Jared Thompson PhD
Temporal Novice
I'm with you, TT_0 seems to have very different ideas about the nature of government and the roles of various figures here.
Today, exactly 24 years from the date of my first appearance on this forum. 2000.11.01
- Thread starter Time travel_Ο
- Start date
Time travel_Ο
Temporal Navigator
Your impression is completely wrong, you must not know who I am to ask such questions. I will answer very briefly - Trump will destroy the free press, freedom of speech, Max will destroy your rights and your rights to any choice at all, a very potent mixture, the US has never been so close to a totalitarian regime. I see you are the ones who voted to kill the future.
I will explain very simply - before Trump, there was a lot of free and independent media, apolitical special services, independent judges, now, he starts to remove all dissenters and put his own people who will be loyal to him. This will lead to Trump-Musk turning free America into their own corporate state, without any freedoms or rights, where those who disagree will be imprisoned or killed. 300 years, 300 years down the drain. Moreover, it will lead to the country falling apart and total conflict in the world. If you voted for Trump, then we will end the discussion, I can not communicate with people who do not understand one simple fact - the crisis that is now in the U.S., it is the result of the rule of Trump, who in the past presidency messed up with taxes, laws, ruined relations with neighboring countries, countries in Europe, this is not the result of Democrats. There is no free USA anymore, you did a good job (no).
Time travel_Ο
Temporal Navigator
Apparently you still haven't realized what a “pit” half of US citizens have fallen into...Well, we'll come back to this discussion in a couple of months, but not within the framework of this forum.
Time travel_Ο
Temporal Navigator
I'm not trying to prove anything to you, I'm just telling you this as a fact that has already happened in the future, sadly.
Classicalfan626
Staff member
@Time travel_Ο - Well then, I could be mistaken, but it seems to me like you might have been listening to a lot of suspected left-wing propaganda and lies. And as I recall, pre-Trump there was barely any free press in the mainstream, but a lot of propaganda and lies coming out of sources like CNN, the New York Times, NBC, and MSNBC, all of which have long since lost their credibility.
And I would say that the amount of U.S. citizens who would agree with me is way more than a measly half. I don't trust the election results that the mainstream media is reporting, and I strongly believe there is massive voter fraud in the United States.
You may not believe a word I say, and I'm not trying to convince you of anything, but only time will tell if I'm right or wrong. Who knows, I may be surprised at who's good and who's bad. I'm just going with my gut.
And I would say that the amount of U.S. citizens who would agree with me is way more than a measly half. I don't trust the election results that the mainstream media is reporting, and I strongly believe there is massive voter fraud in the United States.
You may not believe a word I say, and I'm not trying to convince you of anything, but only time will tell if I'm right or wrong. Who knows, I may be surprised at who's good and who's bad. I'm just going with my gut.
Time travel_Ο
Temporal Navigator
You are absolutely right about listening to your intuition and that “time will tell who is good or bad”, but in my case time has already shown it and believe me, what just happened is the worst thing that could have happened.
I want to give you a chance to prove your identity by asking a basic technical question you would know the answer to as a time traveller, and which the current state of technology does not exist for anyone else to give an answer:
Briefly explain without going into any supporting detail the relationship between gravity waves, the selection of timelines using Fourier transformations, and where the physical universe resides in this model. Relate your answer to E8 geometry, or an Ads/CFT diagram, or a Kerr black hole. For example, using the same technology, the fastest way for interstellar travel is not by folding the universe over; it's to tunnel along a chord.
Jared Thompson PhD
Temporal Novice
In defense of your question, these are excellent questions that JT2001's technology could potentially have ways of addressing. Assuming that a black hole is generatable and capturable under standard physical conditions, one could at least imagine accessing the AdS space and traveling along a selected chord to a different conformal coordinate in the superlattice. Since time is likely just a coordinate in the lattice, it boils down to being able to select the right coordinate. I eagerly await TT_0's answer.
I need some way to verify the guy is real to ask about events happening now around Trump. I do not know your background, but there is a lot of complex high dimensional math behind the questions. I just want him to chain the general concepts to show he has an understanding of the basics of time travel. so, I wasn't asking him to prove or share the theory. In fact, dark energy is involved and if somebody figured how to release that, it would by a billion times more formidable weapon than an atom bomb at a far smaller scale. the questions I have asked won't lead anyone to such answers. I just need him to prove he is the genuine thing he claims to be by speaking about generalities that won't lead to the reconstruction of the time technology. I am more interested in how to survive Trump or disrupt this timeline
BTW, when you mean the superlattice, are you talking about the ATS diagram, or what's behind the second inner horizon of a Kerr singularity?
