Defying Zeshua
I see Peter has again been promulgating lies with respect to the Zeshua hoax. And note where he uses words to indicate the authority of his words. Does Peter speak to Yeshua...err, I mean Zeshua? I think not.
I know there may be some here who rely upon my interpretations of Peter's actions as he continues his game. For example, we saw how Peter tried to change the rules in claiming that "Demongs Former Jig Jug" was not really an anagram. I followed that up by pointing out exactly what he was doing, and how this was a reaction to my cornering him. Now we see that he has revised some of his other anagram predictions. But "Demons Former Jig Jug" still eludes him. He cannot solve it for the life of him. Or perhaps, as I have also suggested in the past, he HAS solved it but the solution does not fit his model for where he wants to take this hoax. So we see another stopgap measure by Peter to try to assert authority once again with respect to the solution to this anagram:
Zeshua has requested no such thing. Is it not clear that Peter is trying to plug a hole in the dyke before it grows into a torrent? Furthermore we see how he has "set the rules" once again, this time making it easy on himself. Once some event occurs that may fit the letters of "Demons Former Jig Jug" Peter will then return to Zeshua's "Blast From The Past" thread and claim this was the solution to the anagram all along. But me, I like to "Eff" with people. I've been probing and provoking Peter in his game, and he just ignores me. But I know others are reading and not ignoring me. Based on the PMs I have received, I can tell that people know that I can see right through Peter's game. And so now, with Peter's new rule that "Zeshua has requested that the solution to line ten be withheld from public forums until after the fact", I guess that means I now have an opportunity to "Eff" with Zeshua, the "prophet". So I will. There are various solutions to "Demons Former Jig Jug", and much like the solutions I have pointed out for "A Renaissance Pi Melts", one solution is clearly related to a general truth about something that has already happened. We have lost many brave soliders in Iraq and Afghanistan. Another solution relates to something that could occur, and is even based on a common conspiracy theory that describes covert US government operations in narcotics trafficking in Afghanistan. Still another solution relates activities that a major US company will undertake to reinvigorate its competitiveness in the global marketplace. The question is: Which solution should I reveal first?
I have developed a deliberate plan for how these solutions can and will be revealed. This plan presupposes several actions that Peter can take. Indeed the actions taken by Peter will set the order with which I reveal these solutions and their pertinence to the Zeshua hoax. This is in the best traditions of a cunning chess player: Select at least two win strategies, and allow the moves of your opponent to select which win strategy you follow. So here I am even giving Peter a brief look at my poker hand. That should clearly establish that I know I will beat him in his game, and am so confident in this that I am essentially telegraphing my strategies to him. If Peter were really brilliant, he might even consider that I have "encoded" other pieces of my strategies in some of my replies on this forum. So allow me to get the ball rolling by supplying (for an unknown period of time) one of the solutions that Zeshua claims to not want in the public domain:
<font color="white">Judge Joins GM Reform.[/COLOR]
I see Peter has again been promulgating lies with respect to the Zeshua hoax. And note where he uses words to indicate the authority of his words. Does Peter speak to Yeshua...err, I mean Zeshua? I think not.
I know there may be some here who rely upon my interpretations of Peter's actions as he continues his game. For example, we saw how Peter tried to change the rules in claiming that "Demongs Former Jig Jug" was not really an anagram. I followed that up by pointing out exactly what he was doing, and how this was a reaction to my cornering him. Now we see that he has revised some of his other anagram predictions. But "Demons Former Jig Jug" still eludes him. He cannot solve it for the life of him. Or perhaps, as I have also suggested in the past, he HAS solved it but the solution does not fit his model for where he wants to take this hoax. So we see another stopgap measure by Peter to try to assert authority once again with respect to the solution to this anagram:
Zeshua has requested that the solution to line ten be withheld from public forums until after the fact. Once the event occurs, and the pertinent words are in all the headlines, I'm sure some bright reader here will remember this strange line and finally decipher it.
Zeshua has requested no such thing. Is it not clear that Peter is trying to plug a hole in the dyke before it grows into a torrent? Furthermore we see how he has "set the rules" once again, this time making it easy on himself. Once some event occurs that may fit the letters of "Demons Former Jig Jug" Peter will then return to Zeshua's "Blast From The Past" thread and claim this was the solution to the anagram all along. But me, I like to "Eff" with people. I've been probing and provoking Peter in his game, and he just ignores me. But I know others are reading and not ignoring me. Based on the PMs I have received, I can tell that people know that I can see right through Peter's game. And so now, with Peter's new rule that "Zeshua has requested that the solution to line ten be withheld from public forums until after the fact", I guess that means I now have an opportunity to "Eff" with Zeshua, the "prophet". So I will. There are various solutions to "Demons Former Jig Jug", and much like the solutions I have pointed out for "A Renaissance Pi Melts", one solution is clearly related to a general truth about something that has already happened. We have lost many brave soliders in Iraq and Afghanistan. Another solution relates to something that could occur, and is even based on a common conspiracy theory that describes covert US government operations in narcotics trafficking in Afghanistan. Still another solution relates activities that a major US company will undertake to reinvigorate its competitiveness in the global marketplace. The question is: Which solution should I reveal first?
I have developed a deliberate plan for how these solutions can and will be revealed. This plan presupposes several actions that Peter can take. Indeed the actions taken by Peter will set the order with which I reveal these solutions and their pertinence to the Zeshua hoax. This is in the best traditions of a cunning chess player: Select at least two win strategies, and allow the moves of your opponent to select which win strategy you follow. So here I am even giving Peter a brief look at my poker hand. That should clearly establish that I know I will beat him in his game, and am so confident in this that I am essentially telegraphing my strategies to him. If Peter were really brilliant, he might even consider that I have "encoded" other pieces of my strategies in some of my replies on this forum. So allow me to get the ball rolling by supplying (for an unknown period of time) one of the solutions that Zeshua claims to not want in the public domain:
<font color="white">Judge Joins GM Reform.[/COLOR]