Future posting.

Re: Your Test

Hey matt_fromfuture!

What kinda of time machine or device did you use to get in this time? Size? Energy source? Possible name?

JanEx
 
Re: Your Test

Model C204.
I've installed it in a Vehicle, the size is very bulky. It fills the passenger side in the vehicle. You'll learn to use black holes as an energy source.
 
Re: Your Test

Model C204.
I've installed it in a Vehicle, the size is very bulky. It fills the passenger side in the vehicle. You'll learn to use black holes as an energy source.
Click to expand...

Why don't you just cut-and-paste from Titor's posts? It will be easier and your english will be more accurate. Is there ANYTHING unique and interesting in your story? I'll bet the C204 is made by General Electric, right? /ttiforum/images/graemlins/tongue.gif

RMT
 
Re: Your Test

If John Titor came here 8 years ago that's not my fault. I've the same Time Machine of John Titor. I don't want to know the John Titor's post, but i tell you my truth. Yes, it was manufactured by General Electric.
 
Re: Your Test

John Titor new the answer to temporal divergence
but you didn't. Yet you use the same time machine
so what are we to think? /ttiforum/images/graemlins/confused.gif
 
Re: Your Test

I replied that i have not noticed any divergence in this worldline. You mean if i can create divergence? Well, i can. But the percentage is very low. John Titor is still creating a divergence in this worldline surely higher than the divergence that i can create.
 
Re: Your Test

Bulky? I know what that means, but want know more details like lenght, height and what materials have been used in engine etc.
 
Re: Your Test

John Titor stated that there was
around 2% divergence from this
to his native time line. I don't
know how he figured this out but
it is common imformation for that
specific type a time travel using
the C204 that all.
 
Re: Your Test

The percentage is variable. if i stop to chat with you now and leave this worldline, the percentage that i've changed this worldline is less than 2%. 2% is a "number of occurence". I can tell you that the John Titor presence in this worldline could diverge 7,8%(number of occurrence).
 
Re: Your Test

Matt,

Let me give you some insight about this fourm. There are about 5 guys that question you here who are geniuses when it comes to physics. Some of them probably have a working theory on how time travel works. If you can prove to them without a doubt you are the real deal, then I would believe you.

Also the creditability of someone coming from the same worldline as Titor is not exactly possible in the way he described it. It is but the chances of it are like winning the lottery ten or fifteen times. If you are using the same time machine with the same technology he used. Then I say you are full of it. The time diverges are never 100% correct each time you travel.

I am not saying I believe Titor was a real time traveler, but I do know what you are saying cannot be true.

Riddle me this.

If I was a time traveler from 30 or 40 years in the future, and I was to travel back to 2008 and land on the same worldline I was from. Is it possible that it would not be the same as I remember because of others who have traveled back and alter the timeline?

Also if you are going to claim to be from the time as Titor, you should research him well before posting. Most of these people here have read that story over and over and can quote everything he said like a lyric to a song.
 
Re: Your Test

Yes, that's what i've told you. My worldline CANNOT interact with anyone else's worldine
Click to expand...

And this is totally at odds with the vast majority of physics, as exhibited through experiment. You don't have your own personal worldline. If that were true, people would never be able to shoot each other, thus affecting someone else's worldline.

Your arguments are hopelessly disjointed and non-sensical. They are simply demonstrably not true, and I have pointed out their obvious contradictions. So now it is time to send your own (borrowed) line back to you: You can believe me, or not. But what you are saying is not scientifically coherent by any means.

RMT
 
Re: Your Test

Matteo,

If John Titor came here 8 years ago that's not my fault. I've the same Time Machine of John Titor.
Click to expand...

Why, some 8 years after Titor's mission (2036 vs. 2044), would you still be using the C204? Titor told us that the C206 was ready to go into service in 2036.
 
Re: Your Test

But the percentage is very low. John Titor is still creating a divergence in this worldline surely higher than the divergence that i can create.
Click to expand...

Divergence from what? What known history are you refering to? And how do you measure your effect vs. whatever effect Titor might have had?
 
Re: Your Test

I can tell you that the John Titor presence in this worldline could diverge 7,8%(number of occurrence).
Click to expand...

Of course you could tell us that but by so doing you'd be in direct conflict with Titor's story. If the divergence was 7-8% then Titor would not have been here.

And he said that the divergence was not cumulative. It (somehow) remained 2%, time independent.
 
Re: Your Test

Matteo,

I'm just going to come out and ask: did you spend any more time than 30 minutes cooking up this story? From your posts so far it really does appear that you spent a few minutes thinking about this after watching Voyager, started posting and since then your resp0onses have been ad hoc.
 
Back
Top