You can travel forwards, but not backwards
- Thread starter kimberlyd
- Start date
thomas pendrake
Temporal Novice
G forces result from acceleration, not velocity. Fighter pilots and astronauts (during blast-off and re-entry) wear "g-suits" that are designed to keep blood from draining away from the brain during high g-forces. They are basically whole body pressure bandages.
The primary problem with the 2045 initiative is in the type of computer to be used. I agree with Penrose in the hypothesis that digital AI will not work. Only when at least part of the computer is quantum can sentience be achieved.
The problem with the Turing model for AI is that it is based on a human imitating a computer, not a computer imitating a human. Our brain is not binary. It does not compute in a linear model. It is probably not purely quantum, since we may try multiple "computations" to reach a solution. Notably, one of the characteristics of geniuses, notably those with Asperger's, is that complex problems are often solved without intermediate steps.
The primary problem with the 2045 initiative is in the type of computer to be used. I agree with Penrose in the hypothesis that digital AI will not work. Only when at least part of the computer is quantum can sentience be achieved.
The problem with the Turing model for AI is that it is based on a human imitating a computer, not a computer imitating a human. Our brain is not binary. It does not compute in a linear model. It is probably not purely quantum, since we may try multiple "computations" to reach a solution. Notably, one of the characteristics of geniuses, notably those with Asperger's, is that complex problems are often solved without intermediate steps.
thomas pendrake
Temporal Novice
Have you ever flown in a commercial Jet? I especially enjoy 727s. When the jet is taking off or makes a sudden turn you feel pressed into the seat, or pushed to one side. But when you are traveling smoothly at a constant speed you feel normal. G forces come from acceleration, not velocity. Turning involves acceleration, radial acceleration. Fighter jets (and rockets) can accelerate and turn rapidly, resulting in the need for "g-suits".
AuditorMaterial1
Chrono Cadet
I think this explanation is a limit state to an equation that is merely an approximation of the actual physics involved, for photons do not slam headward into a point containing all mass in the universe.
the only problems encountered with G forces are when thee is acceleration. It's not the speed of light that hurts, just how fast we approach it.
Last edited by a moderator:
PrecursorHwy
Temporal Novice
If history expands as does universe & everything change beneath & Including our own noses, can we who're only noticing time in forward motion not prove creation building-up behind us & that we'd gone back to new precursors (memories of warnings/influences) to new untold futures, to begin from those again without trace of having lived as far as are the reprocussions ..to hence avoid them but reach brand new procussions which to avoid, with new precursors which to go back to?
This way, going back in time does not prevent us from having to have to go back in the first place ...because something else would end up occuring.
To've seen the event what took place in the future to've arrived back to the last precursor you had, if time building behind us contributes to evolution, might we see fit to repeat our mistakes over & over again assuming we'll live for eternity this way, however cease to evolve as a result?
I wonder there's no method involving creation of going to the future, but do wonder that to go back to precursors often enough can bring about a rise in global consciousness to resemble the consciousness we'd otherwise have had to wait for.
May we not be able to jump from present to future, but rather can we jump future that it may exist now instead of what only does at present?
But. As long as we'll assume that to timetravel to the past must mean to move the who you are now to a different whenabouts, i'll assume that the further we go back the dumber we'll be than the rest of the species who's history since you left the present has still been building up behind them. Not only would they be more evolved that what you remember them, but they'd not nearly have evolved as much as they should've since the get go, your travelling there also having lowered the consciousness level of the whole world ...in preparation for you? It would be a super hateful thing to do to yourself & to humankind.
To head into the future though would it result in more history having built up behind you than everyone else by that time in comparison (as everything would've stopped changing beneath their own noses to Wait for you lol
), & would it cause a subsequent rise of global consciousness ? I actually think we would exact some change to the either past or future if we were to go as who we are .
To be the era's Steven Hawkings would be better than winning the lotto Anyday . If travel to the future was possible, I wouldn't like to come back, as i guess i'd like that history would've been building faster from the get go since i left ...in preparation . To come back would it just return us all to this present speed of progression?
