Einstein
Dimensional Traveler
One step forward and two steps backward. That is usually how my trial and error experimental effort works. And this time without exception. About a month ago I fired up an experimental device I built. It was supposed to amplify the antigravity force that I was measuring off my previously built Lorentz force generator. I used higher current carrying semiconductors. The device was able to handle continuous current levels of around 150 amps. The previous device could only handle levels up to around 5 amps. The device took me around four months to complete. Which is why you haven't seen me post very much to this thread. So I fired up the device. It was a tremendous improvement in the Lorentz force field generation over the previous device. But I was interested in the antigravity pulses that I had monitored off my previous Lorentz force field generator. I hooked up my accelerometer sensor to my oscilloscope to monitor for antigravity pulses and became very dissappointed. There were no antigravity pulses at all coming from the new device. I rechecked my previous device just to be sure I actually had antigravity pulses. Yes, the previous device does produce antigravity pulses. So obviously I had made some assumptions about antigravity field generation that were wrong. The main assumption was that the Lorentz force was actually the antigravity force and only need be tuned to the correct frequency to get it to work on all matter rather than just metal conductors. That assumption was wrong. And along with it, my unified field theory hits the dust as well. But rather than take an entirely new direction in research, I decided to find out why the new device doesn't produce antigravity.
The first thing I had to do was to examine some of the assumptions I had made that had lead me to construct the present device. I had to sleep on it. Of course I woke up with an answer. It was a logical answer. In order to use more current or amps to produce a larger Lorentz force field, I had to reduce the resistance of my output coil to let more current go through. So the big change in the present device was that I was using a coil with only 1/4 ohm of resistance. The previous coil was just over an ohm in resistance. That did suggest that possibly resistance or ohms was much more important in the production of antigravity than I had given it credit for. I usually look at resistance as the evil gremlin in an electrical circuit that steals away precious energy. Another assumption that I am going to have to let go of. So I made a variable resistor out of Nichrome wire. I put it in series with my output coil. I hooked up my test equipment again and monitored for antigravity pulses while I was slowly sliding the electrical connection down the length of Nichrome wire. BINGO! The antigravity pulse appears, and slowly increases in amplitude (I'm changing the resistance while this is happening) and then decreases and disappears. So at the maximum amplitude I turn off the device and take a resistance measurement across the coil and Nichrome wire resistor. I get a reading of 2.5 ohms. I was only getting about 1/2 gee pulses of antigravity, so I decided to try some other coils with more internal resistance. I have lots of coils laying around from previous experimentation. So I tried them all. I had a long cylindrical coil with a diameter of 4.5 inches, #20 wire guage, at 2.3 ohms that gave me the best performance. 2 gee pulses of antigravity. It does appear that a coil with a specific amount of resistance is crucial for antigravity field production. But I didn't stop there.
I added more adjustability to my device. I can control the pulse width window that the actual capacitor discharge takes place. Also I can control pulse repitition frequency. In addition I can also use different sized capacitors for the capacitor discharge to take place. And I have addon capability to add a phase generator which I haven't added on yet. My oscilloscope is a two channel scope. So I decided to watch what the voltage was doing simultaneously during the antigravity pulse emission. That's when I discovered that another assumption I had made hit the dirt. All along I had assumed that the antigravity pulse was occurring at the same time that the capacitor was discharging. I was wrong! The antigravity pulse occurs after the capacitor is turned off. Refer to the following picture. The top trace is what the voltage is doing in the coil. The bottom trace is the accelerometer. Each vertical division for the bottom trace represents one gee of antigravity. The top trace was very interesting to me. What is that bulb like trace thingy? That is another BINGO! I'm actually learning more from this failed experiment than In all my successful ones. I believe that bulb like thingy is the coil oscillating using its own internal capacitance and resistance. There is energy in that coil when it goes open circuit. I don't know what the oscillation frequency is because my scope only measures frequency up to 20 Megahertz. But I do believe this frequency can be calculated. The bulb thingy looks like it's solid, but I suspect that up in the Gigahertz range the vertical up and down trace pattern would become visible. So there apears to be EM frequencies for tuned coils that stimulate spacetime into emitting antigravity pulses. I'll just bet that if my coil was hit with an EM wave in that frequency that it prefers to oscillate, an antigravity field would be emitted. This does give more support for Bob Lazars claims. Although his memory mysteriously failed when asked what those frequencies were. He did say everything appears to work through electromagnetic induction.
