I am from the year 2522
- Thread starter chronohistorian
- Start date
creedo299
Epochal Historian
Chrono' no did not get my information about the universe being a sphere off the news as you say, I got this info as a result of allot of hard work.
I am extremely well read on the subject of UFOs, E.T. and unusual phenomenon.
What I don't know, which would be interesting to find out, is how the Pleiadeans managed to get a saucer outside of this universe, in order to visualize it?
I don't know the answer to this postulate, unless this is only imagery of something they already knew, or the dead-manned the controls to go all out away from the sphere without a pilot in the saucer.
I am extremely well read on the subject of UFOs, E.T. and unusual phenomenon.
What I don't know, which would be interesting to find out, is how the Pleiadeans managed to get a saucer outside of this universe, in order to visualize it?
I don't know the answer to this postulate, unless this is only imagery of something they already knew, or the dead-manned the controls to go all out away from the sphere without a pilot in the saucer.
Re: uysr
"cerial-why am I funny? do all your theories have to be correct?"
no, not at all .. i know i know nothing and everything i know might change tomorrow BUT if i am to take you at all seriously you have to show me something i can relate to.
the future u claim to be from is one created from TV and FILM with added details by you, some of which you have only provided in simplest form, and a seeming limited knowledge of a century which u claim to be ur speciality , which ... and think about this, is something I find hard to believe ..
but what i do believe is that anything is possible ... but with a story as fundamentally flawed as yours i'd have to say your future is mostly improbable.
but this is jus MY opinion and if u trully believe in this then by all means carry on good fellow.
all i will say to you is think of the benifit of what you are doing .. what will it achive at the end of the day ?
with the rash of TTers popping up its like having a somewhat interesting, often funny and of ocassion slighty eye opening book to read, to which the last 200 pages are still to be written ..
jus some thoughts
b
"cerial-why am I funny? do all your theories have to be correct?"
no, not at all .. i know i know nothing and everything i know might change tomorrow BUT if i am to take you at all seriously you have to show me something i can relate to.
the future u claim to be from is one created from TV and FILM with added details by you, some of which you have only provided in simplest form, and a seeming limited knowledge of a century which u claim to be ur speciality , which ... and think about this, is something I find hard to believe ..
but what i do believe is that anything is possible ... but with a story as fundamentally flawed as yours i'd have to say your future is mostly improbable.
but this is jus MY opinion and if u trully believe in this then by all means carry on good fellow.
all i will say to you is think of the benifit of what you are doing .. what will it achive at the end of the day ?
with the rash of TTers popping up its like having a somewhat interesting, often funny and of ocassion slighty eye opening book to read, to which the last 200 pages are still to be written ..
jus some thoughts
b
Darby
Epochal Historian
Gilmer,
If we’re going to use a radio transmission analogy to explain your method of travel, what receives, translates and reassembles the transmission when you travel to a time before the invention of your gadget?
You experience no proper time during your journey? Can you give us the “modified†Lorentz Transformation for “t†that describes this change in theory?
Given the previous quote, what possible necessity would there be for medication?
How odd. English, a Germanic – not a Romantic language, would devolve to a form of Franco-Italian German without German evolving to the new Germanic language directly. Are you sure about this?
Or did you simply use a German phrase, an Italian phrase and a French phrase - none of which represent a new language at all?
If we’re going to use a radio transmission analogy to explain your method of travel, what receives, translates and reassembles the transmission when you travel to a time before the invention of your gadget?
You experience no proper time during your journey? Can you give us the “modified†Lorentz Transformation for “t†that describes this change in theory?
Given the previous quote, what possible necessity would there be for medication?
How odd. English, a Germanic – not a Romantic language, would devolve to a form of Franco-Italian German without German evolving to the new Germanic language directly. Are you sure about this?
Or did you simply use a German phrase, an Italian phrase and a French phrase - none of which represent a new language at all?
chronohistorian
Dimensional Traveler
I don't make calculations but I have seen people make them so I am almost positive that the calculation is the orbit around the sun at that time.
I cannot draw but even if I could I wouldn't be able to show you because I don't have a scanner.
Darby-There is a language but I can't remember the name that was created centuries ago that has a bit of every language in it. The person who invented it hoped that everyone on earth would speak it.
I cannot draw but even if I could I wouldn't be able to show you because I don't have a scanner.
Darby-There is a language but I can't remember the name that was created centuries ago that has a bit of every language in it. The person who invented it hoped that everyone on earth would speak it.
creedo299
Epochal Historian
To everyone here concerning Chronohistorian:
I think that Chronohistorian may be computer-over-dependent?
This in our time, would be considered a disability.
Go easy on him?
I can help under the MOPs supervision here, if it's alright with everyone help translate some of what he's saying.
In the early galactic server.com, there are telling of races that are two hundred million light years from Earth, that have some cat-like qualities.
The old server, which was Norway based, also had an aliens known index.
In time, it may have been as I suspect that some Lizianrans bread more into humans, as how humans on Earth are put togeather, is that they have a bit of a reptoid input anyway..
It is anybodie's guess, what the conflict with these beings would be over, might be economics, space area control, who knows?
I think that Chronohistorian may be computer-over-dependent?
This in our time, would be considered a disability.
Go easy on him?
I can help under the MOPs supervision here, if it's alright with everyone help translate some of what he's saying.
In the early galactic server.com, there are telling of races that are two hundred million light years from Earth, that have some cat-like qualities.
The old server, which was Norway based, also had an aliens known index.
In time, it may have been as I suspect that some Lizianrans bread more into humans, as how humans on Earth are put togeather, is that they have a bit of a reptoid input anyway..
It is anybodie's guess, what the conflict with these beings would be over, might be economics, space area control, who knows?
chronohistorian
Dimensional Traveler
creedo299-I haven't got a disability.
I have been asking questions over messenger
I have been asking questions over messenger
creedo299
Epochal Historian
From link, http://www.paranormalnews.com/article.asp?ArticleID=999
Written By: Bill Knell
Posted: 5/1/2004
Videos : The Truth About The Philadelphia Experiment
<< Click Here For Further Details >>
4 VHS Videocassettes that provide a complete history and background on U.S. Government experiments with INVISIBILITY, TIME TRAVEL and MIND CONTROL. 8 hours of material!
Price: $00.00
Shipping: $0.00
Add to Cart: $00.00 *Note can not advertise, due to TOS agreements)
Paranormal Item Search
View other VHS Videos about Time Travel
View other DVDS about Time Travel
View other Books about Time Travel
The Philadelphia Experiment is a story that refuses to die. For over sixty years the tale of U.S. Government experiments with invisibility, time travel and mind control have been the crux of what started at the Philadelphia Navy Shipment as a project to demagnetize warships in the early 1940s. Despite denials by the Navy, in-depth investigations by debunkers and a world full of scientists who say it wasn’t possible in the 1940’s and still isn’t today, a steady flow of new witnesses and evidence seems to support the story.
