The ship's seat is like a seat on a motorbike in one of your aracades, it moves the way your body moves.
So you
are saying that when these ships are moving at subluinal speed that you use kinetic energy to move them. Where to start whith what's wrong with that from a physical point of view?
I think you are very gullible if you believe all theories are correct and everything your leaders tell you are correct.
I would be, yes. I would be far
more gulliable if I believed anything that you said, though.
no, If the ice in the antarctic melts then that will cause sea levels to rise[...]
You mean "yes", here, not "no". After all, that is what I said.
[...]the water did not recede 15 miles everywhere (that was the most it receded) it just receded 15 miles in england.
So sea level is no longer a global constant? How did you manage that? Are you going to tell me that what we know about gravity is wrong, too? Unless the water's on a serious slope, would that not mean that Dover is now landlocked with Calais, seeing as they're about 25 miles apart?
Oh, BTW, you'd
still have a lot of water unaccounted for. So, what happened to the extra water?
I like to watch the news live because there is no point in watching it if you tape, that what I feel anyway.
Um, so you're just going to rely on fuzzy 8-year recollections of events, when you could have a real, tangiable physical record? Wow, citing and standards of evidence must be a lot more lax in your time, too.
The government decides everything, the scientists can suggest it but the government doesn't have to listen.
Ah-ha.
So, do you want a biscuit?
You did a quick very
bad essay, with difficulty conveying ideas and very simple basic factual errors. You're supposed to be an expert in this time period, you had completely free choice regarding what to write about, you chose one of the most famous events of the 20th Century and yet
still got very simple things wrong. Not exactly impressive.
I am too busy to cut and paste the answers, why don't you go back and look?
Because they do not exist. This has to be your least convincing tack yet;
pretending things exist when they don't and the evidence of their non-existence is there, plain as day, for all to see. I may have been too generous in thinking that you were 16 or so, as this tactic usually goes out of favour with people by the time they hit double figures.
10.79% of our brain is used for knowledge and memory.
Well, you can add neuroscience to the list of things that you don't know enough about to bluff it in. Still, why don't you tell us which 10.79% that is? And why did you say that we only use 10.79% of our brains if that's not what you meant? Adn why are scientists trying to increase this figure if the rest of the brain is used for other things? What functions of the brain are people prepared to sacrifice for more memories?
There is nothing hard about lightspeed.
So why is the new "light speed" supposedly "easier for everyone"?
sorry everyone I cannot answer anymore questions, I will try and get around to you later
Not even an excuse? Not good enough. I think people can tell that the real thing you're saying here is "I've dug myself into enough deep holes that I don't think I can get out, so I'm going to stop doing this for a while and hope that people forget". Well, you know, I'm still going to ask the questions you've avoided. If for no other reason than for fun, and so that it's all here, plain for all to see.
So the ship has three engines, one at the back, and one on each side?
.
Wouldn't that mean that it would turn if you, say, crossed from one side of the ship to the other?
.
Why don't you define what you mean by "cryogenics", then?
.
Also, with the seas receeding 15 miles, what has happened to the reefs and other near-shore ecosystems, which can be up to 10,000 years old?
.
Why don't you explain how [electricity] works as you understand it?
.
[...]why do you not seem to care how comprehensible you make yourself?
.
There's an academic called Donkel who has edited a book about philosophy, but there is certainly no Communistic school of thought or belief by that name. Care to explain?
.
But you said that you did know how you managed to circumvent the laws of physics. Now you say you don't?
.
Yeah, just the basic, well-established, easily proven fundamental truths of how the universe works are wrong. it's just the little things like what electricity is and how it works, how molecules are composed, as well as matter itself and things like that which are wrong, eh? The fact that they have a knock-on effect to everything else doesn't matter because...what?
.
Why don't you tell me which scientific theories of the moment are wrong and which are right?
.
How do you keep the larger icecaps frozen?
.
How do you manage this process without making the global temperature actually rise?
.
And you're not going to tell me that it didn't because the First Law Of Thermodynamics is wrong, too, are you?
.
[You can extend the half-life of an element] the same way as what?
.
So why did you need to deal with an ice-age? Was it a warm ice-age?
.
Once more, I'm going to ask for the name of this philosophy under which your society operates[...]
.
What you have to answer is what you do to it on the atomic level? How do you extend it's half-life?
.
If that wasn't true, as you claim it isn't, then splitting the atom would be impossible.[Not technically a question, but it demands an answer all the same]
.
Any excuse for the other two questions?
.
[...]if the new "speed" is called "light speed", then what do they call light speed?
.
[...]why didn't they just call the new "light speed" by the new name that the old "light speed" has?
.
[...]isn't it stupid to have the speed of light called something else and somethign else called "light speed"?
.
[...]how come there have been huge nuclear reactions many times as fierce and hot as the sun in the moon and nobody on Earth has noticed?
.
How come that this element formed naturally on a dead and chemically simple satellite when not even a Supernova is explosive and complex enough to form such an element?
.
You will need to explain how [Einstein] was wrong, what is right, who sucessfully proved him wrong and when, and what on Earth has been up with all the experiments that have been done over the years which have proven him right time and again?
.
[...]you can tell me what the new equasion [that replaced "E=mc^2] is and what any and all of the elements that are new signify.
.
Which speed of light are we talking about now, the new one or the old one? [I'll add a second question to this actually. If we're talking about the new "speed of light", then what is the significance of that speed, and what would be significant about travelling at that speed that would relate to time travel?]
.
How come speed is measured in seconds, now?
.
Do you mean that no matter how much faster than the speed of light you're travelling and no matter the distance you always go ahead in time 33 seconds? How does that work?
.
Would that be covered by the new theory of relativity?
30, now. One might almost think that you don't know the answers...
JamesAnthony said:
You see, to me this sounds like an anecdote told in a classroom, to hone in the point to the students.
Actually, this is one of the things that I didn't bother commenting on, but that is also indicative of how Chrono is not a historian. The way the story is written, it could simply be that the man left his home without enough money in his pocket to pay for the shoes that he wanted to purchse. Wheras the actual point of the story is that he had plenty of money to buy the shoes, but by the time he got there the Mark had devalued so much that all he could afford is coffee. Maybe something like this:
There was one case reported in which a man went to the shops to buy some shoes. By the time he got there, however, the money in his pocket had decreased in value so much that he only had enough to buy a cup of coffee.
Of course, that kind of anecdotal illustration is common to historians, but the story is most likely bunk. I mean, did the Germans have constant updates on the value of the Mark, or is it more likely that they adjusted their prices every day?