So I continued to experiment with the adjustable parameters of my device. The pulse width of my capacitor discharge was of interest to me. I had assumed that the capacitor discharge had to completely discharge before an antigravity pulse could be emitted. I was wrong again. The pulse width window showed that my capacitor was being turned off before complete discharge. By adjusting the pulse width I found out that the antigravity pulse only occurs if a small section of the capacitor discharge curve is used. By narrowing the pulse width I was able to get antigravity pulses up to 3 gees of amplitude. See the following picture. The pulses of antigravity are in the two to three hundred mircrosecond range. As you can see I adjusted the frequency to bunch up the antigravity pulses close together to see if I could get any type of observable repulsion effect. Nothing yet. What is interesting is that it doesn't matter which way I point the accelerometer sensor. It appears that spacetime is being altered in pulses to produce an expansion effect from every single point in space. Also it does seem to be becoming evident that spacetime is not comprised of electric and magnetic fields. But it can be influenced by them. This tends to lend support for extra dimensions. Electric fields and magnetic fields may be comprised of dimensions other than the dimensions that comprise spacetime. Just remember mathematicians have failed to mathematically derive spacetime from electromagnetic theory.
Now for one more picture that is of particular interest to me. I was using a very compact coil that measures 4 ohms on a 4.5 inch form. The wire guage was #24. The bottom trace is of a gravity wave. It's in the four microsecond range of duration. I stuck the accelerometer sensor into the coil during operation. The gravity wave increased in duration. I don't completely understand this yet. I am speculating that the flow of time changed inside the coil. But a gravity wave by itself is spacetime oscillating. That appears to be something that has not been observed in our universe. It also happens to be the basis of an Alcubierre drive system for space propulsion. So I will definitely be focusing my efforts into this gravity wave phenomena. And also to observe any time altering effects with the antigravity pulse waves I've been getting.
I have one final little bit of info that I copied out of a UFO book I read years ago. I don't remember the name of the book. But the info is supposedly the EM signature of a UFO in flight.
"frequency 2995 MC to 3000 MC; pulse width of
2.0 microseconds; pulse repititions frequency
of 600 cps; sweep rate of 4 RPM;
vertical polarity...
Signal moved rapidly up the DF scope indicating
a rapidly moving signal source; i e., an airborne
source..."
I never knew what the information meant, but I suspected that someday it would all make sense. Apparently that day has arrived. That frequency is in the Gigahertz range. I suspect my test coils are oscillating close to this frequency. It would be nice to have a scope that could actually look at the frequncies I'm running at. But scopes in the Gigahertz range are very expensive. At any rate I can play around with the math to help me design and construct coils that would harmonically oscillate in this frequency range.
The first thing I had to do was to examine some of the assumptions I had made that had lead me to construct the present device. I had to sleep on it. Of course I woke up with an answer. It was a logical answer. In order to use more current or amps to produce a larger Lorentz force field, I had to reduce the resistance of my output coil to let more current go through. So the big change in the present device was that I was using a coil with only 1/4 ohm of resistance. The previous coil was just over an ohm in resistance. That did suggest that possibly resistance or ohms was much more important in the production of antigravity than I had given it credit for. I usually look at resistance as the evil gremlin in an electrical circuit that steals away precious energy. Another assumption that I am going to have to let go of. So I made a variable resistor out of Nichrome wire. I put it in series with my output coil. I hooked up my test equipment again and monitored for antigravity pulses while I was slowly sliding the electrical connection down the length of Nichrome wire. BINGO! The antigravity pulse appears, and slowly increases in amplitude (I'm changing the resistance while this is happening) and then decreases and disappears. So at the maximum amplitude I turn off the device and take a resistance measurement across the coil and Nichrome wire resistor. I get a reading of 2.5 ohms. I was only getting about 1/2 gee pulses of antigravity, so I decided to try some other coils with more internal resistance. I have lots of coils laying around from previous experimentation. So I tried them all. I had a long cylindrical coil with a diameter of 4.5 inches, #20 wire guage, at 2.3 ohms that gave me the best performance. 2 gee pulses of antigravity. It does appear that a coil with a specific amount of resistance is crucial for antigravity field production. But I didn't stop there.
