RainmanTime
Super Moderator
Question #1
1) I like to read newspaper articles on crime. (True/False)
RMT
1) I like to read newspaper articles on crime. (True/False)
RMT
believe me or not, its hard to understand
- Thread starter justhere
- Start date
RainmanTime
Super Moderator
Question #2
Whether you wish to give an expansive response, you should also try to give a "True" or "False" answer so that your position is clear. The expansive response also helps, but if you do not offer True or False then I must assume an answer. For the record, I will assume the answer is "True" for question #1.
2) I do not always tell the truth. (True/False)
RMT
Whether you wish to give an expansive response, you should also try to give a "True" or "False" answer so that your position is clear. The expansive response also helps, but if you do not offer True or False then I must assume an answer. For the record, I will assume the answer is "True" for question #1.
2) I do not always tell the truth. (True/False)
RMT
Warrior381
Temporal Navigator
Re: the questions
In reply to:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cool it rainman keep your self clean and stop asking so many question..listin and learn.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hey Warrior... you do your thing, and I'll do mine. If you have that weak of a mind, and cannot see what is going on "under the covers" here, then that is not my problem. If you wish to buy-into a pre-determined future that is full of gloom, doom, and death, then I feel sorry for you, and you are going to live thru a terrible future. My future will be different, as I will take an active part in formulating it. I am at cause over my universe. Are you? Or are you just at the whim of others who exert their cause?
hey cool it Rainman again........keep your mouth shut and I know your little secret hahahah
are you a time traveler?? are you a sissy?? a coward like other people?? well guess what I know that you don't have a future..you have a same future as me as all other people you don't work for the Goverment and you don't have time machine..so what are you going to do?? noting just sit there and keep your /ttiforum/images/graemlins/ooo.gif mouth shut /ttiforum/images/graemlins/loveit.gifloverboy..hahahhaah
In reply to:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cool it rainman keep your self clean and stop asking so many question..listin and learn.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hey Warrior... you do your thing, and I'll do mine. If you have that weak of a mind, and cannot see what is going on "under the covers" here, then that is not my problem. If you wish to buy-into a pre-determined future that is full of gloom, doom, and death, then I feel sorry for you, and you are going to live thru a terrible future. My future will be different, as I will take an active part in formulating it. I am at cause over my universe. Are you? Or are you just at the whim of others who exert their cause?
hey cool it Rainman again........keep your mouth shut and I know your little secret hahahah
are you a time traveler?? are you a sissy?? a coward like other people?? well guess what I know that you don't have a future..you have a same future as me as all other people you don't work for the Goverment and you don't have time machine..so what are you going to do?? noting just sit there and keep your /ttiforum/images/graemlins/ooo.gif mouth shut /ttiforum/images/graemlins/loveit.gifloverboy..hahahhaah
RainmanTime
Super Moderator
Re: the questions
Bibbidy Boppity Boop!
Ah-ah sqeek, ah-ah snort.
{grunt-grunt-grunt}
Ohhhhh boy! HERE IT COMES!!!
Eeeeeaaahhhhhhhhh!
{Ploop-Splash}
AHHHHHHHHHHH!
Now take your meds, Warrior. Your humor really bores me. I prefer intellectual humor, which it does not appear you are capable of contriving.
Cha-cha, La-La... Oh, is your slip showing, Warrior? Creeds can help you with that! /ttiforum/images/graemlins/devil.gif /ttiforum/images/graemlins/tongue.gif
Get out your translator! You will need it for the above!
RMT
Bibbidy Boppity Boop!
Ah-ah sqeek, ah-ah snort.
{grunt-grunt-grunt}
Ohhhhh boy! HERE IT COMES!!!
Eeeeeaaahhhhhhhhh!
{Ploop-Splash}
AHHHHHHHHHHH!
Now take your meds, Warrior. Your humor really bores me. I prefer intellectual humor, which it does not appear you are capable of contriving.