Jared Thompson PhD
Temporal Novice
I mean more the Anti de Sitter lattice. I thought the second event horizon of a Kerr black hole hides a ring singularity. I don't know if that region has any solutions encompassed by current physics. Certainly the middle of the ring singularity is an interesting place.
I think John Titor himself spoke about the ring singularity of the Kerr black hole 23 years ago, right?
Jared Thompson PhD
Temporal Novice
I don't recall. Anyhow that isn't how he said the machine worked. The black holes in Titors machine produce a field that moves the car thru time.
Jared,
I have not heard any response yet. But, I looked through his posts since he started posting again and found this calling card he left, which you had replied to with a thumbs up:
[C x Bh x M = {S} - {S}= M x Bh X C]
Do you know what this is!?
At first I thought it was some made up garbage saying two equations were the same if you reversed the order of operations. But, I then noticed the square brackets, and guessed this might be a matrix.
I am not a scientist or a mathematician, so I worked with chatgpt to first confirm it was matrix arithmetic and to get explanations for the symbolic operations.
This is a gauge theory formula! It describes how two different complimentary particles interact with each other. The left {s} is one of the particles. The right {s} is the other particle.
Multiplication is NOT commutive in matrix arithmetic. when you reverse the order if the terms as was done on the right side, it is equivalent to rotating something in space. This looks like the first particle is perpendicular to the second particle.
The {s} terms representing each particle are actually a matrix of vectors for each particle. I don't know about the minus sign between the {s} terms, but it may not be subtraction. It could be the {S} - {S} is actually a set of co-ordinates inside the superlattice.
The C seems to be a transformation matrix made up of the speed of light terms. But, c shows up a lot in Einstein's equations and higher dimensional math. it is always connected with r (radius). This suggests the formula is dealing with fibre bundles or manifolds.
h is planks constant. It's not in a matrix. I do not know what B is. It's a matrix of something, the properties of the electron?
M is a matrix of mass (or energy). It's probably describing the mass that needs to be added to an electron to turn it into a black hole.
What are your thoughts?
Jared Thompson PhD
Temporal Novice
Yes as far as I can tell this is one part of a field equation showing interaction between two black holes. I'm happy to continue this discussion with you.
We can surmise that S is the Gauge field for the Dirac Lagrangian, Bh is the magnetic field interaction caused by the rotation of the Kerr field.
If a Kerr-Newman black hole is like a charged, spinning, heavy magnet, what kind of magnet is it like?
I was reading up on De Sitter spaces, which states that the gravitational effects from a black hole is indistinguishable from any other spherically symmetric mass distribution. This makes a lot of...
I don't know for sure what C is. I have a guess below.
But there are parts that are missing. There need to be closed form solutions of this system.
Here is a piece of the mystery: https://pubs.sciepub.com/ijp/6/1/1/index.html
But there are physics needed for the Kerr-Newman metric:
Kerr–Newman metric - Wikipedia
ynogkm: A new public code for calculating time-like geodesics in the Kerr-Newman spacetime | Astronomy & Astrophysics (A&A)
Astronomy & Astrophysics (A&A) is an international journal which publishes papers on all aspects of astronomy and astrophysics
The suggestion is then that C is the Carter integral.
There needs to be an exact solution for the space-time geodesic of the two black holes. This equation suggests that the coordinates of {S}-{S} are a set of required boundary conditions (trajectories) that are satisfied by the two black holes.
I'm happy to go back and forth with you on this to see if we make some headway.
@Time travel_Ο care to help us lunkheads out? We must be missing several equations here. We are harmless; we can't create black holes, all we can do is talk about them.
Last edited:
Yes as far as I can tell this is one part of a field equation showing interaction between two black holes. I'm happy to continue this discussion with you.
We can surmise that S is the Gauge field for the Dirac Lagrangian, Bh is the magnetic field interaction caused by the rotation of the Kerr field.
If a Kerr-Newman black hole is like a charged, spinning, heavy magnet, what kind of magnet is it like?
I was reading up on De Sitter spaces, which states that the gravitational effects from a black hole is indistinguishable from any other spherically symmetric mass distribution. This makes a lot of...physics.stackexchange.com
I don't know for sure what C is. I have a guess below.
But there are parts that are missing. There need to be closed form solutions of this system.
Here is a piece of the mystery: https://pubs.sciepub.com/ijp/6/1/1/index.html
But there are physics needed for the Kerr-Newman metric:
Kerr–Newman metric - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
ynogkm: A new public code for calculating time-like geodesics in the Kerr-Newman spacetime | Astronomy & Astrophysics (A&A)
Astronomy & Astrophysics (A&A) is an international journal which publishes papers on all aspects of astronomy and astrophysicswww.aanda.org
The suggestion is then that C is the Carter integral.
