Sorry Kerr,
But us engineers finish a task that we start. Peter wanted both barrels...let me give it to him. Here is what Peter stated in the post I am replying to:
I have argued here that line numbers 1, 2, 3, 5, 11, 12, and 13 have been fulfilled within the allotted time windows, but the remaining lines have not. In order for them to be fulfilled, they must appear in major media headlines. Lines 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 have not, and I don't think anyone could argue otherwise.
Now this is going to cause some to LOL, so I suggest putting down anything you are drinking while you are at your computer.... Peter doesn't think anyone could argue otherwise, eh? Well, I wonder what Peter Novak might say if Mr. Peter Novak was willing to argue with the statement above?
Think I am joking???? On 7/11/2009 Peter Novak wrote the following post:
Batting 1000 anyone?
And in that post we read the following:
I don't care how Zeshua is managing to make these successful predictions, but as long she she keeps hitting home runs, I'll keep paying attention. I'm not interested in methodology. I'm only interested in results, and so far, she's batting 1000
So in addition to the things that Kerr has pointed out, now we see Peter Novak falsifying Peter Novak! I really can just step back and let himself implode, can't I? Let's review:
1) Above, we see Peter make the argument that 6 out of 13 of Zeshua's "predictions" in her anagrams have not been fulfilled.
2) By Peter's own admission, and doing the simple math, that means only 7 out of 13 have (allegedly, by Peter) been fulfilled.
3) This equates to a "batting average" of only 0.538.
4) Peter then states that he doesn't think anyone could argue otherwise.
5) But on 7/11 Peter, himself, claimed Zeshua was "batting 1000."
Wow. /ttiforum/images/graemlins/ooo.gif W....O....W! /ttiforum/images/graemlins/tongue.gif
With this humiliation, I would bet Peter really will disappear! He just argued against his own claim! :D
Priceless!
RMT