chronohistorian
Dimensional Traveler
Re: The chronopsychologist speaks again
Never understood most of that and you never answered my question.
Never understood most of that and you never answered my question.
My first post
- Thread starter Razimus
- Start date
Transient001
Quantum Scribe
Re: The chronopsychologist speaks again
Chroni
I never thought you had asked one.
Please ask me again I shall answer, for I always answer a question.
Until later becomes now or as it would be said in 500 years into the future
Unta becklat ayor....
Chroni
I never thought you had asked one.
Please ask me again I shall answer, for I always answer a question.
Until later becomes now or as it would be said in 500 years into the future
Unta becklat ayor....
chronohistorian
Dimensional Traveler
Re: The chronopsychologist speaks again
When what I say comes true will you believe me then?
if not then why?
When what I say comes true will you believe me then?
if not then why?
Transient001
Quantum Scribe
Re: The chronopsychologist speaks again
Chroni
I do not tend to believe things o9n a whim. I am also not trying to make you make a believer out of me. I simply want to understand certain aspects of your story.
For example, you being 16 years old and claiming to be a time traveler.
The topic about your quantum signature and the fact that you are simply trying to boost your ego by having us reply to you constantly, I might even say that you gather round your PC with all your friends to see what the gullibble wrote this time.
Signing out from your threads Michael
Until later becomes now.
Chroni
I do not tend to believe things o9n a whim. I am also not trying to make you make a believer out of me. I simply want to understand certain aspects of your story.
For example, you being 16 years old and claiming to be a time traveler.
The topic about your quantum signature and the fact that you are simply trying to boost your ego by having us reply to you constantly, I might even say that you gather round your PC with all your friends to see what the gullibble wrote this time.
Signing out from your threads Michael
Until later becomes now.
creedo299
Epochal Historian
Re: The chronopsychologist speaks again
Chrono as a mathematical formula:
Either Chrono does or does not come from the future?
If chrono sits infront of a television and is insistent on this, then this is one part of his primary mission.
This is all people needs to know is that Chrono sits infront of televisions sets and also watches people.
The problem with Chrono's presence, is that he like supposed John Titor variants the past, in the formula of time travel, where someone comes from the future, and states that they are from the future, then they change the past.
If this is so, then Chronohistorian has willfully changed the past, is purposely subject to time travel authority enforcements.
Pamela said to me, that I'm trying to ruin everything, however let's say that John Titor was real?
By new evidence, then whether I would try to be goofing things upon or not, in reference to said Johhn Titor, would make little or no difference at all.
So mathematically by the process of elimination, then if Chronohistorian is the second enforcement sent back in time.And this sending was to add verification that what John Toitor said was true; hinting at a catastrophe in the past, as it is perceived that the legend of John Titor existed, then it would not be necessary for Chronohistorian to appear at all.
John Titor would have been sufficient enough.
The appearance of Chronohistroian, at all, valid or not in this relative time, would go against the axiom, that people's wills, affect the outcome of the future.
So any appearance of Chronohistorian at this relative time, would therefore be deemed un-necessary?
The future will be what people's will makes it to be. However, by coming back in time to publicly enforce an idea, does not yield the prospective outcome proposed by the future.
This is since those in the past might go against it; instead this presence always offers a variant timeline, that neither the people of the past, or those in the future desire?This is as both outcomes by random chance numbers within Monticarlo sets, of timelines, always being variable, then cancel each other out and the timelines split.
So Chronohistorian never came here to begin with.
If he did, then he would have varaited his own future and even the machine that sent him here, so dooming himself to true nonexistence.
If the future is set by natural action and the past is also, then the difference between the two, must always compensate for a felony, which a known time traveler creates.
Chrono as a mathematical formula:
Either Chrono does or does not come from the future?
If chrono sits infront of a television and is insistent on this, then this is one part of his primary mission.
This is all people needs to know is that Chrono sits infront of televisions sets and also watches people.
The problem with Chrono's presence, is that he like supposed John Titor variants the past, in the formula of time travel, where someone comes from the future, and states that they are from the future, then they change the past.
If this is so, then Chronohistorian has willfully changed the past, is purposely subject to time travel authority enforcements.