There needs to be an exact solution for the space-time geodesic of the two black holes. This equation suggests that the coordinates of {S}-{S} are a set of required boundary conditions (trajectories) that are satisfied by the two black holes.
I'm happy to go back and forth with you on this to see if we make some headway.
@Time travel_Ο care to help us lunkheads out? We must be missing several equations here. We are harmless; we can't create black holes, all we can do is talk about them.
Everything you described to me, and my own belief of a "timeline" theory, what you call "the electric charge of a Kerr black hole" aligns closely to what I call "state time".
The concept arises from asking what's at the center of any black hole? The answer people give is a singularity. What's that? It's a point where space closes in so much, there is no more room for anything else because the walls of the black hole press up against each other.
The other "part" of this (not part 2 of his field equations), is how do you and I measure time in our local universe? Most people will say they use a clock. So, how do you know how much time has gone by from looking at a clock? You do it by the physical displacement of the hour, minute, and second hands. If the battery in the clock died, and the hands stopped moving, and you watched only the clock, could you still tell how long you have been starring at it?
So, our way of measuring time is based on physical points in space, and not actually units of time. If I were to roll a ball across a table, the past would be the ball's position where it started - a physical place. The future would be the destination the ball is headed for (another physical place). The present is where the ball is right now along the path between the start and destination end points. So, let's call our particular way of measuring time in the physical universe "spatial time".
If this is true, how do you measure time inside the singularity? There is no space there to put a ball (or anything else) and roll it around. Yet, black holes change. They can grow, shrink, and spin. What is time other than a quantification of change? Well, you mentioned a changing charge of a Kerr black hole's electrical potential. What if we used that instead to measure time?
The concept is similar to the clock speed of the bus and cpu in a desktop computer. It measures fluctuations in energy levels rather than a displacement in space. We can measure time in the black hole the same way, by counting the fluctuations of its electrical charge. Let's call this "state time".
Now, suppose the ethereal singularity our universe came from in the big bang did not actually explode in a blaze of self destruction. Let's assume parts of it only EXPANDED, and the rest of it is still there today. If this happened, it means what expanded took everything with it, including its own state time. In the expansion, state time got stretched out into spatial time.
This means, state and spatial time are still interconnected. One is just the inflamed end of the other. They can be mapped to each other. What would that mapping look like? On one side, everything is just a measure of a current moment of state (without any past or future). But, it's attached to spatial locations of past, present, and future. Can we travel along these mappings and combine them in deferent ways to arrive at different spatial points in our physical universe?
The thing that wraps everything up and holds it together is where is the ethereal singularity in relation to our universe? Well, it is NOT inside our universe, it is somewhere outside of it. Our universe is inside new space that this singularity created. And, I am sure that this is bringing up haunting echos of the holographic principal for you, as you seem to work with ADS diagrams.
But, instead of going into those, PBS Space Time has a good YouTube video on cosmological natural selection that visually depicts the big bang process I described. In the animations, watch the center of the black hole where a point space appears and expands. That is the supperlatice behind the inner horizon in which our universe sits. That's how the singularity and the universe can still simultaneously exist.
The outer horizon of the holographic principle is actually the inner horizon of the Kerr black hole. It's like the model of inflation when you blow up a party balloon, draw galaxies on it, and keep blowing it up. The outer horizon is the balloon's nozzle where you blow air into it, not the surface where the galaxies are drawn.
pbs spacetime: blackhole doorway universes
View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=rFgpKlcpzNM
BTW, this is not meant to say time travel occurs through gateway universes. You can navigate the path from the projected universe towards its holographic outer horizon (which is the ethereal singularity's inner horizon) and back out to the projected universe without leaving the system or going into another gateway universe. his technology uses black holes at a smaller scale to manipulate the superlattice the ethereal singularity created by creating a tiny bubble that can drop into the physical universe's quantum substrate and then come back out again.
Time travel_Ο
Temporal Navigator
Having "John in 2000", it's a vicious cycle. If he hadn't shown up, there wouldn't be a time machine in this timeline either. It's like a thing that always existed and didn't exist at the same time. John's arrival set the stage for his departure in the future.
Time travel_Ο
Temporal Navigator
I have no goal of proving that I am John, that's for you to decide, there's no point in convincing anyone of that. Unfortunately your questions require very detailed disclosure of the technology, as the answer to these questions would allow to reveal the principle of calculation of divergence of different world lines, as well as the method of calculation of the coefficient of deviation of the world line from the main world line and the concept of determining the necessary world line.
The technology of interstellar moving has nothing in common with the technology of moving in time, as for moving on galaxies it is necessary to use absolutely other approach in manipulation of space, much more dangerous and difficult. I am happy to discuss any issue, but I will not publish any information that would show how the calculations used in gravity distortion technology are done.
Not now, it's not time yet.