Cha-cha, La-La... Oh, is your slip showing, Warrior? Creeds can help you with that! /ttiforum/images/graemlins/devil.gif /ttiforum/images/graemlins/tongue.gif
Get out your translator! You will need it for the above!
RMT
RainmanTime
Super Moderator
Re: Question #2
The question was: 2) I do not always tell the truth. (True/False)
Your answer was:
RMT
The question was: 2) I do not always tell the truth. (True/False)
Your answer was:
So by answering FALSE, you are then claiming that you DO always tell the truth! (Please read and answer carefully). Again, I will have to go with your answer (FALSE) which then means you claim to always tell the truth. (Gee, this is going much better and faster than I expected!)
RMT
RainmanTime
Super Moderator
Question #3
3) When someone does me a wrong I feel I should pay him back if I can, just for the principle of the thing. (True/False)
RMT
How about you let me administer the test in the manner it is intended?
3) When someone does me a wrong I feel I should pay him back if I can, just for the principle of the thing. (True/False)
RMT
Re: Question #3
you know what, im feed up with you, go ahead, do not believe what i am saying, im sick of you, you believe that everythign i say is not true, go ahead, i really dont mind, and tell all your little firends as well that im a fake, i REALLY dont care, you are jsut a narrow minded guy who cant get a life or even believe for a second, so you know what, by administareing that test you wont believe me anwyays so why waste both of our times, jsut leave me alone ,and nag on some otehr person you think is fake and leave me here to talk to people who are intrested, for you are just here to use all ytour power to disprove me, leave that for other people to decide wether i am or not, they are grown up to you knw, they dont need you to lead them anywhereby the hand and show them that YOU think
you know what, im feed up with you, go ahead, do not believe what i am saying, im sick of you, you believe that everythign i say is not true, go ahead, i really dont mind, and tell all your little firends as well that im a fake, i REALLY dont care, you are jsut a narrow minded guy who cant get a life or even believe for a second, so you know what, by administareing that test you wont believe me anwyays so why waste both of our times, jsut leave me alone ,and nag on some otehr person you think is fake and leave me here to talk to people who are intrested, for you are just here to use all ytour power to disprove me, leave that for other people to decide wether i am or not, they are grown up to you knw, they dont need you to lead them anywhereby the hand and show them that YOU think
RainmanTime
Super Moderator
Re: Question #3
I asked you to take a personality test. You agreed. You read about the basis of it. We have not even completed question #3 out of 75 questions, and you are already throwing in the towel? That, in and of itself, says a great deal about your personality. And BTW, you might like to know that even in answering two questions you have provided data. Your answer to question #2 certainly shows that you read things at a very superficial level. This indicates a shallow thinker, one who is easily swayed by opinion and not disposed to uncovering facts for themselves.
Power? What power do I have in this forum that you do not also have? Unless you are referring to my intellect, which is another product of my age and experience.
Perhaps we should post-up a poll to see if other forum readers think you should continue to answer questions in the personality test? Would you like to do that or should I?
If you go back and read my initial response to you in this thread, you will see I spelled it out quite plainly to you...and either you ignored it, or you took it at the normally superficial level that you take other things presented to you:
Well done, justhere. You have folded in extremely short order. Now let's see how some others feel about your hoax. Folks?
RMT
I asked you to take a personality test. You agreed. You read about the basis of it. We have not even completed question #3 out of 75 questions, and you are already throwing in the towel? That, in and of itself, says a great deal about your personality. And BTW, you might like to know that even in answering two questions you have provided data. Your answer to question #2 certainly shows that you read things at a very superficial level. This indicates a shallow thinker, one who is easily swayed by opinion and not disposed to uncovering facts for themselves.
Power? What power do I have in this forum that you do not also have? Unless you are referring to my intellect, which is another product of my age and experience.
Perhaps we should post-up a poll to see if other forum readers think you should continue to answer questions in the personality test? Would you like to do that or should I?