Pamela said to me, that I'm trying to ruin everything, however let's say that John Titor was real?
By new evidence, then whether I would try to be goofing things upon or not, in reference to said Johhn Titor, would make little or no difference at all.
So mathematically by the process of elimination, then if Chronohistorian is the second enforcement sent back in time.And this sending was to add verification that what John Toitor said was true; hinting at a catastrophe in the past, as it is perceived that the legend of John Titor existed, then it would not be necessary for Chronohistorian to appear at all.
John Titor would have been sufficient enough.
The appearance of Chronohistroian, at all, valid or not in this relative time, would go against the axiom, that people's wills, affect the outcome of the future.
So any appearance of Chronohistorian at this relative time, would therefore be deemed un-necessary?
The future will be what people's will makes it to be. However, by coming back in time to publicly enforce an idea, does not yield the prospective outcome proposed by the future.
This is since those in the past might go against it; instead this presence always offers a variant timeline, that neither the people of the past, or those in the future desire?This is as both outcomes by random chance numbers within Monticarlo sets, of timelines, always being variable, then cancel each other out and the timelines split.
So Chronohistorian never came here to begin with.
If he did, then he would have varaited his own future and even the machine that sent him here, so dooming himself to true nonexistence.
If the future is set by natural action and the past is also, then the difference between the two, must always compensate for a felony, which a known time traveler creates.
chronohistorian
Dimensional Traveler
Re: The chronopsychologist speaks again
Transient001-when did I say I was 16?
you still have not answered my question.
creedo299-I am hardly going to change the future going onto a forum with hardly anyone replying or even reading.
Transient001-when did I say I was 16?
you still have not answered my question.
creedo299-I am hardly going to change the future going onto a forum with hardly anyone replying or even reading.
trollface
Quantum Scribe
Re: The chronopsychologist speaks again
Let's put it this way, it's a very sad lookout for you if you're older - both in terms of your confabulist tendancies, and with regards to your poor communication skills. If you are older than 16, then you should be thoroughly embarrassed by your actions.
Never heard of the Butterfly effect, eh?
Let's put it this way, it's a very sad lookout for you if you're older - both in terms of your confabulist tendancies, and with regards to your poor communication skills. If you are older than 16, then you should be thoroughly embarrassed by your actions.
Never heard of the Butterfly effect, eh?
chronohistorian
Dimensional Traveler
Re: The chronopsychologist speaks again
I am 22.
butterfly effect=doing something on one side of the world and because of that something else happens in another part of the world?
if I am correct then that is a stupid analogy
I am 22.
butterfly effect=doing something on one side of the world and because of that something else happens in another part of the world?
if I am correct then that is a stupid analogy
trollface
Quantum Scribe
Re: The chronopsychologist speaks again
Then you should know better by now. And you should know more.
Nope. And it's a one of the fundamental principals of time travel. You're a time traveller and you've never heard of it?
It's not an analogy. It's a scientific principal.
Then you should know better by now. And you should know more.
Nope. And it's a one of the fundamental principals of time travel. You're a time traveller and you've never heard of it?
It's not an analogy. It's a scientific principal.
chronohistorian
Dimensional Traveler
Re: The chronopsychologist speaks again
ok then explain the butterfly effect
ok then explain the butterfly effect
trollface
Quantum Scribe
Re: The chronopsychologist speaks again
http://www.cmp.caltech.edu/~mcc/chaos_new/Lorenz.html
http://www.fortunecity.com/emachines/e11/86/beffect.html
http://www.cmp.caltech.edu/~mcc/chaos_new/Lorenz.html
http://www.fortunecity.com/emachines/e11/86/beffect.html
chronohistorian
Dimensional Traveler
Re: The chronopsychologist speaks again
from fortune city:
"the notion of a butterfly flapping it's wings in one area of the world,causing a tornado or some such weather event to occur in another remote area of the world"
which is what I meant.
from fortune city:
"the notion of a butterfly flapping it's wings in one area of the world,causing a tornado or some such weather event to occur in another remote area of the world"
which is what I meant.
creedo299
Epochal Historian
Re: The chronopsychologist speaks again
And Chrono and Trollface bawl and fight like two tom cats, till they roll of the edge of the wall and land in the bushes.