Ronald Mallett, theoretical physicist and professor at the University of Connecticut, stated in 2001 that recent experiments with light make time travel possible. Those experiments proved that light can be slowed, then returned to its normal speed. Mallett felt that this new information provided positive theoretical implications for time travel theorists. But that’s theoretical and pails in comparison to what the Philadelphia Experiment and Montauk Project may have already accomplished.
I’ve presented hundreds of seminars on the UFO cover-up which includes information that I have about the Philadelphia Experiment and Montauk Project. I also maintain a website with short versions of those stories available to read. Given that, people often contact me when they come across anything related to those topics. Such was the case a few weeks ago when I received a call from a person I will call Virginia, a homeowner from a costal Maryland town. I cannot be more specific until we iron out all of her privacy concerns.
Virginia retired last year and purchased a home near the Maryland Coast. The house she bought was 85 years old and needed some major repairs. Virginia and her husband planned to spend about three months preparing the home for their use. Most of the needed repairs involved an interior facelift. A small room with an old desk and empty file cabinets on the second floor of the two story home was slated to become a part of a larger room next to it with the removal of a wall. Some old suitcases, empty packing crates and other debris had been left in there as well.
With contractor work scheduled to begin within a few days, Virginia, her husband and two friends went to work removing everything from the small room. They moved the desk and file cabinets out first, then began bundling up the old suitcases and various pieces of debris left in the corners of the small room. While the four worked, Virginia began to feel a bit sick to her stomach. Her husband and friends complained of similar feelings over the next few moments. Before any of them had time to consider they’re sudden, unexplained illness, an odd green mist filled one corner of the room.
As all present were focused on the green mist, they could see a human form taking shape. It looked like a man dressed in what all agreed later was a sailor’s white uniform. It did not appear to be a modern uniform, but one that might have been worn fifty or sixty years ago. None were familiar with Naval Uniforms, but the group came to this conclusion after viewing photos of U.S. Sailors from the 1940‘s. Within seconds, the man became solid and started to move a bit. Virginia’s husband had been an electrician for years before he retired and noted that he smelled the odor of over-heated circuitry in conjunction with the Sailor‘s appearing.
Before anyone could say or do anything, the sailor looked at the group and said, “2005. Watch out for 2005! They’re playing with your future!†After that, the Sailor faded into the wall and the green mist dissipated in less then ten seconds. All agreed later that they had heard his voice and everyone heard the same thing. They described the Sailor’s voice as deep and full, but sounding a bit muffled.
For at least an hour after the event the group talked about what had happened. Each described what they had felt happened and it was obvious that they had all seen and heard the same thing. The four felt as though they wanted to get out of that house, but none could bring themselves to leave the small room. Suppose the Sailor came back? Virginia brought some sandwiches up to the room while the others stayed to keep watch, but nothing further happened. They completed the work on the room and ended the day by agreeing not to speak to anyone about the event until they could meet in a few days to discuss it again.
The incident with the Sailor occurred on February 12, 2004. Virginia, her husband and their two friends got together a few days after it to discuss what should be done. Virginia and her husband had gone back and carefully examined the area in the small room where the Sailor had appeared. There was no physical evidence that they could see to indicate anything strange had happened. After reporting this to her friends, Virginia indicated that she had spent some time online to see if this had happened to anyone else. While digging for information, Virginia came across my website. She and her husband read the articles I had available about the Philadelphia Experiment and Montauk Project, sharing the information with her friends.
As a group, they decided to order the video set I had available on the two subjects before contacting me or anyone else. By the end of March, all had watched the videos and been stunned at the information they contained. According to Virginia, none of these people had any particular interest in or feelings about paranormal topics prior to the strange event involving the Sailor. But all agreed the incident had happened and none could find a logical explanation for it. At that point, the group decided to contact me.
After speaking with Virginia, I made arrangements to visit these people and examine the room for myself. I was able to spend three days in the area and spoke with each person in-depth during that time. Although I found no physical evidence to support their story beyond the existence of the room and the way they said it looked, I was impressed by their individual accounts. None of these people seemed willing to add or subtract from what they claimed happened and all their accounts matched up perfectly.
Although I am only in the first stages of investigating this event, I honestly believe that these people had related a true account to me of an actual event they experienced. I have no idea and cannot even speculate if the appearance of the Sailor was connected in any way to The Philadelphia Experiment or Montauk Project, but I do feel that the Sailor was probably not a ghost, random vision or an image from the past being played back in the present. This seemed to be a purposeful visit.
My concern is whether or not the warning about 2005 was directed at these individuals or to people in general. None of the group involved had knowledge of any relatives or close friends who may have served in the Navy in the present or recent past. All agreed to speak with their families to find out if there is such a connection, but none wanted to share their experience with relatives or other friends at this point.
This event could turn out to be a very important one if the message from the Sailor was directed to more then just the group involved. That is the nature of the Philadelphia Experiment and Montauk Project. The Government seems to know what such cryptic messages mean, but we are left to speculate or live with the consequences. Had I understood what Al Bielek and Preston Nichols related to me in the late 1980’s, I would have done everything possible to warn people about 9/11. But I didn’t understand it and neither did they. All we had was their account of traveling to a future point in New York City and viewing the aftermath of a terrific disaster.
It’s fortunate that I captured the conversation with Preston and Al on video, or I would look back and wonder if I could have derived more from what they said and have done something to warn people. But I’ve watched the video many times and see that while the description was perfect, no specific date was available. Remember, they were seeing the aftermath of the World Trade Center attacks without any knowledge of who caused them or when.
If the message from the Sailor is a warning to all of us and the U.S. Government knows the nature of the threat, I hope they will take action or prepare us for the worst. Given what has happened to date, I do not see this happening.
Responses to Article
Click here to post a Response (members only)
Posted: 4/18/2004
Posted By: kratheau
Message: It makes sense to me, kinda fits kinda makes me feel if this event was a true acount for sure, and they have the capabilities to go forward into time, they can most likely go BACK into time also, here is something to make one think. was the philedelphia experiment just a war tactic.. or was it a time travel experiment that allowed one of the governments super powers to go back into time and change our future for ever by encoding all of this into ONE book! if you get my drift... maybe im just crazy but i BELIEVE the bible was written in reverse, from ending to begining... in the END there was light, adam (ATOM BOMB) destroyed everything in genicide, not ( GENESIS) it makes sense
Posted: 4/18/2004
Posted By: khalilk
Message: I also agree with him up there i see a connection when i read this article i was stunned because in relation "John Titor" the guy that came from the year 2036 using time travel spoke of this war begining in "2005" killing 3 billion and ending in the year "2015" i am begining to feel that this is no doubt happeing to us we may very well be in danger if this. . . .
Khalil
Written By: Bill Knell
Posted: 5/1/2004
Videos : The Truth About The Philadelphia Experiment
<< Click Here For Further Details >>
4 VHS Videocassettes that provide a complete history and background on U.S. Government experiments with INVISIBILITY, TIME TRAVEL and MIND CONTROL. 8 hours of material!
