Some people on this web site have very disturbing personalities.I definitely would not want to meet some of them in person.
Some people are very dark and have very little light in them.
I'm not disagreeing. Some people worry me for their possible interactions with others.
I think this points out an obvious common oversight. That being, superficial qualities vs. deeper essence.
I'd imagine that friendships and families delve typically deeper into the more complex of the two, however every bond is a very personal thing with many degrees between for every example.
What's life without uniquely perceived variable?
The mystique and intrigue I'd think (that as in mentioned above), is once again a very personal understanding.
It's funny how everything seems inevitably to come back to a balance of sorts.
So back to the original point - I think you're very wise in the cautions that must preclude anything with 'chaotic' seeming qualities.
Though my point once again, is that, until we believe we have a true sense 'of the deeper essence' (that which truely exhibits the intent), there is much to learn on all sides of every table.
I don't say that with bias, but with hopefulness.
For every larger percentage I have been 'wary' of, there has been that much more in the worth of the undiscovered, and back to perception - obscured.
Communication and translation. Science and the pseudo. For every emotion and logic, we have a tendency of the head and heart lines. Similar in their outcome perceived, though much different in approach to their method prior to observation.
Do inevitable prejudiced statistics count? We're all human, and that has to be part of our better senses. I use the word
prejudice in an universally shared context of helpful but changing bias. The inevitable, what has occurred, is occurring and will occur. Evolution of sorts, not the reference to a 'missing link' or how a dinosaur became a bird, but the idea that with the universe being in motion, and all life moving forward in time, that everything undergoes transitions. That being said, some transitions have different potential.
Potential in this respect could not be attributed to genetics only, but the course of free will.
Explaining why we are a hopeful people in some ways I'd think. Since inherent in our ideals is the idea of positive change, the gradual, the course of the world and so many new discoveries therein.
For every disturbing person I've met, there's been someone along the way to remind me that everyone's different. Finding the best or worst in someone is something I think we're all guilty of at times. Has anyone in paticular disturbed me on this site? Nope.
Though I have been worried in retrospect solely of how some very sensitive people may misconstrue a topic of debate.
Reactor? I don't think he necessarily meant harm, however -
A big 'however' - in reference to posting the US army field guide alongside govermental styles currently at tension only serves to promote conflicted subliminal messages to some of the 'glancing' population.
Though as reminded by RMT, intent is key and knowing Reactor, there's certainly no 'conspiracy' however we still have to be careful how our 'frustrated outbursts' may be digested, and perceived by others. (I'm not lecturing at all, this is in the purest sense a sharing of personal reflection in regards to the topic).
So all in all, yeah maybe coming to this site is constructive in the sense; not only can a person 'learn' something, but it's possible to learn something about ourselves.
Interesting as always
