Gravity Research Update

Hi everyone.

I've been furiously busy with my experimentation lately. I just recently finished constructing gravity wave generator number four. With alarming success. A time machine just may be possible!

But first let me get back to where I left off on gravity wave generator number one. It turns out there is a preferred time interval for the firing capacitor to discharge within. That time interval is very close to two microseconds. The size of the capacitor that allows a discharge that fast is very small at one nanofarad. Actually a one nanofarad capacitor will discharge in around one microsecond. But by adding a variable resistor in series with the discharge path, allowed me to slow it down to the optimal time width for the maximum gravity wave amplitude. The gravity wave produced is predominantly negative in amplitude. Around 1.2 gees negative and only .6 gees positive in amplitude.

So on to gravity wave generator number two. Just knowing that gravity wave generator number one took two months to complete made me stop and think about a faster way to get to the next phase. I canabalized the circuits in my lorentz force generator and converted it over to a dual gravity wave generator with phase adjustability. Just two weeks to do that. Oh, I forgot to mention that I borrowed a design feature from Bob Lazars gravity generators. I'm using a large copper circular ring made of bare copper wire. The ring measures sixteen inches in diameter. I have a second ring about four inches above the first ring. The second ring is only around 14 inches in diameter. So I hooked up the generator and monitored the voltage and gravity waves simultaneously on my PC oscilloscope. I have an output wire connected directly to the discharge capacitor of each generator. Each of these wires were connected to the metal copper rings. I adjusted the phase of the second gravity wave to connect to the first gravity wave. It looked like one continuous wave with two peaks on the scope now. Success, this is what my intuition tells me to do. I've given the gravity wave direction through linear time and also displacement through space. A moving gravity wave. However there was something odd going on with the data on the scope. The ground plane for both the gravity waves and the voltage discharge wave had changed away from zero. The ground plane for the voltage wave was slightly positive at around a half a volt. And the gravity wave ground plane had shifted downward by about a tenth of a gee. It's like there is some kind of equalization going on between the electric wave and the gravity wave. Interaction on a shared time flow is my suspected theory at present. Subject to change when more data becomes available.

Well, I was really motivated now. So, on to gravity wave generator number three. It was a six channel gravity wave generator with phase adjustability on each channel. I got a big roll of copper wire off ebay, real cheap. It only took two weeks this time from making the printed circuit boards to getting it all together. But on the last day just as I was about to put it all in the big project box I had gotten just for this project, I mysteriously came up with a new idea I hadn't investigated yet. I was controlling the discharge time of the firing capacitor with a variable resistor. What if I substituted a variable inductor instead? I had to try that. So I canabalized the primary coil off one of my tesla coils to use as the variable inductor. It has a tap point at every turn after the first thirteen turns. Gravity wave generator number one was used for the experiment. I removed the variable resistor and substituted the variable inductor. It worked. But the data was different. The gravity wave was biased positive now. With almost 1.2 gees positve and .8 gees negative in amplitude. But using the inductor I could actually balance the gravity wave so that both the positive half and the negative half were equal. A balanced wave. Or maybe a zero point wave.

This was really getting interesting. What if I combine the inductor with the variable resistor? So I did it. The gravity wave was biased positive. I cranked the variable resistor from zero to it's max of 25 ohms. My rotating gravity field theory says that the dimension of time should be accessed. Time should speed up as a gravity field goes from positive to negative. As I changed the variable resistor, the time interval that the firing capacitor stayed charged changed by seven microseconds. I didn't suspect that at all. At least not any amount of time that could actually be measurable. But it did happen and I still can repeat this experiment. But I didn't mention that even though the capacitor charge time changed, the discharge time also changed by and equal but opposite amount. It's like I nudged the flow of time one way and it bounced back by an equal amount the other way. I had created a time wave. Needless to say, now I wanted to explore these time waves some more. Like, could I speed up or slow down time locally? So on to gravity wave generator number four.

