Bransonian

Bramsonian,

I am asking you to listen then come here and say either "Bransonian is a real time traveller" or "he is not"- that's all.

My friend, if you have something to say just say it. I'm not here to validate your story. That's your job.

And if you really wanted to pass the information along to me you'd have done so. My email addy is right there in front of your eyes, to use a Titorian-Bransonianism.
 
Bramsonian,

Show us some of the future post and just paste them in this thread. Knowing C=ME^2 works would be great but the future post would do just fine also it would spare us all a lot of useless typing to get to the same point in time. For C=ME^2 you showed the secrete in a pervious time line anyhow so what the big deal showing us in this time line I just don’t know what the ramification are; there is non, you done it before and the world did not stop so do it again ok.

Can you at least tell us if this thread has any different from you timeline compared to this one?
 
Okay Designer, then how about this-

Our entire universe exists within the event horizon of a black hole.

Add this to any physics equasion and look at the result.
 
Bramsonian,

Thanks for responding to my question. I think you gave us a lot to think about with such a small statement. It seams to make sense. Going closer or further away from the black hole will probably change the physical constant of our world and everything. It also seems that this world is on a precarious position in which everything can very easily be lost. It would be nice to know how they figure this out is such a short time line from you vantage point of 2040. Thanks for the info. /ttiforum/images/graemlins/smile.gif
 
Hey Bransonian

As titorian 45 wrote in a very early message ...
in this timelime?:hmmmmmmmmmm

"
"C=ME2" is a catch phrase, not a physics formula. It means "E=MC2 inside out" or "first person physics". It states that mass and energy are both quanta of acceleration. This infers a unified field: acceleration. C=ME2 means the entire universe and everything in it are nothing but packets of acceleration- that everything everywhere is nothing but motion (i.e. tensor fields).

Since the universe has no absolutes, it is possible to affect acceleration (fundamental acceleration) and by doing so, traverse within the fourth dimension (in fact time travel is the first of many different things you can do). This is why the universe makes sense regardless of the fact that time is relative- how else could the universe exist but to allow time travel- there is no "universal time" and everything is moving at every concievable speed everywhere (and therefore dialating time) yet "we're all here in the present".

Imagine a universe where time travel is not allowed- everytime a particle accelerated or decelerated, it would pop in and out of reality... quite literally this would not be reality. Since E=MC2, then the opposite MUST also be true- therefore the catch phrase C=ME2.
"

--
regards
http://spaceheroes.org/
 
Recall- The Big Bang was the moment the black hole was created. We are all energy and matter infalling towards the center. It will take trillions of years to reach the center. The universe resembles a paper tower roll and this is how time travel is possible. Now what do you think the only thing that can escape the universe is? /ttiforum/images/graemlins/smile.gif
 
Designer- We are actually not in a precarious situation, we are rather stable. There are several realms above us- realms provide stability. How do you escape the Earth's gravity? By speeding up. How do you escape the solar system? By speeding up more. The galaxy? By speeding up a lot more. See a pattern? Where is all of this speed going? Now look at the accelerated expansion of the universe and ask- what's causing the entire universe to speed up as time goes on all while everything all around is cooling down?

Titorian alluded to all of this and in all honesty, this is obvious once you understand it (as I'm sure you all do now). I have a luxory Titorian did not have- feedback from the future. All you have to do is plug in some equasions and see the proofs yourself-
 
as time speeds by quicker then thought, what makes the crack to go into time?

on less you use time like a razer blade. time speed by. but you and the machine could burn up.

what cools the blade down so you dont burn up? there would have to be other time lines. they cool down the razer. Are you slicing into more then one time line at a time?

this all made sence when i typed it out. lol but if i lost you all. sorry. just wanted to know if i got the picture right or some what right. slighty.
 
Recall- The Big Bang was the moment the black hole was created. We are all energy and matter infalling towards the center. It will take trillions of years to reach the center. The universe resembles a paper tower roll and this is how time travel is possible. Now what do you think the only thing that can escape the universe is?

another blackhole?
 
Bekenstein-Hawking radiation as usual...



