Xavier,
As you know, John Titor (TimeTravel_0 on this forum) claimed that he was a historian and not a scientist. You, on the other hand, claim to be a scientist.
That's a good start because at least we have simple ways to verify that you have some clue about, well...science...and all that that field entails.
You also said that unlike Titor you are willing to answer specific questions with specific answers. Trust me, that's a refreshing thought.
So, let's start with some basic skills testing, if you're willing to participate. And please, answer the questions in your own words rather than quoting someone else or cutting and pasting from some website (as was Titor's habit):
1. What are the first and second derivitives of
5x^5 + 3x^3 + x? How many non-zero derivitives can we take here?
2. In the sense that an object is moving at some velocity, what does the first derivitive tell you? What does the second derivitive indicate?
3. Explain the meaning of dot product and cross product.
(Please, no hints or help from the neighborhood
)
Some C204/C206 questions:
1. Titor stated that the mass of your micro-black holes is on the order of one electron's mass. What is the actual mass of each micro-black hole in the C204/C206 gadget? State that mass as a scientist would give it and not as might be given by a non-scientist.
2. Relative to the C204, Titor stated that electrons are injected across the event horizon to pump up the electric charge and angular momentum to enable you to form a specific class of Kerr black hole.
a. What class of black hole would be formed (specific class, not general class) via this process?
b. Explain Pauli's Exculsion Principle and how it might relate to your C204/C206 charged black holes.
c. Assume that gravity has a relative force of "1". What would the electric force be relative to the gravitational force?
d. Assume that your micro-black hole has an electric charge of -1. How does this impact injecting a second electron across the event horizon?
I think that these questions are a reasonably easy task for you. Answering them doesn't give away any secrets, they don't impact "the future" and they are based on principles of basic E&M theory with a bit of black hole mechanics.
Titor said that the physics underlying the C204/C206 had already been discovered in the 1970's, i.e. no surprises are on the future horizon. So it should be OK to answer these Q's.
We'll save "tougher" questions for later, assuming that you are successful in answering these questions.
Thanks