Sorry, I was somewhere else in cyberspace:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/talking_point/4505071.stm
It did not start on May 5 though (the NPT). The Heading of that Article was just an attention getter, and mainly most anything that came from the sky would also probably hit the oceans instead of hitting land. I just think that article was trying to make a point, the May 5, 2005 whatever thing, is something I do not know!
On another note:
Also if Titor come and came as he said, there were many Titors here, as I mentioned before, when I said "We are surrounded by Johns" according to the story, so what is written in that fashion would be different if different Johns were here.
The secondary agenda then to me would be - change worldlines and collect data, so all Johns would collect various worldline data from more than one worldline, and whenever he returned to a similiar worldline, they would have more data than from just one worldline, but a few worldines.
So, it is easy to have it a hoax or even think that it may be real, because of the theory of multiple worldlines.
It can not be proved, that is all I know, and that is where I leave it. Afterall, it is sort of funny, unless it in a sense does come true of course, but then, it would only be similiar to any other worldline, and the notion that each worldline should be different (with a different result when anything happens) is also only speculation.
The only thing anyone can be is -- exactly uncertain about anything --- I guess!
But still, with some of the answers given about that NPT, it unlikely that anyone is going to get rid of all N. Weapons!
It is though like some people are living in flatland when they answer. So what is the answer?
I don't submit that anyone as of yet can think of a singularity being positive with top spin -- whatever that is, so again, the only thing that it could be - -- is a comedy --- but still no one can really answer a story like that in any absolute.
Therefore, the only reference one can make is why -- anyone should care if all those worldlines exist.
Well, I think Dr. David Deustch has answered that already by saying that no matter what worldine anyone is in -- better decisions can always be made. But which then is the better decision?
I leave at that point, because nothing can be concrete, and all of anything ends up - abstract!
Maybe the NPT conference decides something today, but then again probably not!
This is also going on here:
http://www.mclaughlin.com/
and all I can say is that none of it is making me any money, so to those people who have that time to discuss anything - - fine -- I suppose that I should be doing something else.
Also, I thought of that scenario before about the World, I wonder now if it is not something that is picked up, or something like everything being like sort of collective thought about anything.
Another point made by Titor (Collective Consciousness), and also made by others somewhat in the Holographic Universe (book).
But at some point -- it all denys any Freedom then, so might as watch that old movie -- The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly!
????????????????
So on to something productive!
(Being lead around by the nose, or yanked by the chain or whatever one of those saying are!)
((It is just some people who do not submit to that (and do have the means to be either lucky enough or accomplished enough to not suffer -- and I do not really think that anyone is always that accomplished that extensively), that in the ends should perhaps mean that everyone should get along, but then we all are on Planet Earth!)
The needs of the few outweigh the needs of the many!
(And all of that from that Star Trek movie.)
The needs of the one outweigh the needs of the few or the many!
Generally overall though with all of humanity: At some time, thinking will have to change, because of humans wanting to survive in the future, perhaps, due to advances in science or in technology or both.
But I doubt if that will happen anytime soon, and according to some -- it has already happened!