Price: $00.00
Shipping: $0.00
Add to Cart: $00.00 *Note can not advertise, due to TOS agreements)
Paranormal Item Search
View other VHS Videos about Time Travel
View other DVDS about Time Travel
View other Books about Time Travel
The Philadelphia Experiment is a story that refuses to die. For over sixty years the tale of U.S. Government experiments with invisibility, time travel and mind control have been the crux of what started at the Philadelphia Navy Shipment as a project to demagnetize warships in the early 1940s. Despite denials by the Navy, in-depth investigations by debunkers and a world full of scientists who say it wasn’t possible in the 1940’s and still isn’t today, a steady flow of new witnesses and evidence seems to support the story.
Ronald Mallett, theoretical physicist and professor at the University of Connecticut, stated in 2001 that recent experiments with light make time travel possible. Those experiments proved that light can be slowed, then returned to its normal speed. Mallett felt that this new information provided positive theoretical implications for time travel theorists. But that’s theoretical and pails in comparison to what the Philadelphia Experiment and Montauk Project may have already accomplished.
I’ve presented hundreds of seminars on the UFO cover-up which includes information that I have about the Philadelphia Experiment and Montauk Project. I also maintain a website with short versions of those stories available to read. Given that, people often contact me when they come across anything related to those topics. Such was the case a few weeks ago when I received a call from a person I will call Virginia, a homeowner from a costal Maryland town. I cannot be more specific until we iron out all of her privacy concerns.
Virginia retired last year and purchased a home near the Maryland Coast. The house she bought was 85 years old and needed some major repairs. Virginia and her husband planned to spend about three months preparing the home for their use. Most of the needed repairs involved an interior facelift. A small room with an old desk and empty file cabinets on the second floor of the two story home was slated to become a part of a larger room next to it with the removal of a wall. Some old suitcases, empty packing crates and other debris had been left in there as well.
With contractor work scheduled to begin within a few days, Virginia, her husband and two friends went to work removing everything from the small room. They moved the desk and file cabinets out first, then began bundling up the old suitcases and various pieces of debris left in the corners of the small room. While the four worked, Virginia began to feel a bit sick to her stomach. Her husband and friends complained of similar feelings over the next few moments. Before any of them had time to consider they’re sudden, unexplained illness, an odd green mist filled one corner of the room.
As all present were focused on the green mist, they could see a human form taking shape. It looked like a man dressed in what all agreed later was a sailor’s white uniform. It did not appear to be a modern uniform, but one that might have been worn fifty or sixty years ago. None were familiar with Naval Uniforms, but the group came to this conclusion after viewing photos of U.S. Sailors from the 1940‘s. Within seconds, the man became solid and started to move a bit. Virginia’s husband had been an electrician for years before he retired and noted that he smelled the odor of over-heated circuitry in conjunction with the Sailor‘s appearing.
Before anyone could say or do anything, the sailor looked at the group and said, “2005. Watch out for 2005! They’re playing with your future!†After that, the Sailor faded into the wall and the green mist dissipated in less then ten seconds. All agreed later that they had heard his voice and everyone heard the same thing. They described the Sailor’s voice as deep and full, but sounding a bit muffled.
For at least an hour after the event the group talked about what had happened. Each described what they had felt happened and it was obvious that they had all seen and heard the same thing. The four felt as though they wanted to get out of that house, but none could bring themselves to leave the small room. Suppose the Sailor came back? Virginia brought some sandwiches up to the room while the others stayed to keep watch, but nothing further happened. They completed the work on the room and ended the day by agreeing not to speak to anyone about the event until they could meet in a few days to discuss it again.
The incident with the Sailor occurred on February 12, 2004. Virginia, her husband and their two friends got together a few days after it to discuss what should be done. Virginia and her husband had gone back and carefully examined the area in the small room where the Sailor had appeared. There was no physical evidence that they could see to indicate anything strange had happened. After reporting this to her friends, Virginia indicated that she had spent some time online to see if this had happened to anyone else. While digging for information, Virginia came across my website. She and her husband read the articles I had available about the Philadelphia Experiment and Montauk Project, sharing the information with her friends.
As a group, they decided to order the video set I had available on the two subjects before contacting me or anyone else. By the end of March, all had watched the videos and been stunned at the information they contained. According to Virginia, none of these people had any particular interest in or feelings about paranormal topics prior to the strange event involving the Sailor. But all agreed the incident had happened and none could find a logical explanation for it. At that point, the group decided to contact me.
After speaking with Virginia, I made arrangements to visit these people and examine the room for myself. I was able to spend three days in the area and spoke with each person in-depth during that time. Although I found no physical evidence to support their story beyond the existence of the room and the way they said it looked, I was impressed by their individual accounts. None of these people seemed willing to add or subtract from what they claimed happened and all their accounts matched up perfectly.
Although I am only in the first stages of investigating this event, I honestly believe that these people had related a true account to me of an actual event they experienced. I have no idea and cannot even speculate if the appearance of the Sailor was connected in any way to The Philadelphia Experiment or Montauk Project, but I do feel that the Sailor was probably not a ghost, random vision or an image from the past being played back in the present. This seemed to be a purposeful visit.
My concern is whether or not the warning about 2005 was directed at these individuals or to people in general. None of the group involved had knowledge of any relatives or close friends who may have served in the Navy in the present or recent past. All agreed to speak with their families to find out if there is such a connection, but none wanted to share their experience with relatives or other friends at this point.
This event could turn out to be a very important one if the message from the Sailor was directed to more then just the group involved. That is the nature of the Philadelphia Experiment and Montauk Project. The Government seems to know what such cryptic messages mean, but we are left to speculate or live with the consequences. Had I understood what Al Bielek and Preston Nichols related to me in the late 1980’s, I would have done everything possible to warn people about 9/11. But I didn’t understand it and neither did they. All we had was their account of traveling to a future point in New York City and viewing the aftermath of a terrific disaster.
It’s fortunate that I captured the conversation with Preston and Al on video, or I would look back and wonder if I could have derived more from what they said and have done something to warn people. But I’ve watched the video many times and see that while the description was perfect, no specific date was available. Remember, they were seeing the aftermath of the World Trade Center attacks without any knowledge of who caused them or when.
If the message from the Sailor is a warning to all of us and the U.S. Government knows the nature of the threat, I hope they will take action or prepare us for the worst. Given what has happened to date, I do not see this happening.