Honey' there is a glass of milk in the refrigerator.
Get yourself something and return to the living room and do what you were doing.
And Chrono and Trollface bawl and fight like two tom cats, till they roll of the edge of the wall and land in the bushes.
Honey' there is a glass of milk in the refrigerator.
Get yourself something and return to the living room and do what you were doing.
chronohistorian
Dimensional Traveler
Re: The chronopsychologist speaks again
trollface-you won't come out on top because you might be gay but I aren't
trollface-you won't come out on top because you might be gay but I aren't
trollface
Quantum Scribe
Re: The chronopsychologist speaks again
Wow, it took you that long to come up with a come-back, and then it's a weak homophobic jibe? So tolerance isn't something that's changed in the future, then? People are still small-minded little bigots, obviously. I tell you, my opinion of you wan't very high before, but now it's sunk even further. I thought you were out of your depth. Now I think you're a mean-spirited, nasty, hatemongering, bigoted, close-minded, prejudiced, insecure boy who is in out of his depth. You've certainly destroyed any slight credibility you might have had as an academic, if you can't debate without resorting to such underhand ineffective tactics.
Anyway, as you meant that as an insult, I have to ask you, how do you know that I'm not gay? How do you know that I would consider being gay something to be ashamed of? Maybe you should explain to me, right now, what is wrong with being gay?
Wow, it took you that long to come up with a come-back, and then it's a weak homophobic jibe? So tolerance isn't something that's changed in the future, then? People are still small-minded little bigots, obviously. I tell you, my opinion of you wan't very high before, but now it's sunk even further. I thought you were out of your depth. Now I think you're a mean-spirited, nasty, hatemongering, bigoted, close-minded, prejudiced, insecure boy who is in out of his depth. You've certainly destroyed any slight credibility you might have had as an academic, if you can't debate without resorting to such underhand ineffective tactics.
Anyway, as you meant that as an insult, I have to ask you, how do you know that I'm not gay? How do you know that I would consider being gay something to be ashamed of? Maybe you should explain to me, right now, what is wrong with being gay?
chronohistorian
Dimensional Traveler
Re: The chronopsychologist speaks again
trollface-actually that was the first time I saw what you wrote
In the future people don't mind having jokes about them. we still accept people for who they are.
sometimes insulting people can be good but not always. I forgot that in this time people are too stressed and get mad over anything.
There is nothing wrong with being gay. gay people are just normal people. they are as strong as anyone else
trollface-actually that was the first time I saw what you wrote
In the future people don't mind having jokes about them. we still accept people for who they are.
sometimes insulting people can be good but not always. I forgot that in this time people are too stressed and get mad over anything.
There is nothing wrong with being gay. gay people are just normal people. they are as strong as anyone else
trollface
Quantum Scribe
Re: The chronopsychologist speaks again
What? With regards to what?
Oh dear, oh dear. I've got a friend who is the co-owner and mod of another board. she's goping for her PhD in Psychology, and recently posted a list of 5 classic excuses used by people, why they don't work logically, or as excuses and made them relevent to the board that she owns. Let me just quote two of them here, both of which you've just invoked. I'm not entirely sure of the rules here regarding bad language, so I'll censor some words:
In other words, it's a weak excuse, which is clearly valueless. I suppose, however, the the childish route is the one I should have expected you to take.
Anyway, I thought you said that in the duture you only joked about aliens, and that we wouldn't understand your humour in this time line? Yes, I may be gay in your estimation, but my memory works just fine. That's another contradiction we can add to your score.
It's just that being called gay is an insult, huh? How is that accepting? That's homophobic.
Are we talking about the issues of personal boundries? I don't believe that this will have changed in the future. I've got black friends that I can call any ethnic slur under the sun. However, I'd not be stupid enough to call a black stranger any names. There are certain things that you earn. I don't believe that that will have changed in the future, and I certainly don't think you believed that we were on chummy terms so that you could insult me willy-nilly and it's all be a good laugh.
No, you deliberately tried to insult me using a homophobic slur, and no amout of after-the-fact, weak justification is going to alter that. You have two choices, really. You can be mature, apologise and acknowledge that you were wrong to say that (and do not give me any of your twaddle about cultural differences, be a man and take full responsability for yourself), or you can keep flapping about scrabbling for lame excuses to try to cover your actions.
