I am a time traveler from 2015

this particular time traveler claims it isn't possible to predict the future due to the uncertainty principle.
Which is a misstatement of the Uncertainty Principle. The Uncertainty Principle has nothing to do with prediction of anything. It deals with the inability to simultaneously state to an arbitary degree of certainty the current, not future, quantum state of two or more non-commutating physical properties of a subatomic particle, such as its momentum and position. Obviously, if you can't determine the exact current state then you can't predict the exact future state beased on your current knowledge. Given a large enough system, however, you can make reasonably accurate predictions about the overall evolution of the system as it moves into the future.
For example, the Uncertainty Principle states that I am prevented from konwing, even in theory, the exact states of the individual molecules of a certain volume of water. But if that water happens to be flowing in the Colorado River I can pretty well state with a high degree of certainty that the water that neither evaporates, is absorbed into the soil nor is otherwise syphoned off will eventually end up in Lake Mead.

An B-747 aircraft has lost power because its 4 engine have disintegrated, the pilots are dead and it is in a dive losing altitude at 10,000 ft/min. You can't state with certainty the quantum state of its individual atoms and molecules. But you probably won't lay money on the proposition that the aircraft will not auger a large hole in the ground at some time in the very near future.

 
Which is a misstatement of the Uncertainty Principle. The Uncertainty Principle has nothing to do with prediction of anything. It deals with the inability to simultaneously state to an arbitary degree of certainty the current, not future, quantum state of two or more non-commutating physical properties of a subatomic particle, such as its momentum and position.For example, the Uncertainty Principle states that I am prevented from konwing, even in theory, the exact states of the individual molecules of a certain volume of water. But if that water happens to be flowing in the Colorado River I can pretty well state with a high degree of certainty that the water that neither evaporates, is absorbed into the soil nor is otherwise syphoned off will eventually end up in Lake Mead.
I just mentioned it because it appears there are two paths to choose from. Only one or the other can be ascertained. Kind of like a fork in the road through time.

 
I just mentioned it because it appears there are two paths to choose from. Only one or the other can be ascertained. Kind of like a fork in the road through time.
What it really means is that you can only know a certain total quantity of information about a quantum particle. Momentum and position are just two quantum properties of the state a particle. There are more - mass, energy, spin, charge, angular velocity, angular momentum...
But it's the non-commutating properties that are inportant to uncertaity. I won't go into matrix algebra, but that is where it is explained. In short, the non-commutatig properties goes like this:

A x B = C

B x A =/ C

A and B are non-commutating. You can't arbitrarily switch the order in which A and B appear in the equation/inequality because the order determines the outcome.

A x B = C

B x A = C

A and B are commutating in the manner that we all learned when we were taught the basic rules of arithmetic.

A, B and C are individual matrices, columns and rows of numbers, representing the individual quantum states of the particles under consideration.

 
What it really means is that you can only know a certain total quantity of information about a quantum particle. Momentum and position are just two quantum properties of the state a particle. There are more - mass, energy, spin, charge, angular velocity, angular momentum...But it's the non-commutating properties that are inportant to uncertaity. I won't go into matrix algebra, but that is where it is explained. In short, the non-commutatig properties goes like this:
A x B = C

B x A =/ C

A and B are non-commutating. You can't arbitrarily switch the order in which A and B appear in the equation/inequality because the order determines the outcome.

A x B = C

B x A = C

A and B are commutating in the manner that we all learned when we were taught the basic rules of arithmetic.

A, B and C are individual matrices, columns and rows of numbers, representing the individual quantum states of the particles under consideration.
You know there is a physical phenomena that parallels this type of math. The Faraday riddle. A rotating conductor in a uniform magnetic field will generate a current perpendicular to the axis of rotation. Yet when the uniform magnetic field is rotated instead, no current is generated through the conductor.

 
Gee, I guess I wasn't paying attention. Or maybe it's that professed time travelers don't seem to get my attention anymore. But that is interesting that this particular time traveler claims it isn't possible to predict the future due to the uncertainty principle. I thought I was the only one that realized that. And no predictions of gloom and doom. That's a first.Perhaps if he can pass this test, I might pay attention a little more.
How can a wave appear to be a particle?
Believe me, you do not want to pay any attention to this person (in regard to their claims of being a time-traveller).

 
Believe me, you do not want to pay any attention to this person (in regard to their claims of being a time-traveller).
You don't have to worry. There haven't been any time travel claimants that have come back from the future with any future knowledge about science.

In fact the majority seem to be scientifically illiterate. Its like people from the future appear to be less educated than people in the present.

But the usual course of action for the time travel claimant, is that my question will go unanswered. And then most likely his postings will stop. And then in about two weeks another claimant will take his place.