Time for a Quiz:

1. The horizon of a black hole is a place where photons can orbit in circular orbits, just skimming the surface without falling in. True or false?
2. If you fall into a black hole, you will be torn apart at the horizon. True or false?
3. You hover just above the horizon of a black hole, dangling an immensely strong fishing line. You dip the line through the horizon. What happens?
4. You, on the outside, watch a person fall through the horizon of a black hole. According to you, the infalling person's watch appears to freeze at the horizon. If you now fall in yourself, you can see the previous infaller actually pass through the horizon. Does this mean that the previous infaller's clock suddenly appears to speed up as you pass through the horizon?
5. As you fall freely into a black hole, you see the entire future of the Universe played out before your eyes. True or false?
6. As you approach the horizon of a black hole, your view of the Universe outside concentrates more and more into a tiny region of the sky just above you. As you pass through the horizon into the black hole, the view contracts to a point and then disappears, leaving you in blackness. True or false?
7. The orbital period of an object in circular orbit about a Schwarzschild (spherical) black hole is exactly equal to the orbital period given by Kepler's third law. True or false?
8. The Schwarzschild metric is invalid inside the horizon of a Schwarzschild black hole. True or false?
9. From the point of view of an outside observer, a star collapsing to a black hole never appears to collapse, but rather freezes at the horizon. How then can it be said that the star collapses to a singularity, if it never appears to collapse even till the end of the Universe?
10. If nothing can escape from a black hole, how can you feel the gravity from it?
11. From the point of view of an outside observer, a person falling into a black hole will never actually be seen to fall in, but will rather appear to freeze at the horizon. Suppose however that the mass of the black hole is increased (by other matter falling in), so that the horizon is enlarged. Will the person then appear to be engulfed by the horizon?
12. X-ray binaries consist of a normal star overflowing on to a companion neutron star or black hole. Is the x-ray emission Hawking radiation?
--
regards
http://www.spaceheroes.org/about.html
 
Quizes are cool.

Time for a Quiz:

1. The horizon of a black hole is a place where photons can orbit in circular orbits, just skimming the surface without falling in. True or false?


False


2. If you fall into a black hole, you will be torn apart at the horizon. True or false?

Trick question.

3. You hover just above the horizon of a black hole, dangling an immensely strong fishing line. You dip the line through the horizon. What happens?

You spread out across the horizin at the same time being compressed into oblivion.


4. You, on the outside, watch a person fall through the horizon of a black hole. According to you, the infalling person's watch appears to freeze at the horizon. If you now fall in yourself, you can see the previous infaller actually pass through the horizon. Does this mean that the previous infaller's clock suddenly appears to speed up as you pass through the horizon?

no


5. As you fall freely into a black hole, you see the entire future of the Universe played out before your eyes. True or false?


sorda true...how you gonna live through it?

6. As you approach the horizon of a black hole, your view of the Universe outside concentrates more and more into a tiny region of the sky just above you. As you pass through the horizon into the black hole, the view contracts to a point and then disappears, leaving you in blackness. True or false?

true

7. The orbital period of an object in circular orbit about a Schwarzschild (spherical) black hole is exactly equal to the orbital period given by Kepler's third law. True or false?

false

8. The Schwarzschild metric is invalid inside the horizon of a Schwarzschild black hole. True or false?


false

9. From the point of view of an outside observer, a star collapsing to a black hole never appears to collapse, but rather freezes at the horizon. How then can it be said that the star collapses to a singularity, if it never appears to collapse even till the end of the Universe?


Because said star will exhibit a whole range of differnt emissions known to singularites and not stars. The star itself will be for all intents and purposes consumed inside the singularity.

10. If nothing can escape from a black hole, how can you feel the gravity from it?

Because gravity is an inward force not an outward force.. The densier mass has more gravity.


11. From the point of view of an outside observer, a person falling into a black hole will never actually be seen to fall in, but will rather appear to freeze at the horizon. Suppose however that the mass of the black hole is increased (by other matter falling in), so that the horizon is enlarged. Will the person then appear to be engulfed by the horizon?


yes


12. X-ray binaries consist of a normal star overflowing on to a companion neutron star or black hole. Is the x-ray emission Hawking radiation?

yes
--
Keep the answers till your ready to grade us all. I am aiming for a C
 
Bransonian,

Our entire universe exists within the event horizon of a black hole.

By the formal definition of a black hole and the formal definition of an event horizon that is an incorrect statement.

Moreover, the current state of cosmology indicates that we live in an open universe, not a closed universe. We appear to be short about 90% of the mass necessary for the Big Crunch. If Hawking is correct and black holes can evaporate through the process of Hawking Radiation then all matter and mass will eventually escape to infinity (the average density of the universe will tend to zero in the limit as delta-t tends to infinity).