I am neither stressed nor mad. I don't have a high enough opinion of your or your opinions to be offended by anything you might say, and even if I did, as I've said, I wouldn't consider that an insult in any case.
I'm merely pointing out that homophobic jibes aren't exactly good debating tools, and that all you've done is paint yourself as an even bigger fool than you already have, and you've added malice and intolerance to your repatoire. I don't care if you're a homophobe, it just makes you an unpleasent and small-minded individual.
They're just as strong, eh? If there's nothing wrong with it, then why would it be an insult?
Grow up, and stop making excuses for yourself.
What? With regards to what?
Oh dear, oh dear. I've got a friend who is the co-owner and mod of another board. she's goping for her PhD in Psychology, and recently posted a list of 5 classic excuses used by people, why they don't work logically, or as excuses and made them relevent to the board that she owns. Let me just quote two of them here, both of which you've just invoked. I'm not entirely sure of the rules here regarding bad language, so I'll censor some words:
In other words, it's a weak excuse, which is clearly valueless. I suppose, however, the the childish route is the one I should have expected you to take.
Anyway, I thought you said that in the duture you only joked about aliens, and that we wouldn't understand your humour in this time line? Yes, I may be gay in your estimation, but my memory works just fine. That's another contradiction we can add to your score.
It's just that being called gay is an insult, huh? How is that accepting? That's homophobic.
Are we talking about the issues of personal boundries? I don't believe that this will have changed in the future. I've got black friends that I can call any ethnic slur under the sun. However, I'd not be stupid enough to call a black stranger any names. There are certain things that you earn. I don't believe that that will have changed in the future, and I certainly don't think you believed that we were on chummy terms so that you could insult me willy-nilly and it's all be a good laugh.
No, you deliberately tried to insult me using a homophobic slur, and no amout of after-the-fact, weak justification is going to alter that. You have two choices, really. You can be mature, apologise and acknowledge that you were wrong to say that (and do not give me any of your twaddle about cultural differences, be a man and take full responsability for yourself), or you can keep flapping about scrabbling for lame excuses to try to cover your actions.
I am neither stressed nor mad. I don't have a high enough opinion of your or your opinions to be offended by anything you might say, and even if I did, as I've said, I wouldn't consider that an insult in any case.
I'm merely pointing out that homophobic jibes aren't exactly good debating tools, and that all you've done is paint yourself as an even bigger fool than you already have, and you've added malice and intolerance to your repatoire. I don't care if you're a homophobe, it just makes you an unpleasent and small-minded individual.
They're just as strong, eh? If there's nothing wrong with it, then why would it be an insult?
Grow up, and stop making excuses for yourself.
Re: The chronopsychologist speaks again
OK, then give us more details, if you can, about the gay situation and communities of the future.
Now that gay marriages are increasingly authorized and popular, one could assume that in the future, they become an integral part of society, possibly with cloned offsprings, etc....
How exactly are they considered in your time?
And, one more thing, can you do me a small favour and stop saying I aren't? You seem to have a difficulty with this one in particular...
You say you are 22, dear Chrono, and old enough by now to be able to conjugate this verb...
Is it OK for you to speak like this in your time?
Basic reminder:
I am , you are, he/she is
I am not, you are not, he/she is not
So, when you refer to yourself in the (present) future, you may want to say: you may be gay but I am not (not I aren't).....do you understand? Are you sure? (and don't answer, yes I are, please)
OK, then give us more details, if you can, about the gay situation and communities of the future.
Now that gay marriages are increasingly authorized and popular, one could assume that in the future, they become an integral part of society, possibly with cloned offsprings, etc....
How exactly are they considered in your time?
And, one more thing, can you do me a small favour and stop saying I aren't? You seem to have a difficulty with this one in particular...
You say you are 22, dear Chrono, and old enough by now to be able to conjugate this verb...
Is it OK for you to speak like this in your time?
Basic reminder:
I am , you are, he/she is
I am not, you are not, he/she is not
So, when you refer to yourself in the (present) future, you may want to say: you may be gay but I am not (not I aren't).....do you understand? Are you sure? (and don't answer, yes I are, please)