September 2024

Surely the fact that you have written the posts now means they exist now, tomorrow, next week, next year, and in 2024?
Click to expand...

My_Time,

Yes, this is what I have just stated. They are able to read everything I am writing post by post.

L. Grummond
 
Everything you have stated, and dont take this as an attack in anyway, you say it is pretty much the same as today just with a few upgrades here and there. Videogames just have a "few" upgrades? I see that as pretty much impossible. Movies are pretty much the same? But they have started to use more 3-D movies? yeah, even i know that, because that is starting to happen now...I cant really say anything that stands out from your year, any different than ours....
Click to expand...

yeyeman9,

Yes, I assume you could look at it that way, but looking even further back: wouldn't most of what is being used and 'new' in 2008 be considered simply old technology that has been 'upgraded'? Keep in mind that I have also mentioned a number of events and technologies/advancements that are just now (2024) becoming commonplace.

L. Grummond
 
Lyndzee Grummond
Hi lyndzee it's adam once again I just wanted to ask you three questions so here they are and thanks for everything and your time and patience:

1. Is real magick popular in the past and future and on your timeline as well?

2. Can people in your timeline use teleportation and what kind of wars and crimes do you have in your timeline?

3. here is a question will our future be your present or not at all or will it be different all at once?

thanks for being cool and honest with me and thanks for all of the information and thanks for answering all of my questions I appreciate you being here to tell me and the rest of the forum what is happening I hope you have a great day and I have to leave now I will talk with you later on see ya later!
 
I have answered every one of your questions and proved you wrong in each of your 'gotcha!' arguements.
Click to expand...

Except... you continue to conveniently ignore Minkowski spacetime. Why is that? Failed your college physics? That's my guess.

Now THERE is a gotcha.

RMT
 
Lyndzee-

I must admit you've piqued my interest. I am a disciple of Stephen Wolfram and a close study of Henry Ford.

Two questions, hope you can answer them:

1. What does the modern day Ford Motor Comnpany look like?
2. How has the world recovered after the 2nd law of thermodynamics was disproven?

Thanks

NKS
 
Once again you make up some odd reasoning why I should be aware of something I am not. As if, by being the Director of DARPA, I should, for whatever reason, be fully knowledgable of the budgets of a completely separate international coalition which I am not at all involved with in any way? Makes no sense at all Darby and therefore your arguement - once again - just doesn't hold up.

You have put up a good fight in your attempt to label me a hoax I must admit, however you have done nothing more than prove to others that I am in fact the real thing because I have answered every one of your questions and proved you wrong in each of your 'gotcha!' arguements.
Click to expand...

You haven't addressed spacetime geomety at all. Give it a whack.

And, again, you missed the point. As a citizen and taxpayer you'd be somewhat familiar with the costs of the Mars Program even if you didn't bother to look at the details. It's public information available today. As a scientist you should have made the fiscal connection between your project and the Mars Program. You missed this aspect of your story because you don't understand either spacetime geometry or the implications of time travel. It never occured to you that $25 million to go to Mars with a technology already available versus $100-200 billion might be of some interest to your President, SecDef, Congress and the tax-payers in general. I'm assuming that $200-300 billion had already been invested in Mars Program R&D (I didn't ask about R&D costs, didn't I?).

No, lad, I think that I'm holding my own quite well here. You haven't shown us that you have any scientific background at all and you most certainly have shown that you have no instinct for managing a budget, have never been involved in a government agency budget prep process, OMB or Congressional budget hearings.
 
Is real magick popular in the past and future and on your timeline as well?
Click to expand...

Adam,

Go back and read the beginning of the story. S/he isn't from some other "timeline". It's the same as ours in the story.
 
You haven't addressed spacetime geomety at all. Give it a whack.

And, again, you missed the point. As a citizen and taxpayer you'd be somewhat familiar with the costs of the Mars Program even if you didn't bother to look at the details. It's public information available today. As a scientist you should have made the fiscal connection between your project and the Mars Program. You missed this aspect of your story because you don't understand either spacetime geometry or the implications of time travel. It never occured to you that $25 million to go to Mars with a technology already available versus $100-200 billion might be of some interest to your President, SecDef, Congress and the tax-payers in general. I'm assuming that $200-300 billion had already been invested in Mars Program R&D (I didn't ask about R&D costs, didn't I?).