 
An observation: If actions can not be predicted how can we not say that water will always end at Lake Mead? To look at this incontrovertible truth is to look at a greater principle that we may have overseen altogether. What could that be? Care to guess anyone?
 
You've chosen lake Mead as the predetermined destination for the water in the river. But that is only one of the possible outcomes available that could be the destination of each of the water molecules that make up the river of water. Some of the water will make it to lake Mead. But predicting which water molecules will is the dilemma. The only certainty is the multiple future paths are already there.

 
I am not John Titor 1.My handle is John Thomas.I mix a lot of lies in with the truth in order to protect our time-line.

.....

"Predictions" that will be proven shortly.

.....

Russia and the U.S.A. will work out a deal on Syria.

Romney will lose by a historical landslide to Obama.

.....
As in June 2014, only 2 predictions are correct.

 
If you are listing "Romney will lose by a historical landslide to Obama" as a prediction, then it was an obvious failed prediction. As I recall at the time, Romney's popular vote was very close in count to Obama's.

 
If you are listing "Romney will lose by a historical landslide to Obama" as a prediction, then it was an obvious failed prediction. As I recall at the time, Romney's popular vote was very close in count to Obama's.
You are correct, Einstein. Obama appears to have won 332 electoral votes to Romney’s 206. It is not a historical landslide.

 
You know there is a physical phenomena that parallels this type of math. The Faraday riddle. A rotating conductor in a uniform magnetic field will generate a current perpendicular to the axis of rotation. Yet when the uniform magnetic field is rotated instead, no current is generated through the conductor.
"Rotated" only along the "B" axis. Video demonstrating with a CRT:



 
If you are listing "Romney will lose by a historical landslide to Obama" as a prediction, then it was an obvious failed prediction. As I recall at the time, Romney's popular vote was very close in count to Obama's.
You are dead wrong. It was a landslide. 332 to 206 in the electoral college; a 38% lead!
I suppose you wouldn't necessarily count the popoular vote as a landslide, with President Obama carrying only 5,000,000 more votes, but that isn't how we elect presidents.

But, of course, anybody with a pulse on politics was aware that any Republican was going to lose hard. Strong candidates rarely challenge Presidential incumbents.

Moz

 
If the truth could damage the timeline, and you goal was to prevent damage, then you wouldn't dilute it, you'd abstain entirely. You obviously did not think this through.

A genuine time traveler from the future would not spend their entire time defending their claims. They would be far too busy accomplishing whatever it was that motivated them to time travel in the first place.

 
I am not John Titor 1.Michigan area radioactive fallout and Walking Pneumonia. (you aren't aware of this yet)"Fast and Furious" will be justified as we begin to learn that the Mexican government and army has lost to the drug cartels.
Walker, Paul.

 
If the truth could damage the timeline, and you goal was to prevent damage, then you wouldn't dilute it, you'd abstain entirely. You obviously did not think this through.A genuine time traveler from the future would not spend their entire time defending their claims. They would be far too busy accomplishing whatever it was that motivated them to time travel in the first place.
The truth isn't going to affect their home timeline. Besides, a time traveler such as Titor had a goal - a mission. Due to my studies, I've concluded that he left behind clues for other copies of himself AND he may have met people in this time line that he wanted to remain safe, so he spoke. There is a very large picture going on and although I understand convincing people is futile, I still try to point that out. Some of us have been "thinking it through" for several years. Just sayin'.
Tell me, out of curiousity, have you read and studied Alas, Babylon? :) [DOUBLEPOST=1410999085][/DOUBLEPOST]

Walker, Paul.
haha. Paul Walker, or a walker named Paul? ;)

 
haha. Paul Walker, or a walker named Paul? ;)
If I can pack at least 3 meanings into the paragraphs, I'm doing well.
The rest of this message is a bit off topic. It is for people who have been asking me for years how to improve their health based on what we will find out.

1st, there isn't a whole lot we can do about metals in our food and power-lines over our heads at this time. But let's start with this.

Update 2014.09.19

The Paleolithic Diet is getting close to a diet that addresses modern lifestyle diseases. But it could use some tweaks.

  • Use 1 plate that is about the size of 4 cups.
     
     
  • 2 cups should contain (non-starchy carbs)vegetables. Eat all varieties.
     
     
  • 1 cup should contain (protein) meat, beans, nuts, seeds, eggs.
     
     
  • 1 cup or 1 slice can contain (starchy carbs and fats) potatoes, pasta, white flour including baked goods, white sugar including cake and chocolate, cheese.
     
     
  • Exclude all carbonated sodas.
     
     
  • Eat fruit alone separately. All varieties.
     
