Really.....
Correspondent:: Alexander Mulligan
Date: 10 Oct 2004 21:46:20 GMT
......
"Sound reasoning, but you are lacking some critical data.
The industrial infrastructure will collapse as a result of the
recently disenfrachised middle class of America, using their
*considerable* practical technological know-how, in very organized
attempts to form dozens of new city-states across N. America."
The "industrial infrastructure" is the buildings, roads, factories, etc...
Why would that "collapse" because the middle class is disenfranchised?
He doesn't even understand the difference. Had he said "the economy, or supporting soft infrastructure" maybe.
"America will be a third-world country by then (2015 or thereabouts), as will every other country in the world."
The terms;
"First World" refers to developed, capitalist, industrial countries, roughly, aligned with the United States since World War II.
"Second World" refers to the former communist-socialist, industrial states.
"Third World" are all the other countries.
He doesn't understand the meaning of the terms again. Third world doesn't refer to a collapsed economy, which is what he implies.
"The Haves, living in 'gated' communities will be the only real benefactors of said industrial infrastructure."
Is this the same "collapsed infrastructure"? Would you really believe a "gated" community will stop armed looters and rioters?
"This is when the nukes will by used, by America, on Americans."
This is a wonderfully frightening statement that will not happen. No single person can launch a nuke and no crew would allow such a launch against their own home. I honestly can not imagine any leader of this Country, regardless of the situation, ordering such a launch.
"I'm giving the above scenario a 90% probability..."
Scenario... probability...not a future event...??
"...based upon the utter refusal of Americans in general to face the fact that their
incredibly materially destructive lifestyle is un-sustainable and needs to be dropped like the radioactively hot potato it is. A
major overhaul is called for, not all the re-arranging of the deckchairs on the Titanic proposed and implemented by the so-called 'progressives and liberals' in America.)"
Evidence of someone's political agenda... not a revelation of our certain future.
Source:
http://www.subgenius.com/bigfist/FIST2004-1/oct2004/x/IfYouWantToSurvive.html
This guy is supposed to be a friend of JT and to have know him in 2036 or 7 or 8, whatever. He is by far even worse at perpetrating a hoax than the main man...Titor was.
After reading the link John Thomas posted, I decided not to read "all" the chat logs. I am very glad I read the short one first. I don't see any value in reading that much from Feb. 2004 when he failed so completely in Oct. 2004.
I maintain; alternate time lines are nothing more than an effort by "wanna be" TT'ers to cover their well exposed asses, as their "predictions, forecasts, revelations", of the future, one after another, fail to come true.