Chronohistorian's Thread #1

[creedo299]

Ray, in answer to this question, I would have to say, latimer salt-fish mothers of God.

 

[zerubbabel]

Rainman,

Thanks for the great links. I will spend endless hours on them. Great resources!!

In regard to your discussion about the diameter of the universe, some thoughts came to my mind about your comments on how the strong nuclear force overcomes gravity at some point. Also about the big bang concept of creation. All this supposses that there was a "singularity". Even the most energetic particles would not be able to escape its infinite pull. At the local level, singularities eat everything within proximity but leave the fringes relatively unaffected by its voracious appetite. Not so with the initial singularity. It contained everything yet was, itself, nothing. Everything from nothing--not even a "point". It was the antithesis of point. It could have no name because there was nothing to compare it to. Science cannot get beyond this point. The primary reason for this is the inability to factor in intelligent design. In order to truly understand it, you have to think like the artist of the design.

At the very least, this "nonpoint" was the most unltimate expression of gravity. Nothing else existed but the eternal pull. Nothing could overcome it. It could only endlessly go inward. It then replicated itself into a new thing--a duality that only singularity could produce. The duality then replicated itself into a third "trinity" that represented the fullest form of expression of nature of the duality--having no substance of its own ("speaking not of itself"), but perfectly expressing the unknowable duality like the scale from octave to octave, and chromic as well as chromatic scale. From there it became a symphony upon a multi-dimensional canvas that "splashed" its color in every conceivable multi-dimensional form. Only gravity was form-less. It did not separate itself from the other 3 forces. It WAS separate to begin with. It creates the effects of the other three. At the atomic scale, it IS the strong force. It can only be space. there is no ultimate "god particle". There is only an ultimate god "superspace". Everything that exists is just an expression of it, a hologram if you will.

 

[chronohistorian]

Watching people shows me the daily lives of people and what they talk about.


It is a cross over between tumour scanners and xrays.


Gravity is different on other planets. If you went to the moon, the gravity would be different from here.




It doesn't decay is space because it has special properties.


everything is different about space.


There isn't magical properties. the reason you haven't found any lunarium yet is because it is deep inside the moon.


They would be able to more understand me because they are more clever than you.


You can extend the half life the same way but just with a couple of modifications.


There are no greenhouse gases to melt the ice caps.


Global warming makes an ice age come faster.
Every 12000 years or so there is an ice age but before that temperatures rise. Because of all the fossil fuels and pollution the earth is heating up quicker which will make the ice age come around quicker.


The history between 1970 and 2150 is missing.


The ruhr comment isn't a question.


The speed of light thing:

If something is somewhere we say how far away it is using the normal speed of light but if we are going somewhere with our ship we tell them how fast to go using the LYPH thing.
do you understand?


I don't know what the speed is to reach andromeda. I have never been outside the solar system.


The government decided to call it light speed.

I don't understand what you are asking me about the 3*10^8.


I am not an engineer so I don't know how the systems make it work.

 

[trollface]

Watching people shows me the daily lives of people and what they talk about.

Um, if you say so, chief.

Irt is a cross over between tumour scanners and xrays.

How so? Does it use x-rays or electromagnetism?

Gravity is different on other planets. If you went to the moon, the gravity would be different from here.

This is simply not true. And you patently didn't answer the question, you merely repeated what you've already said. The question wasn't "is it different?" the question was "how is it different?"

It doesn't decay is space because it has special properties.

"It" has special properties? Which "it", the space or the lunarium? And what are those special properties?

everything is different about space.

Everything? Humans are no longer human? Steel becomes liquid? Elaborate, please.

There isn't magical properties. the reason you haven't found any lunarium yet is because it is deep inside the moon.

If the moon can host a natural element with an atomic weight of 288 and it doesn't decay, then there certainly are magical properties.

They be able to more understand me because they are more clever than you.

I'll ask again, then, why that doesn't seem to be true with you. "They be able to more understand me" in a sentence about intelligence is comedy fried gold.

You can extend the half life the same way but just with a couple of modifications.

The same way as what? You said that Lunarium didn't have a halflife. And you said that it did. Which is it?

There are no greenhouse gases to melt the ice caps.

The question is, though, are there no greenhouse gases because of the ice caps or are the ice caps hopw they are because of the lack of greenhouse gases?

Global warming makes an ice age come faster.
Every 12000 years or so there is an ice age but before that temperatures rise. Because of all the fossil fuels and pollution the earth is heating up quicker which will make the ice age come around quicker.