Responses to Article
Click here to post a Response (members only)
Posted: 4/18/2004
Posted By: kratheau
Message: It makes sense to me, kinda fits kinda makes me feel if this event was a true acount for sure, and they have the capabilities to go forward into time, they can most likely go BACK into time also, here is something to make one think. was the philedelphia experiment just a war tactic.. or was it a time travel experiment that allowed one of the governments super powers to go back into time and change our future for ever by encoding all of this into ONE book! if you get my drift... maybe im just crazy but i BELIEVE the bible was written in reverse, from ending to begining... in the END there was light, adam (ATOM BOMB) destroyed everything in genicide, not ( GENESIS) it makes sense
Posted: 4/18/2004
Posted By: khalilk
Message: I also agree with him up there i see a connection when i read this article i was stunned because in relation "John Titor" the guy that came from the year 2036 using time travel spoke of this war begining in "2005" killing 3 billion and ending in the year "2015" i am begining to feel that this is no doubt happeing to us we may very well be in danger if this. . . .
Khalil
chronohistorian
Dimensional Traveler
never read all what you put down but there will be no civil war in america
Warrior381
Temporal Navigator
never read all what you put down but there will be no civil war in america
how do you know??? are you in a right timeline?? well now I know that you may be disable person but what about New World Order?? tell us about that..tell us that you are from the future and you should tell me if you know there is a time machine comming out or not write back.. /ttiforum/images/graemlins/smile.gif
how do you know??? are you in a right timeline?? well now I know that you may be disable person but what about New World Order?? tell us about that..tell us that you are from the future and you should tell me if you know there is a time machine comming out or not write back.. /ttiforum/images/graemlins/smile.gif
chronohistorian
Dimensional Traveler
Warrior381-I know there will be no civil war in america because there was only one and it has been.
I am not disabled.
The new world order is fake.
I don't understand what you just said about the time machine.
I am not disabled.
The new world order is fake.
I don't understand what you just said about the time machine.
trollface
Quantum Scribe
Re: uysr
Uh...yeah. I believe you.
Any excuse for the other two questions?
Are you the historian or am I?
If it's the most widely and/or the most commonly-spoken language on the planet (and you've still not told me which or if it's both), then I find it hard to believe that you don't speak even a few phrases, if you're supposed to be an academic. It's certainly what's true of English in our time.
You're an expert in this time period and you don't even know a fact like this for sure? What do you know?
Weren't you going to write me a quick essay on the history of hip-hop and rap, or any other 20th Century history subject of your choice? Come on, prove to me that you know something about this time period.
What's "proper" Communism, as you understand it? Again, are you talking about Socialism, Marxism or what? And who on Earth said that you can't own your own businesses under Communism? That's kind of what the idea behind the concept is, you know, the workers controlling the Means of Production and all of that. Don't tell me that once again you're spouting off about something that you don't know enough about to be convincing, are you?
Wow! How long did it take you to come up with that one?
Well, maybe you can explain how you do travel. Laymen's terms will do, so there's no need for your "I don't know these things" routine. Oh, BTW, if the new "speed" is called "light speed", then what do they call light speed? As it's a very basic, standard speed that has a lot of significance for physics (hey, even E=mc^2 depends on it) and is in daily use accross the globe it muct have a new name, otherwise people wouldn't know which speed was meant by "light speed", would they? And why didn't they just call the new "light speed" by the new name that the old "light speed" has? After all, isn't it stupid to have the speed of light called something else and somethign else called "light speed"?
I suppose that you can tell me the speed (in meters per second, please) of the new "light speed"? c= 299,792,458 m/s
Okay, so...how come there have been huge nuclear reactions many times as fierce and hot as the sun in the moon and nobody on Earth has noticed? How come that this element formed naturally on a dead and chemically simple satellite when not even a Supernova is explosive and complex enough to form such an element?
Okay, this should be fun. How?
That is not "how", that is repeating what you said before I asked you how. Maybe I need to put it in more simplistic terms for you. What did you change into what? Is Everest now an ocean of mineral water that grows special algae? Is the ocean now a towering mountain covered with grasses and wildlife? How did terraforming solve the issue of greenhouse gases?
How good the clocks are is neither here nor there with regards to time dialation through movement. You can say what you like about relativity being bunk, but it has been proven. There is no doubt. As a body accelerates towards light speed time passes slower for that object than for a stationary one. I will say this once more, in the hope that it will sink in: THIS IS A PROVEN FACT. There is no dialogue about this. It is something that is true, and has been shown irrefutably to be true.
Now, if you want to try to say that Einstein was wrong, then you're going to have to do a lot better than you have been doing. You will need to explain how he was wrong, what is right, who sucessfully proved him wrong and when, and what on Earth has been up with all the experiments that have been done over the years which have proven him right time and again? Most importantly, I think you'll need to show what's actually right. I mean, E=mc^2 is part of the modern vernacular because it's so famous. I'm sure that anything that proved it to be wrong would be equally famous, so I'm sure you can tell me what the new equasion is and what any and all of the elements that are new signify.
So, when you say that you're going "faster than the speed of light 33 seconds", what exactly do you mean? Which speed of light are we talking about now, the new one or the old one? How come speed is measured in seconds, now? Or do you mean that you go forwards 33 seconds in time? Compared to what? Why mention it as a measure of speed? 33 seconds per what? Do you mean that no matter how much faster than the speed of light you're travelling and no matter the distance you always go ahead in time 33 seconds? How does that work? Would that be covered by the new theory of relativity? Do you mean that you arrive 33 seconds before you leave, or 33 seconds before you would have arrived, were you not travelling in time?
Um, you're claiming to be a time-traveller. One whose "research" consists of watching TV and stalking groups of people. Here's a tip; buy a video recorder. You can then take back the tapes with you and study them at your leisure.
I think you're thinking fo Esperanto. Which was huge in the 1960s, so I find it odd that you don't know the name of it, you being an expert in the time period, and all.
You know, you could just keep this on your clipboard and cut and paste it in answer to pretty much every question you're asked.
Uh...yeah. I believe you.
Any excuse for the other two questions?
Are you the historian or am I?
If it's the most widely and/or the most commonly-spoken language on the planet (and you've still not told me which or if it's both), then I find it hard to believe that you don't speak even a few phrases, if you're supposed to be an academic. It's certainly what's true of English in our time.
You're an expert in this time period and you don't even know a fact like this for sure? What do you know?
Weren't you going to write me a quick essay on the history of hip-hop and rap, or any other 20th Century history subject of your choice? Come on, prove to me that you know something about this time period.
What's "proper" Communism, as you understand it? Again, are you talking about Socialism, Marxism or what? And who on Earth said that you can't own your own businesses under Communism? That's kind of what the idea behind the concept is, you know, the workers controlling the Means of Production and all of that. Don't tell me that once again you're spouting off about something that you don't know enough about to be convincing, are you?
Wow! How long did it take you to come up with that one?
Well, maybe you can explain how you do travel. Laymen's terms will do, so there's no need for your "I don't know these things" routine. Oh, BTW, if the new "speed" is called "light speed", then what do they call light speed? As it's a very basic, standard speed that has a lot of significance for physics (hey, even E=mc^2 depends on it) and is in daily use accross the globe it muct have a new name, otherwise people wouldn't know which speed was meant by "light speed", would they? And why didn't they just call the new "light speed" by the new name that the old "light speed" has? After all, isn't it stupid to have the speed of light called something else and somethign else called "light speed"?