Gravity wave generator number four only took one week to complete. The idea behind gravity wave generator number four was to see if I could remove a section of the time wave that I didn't want, and keep the part that I did want. I know that if I disconnect the wire from the metal ring, no gravity waves are emitted. So what I did was to install a semiconductor which could turn on and off the connection to the metal ring emitter. I made the controls to this semiconductor adjustable so I could synchronize it to the gravity wave emission. It worked. And new data was obtained as well. On the scope, during the time that the semiconductor had turned off connection to the metal ring, the ground plane for the voltage in the metal ring had changed to negative 1.45 volts. Normally that voltage is right at zero. So by rectifying the flow of time, mother nature responds by creating negative voltage as a substitute for the missing section of the time wave. Free energy anyone? I didn't expect that. And I'm not stopping here. I was still having a little trouble with this gravity wave generator. The main thing that I noticed was that I no longer could adjust the frequency of the gravity wave emission. With all previous generators I could move the gravity pulses closer together. It's like by removing the section of the time wave I had removed the time continuity between events. Anyway I decided to see if I had actually affected the local flow of time close to the gravity wave emitter. I put a digital watch right on the emitter and checked it 20 minutes later. No change. The watch was eight and a half seconds faster than my computer. So I left the watch on the emitter for around three hours. This time it appeared that my watch was now running at only eight seconds faster than my computer. Lost half a second. Several hours later after just leaving the watch on my desk, I decided to check it again. To my surprise it was now running 14 seconds fast. Now that watch has been very accurate and usually keeps very good time. For weeks now it has been just eight and a half seconds faster than my computer. But I am comparing the time on the watch to my computers clock. I can't rule out the possibility that maybe there was a master time adjustment to some atomic clock somewhere. Since my computer automatically will synchroze itself through the internet. So I have to nullify the results of this time flow experiment. Next weekend I'll obtain a couple of electronic stop watches and repeat the experiment using one of the stop watches as my control time base.

Well, this is a big switch for me. Here I am trying to gather enough data to make a gravity amplifier and I come across an observation that shows I'm affecting the flow of time using the gravity waves. The directions I can pursue are many. I already have plans for making a time wave oscillator. Coupling this time flow change in conjunction with positive and negative gravity waves may have an amplifying effect that I have been searching for. Also that change in the flow of time that I noticed, is when the force of time is being accessed. The time force in sufficient amplitude just may be the motive power for a time machine.

Also I have given some thought to RMT's suggestion that the resonant frequency of my accelerometer just may be giving me false data. Rather than come up with a logical argument to defend the data, I have come up with an alternate solution that will most likely validate the data. I just recently obtained an accelerometer chip that actually operates with a different resonant frequency. Also it can handle gravity pulses at a much higher frequency. It happens to be this weeks project. I just have to make a custom circuit board to mount the chip on.
 
was wondering if you could try something for me. if this machine made your watch 8 second faster did that effect the battery? ok get an apple and place it next to the machine see how long it takes the apple to rot. for the watch you get 8 seconds, but it may effect the apple faster. less to work with since its not a small machine.
 
I'm just wondering, could you share your ideas regarding the nature of time? Thanks.

Time is the master force that all other forces play out within. I have an idea that time is generated by nuclear force. But I haven't come across anything that could actually validate that. Time is space. And space has to perpetually expand for time to exist.
 
aerohead

I must say that is an interesting reply you gave me. Thanks.

What about the space expanding bit? I don't necessarily disagree, but I'm wondering how you came to this conclusion. Thanks.

That part was easy. Just deductive reasoning. The expansion of space would have to originate somewhere. I merely just observed that we have a very large amount of mass decreasing on the sun because of the hydrogen to helium nuclear reaction. Does it really change into energy? Or does the energy production just covary with the decrease in mass? I am merely proposing that mass is just undergoing a state change. Mass is being converted into space. It's just my idea. I like it. I'll hang onto it till I get something that looks better. So as long as the universe keeps changing the state of mass, time will flow. We don't see the reverse reaction happening. But elements above iron on the periodic table indicate that the reverse reaction did occur for those elements to be formed.