I agree that if we could move who we are now to anywhen (which i don't agree we can), we should only move forwards not backwards .
This way, going back in time does not prevent us from having to have to go back in the first place ...because something else would end up occuring.
To've seen the event what took place in the future to've arrived back to the last precursor you had, if time building behind us contributes to evolution, might we see fit to repeat our mistakes over & over again assuming we'll live for eternity this way, however cease to evolve as a result?
I wonder there's no method involving creation of going to the future, but do wonder that to go back to precursors often enough can bring about a rise in global consciousness to resemble the consciousness we'd otherwise have had to wait for.
May we not be able to jump from present to future, but rather can we jump future that it may exist now instead of what only does at present?
But. As long as we'll assume that to timetravel to the past must mean to move the who you are now to a different whenabouts, i'll assume that the further we go back the dumber we'll be than the rest of the species who's history since you left the present has still been building up behind them. Not only would they be more evolved that what you remember them, but they'd not nearly have evolved as much as they should've since the get go, your travelling there also having lowered the consciousness level of the whole world ...in preparation for you? It would be a super hateful thing to do to yourself & to humankind.
To head into the future though would it result in more history having built up behind you than everyone else by that time in comparison (as everything would've stopped changing beneath their own noses to Wait for you lol
), & would it cause a subsequent rise of global consciousness ? I actually think we would exact some change to the either past or future if we were to go as who we are .To be the era's Steven Hawkings would be better than winning the lotto Anyday
. If travel to the future was possible, I wouldn't like to come back, as i guess i'd like that history would've been building faster from the get go since i left ...in preparation . To come back would it just return us all to this present speed of progression?I agree that if we could move who we are now to anywhen (which i don't agree we can), we should only move forwards not backwards
.
Last edited by a moderator:
If Astral Travel to locations of memory is possible, is it then not possible to Astral Travel back in time? I know I have experience w/Astral Travel in relation to past locations and events - are these just memories awakened by the idea or is this real Astral Travel to a time in the past? Alchemy is also a big part of the process in my opinion as there are often light and dark times in past, present and future - Would you travel to a time if you knew there was an inherent darkness present? Astrally or otherwise?
PrecursorHwy
Temporal Novice
What do you make of astral time travel, & why don't you believe in it
?PrecursorHwy
Temporal Novice
I can appreciate the term "smeared", but then the term i use to explain how we respond to stimuli before it occurs is *by preshock*.
I suggest that we each (as well as as a whole) have an internal richter scale, which IS involved in our repetitively moving back, to new precursors in shock as history expands as does universe allowing us elbow-room to.
To even in shock (be smeared as far as to) become another species long ago dominant over sapiens to wonder again who our missing link is , involved in dragging future over the present rather than jumping forward toward IT.
The way an earthquake creates noticeable aftershocks, it will also create preshocks (pre-tremors) which may be noticed using either a richter scale, or a higher sense of awareness (internal richter scale) as seen in birds as they flee prior to natural disasters.
Though man may have the same inner richter scale as the birds to save their lives by fleeing from events before they happen, might they otherwise flee to earlier points in time as events unfold, to live again from an add-on memory at which time to'd thought "This is going to happen", which most times won't be recalled you'd lived from until after an only similar event takes place? No two anything being alike?
For one to boast a correct premonition pending an event though, might it mean that the event wasn't prevented by their escaping back to the precursors meant to prevent it the 1st time, and so the event thus happening twice over would one thus ripple back over the same precursors twice over also, to then consciously note they predict the event? Is to be psychic not a sign of intelligence thus, but rather of a hiccup to ones evolutionary path? Where in this case, two outcomes may actually be alike so remain the same outcome? To double back twice over, is it to scream of a standstill & a slowing of evolution on some level past (& so also until) the point of an event not being prevented? Might it mean they're arriving at the same precursors over again, with no more new precursors (& untold futures) having built up behind them to go back to to rather live forward from? The lack of creation behind them evident by the lack of evolution up until the point of the so far unpreventable certain event? No taking up a new sport or calling for Jesus eg. to've been born to any new outcomes & so different precursors rather? Those certain of their preminitions, are they stumbling on both their creation-creating evolutionary course, & their evolution-evolving creationary course? Man may find they've had premonitions previous to unfolding events and think the ability to've known was due to natural selection & sixth-sense alone, all the while oblivious to that the point in time the premonition was had had happened After the event due to creation building up behind them, creation & evolution walking hand in hand.