You keep repeating this, but you haven't said why. Why don't you ever just answer questions?

The history between 1970 and 2150 is missing.

So what's that got to do with you getting the hyperinflation thing completely wrong?

The ruhr comment isn't a question.

Alright, Mr. Pedantic, I'll rephrase it. Are you saying that you made a mistake with regards to the Ruhr region because in our time the history it's self is actually wrong? You're the hyperintelligent one and you couldn't figure a way to make that sentence into a question by yourself?

If something is somewhere we say how far away it is using the normal speed of light but if we are going somewhere with our ship we tell them how fast to go using the LYPH thing.
do you understand?

I understand that, but you've still not answered the question I asked.

I don't know what the speed is to rech andromeda. I have never been outside the solar system.

So why did you say that travelling at lightspeed it'd take an hour? Your new tactic of defence seems to be "I don't know anything about anything, and some of the things I've said have been outright lies". Good tactic.

The government decided to call it light speed.

Yes, you've said that. Now answer the question you were actually asked: why?

I don't understand what you are asking me about the 3*10^8.

Even after I've asked you half a dozen times over a couple of weeks, you still don't get the simplest question? Aren't you the hyperintelligent one able to understand a lot more that my feeble mind ever could, eh? The question is as this new speed is called lightspeed, what is what we now call "lightspeed" (AKA "c") called?

I am not an engineer so I don't know how the systems make it work.

So why do you keep talking abiut all these things that you don't know a single thing about?

Well, you seem to have made an effort to address the questions, even if you didn't really answer a single one of them. I'm training you, slowly but surely, it seems. Next step, try using the cut and paste functions. You've got such an awesome intellect, you tell me, so I don't see how it could be too much strain for you. But if it really is too hard, just say so.

 

[chronohistorian]

It uses partly xrays which see which part of the brain is stimulated mostly.


It is different because if you go to other planets there will be less or more gravity.
There is no gravity in a vacuum (space).


Lunarium has the special properties such as the ones I have said. High energy (for space exploration) and doesn't decay fast.



The species are different in space. sometimes elements react differently on other planets.


sorry about that crappy sentence. I was writing something else but decided to phrase it better. I will change in a minute.


You can extend the life of an element the same as I said (put it in the transformer).



I think you have done a sentence wrong with the greenhouse gas thing because I don't understand.


I didanswer the questions. that is an answer. do you understand?



I never got the hyperinflation thing completely wrong.


I don't think your history about the ruhr is wrong.



I did answer the light speed question. It is an answer. I don't know how to answer it any other way.


It does take one hour to get to andromeda but I don't know the speed in which they go at.


I don't know why the government makes their decision. I never made it.


We call light speed the same thing.


I know the basics of how things work but not anymore than the basics.

 

[trollface]

I'm in a hurry, so I'm not going to give this the full whack. I'll come back to it later.

It uses partly xrays which see which part of the brain is stimulated mostly.

How do they manage that? What do the x-rays bounce off, to be detected by the satellite? How do x-rays tell you anything about the functioning of the brain?

It is different because if you go to other planets there will be less or more gravity.

That's to do with the size of the planet, not the gravity acting differently. The gravity acts exactly the same way, and is exactly the same thing.

There is no gravity in a vacuum (space).

Not true on either count. If there is no gravity in a vacuum, then why do things in vacuum chambers not float? If there is no gravity in space, then what keeps the Earth and the other planets in their orbits? You really don't understand the basic principals, do you?

The species are different in space.

So you are saying that humans mutate in space?

sorry about that crappy sentence.

That's perfectly alright, I expect it from you. And, as I said, it's very funny, particularly in context.

You can extend the life of an element the same as I said (put it in the transformer).

So does it have a halflife or not? Which of the two contradictory things that you've said is true?

I think you have done a sentence wrong with the greenhouse gas thing because I don't understand.

I've asked the question many times with many different phrasings. Where's the superior understanding that your superior intelligence gives you? I'll come back later and see if I can rephrase it in an even more remedial fashion for you.

I didanswer the questions. that is an answer. do you understand?

I understand that you're trying to get out of it by saying this, but you've still not explained how global warming leads to an ice age. You have kept saying that it does, but not said how.

I never got the hyperinflation thing completely wrong.