No, lad, I think that I'm holding my own quite well here. You haven't shown us that you have any scientific background at all and you most certainly have shown that you have no instinct for managing a budget, have never been involved in a government agency budget prep process, OMB or Congressional budget hearings.
Click to expand...

"Say it ain't so Joe, there you go again!"

You obviously failed to read my reply to you thoroughly in that you once again when you said "As a scientist you should have made the fiscal connection between your project and the Mars Program."

Hmmm...I can't even bother reading any of your reply after that because all of your arguements are based on false facts you have created in your head in order to make your story plausible. Sorry, not happening.

L. Grummond
 
Hmmm...I can't even bother reading any of your reply after that because all of your arguements are based on false facts you have created in your head in order to make your story plausible. Sorry, not happening.
Click to expand...

Hmmm...Are you sure you do not know Darby from your time? lol




"Say it ain't so Joe, there you go again!"
By the way... is this a Palin quote? /ttiforum/images/graemlins/smile.gif
 
I can't even bother reading any of your reply after that because all of your arguements are based on false facts you have created in your head in order to make your story plausible. Sorry, not happening.
Click to expand...


S/he blinked.

Game. Set. Match.
 
Oh, I forgot to use the hillbilly version. "Say it ain't so, Joe!"

"Drill, baby, Drill!" I guess we won't be seeing new energy sources anytime soon? I believe you did mention new energy sources in the automobile industry, Lindzee.

Does Palin eventually go back to taking care of her children or does she resume life as Governor of Alaska?
 
S/he blinked.

Game. Set. Match.
Click to expand...

Wow! I called you out and that reply is all you can say! Laughable! You won't believe the number of private messages I received for saying what I said to you and all of them loved it! Your arguements have all fallen flat and everyone sees right through them. Sorry Darby! At least you will be mentioned in my debriefing and you will probably find your name (well, the name you take on this forum at least) on an international report a number of years from now! The amount of work you have tried to put into proving me a hoax is amazing and is noted! How interesting that there are one or two people who are so adamant on this even after I have shot down each and every arguement they have launched.

Moving on...

L. Grummond
 
Except... you continue to conveniently ignore Minkowski spacetime. Why is that? Failed your college physics? That's my guess.

Now THERE is a gotcha.

RMT
Click to expand...

Actually, no...that's not a 'gotcha'. Unfortunately you and Darby seem to be on the same page...in the wrong book!

Obviously you have just proved that along with Darby you have failed to correctly comprehend my previous posts. Once again, I never stated that I was a "scientist at MIT" and additionally, why would I devulge any type of information regarding the time travel technology which I have already explained is restricted? You of all people with your "arguments" (although inaccurate) about security and government guidelines should know better! /ttiforum/images/graemlins/smile.gif

L. Grummond
 
At least you will be mentioned in my debriefing and you will probably find your name (well, the name you take on this forum at least) on an international report a number of years from now!
Click to expand...

Darby is in trouuuuuuuuuuuuble. /ttiforum/images/graemlins/smile.gif

Next thing I expect to read is rainmantime accusing Lyndzee of threatening Darby. lol
It is all so...well......predictable. Of course now he might not say it because I mentioned it. lol
 
Bureaucrat,

I've given you enough information for you to address the implications of your gadget relative to Special Relativity. I didn't say Special Relativity specifically, rather, I referenced Minkowski, rotations and translations. That's where you blinked, lad. You didn't know what I was refering to. Instead, you assumed that I was simply making it up. I wasn't. It's a central part of SR.

And just so we have another opinion I'll let Professor Robert Brown, PhD, Duke University Department of Physics respond to you:

a society that has in its possession a star drive for the goddamn thing would clearly work as such as easily as a "time machine" -- arbitrary translation in four space is arbitrary translation in four space and they have to play all sorts of games to NOT go off into space FTL.
Click to expand...

Dr. Robert Brown Responds to Darby

But you wouldn't have seen that response here. That one is on Anomalies.
 
Pamela,

Nah. She wasn't threatening anyone. As I said, she blinked. But I was also correct earlier in the thread when I said that she wasn't here for you. She's here for me.
 
Back
Top