I added more adjustability to my device. I can control the pulse width window that the actual capacitor discharge takes place. Also I can control pulse repitition frequency. In addition I can also use different sized capacitors for the capacitor discharge to take place. And I have addon capability to add a phase generator which I haven't added on yet. My oscilloscope is a two channel scope. So I decided to watch what the voltage was doing simultaneously during the antigravity pulse emission. That's when I discovered that another assumption I had made hit the dirt. All along I had assumed that the antigravity pulse was occurring at the same time that the capacitor was discharging. I was wrong! The antigravity pulse occurs after the capacitor is turned off. Refer to the following picture. The top trace is what the voltage is doing in the coil. The bottom trace is the accelerometer. Each vertical division for the bottom trace represents one gee of antigravity. The top trace was very interesting to me. What is that bulb like trace thingy? That is another BINGO! I'm actually learning more from this failed experiment than In all my successful ones. I believe that bulb like thingy is the coil oscillating using its own internal capacitance and resistance. There is energy in that coil when it goes open circuit. I don't know what the oscillation frequency is because my scope only measures frequency up to 20 Megahertz. But I do believe this frequency can be calculated. The bulb thingy looks like it's solid, but I suspect that up in the Gigahertz range the vertical up and down trace pattern would become visible. So there apears to be EM frequencies for tuned coils that stimulate spacetime into emitting antigravity pulses. I'll just bet that if my coil was hit with an EM wave in that frequency that it prefers to oscillate, an antigravity field would be emitted. This does give more support for Bob Lazars claims. Although his memory mysteriously failed when asked what those frequencies were. He did say everything appears to work through electromagnetic induction.
So I continued to experiment with the adjustable parameters of my device. The pulse width of my capacitor discharge was of interest to me. I had assumed that the capacitor discharge had to completely discharge before an antigravity pulse could be emitted. I was wrong again. The pulse width window showed that my capacitor was being turned off before complete discharge. By adjusting the pulse width I found out that the antigravity pulse only occurs if a small section of the capacitor discharge curve is used. By narrowing the pulse width I was able to get antigravity pulses up to 3 gees of amplitude. See the following picture. The pulses of antigravity are in the two to three hundred mircrosecond range. As you can see I adjusted the frequency to bunch up the antigravity pulses close together to see if I could get any type of observable repulsion effect. Nothing yet. What is interesting is that it doesn't matter which way I point the accelerometer sensor. It appears that spacetime is being altered in pulses to produce an expansion effect from every single point in space. Also it does seem to be becoming evident that spacetime is not comprised of electric and magnetic fields. But it can be influenced by them. This tends to lend support for extra dimensions. Electric fields and magnetic fields may be comprised of dimensions other than the dimensions that comprise spacetime. Just remember mathematicians have failed to mathematically derive spacetime from electromagnetic theory.
Now for one more picture that is of particular interest to me. I was using a very compact coil that measures 4 ohms on a 4.5 inch form. The wire guage was #24. The bottom trace is of a gravity wave. It's in the four microsecond range of duration. I stuck the accelerometer sensor into the coil during operation. The gravity wave increased in duration. I don't completely understand this yet. I am speculating that the flow of time changed inside the coil. But a gravity wave by itself is spacetime oscillating. That appears to be something that has not been observed in our universe. It also happens to be the basis of an Alcubierre drive system for space propulsion. So I will definitely be focusing my efforts into this gravity wave phenomena. And also to observe any time altering effects with the antigravity pulse waves I've been getting.
I have one final little bit of info that I copied out of a UFO book I read years ago. I don't remember the name of the book. But the info is supposedly the EM signature of a UFO in flight.
"frequency 2995 MC to 3000 MC; pulse width of
2.0 microseconds; pulse repititions frequency
of 600 cps; sweep rate of 4 RPM;
vertical polarity...
Signal moved rapidly up the DF scope indicating
a rapidly moving signal source; i e., an airborne
source..."
I never knew what the information meant, but I suspected that someday it would all make sense. Apparently that day has arrived. That frequency is in the Gigahertz range. I suspect my test coils are oscillating close to this frequency. It would be nice to have a scope that could actually look at the frequncies I'm running at. But scopes in the Gigahertz range are very expensive. At any rate I can play around with the math to help me design and construct coils that would harmonically oscillate in this frequency range.