Yes you did. You said that the hyperinflation caused Germany to be unable to pay off the reparations. Then you contradicted yourself and said that the hyperinflation was caused by Germany trying to pay off the reparations. Neither of these things is correct, as the hyperinflation was the result of the occupation of the Ruhr region.

Can you explain why you've said two completely contradictory things, neither of which is true?

I don't think your history about the ruhr is wrong.

So why are you saying that the correct version of events, as remember by the history book sof this time, and as remembered by the people who lived through it who are still alive is wrong, and that one of your two versions is right?

I did answer the light speed question. It is an answer. I don't know how to answer it any other way.

Translation: "I am too inarticulate to answer the question". It's a novel defence, I'll grant you. I'll come back and see if I can make it even easier to understand later. Maybe I'll draw diagrams for you.

It does take one hour to get to andromeda but I don't know the speed in which they go at.

So why did you say that it was lightspeed? Then when challenged, why did you say that it definately was lightspped, but that the definition of "lightspeed" was different in your time? And then, why did you give a definition of what "lightspeed" meant that wouldn't be the speed of light, and also wouldn't get you to Andromeda in an hour? Do you just blurt things out without thinking at all?

We call light speed the same thing.

So lightspeed is lightspeed and also many thousands of times lightspeed?

I know the basics of how things work but not anymore than the basics.

No, you don't even know the basics, from what you've said.

 

[chronohistorian]

Xrays don't really tell you much which is why we have merged it with tumour scanning equipment.


No. I am saying aliens are different to us.


It doesn't have a half life.


I have just explained. global warming is caused by the burning of fossil fuels which heat the earth up which makes the ice age come around quicker. do you understand that?


The occupation of the ruhr was caused by germany not being able to pay the reparations.


I just think you are misinformed.


My god! It is like explaining things to a little child when talking to you about light speed. I didn't think it would be this hard.

 

[JamesAnthony]

It is different because if you go to other planets there will be less or more gravity.
There is no gravity in a vacuum (space).

I'll try to clear up the question for you Chrono - this answer shows you don't know what's being asked of you. No offence but it is a difficult concept to comprehend when you seem to have had no formal training in basic physics.

The force of gravity is exerted between two bodies. I don't remember the exact formula, but the most important aspect is the gravitational constant, G, or 'big G'. Which in itself is a contradtion, seeing as how it's a very very tiny force. The main point is that this constant is the same anywhere in space. It doesn't change as you move further away from the earth, or if you live on the moon.

You seem to be confusing G with 'g', or 'little g'. This is the acceleration we experience here on Earth(9.8m/s/s). 'g' is different depending on where you are in space. However it doesn't mean that there's somewhere where it's non existant. And it's certainly not affected by vacuums.

Now I haven't bought you a Get Out of Jail Free card here. 'g' being different in different parts of the universe does not cause elements to behave differently. Otherwise strange behaviour of elements would be registered in our orbit. 'g' can also be artificially altered. Like in the case of astronaut training planes that counteract 9.8ms^2 to simulate weightlessness. And G? Well it's a constant it is the same no matter what's between two large bodies - vacuum or otherwise!

James

 

[RainmanTime]

As far as we know, all trans-uranic elements "have" half-lives.

Actually, to further your point... even plain old carbon has a half-life. Thus the ability to perform carbon dating.

Mass decays. I just wish Chrono would decay,
RainmanTime

 

[RainmanTime]

Furthermore...

I seem to remember Chronopal telling us his Lunarium fantasy element had an atomic mass of 288.

Sorry, that hotel room is already taken, by Ununpentium.

RainmanTime

 

[keeb333]

Re: Furthermore...

Hi RainmanTime,

I did some research about the newer elements, and this site has a lot of good info about the newer elements.

Interestly enough, Uuq-289 actually has a half life of 30 seconds, an anomalously long half-life compared to the other heavy elements. Uuq-288 has a half-life of 2 seconds. However, there is absolutely no possibility of these elements still existing in nature. If they were ever naturally formed (supernova or whatever), they would be long decayed by now.

By the way, the names of elements 111-120 are provisional until proper names can be agreed upon. The current names are merely the latin translation of the element's atomic number.


Keeb

 

[chronohistorian]

don't have a lot of time but can just answer one question:


iqbalgomar-I was talking about elemebts in general.

 

[creedo299]

Re:Iqubal'

No don't think that Chrono comes from a race of morons, however an extremely advanced society over what we know.

Did you not the pixel count around the said laser beam, in the Titor jump still?