I suppose that you can tell me the speed (in meters per second, please) of the new "light speed"? c= 299,792,458 m/s
Okay, so...how come there have been huge nuclear reactions many times as fierce and hot as the sun in the moon and nobody on Earth has noticed? How come that this element formed naturally on a dead and chemically simple satellite when not even a Supernova is explosive and complex enough to form such an element?
Okay, this should be fun. How?
That is not "how", that is repeating what you said before I asked you how. Maybe I need to put it in more simplistic terms for you. What did you change into what? Is Everest now an ocean of mineral water that grows special algae? Is the ocean now a towering mountain covered with grasses and wildlife? How did terraforming solve the issue of greenhouse gases?
How good the clocks are is neither here nor there with regards to time dialation through movement. You can say what you like about relativity being bunk, but it has been proven. There is no doubt. As a body accelerates towards light speed time passes slower for that object than for a stationary one. I will say this once more, in the hope that it will sink in: THIS IS A PROVEN FACT. There is no dialogue about this. It is something that is true, and has been shown irrefutably to be true.
Now, if you want to try to say that Einstein was wrong, then you're going to have to do a lot better than you have been doing. You will need to explain how he was wrong, what is right, who sucessfully proved him wrong and when, and what on Earth has been up with all the experiments that have been done over the years which have proven him right time and again? Most importantly, I think you'll need to show what's actually right. I mean, E=mc^2 is part of the modern vernacular because it's so famous. I'm sure that anything that proved it to be wrong would be equally famous, so I'm sure you can tell me what the new equasion is and what any and all of the elements that are new signify.
So, when you say that you're going "faster than the speed of light 33 seconds", what exactly do you mean? Which speed of light are we talking about now, the new one or the old one? How come speed is measured in seconds, now? Or do you mean that you go forwards 33 seconds in time? Compared to what? Why mention it as a measure of speed? 33 seconds per what? Do you mean that no matter how much faster than the speed of light you're travelling and no matter the distance you always go ahead in time 33 seconds? How does that work? Would that be covered by the new theory of relativity? Do you mean that you arrive 33 seconds before you leave, or 33 seconds before you would have arrived, were you not travelling in time?
Um, you're claiming to be a time-traveller. One whose "research" consists of watching TV and stalking groups of people. Here's a tip; buy a video recorder. You can then take back the tapes with you and study them at your leisure.
I think you're thinking fo Esperanto. Which was huge in the 1960s, so I find it odd that you don't know the name of it, you being an expert in the time period, and all.
You know, you could just keep this on your clipboard and cut and paste it in answer to pretty much every question you're asked.
chronohistorian
Dimensional Traveler
Re: uysr
Arabic is the most spoken language. commonly and most widely spoken are the same.
I am not writing an essay for you.
proper communism is when no one can be rich, everyone is the same. everyone gets an equal amount of everything and the state owns all business but we just share the food out. people can be rich and own their own business.
We travel light speak by mixing lunarium, francium, hydrogen and water together which makes an incredible reaction which creates lots of energy. The energy then blasts us off anywhere we want to go.
We measure light speed by 10000 light years per hour so if we travel at 10000 light years per hour we measure it like 1LYPH.
Elements work in strange ways and can be found in any conditions.
We put it in this machine called a transformer which bends it, reshapes it and puts it back how it was and cover it with dry water then shine red light on it. It is more complicated than that put thats the only way I can put it.
When we terraformed the planet we froze more of the north and south pole so less land would be covered by water and we did something else to the sea which stopped the ice age in europe.
so what if the theory of relativity was proven, in means nothing. About 80 years ago you knew that the atom was the smallest thing, thats until you split the atom.
33 seconds. It takes 1 hour to get to andromeda from earth but really it takes 59 minutes and 27 seconds.
I just forgot the name of Esperanto. I am entitled to forget a couple of things aren't I?
Arabic is the most spoken language. commonly and most widely spoken are the same.
I am not writing an essay for you.
proper communism is when no one can be rich, everyone is the same. everyone gets an equal amount of everything and the state owns all business but we just share the food out. people can be rich and own their own business.
We travel light speak by mixing lunarium, francium, hydrogen and water together which makes an incredible reaction which creates lots of energy. The energy then blasts us off anywhere we want to go.
We measure light speed by 10000 light years per hour so if we travel at 10000 light years per hour we measure it like 1LYPH.
Elements work in strange ways and can be found in any conditions.
We put it in this machine called a transformer which bends it, reshapes it and puts it back how it was and cover it with dry water then shine red light on it. It is more complicated than that put thats the only way I can put it.
When we terraformed the planet we froze more of the north and south pole so less land would be covered by water and we did something else to the sea which stopped the ice age in europe.
so what if the theory of relativity was proven, in means nothing. About 80 years ago you knew that the atom was the smallest thing, thats until you split the atom.
33 seconds. It takes 1 hour to get to andromeda from earth but really it takes 59 minutes and 27 seconds.
I just forgot the name of Esperanto. I am entitled to forget a couple of things aren't I?
trollface
Quantum Scribe
Re: uysr
No they're not. Take the example of right here and now. The most commonly spoken language at the moment is Chinese (Mandarin, to be exact) because it is the language spoken by the largest number of people on the surface of the planet (more than a million). However, the most widely spoken language is English, because it is spoken over the greatest distribution of the globe (it is actually spoken by about half the number of people who speak Mandarin). That's the difference.
So, Arabic is both the most widely spoken and the most commonly spoken? Which would make it the standard language for academic study, academic papers, and basically the entire academic world, in much the same way that English is these days. You really don't know any Arabic at all? Tell me, as there cannot be direct phonetic transcribing of Arabic in the Latin alphabet (which is why spellings like "Moslem" and "Muslem" are both equally correct; the first vowel sound is actually somewhere between a western "o" sound and a "u" sound), can I assume that the most commonly and most widely known form of written language is also Arabic? Can you read Arabic?
Oh, and when you say "Arabic", what dialect do you mean? Which current dialect did it evolve from?
You can't even write a consise paragraph or two on the topic of your choice from the 20th Century? So, you're an expert in the time period, but can't even give me any insight into any single thing of your choice from this time period?
You know, now you put it like that, I'm really convinced that you're a historian.
Again, I'm going to ask for the name of the philosophy you're talking about. Give me a name, don't just repeat yourself.
See, as I understand it, Communism in almost all of it's forms actually involves not having a state at all. Once more, I'm going to ask for the name of this philosophy under which your society operates, and I want the name of which brance of Communism it's supposed to have evolved from.
"Laymen's terms" does not mean "explain as if to a child and repeat yourself". One might almost think that you can only parrot back what you've already said because you've realised that you don't have the imagination or knowledge to say any more.
