Why is everything a sphere?

Re:Microdensity changes in air presure

The collection of particles and force into spheres, may have to do with how gravity invests itself?
 
Re:Microdensity changes in air presure

I was searching for an answer on the quantum level. Maybe superstring can explain it? I don't know, I still can't find anything, but still looking.
 
Messaging torbis in the sunshine

You said everything, which does not denote accurately, with respects to subquantum realms.

It is my suggestion that you take your ankle length dress, along with those combat boots you wear and plant your garden over there, now.

Do this without delay, or I'll call the company that you rented that blond wig from and have it reclaimed.

Try this link >http://www.vasantcorporation.com/
 
do we really need to go in so much of depth for this.Isn't the simple reason is that spherical shape has an equipotential surface, so if you leave anything with no force acting on it..this is the most stable shape.
 
Daniel you sick frreaak, if this isn’t an example of your inappropriateness, of making perverted sexual scenarios and innuendo’s of the posters here and making them feel uncomfortable, your obviously a very strange and sick little man.

For you see Daniel, the truth of the matter is -that you expect historians to look back at your posts for information, but you have failed to realize that history will also look back at them and see you for the kind of person you really are.

-TTA
 
Daniel you sick frreaak, if this isn’t an example of your inappropriateness, of making perverted sexual scenarios and innuendo’s of the posters here and making them feel uncomfortable, your obviously a very strange and sick little man.

For you see Daniel, the truth of the matter is -that you expect historians to look back at your posts for information, but you have failed to realize that history will also look back at them and see you for the kind of person you really are.

-TTA


well it not about Daniel it about you...you need to be born again as a Christian because I can see your error and making lot of bad words so there is no need to attack him but why not attack yourself and see the light of what are you doing yourself becasue you must be born again..

stop attacking and live in peace and friends.!
 
<font color="red"> I am merely in the spirit of proper brotherhood of this board, advising you of you certain vested swaged garnishes of Mandose Johnson. [/COLOR]

I don't speak yugoslavian, or etheopian or canadian or whatever, but I don't want anything to do with your garnished, or vested, or swaged: mandose johnson.
 
Re: Womin s barrowing men\'s shaving razors

Yes.

No.

No.

Yes.

P.S. I have not found anything yet, still looking.

P.P.S I understand that a sphere is the most effecient shape, but why is the most efficient shape? I'm assuming superstring theory might have an explaination as to why a sphere is used as the base structure instead of say, a donut.

P.P.S. I've always wanted to make three P.S.'s

P.P.S.U.P.S.D.n.L. I'm getting carried away. I better go now.
 
Nature and strucuture of the universe

In frequency, sections of the universe, which are also called other universes, are and can be different shapes.

However, the overall design of the universe, is sphere.

This design is due to the mass attractional gradient of gravity, which makes the grand design spherical.

As one goes out into the universe in very great distance, the layers become lighter in density.

There is eventually and end to were the universe goes and ends.

Stringed space, explains the differing frequencies of the universe, which is important to understand.

Don't confuse anything optically you see as structures in space, as after you go a certain point in distance, what you're seeing is older information.

By light signature access, this time is accessible.But by traveling to that distant light, where your vehicle can not be tuned to your original goal, then that viewed time, is not.

This is the mirage effect, to where one can walk to a goal and never reach there, as the object of their travel fades.

There is a method to measure space and this is a parsed method, also a mathematical formula.

However there is a new problem with this forced form of measurement, and this is the deciphering of what is the quality of space that one is looking for, concerning that chosen goal in space travel?

This is well illustrated by say a chosen goal to travel to a closely star system, using superluminal, or near superluminal velocities.

The spacecraft is readied, the crew is ready and the spaceflight is given launch to this system.

However because of the velocities involved, once the flight is underway, this flight can not be stopped.

Could you imagine the shock on the ground control teams part, if the next day this star system had disappeared, as the information that they were viewing, was older to to how long light takes to travel in space?

It was said in Carl Sagan's tape series Cosmos, that differing sections of universe realities exist, which might even be termed as flatland or inch-high land?

Understanding what Sagan was trying to put forward in this excellent tape series, is the very beginning of understanding of how this universe is put together.

Light is composed of waves and pressure.

Light is also measured via force or dynes at time.