What makes you say that being smeared isn't involved in a person traveling backwards to any meaningful time? I wonder that a time must be meaningful to reasonably travel back to it, to live from that point forward again.
I suggest that we each (as well as as a whole) have an internal richter scale, which IS involved in our repetitively moving back, to new precursors in shock as history expands as does universe allowing us elbow-room to.
To even in shock (be smeared as far as to) become another species long ago dominant over sapiens to wonder again who our missing link is
, involved in dragging future over the present rather than jumping forward toward IT.The way an earthquake creates noticeable aftershocks, it will also create preshocks (pre-tremors) which may be noticed using either a richter scale, or a higher sense of awareness (internal richter scale) as seen in birds as they flee prior to natural disasters.
Though man may have the same inner richter scale as the birds to save their lives by fleeing from events before they happen, might they otherwise flee to earlier points in time as events unfold, to live again from an add-on memory at which time to'd thought "This is going to happen", which most times won't be recalled you'd lived from until after an only similar event takes place? No two anything being alike?
For one to boast a correct premonition pending an event though, might it mean that the event wasn't prevented by their escaping back to the precursors meant to prevent it the 1st time, and so the event thus happening twice over would one thus ripple back over the same precursors twice over also, to then consciously note they predict the event? Is to be psychic not a sign of intelligence thus, but rather of a hiccup to ones evolutionary path? Where in this case, two outcomes may actually be alike so remain the same outcome? To double back twice over, is it to scream of a standstill & a slowing of evolution on some level past (& so also until) the point of an event not being prevented? Might it mean they're arriving at the same precursors over again, with no more new precursors (& untold futures) having built up behind them to go back to to rather live forward from? The lack of creation behind them evident by the lack of evolution up until the point of the so far unpreventable certain event? No taking up a new sport or calling for Jesus eg. to've been born to any new outcomes & so different precursors rather? Those certain of their preminitions, are they stumbling on both their creation-creating evolutionary course, & their evolution-evolving creationary course? Man may find they've had premonitions previous to unfolding events and think the ability to've known was due to natural selection & sixth-sense alone, all the while oblivious to that the point in time the premonition was had had happened After the event due to creation building up behind them, creation & evolution walking hand in hand.
What makes you say that being smeared isn't involved in a person traveling backwards to any meaningful time? I wonder that a time must be meaningful to reasonably travel back to it, to live from that point forward again.
I'm not too keen on the 2045 initiative, being it may be against what should be our better instinct to spontaneously generate entire back to precursors in time and more untold future as a way to live for eternity. An instinct quashed by not having proven creation, so we'll only focus on evolution? Can evolution not be without that history grows as does universe,? Without creation?Would you forfeit living forever & on, just to know what forever holds or held only? It would be a rather short forever by comparison.
Last edited by a moderator:
RainmanTime
Super Moderator
I am not trying to be rude, PrecursorHwy, but your writing is exceedingly difficult to understand. And there is no doubt in my mind it is due to excessive use of prepositional phrases in long, run-on sentences. Have you never been instructed about the problems that prepositional phrases create in reader comprehension? Sorry, just trying to help you achieve a better comprehension for your readers.
