Re: Patience and Vigilance, My Friend
Every so often it is amusing to respond to a post in reverse order. This one screams for such treatment.
As I said a month ago- "To quote Dean Galanos, you need to be taken down a few notches to be with the rest of us schlubs". Based on this un-asked for rant I can only surmise you still have yet to learn.
1) Now you see the most effective reason for me to stay "in character" and be a ruthless pitbull when people like you come along. Eventually, your anger and emotion get so high that you can't help but reveal that for you, it's not about discussions about science or TT. No, for you, it has been and will continue to be all about "your agenda."
2) No doubt you have deemed yourself to be the one capable of "teaching me a lesson."
3) Your obvious self-esteem issues are what allow you to position yourself "below me" on some imaginary scale. I have not done that, you have. Why do you feel so inferior?
As far as I go, my name, who I am, my life is unimportant
Nice cover. But the real reason is you don't want to give me ammunition to wage personal attacks on you, as you have done to me. Your record is clear. But if you opened up about who you are, you would add to your vulnerability already exposed with your lack of scientific, methodical thought processes.
>Why are you SO intent upon wishing to "tear me down", and yet at the same time feel the need to remain so anonymous, so "mysterious" about your own capabilities and accomplishments?<
Why? Because you are a Narcissistic fool. Need proof?
Again we note that you ignore questions, and instead just attack. Somehow you think I should be ashamed of my words that I wrote, or the fact that I started a non-profit organization. What sorts of things do you do to FREELY help people? We've already established you like to shoot off your mouth about wind energy, but have you used your money to do it? Do YOU give power back to the grid? Do you do anything other than attack, or throw around non-scientific ideas for how "other people" need to solve the world's problems (with other people's money)?
Yet it wasn't until I called you to the mat
Hardly. In your dreams, perhaps.
that we all found out you're no college professor, you teach one class, one day a week
You just want to avoid any facts that would prove you wrong, don't you? How many times have I told you that you could easily verify my university employment by calling the ARO department secretary. She would set you straight about more than one error in this assessment.... but there are more:
The Cal Poly ARO program just recently passed its re-accreditation as a 4-year curriculum. In case you are not aware, only 4-year engineering programs are nationally accredited. Community colleges do not fall under accreditation and do not have engineering BS programs.
teaching basic principles from a textbook
You should be cautious about presenting your opinions about someone as facts. That can be slanderous.
I could do that, Creedo could do that.
And now you need to bring my friend Creedo into this, and in a derogetory manner? For the bagging you do on Creedo, you should be aware that he has a higher level of scientific awareness than what I see in you.
Oh, and BTW, I STILL don't see you teaching any classes this year, your school's website only lists last years' classes.
And I am sure you have assumed some reason why the website is not updated, right? And somehow it likely shines some negative light on me. At least that is what your MO would indicate your assumption would be. Again, all you need to do is call the department secretary. Or better yet, since you probably wouldn't trust her, why not call the Cal Poly, Pomona OFFICIAL records office and ask them who is the instructor-of-record for this quarter's ARO 201 systems engineering courses? And while there, ask them who is the instructor-o-f-record for next quarter's ARO 202 Aircraft Performance courses? Why not gather real facts, instead of ignoring those that don't meet your agenda?
3. You may know about tensors but that does not qualify you as an expert.
Never in this forum have I made claims of expertise to anything other than what I am truly an expert in, and those topics are twofold:
1) Aerospace vehicle systems engineering
2) Control systems engineering
I know a good deal about many other topics, but I have never used the word "expert" to self-assign such a level of accomplishment to myself in any areas other than the above. Yet you stretch the truth wherever it meets your agenda, don't you? What do you claim expertise in? It sure sounds like a lot whenever your "solutions" to scientific problems begin with words like "It's really quite simple...". Please, do enlighten us on your areas of expertise.
So in other words, the way to prove time travel is possible is by time travelling.
Close, but you're not quite there: The way to prove time travel is possible is by providing solid, empirical, physical evidence that time travel has taken place. You forgot some pretty important words there.
But since your theory is irrefutable, untestable, unprovable and for that matter not even on paper I guess we'll never know.
And yet again we see you come to conclusions based on the small amount of information available to you. Is that how you make ethical decisions, only based on the data laying around where it is easy for you to find?
Funny, because I thought you'd be man enough to leave this thread alone.
And your feigning interest in the scientific subject, and pretending to ask questions to understand it, when you are merely executing your "hidden" agenda is a manly thing, eh? And hiding who you are is also a manly thing? Could it be that you hide who you are because you don't want us to know who you REALLY are? You SAY you are not Ren, and yet you are so hidden that no one could actually verify that, now could they?
You've had YEARS to put it to paper...it still ain't on paper!
You're sure about that, are you?
Did this meeting take place at the Skull & Bones HQ or in Stockholm? Was Sherlock Holmes there? Did you guffaw? Did you spill Champagne on your tweed jacket when he said that?
Personal, emotional attacks. Nice tactics. Do you always use them as a way to cover your ignorance of people, or subjects? For all your claims of me "attacking" you, I think it is clear who results to personal attacks when they get upset. Why not share some of your personal information with us, or would you be too afraid of the potential outlandish personal flaming that I would levy on you?
Yeah, I know. You have had years to make a point, if you didn't make it already, you never will. But you persist.
I persist in many things... many more things that you will ever know about, or ever even know if they somehow benefit you or protect your way of life. Yes, now I expect you will make another snide attack about how ridiculous it might be to think you received any sort of help from me, in any way.
Q for Jmpet: If you hate this country so much, and hate the principles that drive many forces in this country, and hate people who have good jobs, and make good money, and keep our country safe and prosperous... if you hate all these things so much, why not just leave? Why not go somewhere better?
RMT
