Hi im interested to know about the future

John Thomas said:
To Darby+
This definition of 'Psychometric' refers to the metaphysical ability to touch an object and receive impressions of the past from that object.
The Psychometric Video Player exists today in 2012 but it isn't public knowledge. It is a device that amplifies light and sound trapped on an object and projects it so that we may witness past events. With the help of CERN's new findings, this device eventually is developed into a time machine. I have no science and evidence to back up this claim. So you may consider what I am saying to be pure fantasy.
Click to expand...
@John Thomas
I'm interested in it but I can't find it on the internet. Would you please offer more information about it? Or will you tell me where to get the information?
 
@John Thomas:
Can you reply to me in private?

I have a good idea for a time machine, for me it's realizable so I spend each dollars.
All think that for building a time machine takes a lot of money, but for me, I think that just a simple electrical circuit RLC, with a sinusoidal voltage source, tuned to a resonance frequency, it may already generate phenomena of the excellent space-time or better than temporal shift. To break the barrier of space-time is an issue purely magnetic and electric, gravity is only the effect of these two forces. The whole universe is formed of these two forces. The physics that we know is wrong and restrictive.
 
9109109 said:
@John Thomas
I'm interested in it but I can't find it on the internet. Would you please offer more information about it? Or will you tell me where to get the information?
Click to expand...

You're unlikely to find anything on the device. Perhaps if you were to Google "Chronovisor" as Tony suggests.
 
Tony said:
@John Thomas:
Can you reply to me in private?

I have a good idea for a time machine, for me it's realizable so I spend each dollars.
All think that for building a time machine takes a lot of money, but for me, I think that just a simple electrical circuit RLC, with a sinusoidal voltage source, tuned to a resonance frequency, it may already generate phenomena of the excellent space-time or better than temporal shift. To break the barrier of space-time is an issue purely magnetic and electric, gravity is only the effect of these two forces. The whole universe is formed of these two forces. The physics that we know is wrong and restrictive.
Click to expand...

No thanks, Tony. If we talk in private email, other people that need to read our posts won't be able to. I'm on these forums to maintain contact with people.
 
Transient001 said:
Oh my.....Oh dear!!! If I am not mistaken Sally1136 wanted to know about the future, 2080's or something and Australia...whatever occurred afterwards is a mystery.

Well Sally, I am not a timetraveler as people from around here call it, but I might help you with your questions. I'll begin with the topic of Australia. It will still be the enchanting place that it is today. About the buildings they will not change much aesthetically speaking. By the end of the 21st century 50% of the cars will be running on batteries, it will not be until the 23rd century that all cars become electric.

Fashion is another thing altogether, although it will not be what we call futuristic, but rather a return to the vintage era with a little glitter, plastic and zippers. Very nice for the gals, not so much for the guys. Food will be the same, with increasingly healthier menus on fast food chains and restaurants.
Click to expand...

Whoa cool! I like the fashion trend's
 
The whole universe is formed of these two forces. . The physics that we know is wrong and restrictive.
Click to expand...

If the entire universe is formed from "these two forces" (E&M and gravtation) explain how in uranium, with 92 positive charged protons in the nucleus, can ever form. There's at least one other force at work. Then explain how neutrons and protons (plus their anti-particle pairs) are made. There's at least one more force at work there.
 
Darby said:
If the entire universe is formed from "these two forces" (E&M and gravtation) explain how in uranium, with 92 positive charged protons in the nucleus, can ever form. There's at least one other force at work. Then explain how neutrons and protons (plus their anti-particle pairs) are made. There's at least one more force at work there.
Click to expand...

The universes are a very compex lot! They are grouped together by a so many forces, waves and functions that is impossible to conceive with the mind alone. I agree with Tony in the sense that our physics, as advacnced as they might seem, are very limited compared to the grand scope of things. For example we are actually beginning to understand our universe, what will happen when we have to take into account multiple universes, dimensions and pocket realms?
 
Jikan Yugami said:
How so? Let me speculate for a bit here, excuse me if it gets confusing.

So, I want to go back in time and get a copy of a book that Hitler burnt (This is just so that we don't end up getting confused with paradoxes, etc.). So, I set my time machine to send me back to the year 1920. My time machine sends me to 1920 in the exact spot I am standing in (So that we don't end up arguing about whether or not time machines can travel through time and space). I get out of my time machine, pick up my book and then return to my time machine. I get in my time machine and return home. It seems simple enough.

Perhaps you think this because a time machine cannot exist until it is created. However, if we follow the theory of World Lines, then we see that this time machine already exists in another World Line, and its existence is therefore constant in that timeline and allows the time machine to go to different World Lines, including its own past.

Cave Ab Veritas.
Click to expand...


World Lines? That one is new to me. Can you elaborate?
 
Oh,
Jikan Yugami said:
@Darby
Ah, thank you for clearing that up for me. I use the term "World Lines" as the idea of two or more universes that, whilst not parallel, have many different outcomes. Like Dexter said, if I had the opportunity to kill Hitler, it would split into 2 different World Lines. These are not, however, parallel, as they have the same beginning (i.e the Big Bang, as compared to, for argument's sake, the object that created the Big Bang never exploding, and, therefore, never creating our Solar System as we know it) and have a somewhat similar timeline. So, then, my idea of "World Lines" is, in fact, the Many Worlds Interpretation?

@bomberman
Oh, I'm going to have fun with this.....
Tell me, what do your records show of when the first time machine was created, by whom, what was their actual intention, where there any Beta forms in which human experiments failed, was it a single person/group who made this time machine, or was it an organisation, and, last of all, what forms of time travel are there in your time?

Cave Ab Veritas.
Click to expand...



Oh, nevermind. You explained it already here. Sorry about that. I hadn't scrolled down that far yet. I have a small screen. My mistake.
 
Back
Top