Roel van Houten
Quantum Scribe
Re: #778
Mmmmh, I think I'd prefer it "quick and dirty", but alas. Oh and for the 4,877,325th time... I do not feel insulted /ttiforum/images/graemlins/smile.gif
Your assumption is incorrect nonetheless. Answering my question by providing a link to a document containing incomprehensible information to the untrained eye is what I call quick and easy.
I do not mind reading large amounts of text, as long as they make sense. The document OvrLrd pointed me to doesn't. At least, not to me (the untrained eye...you know).
In fact, I'm even less convinced of the existence of god than I already was.
I have this funny feeling that people are making things way more complicated than they actually are. But I already mentioned that before. Adding god to the equation, to me, seems to complicate things, rather than provide answers.
Again, I don't mind reading large amounts of text, but before I start reading I would like to know if this will provide the answer I am looking for.
Once you understand a concept, isn't it possible to at least give a short summary? I can't say the Quabalah appeals to me in such a way that I want to start studying it. I'm aware of the fact that there is no short answer to my question. So if you can't provide an explanation, please allow me to rephrase it:
Was there another creator before our creator. Or do you think our creator has always existed?
Roel, I don't want you to take this as an insult, but this statement of yours certainly does exhibit that you are a product of the "I'd like it quick and easy" generation.
Mmmmh, I think I'd prefer it "quick and dirty", but alas. Oh and for the 4,877,325th time... I do not feel insulted /ttiforum/images/graemlins/smile.gif
Your assumption is incorrect nonetheless. Answering my question by providing a link to a document containing incomprehensible information to the untrained eye is what I call quick and easy.
I am sure you would like to think that a 20-50 word answer would suffice.
I do not mind reading large amounts of text, as long as they make sense. The document OvrLrd pointed me to doesn't. At least, not to me (the untrained eye...you know).
And still, you are not convinced of that!
In fact, I'm even less convinced of the existence of god than I already was.
The fact that you saw "nothing" on the surface when you first looked at it is not surprising at all. Remember, I have been studying mystical Qabalistic texts since 1982 Roel. And even today I do not have "the complete picture"...
I have this funny feeling that people are making things way more complicated than they actually are. But I already mentioned that before. Adding god to the equation, to me, seems to complicate things, rather than provide answers.
Why not start out by reading The Kybalion. Yes, it is a long treatise, but I think you will find it worth it.
Again, I don't mind reading large amounts of text, but before I start reading I would like to know if this will provide the answer I am looking for.
If you really want to understand how that document answers the question of not only the Creator, but the Creator of the Creator, you cannot take short cuts.
Once you understand a concept, isn't it possible to at least give a short summary? I can't say the Quabalah appeals to me in such a way that I want to start studying it. I'm aware of the fact that there is no short answer to my question. So if you can't provide an explanation, please allow me to rephrase it:
Was there another creator before our creator. Or do you think our creator has always existed?