Okay, you have this energy which "blasts" you off? How is the energy converted into motion? If it's expelled in a similar form to a rocket, as you seem to be suggesting, then how come you don't destroy whatever you're near? As E=mc^2, how does altering the amount of energy that you can have at any one time enable you to accelerate beyond the speed of light? How do you navigate? How do you overcome the laws of physics to allow you to accelerate beyond the speed of light? How do you overcome the weight problem?
So you're saying that 10,000 light years travelled in an hour is what is now called "light speed"? Why was such an arbitrary unit used? Why was that speed chosen? And, travelling at this new "light speed", you can cover 2.9 million light years in an hour? I knew your maths was bad, but that's quite a blatant mistake. You want to up your figure by about 290.
No, elements work in very boring, predictable ways. I'm sorry, but the things you have been saying about "Lunarium" would have been accepted in a 50s Sci-Fi horror, but this is that naughties and we're a little better educated than that.
You talking about how you alter the half-life of elements? Nice try. What you have to answer is what you do to it on the atomic level? How do you extend it's half-life?
Oh, BTW, if all of that has to be done to extend the half-life of these unstable elements, then you've just backed up what I said about finding "Lunarium" with an atomic weight of 288 on the moon being impossible. It would have a half-life of a microsecond. And yet you have time to dig down miles, excavate it, put it in a machine, wash it and shine a light on it? All in a tiny fraction of a second? You must have some fast workers in your time.
So you were combatting greenhouse gases by doing something that does nothing whatsoever to the atmosphere? How does that work? And, at the exact same time that you were combatting this global warming by doing something that doesn't affect it at all, you were also combatting an ice age? So the planet was simoultaniously overheating and cooling down? How does that work?
Yes it does.
You really don't know your physics, do you? Think about it...if people "knew" that the atom was the smallest thing, then why would they be trying to split it? Do you really think that science is scientists just trying random things with no idea of what they're doing?
Oh, and do you want to know who it was that showed you could split the atom, and which theories showed it? Einstein with relativity. As has been said; E=mc^2. If that wasn't true, as you claim it isn't, then splitting the atom would be impossible.
Okay, that's one part answered. I'm not going to bother with this, as you only answered the easiest part of the questioning. I'll re-ask everything you've ignored at the end of this post, and show you how to make sure you don't miss or ignore any questions in the future.
All I have seen is evidence of you "forgetting" things. You're supposed to be an expert in this timeperiod, and it seems that you do not know one single thing about it. you even refuse to say anything about the subject of your choice. I could hardly make it easier for you, and you still are not up to the challenge.
Okay, anyway, you've ignored a hall of a lot of questions that I've asked you, so I'm going to re-ask anything and everything that needs to be addressed. Now, you claim that you're unused to typing, so maybe you're unused to reading the buttons at the bottom of the reply screen, and unable to figure out how to use this board properly, so I'll give you a quick masterclass.
What you do when replying to a post where somebody asks you something is to hit "reply" above their post. You then come to the screen where I am now. If you scroll down past the buttons and smilies you'll see the post you're replying to. What you then do, when you encounter a question you've been asked, is to highlight the text of the question. Either hold down CTRL and press "C" or go to the menu marked "Edit" at the top of the screen and select "Copy".
Move your pointer back to the reply window and click on it. Then type in {quote} except, rather than using these brackets {}, use square brackets like this [ ]. Press either CTRL and "V" together, or go to the "Edit" menu and select "Paste". Then type in {/quote}, only with the square brackets, not the one pictured. You then can type in your reply, and move on to the next question.
See? It's that easy. And with these few tips, you'll not only be able to answer the questions fully without side-stepping (which is presumably caused by forgetting the exact content of a question), but you'll be able to answer all the questions wihthout "forgetting" to answer any.
No, don't worry, you're welcome.
So, with that in mind, I'll re-ask all the questions that you seem to have inadvertantly missed, and assume that you can easily answer them, along with the ones already asked in this post.
Well, I suppose it's only 12 questions from that last post that you missed, presumably by accident. That they were the most important ones, and the more difficult ones, I'm sure was just a coincidence. Now you know how to use this board properly with the UBB quote tags and cut and paste options, I'm sure you'll have no problem answering every single one of my questions this time, without accidentally missing any.
No they're not. Take the example of right here and now. The most commonly spoken language at the moment is Chinese (Mandarin, to be exact) because it is the language spoken by the largest number of people on the surface of the planet (more than a million). However, the most widely spoken language is English, because it is spoken over the greatest distribution of the globe (it is actually spoken by about half the number of people who speak Mandarin). That's the difference.
So, Arabic is both the most widely spoken and the most commonly spoken? Which would make it the standard language for academic study, academic papers, and basically the entire academic world, in much the same way that English is these days. You really don't know any Arabic at all? Tell me, as there cannot be direct phonetic transcribing of Arabic in the Latin alphabet (which is why spellings like "Moslem" and "Muslem" are both equally correct; the first vowel sound is actually somewhere between a western "o" sound and a "u" sound), can I assume that the most commonly and most widely known form of written language is also Arabic? Can you read Arabic?
Oh, and when you say "Arabic", what dialect do you mean? Which current dialect did it evolve from?
You can't even write a consise paragraph or two on the topic of your choice from the 20th Century? So, you're an expert in the time period, but can't even give me any insight into any single thing of your choice from this time period?
You know, now you put it like that, I'm really convinced that you're a historian.
Again, I'm going to ask for the name of the philosophy you're talking about. Give me a name, don't just repeat yourself.
See, as I understand it, Communism in almost all of it's forms actually involves not having a state at all. Once more, I'm going to ask for the name of this philosophy under which your society operates, and I want the name of which brance of Communism it's supposed to have evolved from.
"Laymen's terms" does not mean "explain as if to a child and repeat yourself". One might almost think that you can only parrot back what you've already said because you've realised that you don't have the imagination or knowledge to say any more.
Okay, you have this energy which "blasts" you off? How is the energy converted into motion? If it's expelled in a similar form to a rocket, as you seem to be suggesting, then how come you don't destroy whatever you're near? As E=mc^2, how does altering the amount of energy that you can have at any one time enable you to accelerate beyond the speed of light? How do you navigate? How do you overcome the laws of physics to allow you to accelerate beyond the speed of light? How do you overcome the weight problem?
So you're saying that 10,000 light years travelled in an hour is what is now called "light speed"? Why was such an arbitrary unit used? Why was that speed chosen? And, travelling at this new "light speed", you can cover 2.9 million light years in an hour? I knew your maths was bad, but that's quite a blatant mistake. You want to up your figure by about 290.
No, elements work in very boring, predictable ways. I'm sorry, but the things you have been saying about "Lunarium" would have been accepted in a 50s Sci-Fi horror, but this is that naughties and we're a little better educated than that.
You talking about how you alter the half-life of elements? Nice try. What you have to answer is what you do to it on the atomic level? How do you extend it's half-life?
Oh, BTW, if all of that has to be done to extend the half-life of these unstable elements, then you've just backed up what I said about finding "Lunarium" with an atomic weight of 288 on the moon being impossible. It would have a half-life of a microsecond. And yet you have time to dig down miles, excavate it, put it in a machine, wash it and shine a light on it? All in a tiny fraction of a second? You must have some fast workers in your time.