If you go back and read my initial response to you in this thread, you will see I spelled it out quite plainly to you...and either you ignored it, or you took it at the normally superficial level that you take other things presented to you:
and
Well done, justhere. You have folded in extremely short order. Now let's see how some others feel about your hoax. Folks?
RMT
Re: Question #3
Hello again Ray.
Allow the TTA to step right in here for a moment. I have a few things to clear up on another thread later on, and I thought I make a quick statement here before I posted there.
In all sincerity Ray, I am sad that you aspire a spiritual path, yet fall short of it every time you get so personal. Really, the wisdom obtained in your goal is lost in it’s pursuits.
There is no need for you to be so vile and cruel to this kid... You’re the only one reacting in a hostile manner to his imagination. What possible harm can he possibly be doing to you?
Yes, I know. Somehow you’ve justified it to being a concept or a form of terrorism.
But please correct me if I’m wrong Ray. But don’t you see a parallel to your own radical behavior, as to those who adamantly and coarsely demand to be heard from others?
I think the one difference is, that you can infer it. Can’t you?
TTA
P.S. Bytheway, I referenced the Offensive Behavior on the Forums thread. Here’s a novel idea, and I know it may be a bit of a challenge for you, but how about posting according to it mandate? Can you do that Ray? Or is fighting mean and nasty with the façade of scientific enlightenment your only approach to hope to win a debate?
Hello again Ray.
Allow the TTA to step right in here for a moment. I have a few things to clear up on another thread later on, and I thought I make a quick statement here before I posted there.
In all sincerity Ray, I am sad that you aspire a spiritual path, yet fall short of it every time you get so personal. Really, the wisdom obtained in your goal is lost in it’s pursuits.
There is no need for you to be so vile and cruel to this kid... You’re the only one reacting in a hostile manner to his imagination. What possible harm can he possibly be doing to you?
Yes, I know. Somehow you’ve justified it to being a concept or a form of terrorism.
But please correct me if I’m wrong Ray. But don’t you see a parallel to your own radical behavior, as to those who adamantly and coarsely demand to be heard from others?
I think the one difference is, that you can infer it. Can’t you?
TTA
P.S. Bytheway, I referenced the Offensive Behavior on the Forums thread. Here’s a novel idea, and I know it may be a bit of a challenge for you, but how about posting according to it mandate? Can you do that Ray? Or is fighting mean and nasty with the façade of scientific enlightenment your only approach to hope to win a debate?
RainmanTime
Super Moderator
Re: Question #3
Well, well. The TTA returns, and this time as the morality enforcer?
Please. Show me where I have called this "kid" any name anywhere near as offensive as what Creedo has called me. Am I "coarse"? You betcha. But in fact, I think there may be some "friends" of yours out there in this forum (and beyond) who might judge you as cruel, or vile, or even hostile. Of course you might deny their judgments... so why should I accept your judgments of myself?
One thing that I wonder is if the TTA (or Javier Cortez) has ever, without permission from the user/owner, hacked into another's computer or computer account? Ethics can run quite deep. I would not presume to judge whether or not you have actually done any hacking, but I think the TTA knows whether or not he has.
Much like yourself, the poster justhere willfully agreed to my questioning, and also much like yourself, he bailed out after only a few questions. And yet you paint this as a judgment on myself? I am simply debunking and seeking to reveal the poster's intentions. Is this illegal, or offensive behavior? If so, then debunkers of the WWW should beware. Maybe we should organize a debunkers rights' protest?
Forgive me Father TTA, for it has been determined (by Father TTA) that I have sinned.
RMT
Well, well. The TTA returns, and this time as the morality enforcer?
Referring to this, are we?
