I could name names, but I'll refrain for the time being.And I don't think that there are ppl so fanatic with Titor.
Last edited by a moderator:
I could name names, but I'll refrain for the time being.And I don't think that there are ppl so fanatic with Titor.
NO! This whole titor saga is a sad hoax, that has gone on for far too long! Time to put an end to this foolishness, imo!Has anyone considered the possibility that Larry Haber is an attorney and was handed a set of memoirs for publication along with a manuscript and paid to impose that manuscript online? Or the possibility that this timeline did not include Y2K and that our young John has never handled a shotgun in his life. Perhaps he is an aspiring computer programmer who is looked after by Kay and the diamondbacks?
And if it's not?NO! This whole titor saga is a sad hoax, that has gone on for far too long! Time to put an end to this foolishness, imo!
LOL. Today, you have been awarded the John Titor memorial award for the most "entertaining-comment-of-the-Day"Another senseless drive-by Titoring. Luckily, no one was injured. ?
Can you be more specific? What do mean by his "concept"? If you mean his alleged physical method I have to disagree. His diagram showed 2 mini black holes contained in a tin box with no power supply.Yes , John Titor was a hoax. It is confirmed ...but the concept of time travelling he was saying was correct.
Hey! Thanks for considering the original thread. Many didn't ?Going back to Nicholas' original speculation, personally I never thought Pamela was involved in the hoax. I always considered she was just a very gullible person who lapped the story all up. I speculate that at a very early stage the Titor hoaxer may have entered into some private messaging with her, because maybe he was gratified that somebody was buying it wholesale, but Pamela turned out to be a loose cannon, releasing her emails and keeping bits of "information" back because it made her feel important. So the hoaxer soon dropped her, as he was getting heavy flak by then anyway, and could prove zip.
I don't know his theory, if he had much of one; I must have not paid much attention on those posts, if I read them. Yes his "machine" was BS and because he never actually came from the future, his predictions were all BS too.Ohh i mean , his theoretical intepretation of time travelling was very correct. Obviously he was saying BS when he talked about actual time machine
The illustration for the C204 clearly depicts a fuel cell being fed from a H2 reformer fueled by LPG natural gas canisters. There is an onboard power supply, hence the requirement of traveling with a closed O2 supply.Can you be more specific? What do mean by his "concept"? If you mean his alleged physical method I have to disagree. His diagram showed 2 mini black holes contained in a tin box with no power supply.
I should have said a viable power supply. You really think it's possible to maintain electromagnetic fields to contain TWO mini black holes with the low energies from such sources ? The LHC at CERN has just been upgraded to operate at 13 TeV and they haven't managed to create a discoverable microsingularity yet. Not to mention the huge size of the superconducting electromagnets and the racetrack they whizz the particles around in to get them up to atom smashing speeds.[missing attachment]
The illustration for the C204 clearly depicts a fuel cell being fed from a H2 reformer fueled by LPG natural gas canisters. There is an onboard power supply, hence the requirement of traveling with a closed O2 supply.
Perhaps tge LHC functions as a factory for the purpose of isolating singularities? My memory escapes me at the moment, but is there any chance that the singularities used in the C204 have an unnaturally induced charge?I should have said a viable power supply. You really think it's possible to maintain electromagnetic fields to contain TWO mini black holes with the low energies from such sources ? The LHC at CERN has just been upgraded to operate at 13 TeV and they haven't managed to create a discoverable microsingularity yet. Not to mention the huge size of the superconducting electromagnets and the racetrack they whizz the particles around in to get them up to atom smashing speeds.
That's real physics.
I don't know what you can mean. Nothing I have read about black holes or the possibility of micro singularities mentions any type of charge.Perhaps tge LHC functions as a factory for the purpose of isolating singularities? My memory escapes me at the moment, but is there any chance that the singularities used in the C204 have an unnaturally induced charge?
In Titor's Saga Boomer used the idea of a Kerr-Newman class black hole for his time machine. You can Google Kerr-Newman Black Hole (KNBH) for specific details. The short version is that a KNBH is a spinning black hole (Kerr Black Hole) that has a net electric charge, i.e. it is completely described by its mass, angular momentum and charge.My memory escapes me at the moment, but is there any chance that the singularities used in the C204 have an unnaturally induced charge?