Most of my theories involving the control of time usually stem from the control of gravity. Now I'm finding out that through experimentation that there is a link between gravity and electrical phenomena. So this change in time flow that I see happening for electrical phenomena may not be equal to the time flow rate for normal matter. The seven microsecond change I see happening may just translate into one billionth of a second for normal matter. But the controlling factor just may be the gravity wave phenomena.

I forgot to say, mathematically, a matter-antimatter reaction is perceived as annihilation of both particles. However, since Q = E0, dt = dt0 * (1 - E0/E0) = 0, so the particles effectively stop moving through time. So to those still moving forward in time, they just disappear, releasing energy. This also gives me an idea for moving through time: if time dilation actually changes an object's speed through time, then causing the particles to collide with other objects moving at "normal" speed, maybe they would exert a temporal force on the target object. So you go through time, but you die of cancer as soon as you reach the stone age. :-)

Time dilation would just be the result of being exposed to the time force of a different magnitude than is currently present. But what if that magnitude was continuously changing in value? My idea is to nudge time this way by creating gravity pulses that change in intensity by going from positive to negative or visa versa. I like the idea of using the gravity wave to do this by just changing the ground state of the gravity wave. This is how I envision nuclear force to work. But I wont be creating the time force in sufficient magnitude to initiate nuclear reactions.
 
aerohead

As for creating antigravity, wouldn't you need negative mass? Unless there's some as-yet undiscovered means of making gravity without mass.

Antigravity

Yes there is a way to make gravity and antigravity. I've been researching this phenomena for quite a while now. The above movie is just my tesla coil set up to induce an antigravity effect between the two metal disks. My current research into this phenomena is actually back engineering the tesla coil to determine just what is actually going on. When I came across gravity waves on my scope, I became very interested. In a very short span of time I have amassed a wealth of information on gravity waves. The top half of the wave is gravity and the bottom half is antigravity. My interpretations of the observations almost suggest that I am looking at two particles that are trying to keep each other in balance. Because of my observations I really have to consider that current gravity theories taught in school are not correct.

I wondered if your coil just induced an opposite magnetic field in the detector & pushed it away momentarily; this will happen if it's made of metal (see Lenz's Law).

I have to rule that out. I'm using a state of the art accelerometer sensor. It measures mechanical or inertial acceleration. The sensor I am currently using is an ADXL203 accelerometer. I've tested the sensor to see if I can induce any type of reading using a one tesla magnet. The sensor is immune to any magnetic disturbance.

The reason I am so interested in the gravity waves is because of the Bob Lazar connection. A lot of what he said, can correlate to my findings.
 
I read of Lazar several years ago and am certain he was a fraud.

I am equally certain of this. Having worked in classified facilities (and currently working in a SECRET/SAP facility) I recognized certain elements of his story that do not match up with real life in such places. There is NO WAY that guy ever set foot onto any facility in Area 51. I worked with the lead avionics technician for the F-117 stealth fighter wing back when they were based at Area 51 just prior to (and during) the first Gulf War. He confirmed for me that Lazar is a fraud, at least as far as his claims about his Area 51 experiences go.

RMT
 
aerohead

Interesting. Have you tried putting the tesla coil in a Faraday cage to rule out EM effects for the skeptics?

No I haven't. But my favorite is the following depicting this effect on all wood objects.

Gravity

I have investigated the Lorentz force, but there is no gravity pulse or gravity wave phemomena during a Lorentz force interaction.

As for Lazar? I am going to keep an open mind. There are many aspects about what he said concerning the operational theory behind the alien craft that parallel some of the things that I am discovering. And you also have to understand that those theories that he proposed would probably have been the best that they could come up with at the time.
 
