I am (hopefully) not going to derail this thread too much, but I feel a serious need to address this. We are not able to blow up the sun. No nulcear weapons we have can do that. A "sunbuster" weapon is the realm of deep, deep science fiction. But other than laying any worries to rest, since I teach science, it is a bit of a thing with me that I feel it important to correct some powerful misunderstandings you seem to have about basic physics.
Consolidation of my own statement.Fission is the seconadry process of an atom bomb.So then according to textbooks on nuclear physics, the fusion used to start a nuclear weapon, would be the pre-primary state to rapid chain heavy atomic materials before complete fission.
Fission is when you split (big and unstable) atoms. Fusion is when you merge two (small) atoms together. The process you mention uses fission (which is easier to achieve with modern tools) to start a fusion reaction to make a bomb blow up. Fission first, fusion second, not the other way around.
In the making of the Czar Bomba, the largest atomic weapon ever set off,
The mushroom cloud topped out at 64km (40mi) altitude. While that is very high, "space" is typically considered the Karman line, at 100km (62mi) altitude. There is no definitive border of space/not space, though. The bomb expends its potential energy in the explosion, there is no energy that is not allowed to escape that way (I assume that is what you mean by "shunts"?)
The rest of the energy would be shunted extra to this dimension.So this would automatically mean another level of reality transmission of all of the energy set off in that primary tenth of a second blast.Since this give off of energy is thought to be extra scalar, then this energy would have to seek a mass in space of the greatest extra scalar coordinates.
As stated, the bomb goes off, it releases the energy. I have no idea what "rest" there is, it makes no real sense. And there is no energy seeking mass, and I'm not sure you are using the term "scalar" correctly (I also teach math).
This is said by the in-back of XYZ axis, or by the process of worm hole mechanics, this energy would be ferried into the Earth's central sun.
Just no. Plain no. There is no science or even logical conclusions in that. Who told you any of this?
Since this energy given off by A-bomb blast is fission and not fusion. Then there lies the problem of gross electromagnetic radiation signature to which the central sun could not readily accept.This would be so, as the sun's primary burn mechanics, is based on the principle of a fusion upwelling convection burn processes.
The bomb does not give off either fission or fusion energy. Fission and fusion are the processes by which it creates the energy. It gives off shockwaves, EMP, and various kinds of radiation. And any electromagnetic radiation is abosultely *nothing* compared to that which is given off by the sun (electromagnetic radiation is also known as light).
This energy would cross track the general acceptance energy manifold of this systems central sun
No. Again, just... no. Even the Tsar Bomb only had a blast radius of 8 km (5 mi). The Earth has a diameter of over 12.000 km. Not even all the nukes in history could crack the Earth. The sun has a diameter more than 100 times that. No amount of Earthly nukes can cause it any kind of dysfunction/malfunction.
This is as simple as I can possibly break it down for anybody.
It is also immensely wrong. I do not believe you have studied the physics, or the basic astronomy of this, at all. Where do you even get any of this from??
This post was to answer a challenge point.If you believe something else would happen, then this is your right to do so.
No challenge, you are just plainly wrong, and quite spectacularly so. I made the post to keep others from worrying that nuclear weapons might damage the sun, which is an insane idea to begin with.
Sources, enter in search words, extra scalar energy.
I did, just for funsies. As expected, Google had no idea what "extra scalar energy" is. If you translated it with Google Translate, it might have come out wrong. Let me know the original term, maybe I can find out the exact translation.
To be exact what cause the sun to become bogged down as a result of a nuclear weapons exchange, is given in the following example.
Your example makes very little sense, but I think it is a language barrier. I speak a few languages, what is your native one? Perhaps I can understand it better that way. Otherwise, you just cut 1/4 out of a sphere and told me the inside was an area (do you mean its volume?), then called it "space and time".
Then this percentage would be the amount of energy that would wormhole into the sun's operating.However the actual percentage would more than likely be at about half the value of the primary detonation.
You have no basis for this, scientific or otherwise. I don't think you know what wormholes are, or how astrophysics or physics work at even the simplest scale. Or else, you are simply making *massive* jumps in your explanations.