This might mean, if geo-global catastrophe does come and massive amounts of records are lot, this key time would be laid to ruin.

In time, say five hundred years, the lizarians might have adopted a differing view of mankin.

They may have afterall, realized that Earth held humans were worth a lot more than how lizard people related to them in the 1900s till that catastrophe occurred.

This in the future tense, might be so much, that now future Earth people have autonomy with the lizard realms?

 

[chronohistorian]

iqbalgomar-A half life is something like the radiation life it has.


RainmanTime-maybe I was wrong about the number but I am sure it is something like that and I have never heard of Ununpentium.

 

[Transient001]

Chrono

Go to a search engine, on the search bar type PERIODIC TABLE.

A series of entries shall appear.

Choose one that most appeals to you, specially one that provides the newly discovered elements.

Then you shall know a little more than you did before.

Until later becomes now.

 

[trollface]

Xrays don't really tell you much which is why we have merged it with tumour scanning equipment.

And once more you just say something vague without answering a single one of my questions.

I'll ask some more questions, and do the now-usual list at the end of the post. You say that it's been merged with tumour scanning equipment? I ask again if you're talking about CAT scans. And do you mean that it used electro-magnetism?

No. I am saying aliens are different to us.

Well, that had nothing whatsoever to do with what I asked you.

you said that in regard to physics and the laws of the universe that "everything is different in space". Your justification for this statement is that alien species aren't human? No, you have to explain what you mean. How is everything different in space?

It doesn't have a half life.

So why did you say it did? Why did you talk about how scientists in your time extend it's halflife? And don't give me the "I was talking about elements in general" line you've already tried because what you have said is written down in black and white for all to see. You said, very specifically, that Lunarium had it's halflife extended by being put in a box. Now, can you explain this discrepancy?

I have just explained. global warming is caused by the burning of fossil fuels which heat the earth up which makes the ice age come around quicker. do you understand that?

I understand that perfectly, you've said as much several times before. What you don't understand is that you've not answered my question. Let me see exactly how simply I can put this.

How does the Earth heating up cause the ice age to come round quicker? I'm not asking you to re-state yet again that you believe that this happens, I'm asking you to tell me how. Do you understand?

No, I bet you won't because I've asked that in parctically the same language before. I am left with one of three conclusions: 1) You really are not intelligent enough to understand the question you're being asked. 2) You don't know what the word "how" means. 3) You're deliberately avoiding answering the question.

Which is it? And if you want to say that it's none of them, then just answer the question already.

The occupation of the ruhr was caused by germany not being able to pay the reparations.

I have no idea why you just wrote that. The question is why you've now said two completely different versions of this part of history - neither of which are correct according to modern history books and the people who actually lived in Germany at the time. Can you explain that?

I just think you are misinformed.

About what? What was that a response to?

Again, this is why quoting what you're replying to is handy. You said that you care about communicating effectively. But, seemingly, you don't care enough to actually, you know, make yourself communicate effectively. Note for the future: merely posting random sentences that don't seem to be about anything does not equal good communication.

My god! It is like explaining things to a little child when talking to you about light speed. I didn't think it would be this hard.

You and me both, pal. Tell you what, if you want it to be easier, rather than just randomly posting the first bits of gibberish that pop into your head, why not try actually being novel and anwsering the questions that you've been asked? You know, you see a question being asked of you and...you answer it! Rather than going off on some wild tangent or saying something that's vaguely connected to the subject in hand, you simply...answer the question! Go on, try it!

So, the new unanswered question list...

1) How do they manage that?
.
2) What do the x-rays bounce off, to be detected by the satellite?
.
3) How do x-rays tell you anything about the functioning of the brain?
.
4) If there is no gravity in a vacuum, then why do things in vacuum chambers not float?
.
5) If there is no gravity in space, then what keeps the Earth and the other planets in their orbits?
.
6) You really don't understand the basic principals, do you?
.
7) [With regards to the Ruhr region thing]Can you explain why you've said two completely contradictory things, neither of which is true?
.
8) So why are you saying that the correct version of events, as remember by the history book sof this time, and as remembered by the people who lived through it who are still alive is wrong, and that one of your two versions is right?
.
9) So why did you say that it was lightspeed [to get to Andromeda in one hour]?
.
10) Then when challenged, why did you say that it definately was lightspped, but that the definition of "lightspeed" was different in your time?
.
11) And then, why did you give a definition of what "lightspeed" meant that wouldn't be the speed of light, and also wouldn't get you to Andromeda in an hour?
.
12) Do you just blurt things out without thinking at all?
.
13) So lightspeed is lightspeed and also many thousands of times lightspeed?