So did this "kid" contact Roel or MOP? But beyond this, I wonder why it is that certain people, such as Creedo, seem to be given a free-pass to be offensive? Yes, indeed, I can certainly take great offense to a lot of the crap that Creedo posts about me. In fact, his response to this very post of yours calls me a fool. Is that not offensive? Perhaps I should report him to MOP? Oh, that's right... I already have...several times... and nothing comes of it. Guess Creedo is "special". And that is an understatement.
So now we judge that debunking is being "vile, cruel, and hostile"? Interesting. And now, with TTA stepping in here, is this an indication that you are ready to divulge that you are now the owner (and perhaps MOP) of TTI? Is that what you are insinuating with this intervention?
Please. Show me where I have called this "kid" any name anywhere near as offensive as what Creedo has called me. Am I "coarse"? You betcha. But in fact, I think there may be some "friends" of yours out there in this forum (and beyond) who might judge you as cruel, or vile, or even hostile. Of course you might deny their judgments... so why should I accept your judgments of myself?
One thing that I wonder is if the TTA (or Javier Cortez) has ever, without permission from the user/owner, hacked into another's computer or computer account? Ethics can run quite deep. I would not presume to judge whether or not you have actually done any hacking, but I think the TTA knows whether or not he has.
Much like yourself, the poster justhere willfully agreed to my questioning, and also much like yourself, he bailed out after only a few questions. And yet you paint this as a judgment on myself? I am simply debunking and seeking to reveal the poster's intentions. Is this illegal, or offensive behavior? If so, then debunkers of the WWW should beware. Maybe we should organize a debunkers rights' protest?
Forgive me Father TTA, for it has been determined (by Father TTA) that I have sinned.
RMT
RainmanTime
Super Moderator
Re: Question #3
I will now go on public record to claim that your first sentence above is offensive to me. You shall be reported to MOP. If you are smart, you will do your normal act of deleting your offensive comments after-the-fact.
Second, and more importantly, your second sentence could clearly be construed as a threat to my personal well-being. Just to clarify, are you threatening me, Creedo?
If there is going to be a Crusade to hold RainmanTime to some given standard, then perhaps what is good for the Goose is also good for the Creedo?
RMT
Creedo,
I will now go on public record to claim that your first sentence above is offensive to me. You shall be reported to MOP. If you are smart, you will do your normal act of deleting your offensive comments after-the-fact.
Second, and more importantly, your second sentence could clearly be construed as a threat to my personal well-being. Just to clarify, are you threatening me, Creedo?
If there is going to be a Crusade to hold RainmanTime to some given standard, then perhaps what is good for the Goose is also good for the Creedo?
RMT
Re: Question #3
Yes Ray, I am back.
For a moment anyway.
Morality enforcer? That's a good one.
I hope you don't think that this means I am suggesting that I am /ttiforum/images/graemlins/smile.gif.
Join the club Ray. I can't say I am too fond of him either.
The facade in wish you use to justify your malevolent approach is not scientific as you claim and want others to believe it is. Nor is it inducive to your spiritual enlightenment, which you also claim to be highly knowledgeable in as well.
So which is it Ray? What do you want to believe, verses what you want others reading your post to believe?
Is this your scientific conclusion Ray, your "hypothesizes?"
Take the post for what it says, not for what you'd wish or think it means.
Ok... what has Creedo called you? I don't know your history with him.
/ttiforum/images/graemlins/confused.gif Do you find this characteristic something to be proud of?
Why would I deny their judgments of me? If they judged me, obviously I might have done something inconsiderate to them, to deserve it.
I've apologized to those I have hurt. Whether they accept it and believe I am sincere is not up to me.
Again, is that your scientific conclusion? Your "hypothesizes?"
Yes, and much like my self, was subject to the description of the character described in my post above.
Seriously Ray... no one knows but you what crawls up your back and feeds you lines to spin this mean spirited nature of yours as something bona fide and justified.
And the intention for that statement was what?
Please don't make this any harder then it needs to be Ray. Swallow that pride without having to lash back childishly. Which also goes to everyone else.
