My claim is based on logic deduction from the john titor postings and I referenced some of the posts in post one of this thread. There are more posts that point to the same thing.
I, for one, would love to see your logical deduction. It is a very formal process, as I would think you should be aware. If you lay it out for others it should be able to be factually verified.
http://bovination.com/cbs/logicalDeduction.jsp
Perhaps the most important part of logical induction you should keep in mind when analyzing the Titor hoax is the following:
"Note that just because it derived this way doesn't make it true."
Of course, if all this is just your belief which really cannot be supported by a proper logical deduction, then there is probably little hope for ever convincing you that it is a non-sequitor, even if it actually is. Here is a logical deduction that you may wish to take into consideration:
Non-specific statements can be applied to many specific events. Titor's story contained many non-specific statements. Therefore, Titor's story can be applied to many specific events.
Q.E.D.