You can see that there's 13 unanswered questions. I've numbered tham because it's obviously too taxing for your huge intellect to work out how to use the cut and paste functions, so now all you have to do is write the number and then your answer. That way, not only will it be far, far easier to tell which question you think you're answering when you tpye your random sentences, but you can't wiggle out of answering them, either. Plus, you don't have any excuse for not making yourself clear.

A quick example of how one of your answers should look: "12) Yes, I do."

See? Effective communication.

 

[chronohistorian]

I think it has been merged with "CAT scanning equipment" but I don't think it is anything to do with electro-magnetism.


Everything like stars, planets, alien races, space dwellers and moons are different.


I was talking about elements in general and not all elements have to be radioactive to decay.


I will try and explain it in a different way, that a child might understand.

lets say the earth has periods (which women have) the earth sometimes gets very hot and straight after that gets extremely cold but it is all based on a biological clock. but then she starts doing something unhealthy which raises her body temperature she then gets to the coldness faster.
that is the simplest way I can explain it and I don't think the periods fit in now.


well why do you think the reason was for the occupation of the ruhr?

I think you were misinformed about the ruhr.




1.manage what?
2.The xrays bounce off the brain and the skull.
3.Don't know but it isn't really an xray machine because it was merged.
4.don't know.
5.ok but there is very little gravity.
6.if it is to do with science then I don't know much.
7.I never said two contradictory things.
8.I don't understand.
9.it is lightspeed but measured in a different way
10. it is true.
11.don't understand.
12.sometimes
13.yes, I suppose so.

 

[trollface]

I think it has been merged with "CAT scanning equipment" but I don't think it is anything to do with electro-magnetism.

If it's nothing to do with electromagnetism, then in what way is it anything to do with CAT scanning? After all, that's the principal that CAT scanning equipment uses.

Everything like stars, planets, alien races, space dwellers and moons are different.

Define "different".

I was talking about elements in general and not all elements have to be radioactive to decay.

I said don't use that line on me. Again, don't forget that what you've written down is here for all to see. You definately, specifically said that the box with the red light was used to extend the halflife of Lunarium. Not of elements in general, but Lunarium specifically. So, how do you explain the change in story?

lets say the earth has periods (which women have) the earth sometimes gets very hot and straight after that gets extremely cold but it is all based on a biological clock. but then she starts doing something unhealthy which raises her body temperature she then gets to the coldness faster.
that is the simplest way I can explain it and I don't think the periods fit in now.

Well, thanks for the graphic imagry. That still didn't answer the question, just reiterated what you've already said in a colourful metaphor. No, what I mean is for you to explain how the warming of the globe causes an ice age. Does the melting ice cause the seas to cool down, affecting the rest of the weather, or what?

well why do you think the reason was for the occupation of the ruhr?

That's not the issue. The issue is the hyperinflation. Now, as I've said the hyperinflation was caused by the strikes in the region due to the occupation and the goveernment still having to pay the workers and so printing more money. I am backed up in saying this by the history books of today and by personal testimony from those who were alive at the time.

You, however, have said that the hyperinflation was due to the government trying to pay the reparations before the occupation - the government printed extra money to try to pay off the repairations. You have also said that the reason that the government was unable to pay off the repairations was because when the repairations were levied, they already had hyperinflation.

These two statements not only contradict each other, but they contradict everything that is known about this time, both from written history and from people who were there at the time. Now, how do you explain this? You've already said that you don't think that the history that happened there is wrong itself, so we're not talking alternate timelines or anything, you're saying how it happened is how it should have happened. So, therefore, the personal testimony of people whop were there at the time must be right. So, why are you saying that they're wrong? And which of the two versions of events that you've given me is the correct one? And how come an expert such as yourself could get this issue so consistantly and so badly wrong?

1.manage what?

See? It's difficult when you just have a random sentence and don't know what it's in reference to, isn't it? This is why I want you to put that brainpower of yours to use and learn to use the cut and paste function. As it is, I have to have two windows open and scroll back through the thread to see if I can guess what you're on about half the time. Maybe you could put a little effort in, too. After all, you're the one trying to convince us.

Anyway, the question is how do x-rays tell you anything about the working of the brain? The answer is that they don't, and that if you stood up when you spoke your voice would be less muffled.