So you were combatting greenhouse gases by doing something that does nothing whatsoever to the atmosphere? How does that work? And, at the exact same time that you were combatting this global warming by doing something that doesn't affect it at all, you were also combatting an ice age? So the planet was simoultaniously overheating and cooling down? How does that work?
Yes it does.
You really don't know your physics, do you? Think about it...if people "knew" that the atom was the smallest thing, then why would they be trying to split it? Do you really think that science is scientists just trying random things with no idea of what they're doing?
Oh, and do you want to know who it was that showed you could split the atom, and which theories showed it? Einstein with relativity. As has been said; E=mc^2. If that wasn't true, as you claim it isn't, then splitting the atom would be impossible.
Okay, that's one part answered. I'm not going to bother with this, as you only answered the easiest part of the questioning. I'll re-ask everything you've ignored at the end of this post, and show you how to make sure you don't miss or ignore any questions in the future.
All I have seen is evidence of you "forgetting" things. You're supposed to be an expert in this timeperiod, and it seems that you do not know one single thing about it. you even refuse to say anything about the subject of your choice. I could hardly make it easier for you, and you still are not up to the challenge.
Okay, anyway, you've ignored a hall of a lot of questions that I've asked you, so I'm going to re-ask anything and everything that needs to be addressed. Now, you claim that you're unused to typing, so maybe you're unused to reading the buttons at the bottom of the reply screen, and unable to figure out how to use this board properly, so I'll give you a quick masterclass.
What you do when replying to a post where somebody asks you something is to hit "reply" above their post. You then come to the screen where I am now. If you scroll down past the buttons and smilies you'll see the post you're replying to. What you then do, when you encounter a question you've been asked, is to highlight the text of the question. Either hold down CTRL and press "C" or go to the menu marked "Edit" at the top of the screen and select "Copy".
Move your pointer back to the reply window and click on it. Then type in {quote} except, rather than using these brackets {}, use square brackets like this [ ]. Press either CTRL and "V" together, or go to the "Edit" menu and select "Paste". Then type in {/quote}, only with the square brackets, not the one pictured. You then can type in your reply, and move on to the next question.
See? It's that easy. And with these few tips, you'll not only be able to answer the questions fully without side-stepping (which is presumably caused by forgetting the exact content of a question), but you'll be able to answer all the questions wihthout "forgetting" to answer any.
No, don't worry, you're welcome.
So, with that in mind, I'll re-ask all the questions that you seem to have inadvertantly missed, and assume that you can easily answer them, along with the ones already asked in this post.
Well, I suppose it's only 12 questions from that last post that you missed, presumably by accident. That they were the most important ones, and the more difficult ones, I'm sure was just a coincidence. Now you know how to use this board properly with the UBB quote tags and cut and paste options, I'm sure you'll have no problem answering every single one of my questions this time, without accidentally missing any.
chronohistorian
Dimensional Traveler
Re: uysr
ok... arabic is the most commonly spoken language because arabs make up most of the population.
I don't really know any dialects of arabic but I think it is the gulf dialect.
We do blast off kind of like a rocket and it doesn't destroy the objects around it because the reaction is confined to a small space in the engines.
We have star charts and external sensors for navigating.
If I told you how we overcame your laws of physics then you might change history.
We don't have a weight problem but if we did I think the shields would stop it.
That speed was chosen because it is easier to understand.
I did not make a mistake because it would be shown as 290lyph.
Actually the elements that we have that you don't can be found in any conditions. You should stop thinking all of your theories are correct when some aren't.
We cryogenically freeze the lunarium first then do the things to it and I don't think it has a life of half a second.
We were doing other stuff to halt global warming but it is hard to explain to people who think that every theory has to be right.
Most people thought the atom was the smallest thing but not everyone, you should not believe everything science thinks is true.
You never said I could make an essay on anything of my choice, all you said was make it on hip hop or other music.
I might start using the quote things but I think this is a faster way to type
ok... arabic is the most commonly spoken language because arabs make up most of the population.
I don't really know any dialects of arabic but I think it is the gulf dialect.
We do blast off kind of like a rocket and it doesn't destroy the objects around it because the reaction is confined to a small space in the engines.
We have star charts and external sensors for navigating.
If I told you how we overcame your laws of physics then you might change history.
We don't have a weight problem but if we did I think the shields would stop it.
That speed was chosen because it is easier to understand.
I did not make a mistake because it would be shown as 290lyph.
Actually the elements that we have that you don't can be found in any conditions. You should stop thinking all of your theories are correct when some aren't.
We cryogenically freeze the lunarium first then do the things to it and I don't think it has a life of half a second.
We were doing other stuff to halt global warming but it is hard to explain to people who think that every theory has to be right.
Most people thought the atom was the smallest thing but not everyone, you should not believe everything science thinks is true.
You never said I could make an essay on anything of my choice, all you said was make it on hip hop or other music.
I might start using the quote things but I think this is a faster way to type
trollface
Quantum Scribe
Re: uysr
See, I'd have thought it would be the most commonly-spoken one as of this time. A quarter of a million people speak Modern Standard Arabic, usually as well as their own dialect. Isn't it strange how all these unlikely things seem to have come true all the time? How come the Gulf dialect overtook it?
What do you mean? If you blast off like a rocket, then you expel the energy as propulsion. In which case the reaction wouldn't be confined anywhere. And if the energy is confined somewhere then how do you convert that energy to kinetic energy?
I meant, how do you steer?
Ha! Nice try. I don't happen to have an infinite amount of energy sitting around, nor any process by which I might generate an infinite amount of energy, so I think you're safe in assuming that I'm not about to put whatever you say into practice. Now, seeing as it is impossible for a body that is travelling at subluminal speed to accelerate to luminal or superluminal speed, yet you claim it can be done, I'd like you to explain how.
The faster anything is moving, the more massive it is. If an object with mass were to accelerate up to lightspeed, it would have an infinite mass when it reached lightspeed. How do your shields conteract this?
Easier to understand than what? To who? And who chose it?
You said that travelling at "light speed" it would take you an hour to get to Andromeda. You then said that "light speed" meant something different in your time. And then you said that "light speed" in your time meant 10,000 light years per hour. So one of your statements has to be wrong. There's no way around it, I'm afraid.
Unfortunately for you, I'm not talking about things that are theory. I'm talking about basic, known things. The same kind of basic, known things that allow us, as a race, to do such things as create elements, split the atom, create electron microscopes, use electricity, use magnets, watch TV...in fact, a hell of a lot of what is possible these days. Before trying to sidestep this, remember if what we know now is wrong, as you claim, then electricity doesn't work. Care to explain that? How do you overcome the Kelin variable?
You don't even know what a "half-life" is, do you? The temperature of the element is not going to affect the half-life at all. If it did, nuclear power would be really safe. Try answering that again.