"No I haven't. But my favorite is the following depicting this effect on all wood objects."

i swear, i about fell outta my chair laughing so hard! :D
 
Einstein (or anyone else with relevant knowledge for that matter), could a Tesla Coil be built to work in reverse, as in, absorb lightning and transform the energy into a lower voltage DC or AC current?
 
ruthless

Yes, there are quite a few videos on youtube that you can watch about him. But it is a shame that he was never able to duplicate his results or even come up with a theory to explain what was going on.

Currently my experiments into this gravity wave phenomena have given me a wealth of data. And also alot of ideas. There is something here to be heavily researched.
 
Rusty

A couple of months ago I would have said yes. But just recently I was doing some experiments with inductors and happened to notice some very peculiar behavior. An electric charge dumped through an inductor will take longer to travel through the inductor as the inductance increases. The tesla coil uses two inductors. One of very small value and one of very large value. So the larger inductor should take longer to allow the charge to go through. I was measuring that time differential on my oscilloscope and was surprised to see that the time is the same for both inductors. But only if the second larger inductor has the charge through it magnetically induced from the smaller inductor. So it appears that the flow of time has a relationship with inductors that needs to be explored by paying attention to what happens to the flow of time.
 
i was wondering if i could get your permission to build your schematic for experimental purposes?

i have a few ideas about this. if i create a rf field and "dial it in" so to speak, it should create antigravity. also, i saw a nasa video on youtube that reminded me alot of the video you posted. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94KzmB2bI7s

i'd like to know what you think about it.
 
ruthless

The original schematic I posted further up on this thread is the basic design of the circuit I am currently using. However the value of all of the resistors and capacitors have changed. If I get some time today I'll see if I can post the current schematic I am working with. There is one little engineering hurdle I haven't taken care of yet. The gravity waves only occur if I have the ground circuit of the device connected to the ground circuit of my oscilloscope. It doesn't really seem like a big problem to me. But I haven't tackled it yet. I am under the assumption that all I have to do is create a dummy circuit to simulate the ground connection to my oscilloscope. Although it may not be all that simple. Murphy's Law may come into play. I hate that guy.

I've seen the ultrasound levitation setup on youtube before. I haven't experimented with ultrasound. But there is definitely some physics there worth trying to comprehend. I know it all boils down to wave phenomena. But nobody has taken the time to simplify the more complex observations into something everyone can understand.
 
I was playing around with gravity wave generator number one today and came across a unique tuning point with the frequency. Since I can adjust the frequency of the gravity wave event I noticed that I can slightly overlap one gravity wave event with the next gravity wave event. What happened was totally unexpected. The gravity waves would sequentially decrease in magnitude across the screen. As that happened the voltage wave would take less time to occur. But this would happen as if it were moving across the screen. It looks like I created a time wave. Time is decreasing and increasing in magnitude in the horizontal direction. Each time a decrease occurs the gravity wave loses magnitude and the voltage wave loses duration. I made a small video clip. See for yourself:

Time Wave
 
ruthless

Here is the current schematic I am working with:

CIMG0203.JPG


I have been refining this as I go along the way. The Mosfet transistors I used are a complimentary pair. One is a P channel and the other is an N channel Mosfet transistor. It isn't that critical that you use this particular pair. Just as long as one is N channel and the other is P channel. The other thing I should mention is that the NE555 timer chip is just the standard variety. Do not use the high speed 555 chip. The high speed version seems to interact with the Mosfet transistors somehow and slows down the transition time for the discharge curve. If you can't adjust the discharge curve to 2 microseconds, the gravity wave output will be severely dampened if not completely eliminated.

This last week I have been experimenting with the size of the metal ring that produces the gravity wave. My theory is that a gravity wave is a circular wave that travels around a circular path. So just like an EM wave prefers an antenna of a particular length, I am speculating that a gravity wave prefers a circular antenna of a particular diameter. Well that diameter looks to be right around 16 inches. This is still preliminary and subject to further refinement. I tried test diameters ranging in size from 4 inches to 20 inches. 16 inches produces the biggest wave. There may be other diameters that work beyond the range that I tested.
 
Back
Top