2.The xrays bounce off the brain and the skull.

And, no matter the angle, just happen to find their way back to a satellite in a coherent and decipherable form? How does that happen?

3.Don't know but it isn't really an xray machine because it was merged.

Define "merged". If it's not x-rays, and if it's not electromagnetism, then what is it?

BTW, maybe I should tell you this before you dig your hole any deeper, but x-rays are electromagnetism. They're part of the electromagnetic spectrum.

4.don't know.

Answer: because it's not true.

5.ok but there is very little gravity.

Again, that's simply not true. The gravitational constant, G, is a constant. Hence the name. Whether there's a vaccuum or not makes no difference to the gravity. why would air particles make any difference to gravitational force? Can you even think of any explaination of why that would be?

6.if it is to do with science then I don't know much.

What does it have to be to do with for you to know anything?

7.I never said to contradictory things.

I've spelled it out for you. Yes you have. Again, this is not something that you can pretend didn't happen; it's extensively documented on this forum. You may feel able to say ridiculous things that contradict reality and simply not accept that things like relativity are true, but you cannot contradict what is already written down here. You can't pretend that you never said these things, because it's written down, and everybody, but everybody, can read it at the click of a button.

So, don't treat me like a chump, eh? Answer the question - I've spelled it out explicitly more than once.

8.I don't understand.

Isn't history supposed to be your strong suit? And yet even there you don't understand? Isn't comprehension what you've said people from your time are exceptionally good at? How do you explain that you say that you're hyperintelligent and that you have better comprehension skills and that you're an expert in 20thC history, yet you can't get basic facts straight and you can't understand simple questions about your own choice of favourite subject?

9.it is lightspeed but measured in a different way

So, there are 3 speeds which are called "lightspeed", depending on what you want to class it as? There's the "lightspeed" which is the speed of light. Then there's the "lightspeed" which you described above which is 8,760,000 times the speed of light. Then there's the "lightspeed" which would get you to Andromeda in an hour, which was your original claim (that would be 20,148,000,000 times the speed of light). Just to be clear.

10. it is true.

So true that you can't even keep your own story straight? I told you you should be keeping notes, as you're seriously starting to contradict yourself.

11.don't understand.

for someone who claims to be able to understand things that we mere mortals can't you don't seem to understand much that's written in easy to follow basic English. Let me see if I can spell this out. Again.

You originally said that travelling at lightspeed you could get to Andromeda in an hour. I pointed out that lightspeed would actually get you there in 2.3 million years. You then said that there was a different definition of "lightspeed" which was actually 8,760,000 times the speed of light. however, to get to andromeda in the space of one hour, you'd have to travel at 20,148,000,000 times the speed of light. So you've said, essentially, that there are 3 definitions of "lightspeed" in your time.

So why have you said this?

12.sometimes

Which just proves what a world-class academic you are. The first thing you should learn is to engage brain befoer saying things. You wouldn't have dug yourself into half as many holes as you have if you'd have just put in a bit of thought before typing away. You're sloppy and careless, and this is mainly down to lack of thought. Also, if you did do a bit of thinking, then you probably wouldn't come accross as half as thick as you do.

13.yes, I suppose so.

Well, that question only took, what, three weeks to get an answer for? Well done for finally answering a straight question with a straight answer.

so, not bad, you've actually answered most of my questions, and the ones that you haven't I've re-asked in the actual post itself. See? It wasn't as bad as pulling teeth, was it after all?

 

[chronohistorian]

I don't think CAT scanning equipment works like that in my time.


There are variations in them.
Planets have different atmospheres and are different sizes.
Stars are different sizes, brightness, colours and mass.
some are still Nebulae


please find where I said that it was used to extend lunarium and tell me the page of the thread.


The ice age makes more ice which covers more land. I thought that would be obvious.



The ruhr-The german government could not pay the reparations so the french and belgians invaded the ruhr so the germans printed more money. If this is wrong then the history of my time must be wrong too.



1. don't know. I aren't a specialist.

2. the satellite pulls the xrays back.

3. I know normal xrays are part of the electromagnetic spectrum but the xrays that I speak of are different.

4. it is true

5. no

6. history and sometimes religion

7. ask the question again

8. I didn't understand the way you asked it.

9.I can't be bothered answering about light speed now because it is just going to go on forever and you won't understand.