This the exact opposite definition of a black hole. It is a descriptiion of asympotically flat space.
 
told ya it made no sense
 
Hi Bransonian.

From which year are you coming from?

Have you been to your future, in 2100, 2200, 2300 so you know some more answers?
 
Bransonian,

If you have truly read this web site before and had these talks before
then why can't you post something someone has said that would verify to that person
you had truly read the site before. Surely SOMETHING original sticks out doesn't it?
Or better yet why cant you post several responses. Surely people would know if they would have typed something similiar.
John always acted like he had read the sites before also but you could actually post what
you know people said.
 
recall,

From the nature of all of the questions I assumed that you were talking about freely falling bodies and that you were refering to a Schwartzschild class BH - mass only with no angular momentum or electric charge.

1. The horizon of a black hole is a place where photons can orbit in circular orbits, just skimming the surface without falling in. True or false?

False.

2. If you fall into a black hole, you will be torn apart at the horizon. True or false?

False. You will be torn apart soon enough. But it won’t happen at the event horizon.

3. You hover just above the horizon of a black hole, dangling an immensely strong fishing line. You dip the line through the horizon. What happens?

If the fishing line is strong enough you will be pulled across the event horizon. If not, it will snap (and you might still fall across the event horizon if you were accelerated when the line was stretched before it snapped).

4. You, on the outside, watch a person fall through the horizon of a black hole. According to you, the infalling person's watch appears to freeze at the horizon. If you now fall in yourself, you can see the previous infaller actually pass through the horizon. Does this mean that the previous infaller's clock suddenly appears to speed up as you pass through the horizon?

No. The in-faller’s radial distance from the singularity will always be less than yours thus the gravitational effect on the in-faller will always be greater than it is on you. His clock will forever appear to run more slowly than yours.


5. As you fall freely into a black hole, you see the entire future of the Universe played out before your eyes. True or false?

False. Now, if you hovered at the EH this could be true. But not if you are free falling.

6. As you approach the horizon of a black hole, your view of the Universe outside concentrates more and more into a tiny region of the sky just above you. As you pass through the horizon into the black hole, the view contracts to a point and then disappears, leaving you in blackness. True or false?

False.

7. The orbital period of an object in circular orbit about a Schwarzschild (spherical) black hole is exactly equal to the orbital period given by Kepler's third law. True or false?

True – though the orbit will be an ellipse of the exact orbital period as given by Kepler’s 3rd Law.

8. The Schwarzschild metric is invalid inside the horizon of a Schwarzschild black hole. True or false?

False.

9. From the point of view of an outside observer, a star collapsing to a black hole never appears to collapse, but rather freezes at the horizon. How then can it be said that the star collapses to a singularity, if it never appears to collapse even till the end of the Universe?

Because it only appears not to collapse. The outside observer only sees the extremely red shifted photons that are forever “trapped” at the horizon. Inside the star does collapse to a singularity in a finite period of time.

10. If nothing can escape from a black hole, how can you feel the gravity from it?

Two possible answers: 1. Gravity, in general relativity, is not mediated by a particle – the graviton. Rather, it is a metric of space-time itself that describes how much it is curved or warped. You “feel” it because the space around you is curved, not that something is escaping from the BH. The other answer is that you are feeling the gravitational effects of the mass that already fell into the hole.


11. From the point of view of an outside observer, a person falling into a black hole will never actually be seen to fall in, but will rather appear to freeze at the horizon. Suppose however that the mass of the black hole is increased (by other matter falling in), so that the horizon is enlarged. Will the person then appear to be engulfed by the horizon?

No. If the hole gains mass and the radius of the horizon expands whatever is seen at the event horizon also expands but remains at the horizon. (Its actually inflation - like the surface of a baloon)

12. X-ray binaries consist of a normal star overflowing on to a companion neutron star or black hole. Is the x-ray emission Hawking radiation?

No. This isn’t the result of Hawking Radiation. The companion star, which has probably left the Main Sequence and has entered the red giant phase of its evolution, is having its matter siphoned off by the neutron star. That matter streams toward the neutron star and “augers in”. It goes into a decaying orbit that forms the accretion disc. As the orbit decays it is accelerated, compressed and heated. As it closely approaches the surface of the neutron star its velocity becomes a high portion of the speed of light. It is so blue shifted that it emits x-rays rather than the visible light spectrum that it was emitting when it left the companion star.
 
Back
Top