TTA
P.S. Polling is open: http://www.timetravelinstitute.com/ttiforum/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=ttclaims&Number=39681&Forum=ttclaims&Words=TTA_01&Match=Entire%20Phrase&Searchpage=0&Limit=25&Old=1week&Main=18972&Search=true#Post39681
Yes Ray, I am back.
For a moment anyway.
Morality enforcer? That's a good one.
I hope you don't think that this means I am suggesting that I am /ttiforum/images/graemlins/smile.gif.
Join the club Ray. I can't say I am too fond of him either.
The facade in wish you use to justify your malevolent approach is not scientific as you claim and want others to believe it is. Nor is it inducive to your spiritual enlightenment, which you also claim to be highly knowledgeable in as well.
So which is it Ray? What do you want to believe, verses what you want others reading your post to believe?
Is this your scientific conclusion Ray, your "hypothesizes?"
Take the post for what it says, not for what you'd wish or think it means.
Ok... what has Creedo called you? I don't know your history with him.
/ttiforum/images/graemlins/confused.gif Do you find this characteristic something to be proud of?
Why would I deny their judgments of me? If they judged me, obviously I might have done something inconsiderate to them, to deserve it.
I've apologized to those I have hurt. Whether they accept it and believe I am sincere is not up to me.
Again, is that your scientific conclusion? Your "hypothesizes?"
Yes, and much like my self, was subject to the description of the character described in my post above.
Seriously Ray... no one knows but you what crawls up your back and feeds you lines to spin this mean spirited nature of yours as something bona fide and justified.
And the intention for that statement was what?
Please don't make this any harder then it needs to be Ray. Swallow that pride without having to lash back childishly. Which also goes to everyone else.
TTA
P.S. Polling is open: http://www.timetravelinstitute.com/ttiforum/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=ttclaims&Number=39681&Forum=ttclaims&Words=TTA_01&Match=Entire%20Phrase&Searchpage=0&Limit=25&Old=1week&Main=18972&Search=true#Post39681
Warrior381
Temporal Navigator
Re: Question #3
yeah he is a fool....hahahah way to go Creedo299...
say it to rainman..
yeah he is a fool....hahahah way to go Creedo299...
say it to rainman..
RainmanTime
Super Moderator
Re: Question #3
TTA,
I should again make it clear to you that I have studied the TTA quite thoroughly. As long as the TTA is comfortable with someone using the TTA's own tactics on the TTA, then feel free to continue in your comfort.
Yes, perhaps we should talk about purpose. For if my reading of the TTA is correct, the TTA has often told people that he acts in certain ways for specific purposes...most often to "help people learn something about themselves." So (to attempt your own tactic of strawman): Do you wish to deny me my own purpose in taking certain tones, as a means to show you something about yourself?
"That's the trouble with being insincere, you have to make up for it later, and it's so hard when you know you don't want to, but what choice do you have? It's natural to be afraid of the unknown now, but at least your no longer lying to your self and adding to the deception, and that ain't half bad."
"From my knowledge of being capable of doing this, I know that when I enter anothers mind I become that person. I feel what that person is thinking, I don't just know it, I become a part of it and flow with it. "
"if maintaining your façade matters that much to you, why post at all? Ask Pamela, she can attest to how long someone can fool people for so long. In the end, they usually leave because they know they can't keep up the disguise. Just some constructive criticism to make you aware of the reality of the situation."
Obviously by now, if the TTA is astute as he has claimed himself to be in the past, the TTA will see what is transpiring here. May I again remind you that it is you who have initiated this action against me. And I shall not let you, nor the other readers, ever forget this. I learned this tactic from someone whom I have studied in depth.
Interesting how you come back to the forum at this specific time, when I am in the process of debunking the latest person who is attempting to propagate a negative view of the future. Is there some underlying reason for why you have come back now?
