the term TERABYTES? It's not like we haven't achieved any of these terabytes technology. If you still use terabytes, i expect there are other similar counterparts to the pc as well?
You always say I don't know this, or I've never heard of it. I bet you haven't been studying hard and I believe you were duped by your own 'government' to discover what you have really missed out here.
500 years in the future, it all sounds too dumb, too stupid. I would choose to die and fade than to live in a such a 'fascinating' world. It's not a dream world, it's not a paradise. It is just a world built on modern conveniences and technology, mankind has not learnt it's lesson.
Thank you,
Nicolas