     



You will reach your ideal body weight if you follow these portion sizes. Benefits include the reduced risk of Type 2 and Type 3 Diabetes, Tinnitus, Sleep Apnea, Gout, Varicose Veins, and so much more.

 
I am not John Titor 2.
My handle is John Titus Renzi.

I mix a lot of lies in with the truth in order to protect our time-line.

"Russia and the U.S.A. will work out a deal on Syria."

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-mideast-crisis-russia-usa-syria-idUSKCN0YB1HB

"Romney will lose by a historical landslide to Obama."

http://mediamatters.org/blog/2012/11/07/the-romney-landslide-that-wasnt/191203

Michigan area radioactive fallout and Walking Pneumonia. (you aren't aware of this yet)

http://www.forbes.com/sites/jeffmcmahon/2011/04/09/radiation-detected-in-drinking-water-in-13-more-us-cities-cesium-137-in-vermont-milk/#13d92d4d591c

Colorado wildfires.

http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-pirate-fire-california-resort-20160406-story.html

We'll be seeing factory assembly robots roll out soon. That means, robots will start replacing assembly line workers as the cost goes down over the next few years.

http://theweek.com/articles/627054/what-chinese-robots-tell-about-automation-debate

The London Olympics -- more than just false flags? Cancellation and discontinuation.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/to-your-health/wp/2016/05/27/125-experts-say-olympics-must-be-moved-or-postponed-because-of-zika/

http://www.wpxi.com/news/a-wave-of-bad-news-batters-olympics-past-present-and-future/280730728

More annual flooding, heat, earthquakes, eruptions, etc.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3603767/Breath-taking-Mount-Etna-eruptions-captured-dramatic-video-Sicily-Italy.html




 
Last edited by a moderator:
"Predictions" that will be proven shortly."The October 2013 riots starting in Michigan."
I get it. The Detroit Tigers baseball team lost the World Series in October 2013.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2013_World_Series (2013 World Series - Wikipedia)

"Russia and the U.S.A. will work out a deal on Syria."

http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2016/05/russia-reach-deal-ceasefire-syria-aleppo-160504170234773.html (US, Russia reach deal on ceasefire in Syria's Aleppo)

"Romney will lose by a historical landslide to Obama."

That was funny. I get it.

http://mediamatters.org/blog/2012/11/07/the-romney-landslide-that-wasnt/191203 (The Romney "Landslide" That Wasn't)

"Fast and Furious" will be justified as we begin to learn that the Mexican government and army has lost to the drug cartels.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/may/26/mexico-elections-drug-cartels ('There are two governments': Mexican elections held in shadow of the cartels)

"The E.U. will ultimately fail and disband."

http://www.newsweek.com/why-i-will-vote-remain-referendum-470721 (Letter To Friends: Why I will vote remain in the referendum)

"The Euro will decline to previous currencies."

http://www.cityam.com/242501/the-eus-efforts-to-save-the-failing-euro-will-cost-britain-dear-if-we-vote-to-remain (EU efforts to save the failing euro will cost Britain dear if we stay in)

"The U.S. economy will stabilize but most will earn surviving wages permanently. That means the majority won't earn enough to buy a new car every 5 years or take a trip to a foreign country."

Despite the obvious lies told by the U.S. media..

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/connorhoffman/2016/06/15/brexit-could-seriously-effect-us-economy-us-warns-against-it-n2178774 (Brexit Could Seriously Affect U.S. Economy, U.S. Warns Against It)

"We'll be seeing factory assembly robots roll out soon. That means, robots will start replacing assembly line workers as the cost goes down over the next few years."

Foxconn's President actually confirmed the 60,000 lay-offs in China though the media tried to say nobody was laid-off "yet". He and other Chinese executives plan to lay-off 1.1 million human workers by December 2016.

http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-36376966 (Foxconn replaces '60,000 factory workers with robots' - BBC News)

"The London Olympics -- more than just false flags? Cancellation and discontinuation."

Were you talking about may Olympics as a snapshot of the current situation?

http://www.foxnews.com/sports/2016/06/18/rio-state-government-declares-financial-disaster-as-olympics-loom.html

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-japan-politics-masuzoe-idUSKCN0Z1031

"Syrian government overthrown. Joint U.N. and Russian peace keeping."

The Syrian government is basically overthrown and controlled by Russia.

http://edition.cnn.com/2016/06/17/politics/russia-airstrike-syrian-rebels/

"More tampering, dirty and nuke bomb lone wolf terrorist attempts in the U.S. See Michigan for clue."

Hasn't happened yet.

"More annual flooding, heat, earthquakes, eruptions, etc."

It's hard to name a mountain that isn't erupting these days.

But I'm sorry. These are all just lucky guesses. You are not John Titor. You are a hoaxer and a fraud.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top