**Here is what the problem is with a lot of nuclear explosions going on.Inside of the nuclear fireball. What that primary ignition to burn action is made from, are elements of a very heavy nature.
Yes, typically uranium or plutonium, IIRC.
Heavier than naturally found in nature.
No, uranium is mined. Look up "uranium mining".
So what occurs, as with a lens, is that the now formed cloud of nuclear energy is doped with heavier than normal radioactive molecules, which make up the constituency, of this atomic cloud, now shoved into the once normal sun.
I don't think you know how lenses work, or you left something important out. And nothing is being shoved into the sun. It is very far away.
What varies here, is that this material is way heavier than the sun's own liquid like constituency, which is said to be near the consistency of bathtub water.The two differing elements cannot coexist, as their atomic molar weights are differing and this relations as held in a very sharp contract.
I don't think you know how physics work. There is plenty of heavy materials in the sun and other stars, it goes to the core because of gravity. That is why stars burn out, i.e. when their cores get filled up with things too heavy for them to fuse by fusion. Also, I never heard the comparison with bathtub water (which I don't believe is different from other water?), but it sounds very wrong. And things of different molar weight coexist all the time. Otherwise, everything would go pop and disappear.
To a human, this would be similar to someone supplying a person with carbon dioxide to breath, over the normal regular to human's breathable air.
No, it wouldn't. I believe you either don't know how the sun, breathing, or carbon dioxide work. One of them, at least.
The sun would now labor to this newly introduced element, but would not as a part of its own normal functioning dynamics, be able to tolerate this new form of gas matter.
No. Sun big. Earth small. Tsar bomb tiny, on that scale. Also, sun far, far away. If somehow heavy elements were hurled into the sun from nuclear explosions (they won't be, but let's pretend), they would fall into the star core and stay there. You would need an unbelievable amount to affect the sun. In fact, the entire Earth dropping into the sun would not seriously harm it. The sun is more than 99% of all matter in the solar system, and the Earth is *not* a big part of what's left.
The sun would react violently and this is the mechanism probably at the crux, as to why a full scale nuclear exchange would drastically effect the regular functioning the the sun's internal process.
No. It would affect the sun as much as it would affect you or me that someone set of a firecracker. On Mars.
Taking this back to the very first T Zero one millionth of a second after the central plutonium core is crushed. In that femto-second, the encompassment of nature knows that by an established physical function, that not all of the bombs energy can be stored in only one dimension.
Good thing we live in three dimensions, then. Or do you mean dimension as in multiverse theory? Because in that case, all its energy fits very neatly in our dimension.
A wormhole hole allowing grossly heavier matter, must be opened in order to allow this material to escape.
No. Can you even write that without laughing? Sorry to be a bit dickish, but this is so far beyond any kind of rational thinking that I think you are quoting someone who is on very nasty drugs. If it is a friend, please help them get the proper care...
By laws of mass gravity attraction based in the request of size, generating gravity over less size.This as based in the laws of less mass attraction, then this energy travels direly into the sun.This entire process of contaminating the central sun, all goes under the heading of doped energy clouds as indexed in atomic molecular weights.Pinter
I don't think you know how gravity works, and I have never said that to anyone before. Also, most of what you write honestly sounds like someone rolling a set of dice on a list of technobabble. None of it has any real base in anything, not even pseudoscience, and you are using almost every term completely wrong. At the beginning, I was ready to assume it was a translation problem, but I am now pretty sure you just have absolutely zero idea what you're talking about, and may in fact be trolling. I do respect a good attempt at scientific trolling, but this is not a good attempt. If you have some actual science to show me, go ahead, because you clearly need someone to help you with the details (which is common. Science is hard and often a mess). But what you write here is beyond the hallucinations of tinfoil hat LSD trips gone horribly wrong near a sixth grade physics textbook.For anything else, I have no intention of continuing this particular debate. You clearly have some serious misgivings about... a lot, and if you are capable of even believing this, I can do nothing. I just want everyone to understand quite clearly, that no nuclear war on this or any other planet will make *sigh* the sun explode */sigh*