However in your minds eye, light tells you of what, by it image in portrayal of the information that light itself brings?

This one statement should cause you to reexamine what you think you already know.

By Tran oo1s sayings, what would be a proposed Chronotron.......?
 
Re: A good carwax is a good freind

Daniel,

What the heck does this have to do with anything?

You’re not just offensive and perverted, but you’re also ignorant and insulting.

Do you think that by generalizing to me what a typical Mexican family may do for traditions and giving me your pathetic spiel of what you experienced in Mexico means anything at all?

I haven’t been to Mexico in years and that is not the only blood that pumps through my veins.

I am also Chinese… does that mean you’ll give me a description of what a Chinese get together is like, say what your favorite Chinese combo was on one of your visits to the orient?

Please, your pathetic Daniel, your attempts of relating to me or whatever your struggling to do is obvious. And like always and everything else you've ever tried, has failed :D.

-TTA
 
Re: Subject string

Daniel, you prove my point. It must of finally hit you that historians will look back on your posts and label you a nut job. They sure are going to have a hard time figuring out what you said now in those posts... but erasing them from history doesn't seem to bother you, as long as your image is concerned, nor will it matter to history seeing that you tried covering something up. To bad you can’t delete all your guilty posts to prevent them from figuring you out as a pervert… But I will make it a point to copy and paste your new posts next time... You know, for history's sakes /ttiforum/images/graemlins/smile.gif it’s what I do, I preserve things.

-TTA
 
Re: Cosmological shape proposed for M+

Dear Raid' I would like to make a public apology as I was only kidding around with you.

I assure you, that I am neither perverted, or have interests other than is what assigned to this board, in the subject of time travel.

SUBJECT MATTER ASKED:The shape of the universe by conventional means, of what is considered socially acceptable science, differs from what these true possible outside the main stream of science universe configurations are.

The points of couterintetnion are and have been, (That there may have been no central collection point, to the big bang)?

There may have been a collection point and then a series of cosmic burps, which may have formed protomatter. This collctions point was not the size of a head of a pin; however if this point did exist, then it would have had to been a point, as large as the a size of this solar system, for all matter held within the entire universe, as we know it.

OTHER POINTS OF CONTENTION:The entire universe may not be expanding at an infinite rate, however recycle itself in the areas of black holes and other heavy object ingestion points, as the countering fact, tendril white holes pronounce ejected matter and particles, to a continued cycle?

LIGHT AND AGE OF TIME:Another problem with how the universe is realized with age in distance apart from traditional means, is that the distance realized, if they are still real within the sight of, THE HUBBLE DEEP FIELD realizations of observations.

This is that by time parsec spacing alone, the age of the universe can not be a few billions of years old, is distant galaxies are viewed within quadrillions of light years in lengthed distances? See;..THE HUBBLE DEEP FIELD as a qualified search word, in most search engines?

So what is put forward here, is that factors that are not being taken into account, is are the nature of supposed empty space, plus the nature of how space is perceptive within mass held in the universe which is ofcourse in motion.

The problem vested here within only a cursory view, is matter moving, however the nature of the supposed empty universe, staying the same, with respects to recycle potentials?

I suggest a study on Nicola Tessla and his studies of frequency with respects to electrical nature.

I also suggest a study into how the nature of stringed cosmology is placed together, as without these supposed dynamics, then one can not even begin to suppose a shape?

Again, was only kidding, hope that this helps?
 
Re: Cosmological shape proposed for M+

Well it took you long enough to render an apology to Raid for your inappropriate comments to him.

It almost makes you seem like a person for doing that.

But if that were true, why did it take you a week and many posts later after your last post that sparked it, to do so now?

I don’t think you’re really sorry Daniel, I just think you’re sorry you got caught and have no other choice.

For the truth of the matter is Daniel, your not a man of character who takes responsibility for his actions, your just a rat trying to escape a sinking ship.

For if you could do it again, you know you would. History here shows that to be the case. As the victims you violated know as well.

-TTA
 
Re: Cosmological shape proposed for M+

&gt;Note to Radizuo:If unity can not be proven by the Copenhagen protocols in cosmological physics, then a defiant shape of the universe seems at large.

You must investigate your own definition of how the universe might look?

Sources Nova Interview With David Bohm and NOVA's special, on the subject of time travel.
 
Back
Top