POSTED DATE 7/19/203 SEPARATE FROM THIS THREAD, REPLY TO DARBY:
I feel some of the reporting in the threads offered is interesting.
This may be what is known as a parallax conversation, which is a race-mouse by its own nature, within another time?
The points of technology that they do not understand, and this level of change is only to have occurred in the past few years, is that one does not need length momentumed velocity, although this does occur, in order to change time.
The product of time can be changed in station, by the wiggle concept, where a shell is formed and at C velocities, which are either overpumped in amplitude, or strength occur within this shell, or possibly some facet of super C itself, might and I say might be established within the time shell itself.
This was a common misunderstanding in such physics discussions boards, as Askme.com and physics use-nets a few years back, as the old train near 99 percent of C or near light speed were used.
These analogies were always forwarded, where a train at 99% of C would be a stage to where a second beam of light could be reflected to super exceed C which was an attempt to supercede C, as a special frame within a frame to exceed Cs natural velocity?
This did not work, as in accelerating C, all frames of reference become co-joined and relative, due to mass feld effect.
They tried and tried however did not succeed this.
>The wiggle concept is such that overtensored or overpumped values of C are only sought in microangstrom lengths, so therefore the concurrent value of mass in motion at relatively long lengths of distance, are now subject to exclusionary principles?
This means simply to exceed the holding velocity of mass field time effect, that C within its own special man-made velocity or stile, must be fashioned to a specialized locale or design, in order to either plus or minus with reference to time travel.
The professing of a supposed quality known as prions also said as chrono-particles, means that if one can effect a sphere of shape to escape a local in time mass field, then one can center on these time particles, system boss these particles and then use them for a way to time travel precisely?
>Darby' do you feel these postings above, are the beginnings of said John Titor or in some way connected to this era of time traveler?
>Other points offered;It is said in Barbara Marciniack's works, that our central sun, has mild variable tendencies.
In the Nancy Lieder web site, there is the appearance said now, of a brown dwarf known as Planet X.
I don't know if there is any connection to our natural central sun and this dwarf star.
If our central sun went nova, all life on Earth would be wiped out.
The content on these post is to say the least, interesting.
>Thank you Darby and thank you Tran 001, for your comments on chronotrons.