What would be the relative value of our erotic village, as transposed onto said Chrono's time?
AN ASKING TO THE CHRONOHISTORIANS DIRECTLY:
Examples are as given here> Post future shock errotic semantologies
With respects to the visual need of erotic, in the current social matrix, pan wide, what would be the compositions of erotic semantologies, as both people use and understand them?
Examples, if people are part primate and in a captive situation primates must watch visual erotic stimulation in order to perk their interests to procreate, then in this termage, erotica could not be termed in it usage, as evil.
So since people are primate and there is intended erotic supply afforded, what then are all the mathematical compositions of the set of this compositions, as in some respects humankind does mimic the Los Angeles Zoo primate need theory?
A contraposition would be, that all erotica is bad, so therefore intone any use of such, inspire of synergisticiocal effects, from overpopulations, to be under the boss of religious theologies.
So should now erotica, be a vested use program as it is still termed a need, by the clerical set? wanted to know
12/3/2004
10:09 am EST Re: Post future shock errotic semantologies
correction third line up should read, >overpopulations, to be under the boss of religious theologies. ...
12/3/2004
10:27 am EST Re: Post future shock errotic semantologies
clerical set?... jalien
12/3/2004
10:44 am EST Re: Post future shock errotic semantologies
if ...
12/3/2004
10:50 am EST Re: Post future shock errotic semantologies
jalien, wasn´t it "If..." ? jalien
12/3/2004
10:53 am EST Re: Post future shock errotic semantologies
don´t use uppercase ...
12/3/2004
10:55 am EST Re: Post future shock errotic semantologies
http://www.bfi.org.uk/collections/release/if/maconif.html
oops...
needed four dots lol
ok jalien lower case is sufficient /ttiforum/images/graemlins/smile.gif jalien
12/3/2004
10:59 am EST Re: Post future shock errotic semantologies
machine guns in hand,
kind of reminded of, (shawn), sean penn in the movie taps ...
12/3/2004
11:04 am EST Re: Post future shock errotic semantologies
jalien, I´m diggin´ you...
confession: have not seen Taps... wanted to know
12/3/2004
11:42 am EST Re: Post future shock errotic semantologies
Into this asking, additional information.
Postulates:If Jimmy Swaggert has first said that he has sinned and then at a later date says he had better not have a homosexual come onto him, does this statement by Swaggert, mean that he is socially flawed, however is now in complete control of homosexuals?
2.What is the value of Jerry Farwell having seditious views against Jews and what is the value of this man sliding down into a water filled pool, via a sliding board, in a formal suet?
Are these the precepts of relation over physical morality.
3.The Catholic sex abuse scandal said that clerical and underage youth, at times were involved in molestational manifiolds.
If this is so, does the Catholic clergy, have definitive ties with The Church of God organizations, due to Swiggarts said control of hypothalamus challenged humans?
4.If in web site
http://www.xxxchurch.com/ there is a visiting to both rated X places, as well as instructing humans of the evils of pornography as opposed to theosophical ideals, then what is the benefit of erotica at all?
In other words, now in a public way, are the churches onus as an attempted conscript of all erotic materials and their users?
5.At what point is any attempted viewing by any person, by this newer theosophical thrust, considered immoral or non-necessary and how do these principles lie up with the basic need of humans, who are part primate, to have their needed allotments of any form of erotica?
6.Is an electronic goddess, a need-all for humans, as their need for lust, is now supplanted by a regulation of viewed taste?
In other words, what type of erotica, do most of the clergy, whoever they may be, are allowed to watch?
*Is this move a boat-rocking action, where sexual morality will sway one direction and then back to another, or since eltronic frontiers simulate and adapt, will there be pornography acceptance guidelines now issued, as it seems everyone has access to the electronic frontier?
Other notes, what type of erotica should good people watch and is there a standard type of erotica, where say heads of state, or influential people are allowed to watch?
If this is so, is the adage of good taste in pronogprhy being foisted upon the general public, by either governmental, media, or theosophical encouragements? Too Many Secrets
12/3/2004
11:45 am EST Re: Post future shock errotic semantologies
"kind of reminded of sean penn in the movie taps"
I was thinking it was Tom Cuise wanted to know
12/3/2004
11:46 am EST Re: Post future shock errotic semantologies
TMS´ I´m not asking that and have no idea what your trying to say? wanted to know
12/3/2004
11:52 am EST Re: Post future shock errotic semantologies
TMS´ furthermore, the manifolds are coming to reality rather than only theory, so in this thread, then what are these semantologies and how does media relate to these new factors.
Evil Hollywood, is not an overall encompassing reality.
In other words, Cameron Diaz, skipping down the street, does not in the flat basis, effect the flavor of polar bear poop, outside of random chance elements for that day.
In the hyperfine sense, yes there is quantum tunneling, however in the greater sense., Cameron Diaz can scream all she wants, but for the most part it is ventured to say, will not affect the flavor of Polar Bear poop that day!?