RMT
That is a long sentence with several prepositional phrases, and that confounds comprehension. Just sayin'
RMT
Last edited by a moderator:
PrecursorHwy
Temporal Novice
If travel back to locations of memory is possible, how is that not travelling back in time? Travel to past locations and events - is it yes just that memories were triggered by ideas, & that this is real Astral Travel to a time in the past, both. Both evolution & creation may they walk hand in hand, but to know this or stand to do one or the other does it stifle your stand to do either? I'm not sure what Alchemy is, but i disagree that past, present and future are often either light or otherwise dark - so cannot answer your following question as to if i'd astro-travel to a dark time. Where i'd astro-travel, would always be to some time in the past. A time that i'll later say i've been familiar with all my life. All this will i do without knowing i'd gone back at all or that my life & i had changed beneath & including my own nose since. Each time i and the collective astro-travel (are reviewed & redescribed back), to've lived again from added precursors in time, would we always end up at a time brighter than the last? Any not part of the collective, might their time be darker than ours by comparison? Strike that. Might they've never even existed - a replacement brighter time having been forced over the top of them & their heaven & earth as they know it? I would not like to travel by any other means than to do it naturally, learning by mistakes & growing my total consciousness
.i've never heard of a prepositional phrase before. Thankyou. Actually, any advise is gratefully appreciated. At the moment, i find people are rephrasing what i say back at me, & having me approve weather what they say is what i meant or not. I wish what i was saying wouldn't boggle the mind so
.
Last edited by a moderator:
RainmanTime
Super Moderator
Glad you were not offended. Here is a link that can help reduce prepositional phrases:i've never heard of a prepositional phrase before. Thankyou. Actually, any advise is gratefully appreciated. At the moment, i find people are rephrasing what i say back at me, & having me approve weather what they say is what i meant or not. I wish what i was saying wouldn't boggle the mind so
http://www.dailywritingtips.com/5-ways-to-reduce-use-of-prepositions/
I am an engineering educator, and lots of engineering students don't think they need to worry about writing well as long as they can solve equations. NOT SO! I tell them that an average engineer can solve equations...what makes someone an above average engineer is the ability to write prose that describes your work to people who do not have your depth of understanding. Good writing helps everyone!
RMT
PrecursorHwy
Temporal Novice
Agreed . Thankyou.Glad you were not offended. Here is a link that can help reduce prepositional phrases:http://www.dailywritingtips.com/5-ways-to-reduce-use-of-prepositions/
I am an engineering educator, and lots of engineering students don't think they need to worry about writing well as long as they can solve equations. NOT SO! I tell them that an average engineer can solve equations...what makes someone an above average engineer is the ability to write prose that describes your work to people who do not have your depth of understanding. Good writing helps everyone!
RMT
Oh darn. I just realized "Actually, any advise is gratefully appreciated" is a prepositional statement, is it not? I so hope i'm not stuck this way lolGlad you were not offended. Here is a link that can help reduce prepositional phrases:http://www.dailywritingtips.com/5-ways-to-reduce-use-of-prepositions/
I am an engineering educator, and lots of engineering students don't think they need to worry about writing well as long as they can solve equations. NOT SO! I tell them that an average engineer can solve equations...what makes someone an above average engineer is the ability to write prose that describes your work to people who do not have your depth of understanding. Good writing helps everyone!
RMT
.
Last edited by a moderator:
RainmanTime
Super Moderator
LOL! Nope, that one is not prepositional. One way to learn to recognize prepositional phrases is being aware of what words are prepositions. My 5th grade Catholic school teacher made us memorize them!Oh darn. I just realized "Actually, any advise is gratefully appreciated" is a prepositional statement, is it not? I so hope i'm not stuck this way lol
Here is a list:https://www.englishclub.com/grammar/prepositions-list.htm
And I should also reinforce that prepositional phrases are not meant to be banned! :ROFLMAO: They actually are useful when used in their proper manner, and sparingly. But in general, if you have more than one prepositional phrase in any one sentence, then chances are the meaning of the sentence could easily be confused by the reader. Beyond that....ROCK ON!
RMT
PrecursorHwy
Temporal Novice
LolzLOL! Nope, that one is not prepositional. One way to learn to recognize prepositional phrases is being aware of what words are prepositions. My 5th grade Catholic school teacher made us memorize them!
And I should also reinforce that prepositional phrases are not meant to be banned! :ROFLMAO: They actually are useful when used in their proper manner, and sparingly. But in general, if you have more than one prepositional phrase in any one sentence, then chances are the meaning of the sentence could easily be confused by the reader. Beyond that....ROCK ON!
RMT
. Shall research 
.