I don't think that every theory has to be right. I'm open to new theories, if they're even slightly credible. Yours are not. The size of the polar ice caps will not affect gases in the atmosphere at all. This is basic, basic stuff. And your defence of hiding behind my "believeing every theory", besides being a spectacular Straw Man throughly unworthy of someone who is supposed to be an academic and being a tactic that wouldn't even be accepted as sound for an A Level, let alone graduate or post graduate course, and certainly not a member of the academic community...besides that, what it is comparable to is telling someone that they can't possibly understand your new complicated maths because they still cling to the old-fashioned idea that 1+1=2, and yet you won't tell them what 1+1 is supposed to equal.
In other words, it's not remotely convincing.
So, what has been done to counter global warming?
"Most people" did, did they? What, even most scientists?
BTW, I do not believe that everything science thinks is true. I do, however, know that easily proven things are true. And I think that some theories are good working theories. And I think some have been losing credibility with more study. And I think some have been proven to be false. That's what science is, and if you don't understand that basic principal then there is no way you could be a historian.
Is this how much attention you pay to your research? I said, and I'll quote:
I then suggested the origin of rap, as it's something that you've already said you're interested in, fascinated by, even.
Faster, but far more vague and allowing considerable errors in communication both ways. Again, are you not interested in effective communication? How on Earth do you manage to work?
Try it. After all, I've given you a time-saving tip with the videotapes, so I should have managed to free up considerable hours of your time which is spent stalking people and watching TV at the moment. Also, you do know that you can watch TV and type at the same time, don't you?
And, as it is, you've yet again inadvertantly failed to answer the harder questions that I asked you. You see, this is part of the problem, you forget to answer all of my questions, and doing it the way I suggested you won't forget to answer any. Won't that be good? It'll save me repeating myself all the time.
As you've not done that yet, I'll just repeat all the questions from my last two posts that you've overlooked.
See? Through you not using the quotes function, you've accidentally not answered 19 of my questions, now. You can see how much you miss. And, as I'm going to be re-asking any and evrything that you don't answer from now on, you'll save a lot of time in the long-run just answering the questions when they're asked, especially as you must find it as frustrating as I do when you forget to answer one. So I'm sure you'll co-operate and make things easier all round, won't you?
See, I'd have thought it would be the most commonly-spoken one as of this time. A quarter of a million people speak Modern Standard Arabic, usually as well as their own dialect. Isn't it strange how all these unlikely things seem to have come true all the time? How come the Gulf dialect overtook it?
What do you mean? If you blast off like a rocket, then you expel the energy as propulsion. In which case the reaction wouldn't be confined anywhere. And if the energy is confined somewhere then how do you convert that energy to kinetic energy?
I meant, how do you steer?
Ha! Nice try. I don't happen to have an infinite amount of energy sitting around, nor any process by which I might generate an infinite amount of energy, so I think you're safe in assuming that I'm not about to put whatever you say into practice. Now, seeing as it is impossible for a body that is travelling at subluminal speed to accelerate to luminal or superluminal speed, yet you claim it can be done, I'd like you to explain how.
The faster anything is moving, the more massive it is. If an object with mass were to accelerate up to lightspeed, it would have an infinite mass when it reached lightspeed. How do your shields conteract this?
Easier to understand than what? To who? And who chose it?
You said that travelling at "light speed" it would take you an hour to get to Andromeda. You then said that "light speed" meant something different in your time. And then you said that "light speed" in your time meant 10,000 light years per hour. So one of your statements has to be wrong. There's no way around it, I'm afraid.
Unfortunately for you, I'm not talking about things that are theory. I'm talking about basic, known things. The same kind of basic, known things that allow us, as a race, to do such things as create elements, split the atom, create electron microscopes, use electricity, use magnets, watch TV...in fact, a hell of a lot of what is possible these days. Before trying to sidestep this, remember if what we know now is wrong, as you claim, then electricity doesn't work. Care to explain that? How do you overcome the Kelin variable?
You don't even know what a "half-life" is, do you? The temperature of the element is not going to affect the half-life at all. If it did, nuclear power would be really safe. Try answering that again.
I don't think that every theory has to be right. I'm open to new theories, if they're even slightly credible. Yours are not. The size of the polar ice caps will not affect gases in the atmosphere at all. This is basic, basic stuff. And your defence of hiding behind my "believeing every theory", besides being a spectacular Straw Man throughly unworthy of someone who is supposed to be an academic and being a tactic that wouldn't even be accepted as sound for an A Level, let alone graduate or post graduate course, and certainly not a member of the academic community...besides that, what it is comparable to is telling someone that they can't possibly understand your new complicated maths because they still cling to the old-fashioned idea that 1+1=2, and yet you won't tell them what 1+1 is supposed to equal.
In other words, it's not remotely convincing.
So, what has been done to counter global warming?
"Most people" did, did they? What, even most scientists?
BTW, I do not believe that everything science thinks is true. I do, however, know that easily proven things are true. And I think that some theories are good working theories. And I think some have been losing credibility with more study. And I think some have been proven to be false. That's what science is, and if you don't understand that basic principal then there is no way you could be a historian.
Is this how much attention you pay to your research? I said, and I'll quote:
I then suggested the origin of rap, as it's something that you've already said you're interested in, fascinated by, even.
Faster, but far more vague and allowing considerable errors in communication both ways. Again, are you not interested in effective communication? How on Earth do you manage to work?
Try it. After all, I've given you a time-saving tip with the videotapes, so I should have managed to free up considerable hours of your time which is spent stalking people and watching TV at the moment. Also, you do know that you can watch TV and type at the same time, don't you?
And, as it is, you've yet again inadvertantly failed to answer the harder questions that I asked you. You see, this is part of the problem, you forget to answer all of my questions, and doing it the way I suggested you won't forget to answer any. Won't that be good? It'll save me repeating myself all the time.
As you've not done that yet, I'll just repeat all the questions from my last two posts that you've overlooked.
See? Through you not using the quotes function, you've accidentally not answered 19 of my questions, now. You can see how much you miss. And, as I'm going to be re-asking any and evrything that you don't answer from now on, you'll save a lot of time in the long-run just answering the questions when they're asked, especially as you must find it as frustrating as I do when you forget to answer one. So I'm sure you'll co-operate and make things easier all round, won't you?
Re: uysr
Yet another fault in your story. You should really try and make make sure you don't keep making contradicting statements all the time.
When asked why you do not have enough power to control the wheather you said:
Now you state:
Ahhhhh, so all of a sudden you can change the weather. So which is it yes or no.
His entire story reminds me of what my mother says, "The truth never changes, only lies do."
Yet another fault in your story. You should really try and make make sure you don't keep making contradicting statements all the time.
When asked why you do not have enough power to control the wheather you said:
Now you state:
Ahhhhh, so all of a sudden you can change the weather. So which is it yes or no.
His entire story reminds me of what my mother says, "The truth never changes, only lies do."