RMT
TTA,
I should again make it clear to you that I have studied the TTA quite thoroughly. As long as the TTA is comfortable with someone using the TTA's own tactics on the TTA, then feel free to continue in your comfort.
Why? Does the TTA have a concern about what people think about him, and his actions? It would seem from this statement that the TTA does care about what people think about him.
Ahhh, yes. Classic TTA is what I would call this. You seem to believe yourself to be quite good in directing other people's beliefs for them. For example, in this case you set out only two possibilities. When in reality, no one is bound to accept only one of the two possibilities that you have outlined here. You are aware, I would hope, that there is an entire, infinite range of what I, or others here, may believe about how either you or I act?
Strawman alert. In my studies of the TTA, I have found a preponderance for the usage of the strawman argument. If the TTA is as advanced as he thinks himself to be, then the TTA will understand that one does not respond in kind to strawman arguments. IOW, you are the one coming to conclusions and judgments, and therefore hypothesizing. I have simply asked you a question, and you have slyly (or so you think) avoided answering it by setting up a strawman. Did you think I would not notice this?
You mean like the strawman argument that you have setup? See, you can recognize the tactic when it is used!
Again it would seem that you think you are being sly here. This was a challenge for you to show me where I have called this "kid" an offensive name. If you can't show me such evidence, then why not just admit that your charge is without merit?
I don't believe I ever made that claim, no. But what we see here is yet another attempt for you to shift the purpose of my words. To be frank, the purpose of my words was the "own up" to something about myself that I know is true. In my reading of the TTA, this is something that the TTA has often extolled other people to do. So I am doing this. I am admitting that I am, indeed, course. Do you now have a problem with me owning up to my own words, which are used for my own purpose?
Yes, perhaps we should talk about purpose. For if my reading of the TTA is correct, the TTA has often told people that he acts in certain ways for specific purposes...most often to "help people learn something about themselves." So (to attempt your own tactic of strawman): Do you wish to deny me my own purpose in taking certain tones, as a means to show you something about yourself?
Perhaps a quote is best to reply to this statement from the TTA:
"That's the trouble with being insincere, you have to make up for it later, and it's so hard when you know you don't want to, but what choice do you have? It's natural to be afraid of the unknown now, but at least your no longer lying to your self and adding to the deception, and that ain't half bad."
Again you attempt another strawman. Not going to work with me, friend. I believe what I said was quite clear, and I was purposeful in my use of the lead-in words "One thing that I wonder..." Are you catching on now how your tactics will not work with me?
That would be your opinion, and a judgment if I might add.
Well now... this is quite an admission from the great TTA. I believe I can find statements from the TTA where he crows about his ability to "read people". So here you say "no one knows but you..." Does that mean that you are denying the capability you claim to have in this quote?
"From my knowledge of being capable of doing this, I know that when I enter anothers mind I become that person. I feel what that person is thinking, I don't just know it, I become a part of it and flow with it. "
You are the one who seems to be so good (and quick) at judging others. What does your judgment tell you about this?
Actually, I believe it is you who are making this harder than it needs to be, and that is supported by the fact that you were the one who initiated this apparant attack on me. Do you have a problem with me stating the truth about you here? Wait... perhaps once again the sagely words of the TTA can help us in this quandary:
"if maintaining your façade matters that much to you, why post at all? Ask Pamela, she can attest to how long someone can fool people for so long. In the end, they usually leave because they know they can't keep up the disguise. Just some constructive criticism to make you aware of the reality of the situation."
Obviously by now, if the TTA is astute as he has claimed himself to be in the past, the TTA will see what is transpiring here. May I again remind you that it is you who have initiated this action against me. And I shall not let you, nor the other readers, ever forget this. I learned this tactic from someone whom I have studied in depth.
Interesting how you come back to the forum at this specific time, when I am in the process of debunking the latest person who is attempting to propagate a negative view of the future. Is there some underlying reason for why you have come back now?
RMT