10. never contradicted myself

11. It takes us 1 hour to get there. I don't know how many light years are between us and andromeda.

12. ok

 

[trollface]

I don't think CAT scanning equipment works like that in my time.

So how does it work?

There are variations in them.
Planets have different atmospheres and are different sizes.
Stars are different sizes, brightness, colours and mass.
some are still Nebulae

None of these are examples of how "everything" is different in space, certainly not with regards to the laws of physics. They're examples of how there is more than one object in space. You've claimed that there are "lots of weird things" in space, and that "everything", including the laws of physics are different. And yet, all you've been able to come up with as examples and explainations are the simple things that are neither weird or different, rather are things that anyone out of primary school would know.

please find where I said that it was used to extend lunarium and tell me the page of the thread.

See? you should keep notes, otherwise you'll just continue to contradict yourself, and not even know it.

We put it in this machine called a transformer which bends it, reshapes it and puts it back how it was and cover it with dry water then shine red light on it. It is more complicated than that put thats the only way I can put it.

We cryogenically freeze the lunarium first then do the things to it [...]

And so on. You can pretty much pick and choose from the last 5 pages of your original thread.

The ice age makes more ice which covers more land. I thought that would be obvious.

That is obvious. It's also not the answer to the question I asked. I have been asking how the increase in temperature would cause an ice age, not how an ice age would cool things down.

Now, how does a warmer global temperature lead to an ice age?

The ruhr-The german government could not pay the reparations so the french and belgians invaded the ruhr so the germans printed more money. If this is wrong then the history of my time must be wrong too.

Again, you've not addressed the issue. Why did the Germans print more money? Was it for some unspecified reason and that caused them not to be able to pay the repairations? Was it to try to pay the repairations? Or was it, as you've now said, because of the occupation?

You've now given three different versions of what happened with regards to that particular incident. Which is the correct one? And why did you say the other two?

1. don't know. I aren't a specialist.

Indeed. Seemingly you're not a specialist in anything, from the little things like when the word "aren't" is to be used in a sentence, right up to your claimed field of expertese, 20thC history.

2. the satellite pulls the xrays back.

How?

3. I know normal xrays are part of the electromagnetic spectrum but the xrays that I speak of are different.

Is this another new definition of a common term, like "lightspeed" is? Okay, so why did they name whatever you're claiming are now called "x-rays" by the name of something that already exists? And what exactly are they, if they're not related to what we would know as "x-rays"? Do you really think that you can continue to redefine words when you show up your lack of knowledge?

4. it is true

Wait a minute. Last post you said that you were wrong and there was gravity in a vacuum. now you're changing your story again and saying that there isn't any gravity in a vacuum? Which is it? why can't you keep your story straight from one sentence to the next?

5. no

No what? No there isn't any gravity? No, air particales don't affect gravity? No, you can't think of any reasonable explaination? What?

6. history and sometimes religion

But you don't know anything about history. You were challenged to provide a couple of paragraphs about the event sof your choice and you failed spectacularly. You've also muffed a few questions about religion, IIRC. So that's a lie.

7. ask the question again

I've asked it many times. why have you now said 3 completely contradictory things with regards to the cause of hyperinflation in Germany?

8. I didn't understand the way you asked it.

I know. I ask again, aren't you supposed to be hyperintelligent, and better able to decipher what people are saying? How come then you can't understand simple questions that I'll bet you at least 90% of the people on this forum can easily comprehend? Your assertations are hardly bourne out by the evidence to hand.

9.I can't be bothered answering about light speed now because it is just going to go on forever and you won't understand.

Nope, you don't get to cop out like that. If you want to tell the truth and say "I was caught in a stupid lie and have dug myslef into a much deeper hole because I don't understand what I'm talking about and don't think before I post things", then I'll accept that, but I'm not going to accept you posting a load of innane contradictory and stupid drivel and then dismissing it with some guff about not being bothered. Now answer the questions.

10. never contradicted myself

Honestly, who do you think you are kidding? I've cut and pasted examples of you contradicting yourself. I know. Maybe if you close your eyes and wish hard enoguh it'll all go away. why not give that a try. It can't be any less effective than the tactics you're currently using.

11. It takes us 1 hour to get there. I don't know how many light years are between us and andromeda.

I told you right at the start that Andromeda is 2.3 million light years away. The question is why have you said that there are three different speeds which are called "lightspeed"? There's the speed of light, 8,760,000 times the speed of light and 20,148,000,000 times the speed of light. Why have you said this?