Why don't we see concrete evidence of time travel?

[JudasTitor]

Maybe. You can only estimate the size of the unit. It fit comfortably where the passenger's seat of the Corvette was removed as depicted in one of the photos. The only dimension that Titor ever gave for the unit was it had a mass of "about 500 lbs."

AI Overview



The sarcophagus in the King's Chamber of the Great Pyramid of Giza is a large granite box, measuring approximately 3 meters long, 1.6 meters wide, and 1.6 meters tall.
Here's a more detailed breakdown:
Location: King's Chamber within the Great Pyramid of Giza.
Material: Red granite.
Dimensions:
Length: 3 meters
Width: 1.6 meters
Height: 1.6 meters
Significance: The sarcophagus is a prominent feature of the King's Chamber, and while it's large, it remains empty after 4,500 years.
Unfinished Chamber: There is an unfinished subterranean chamber 90 feet (30 meters) below the surface of the plateau, and is closed to the public.

 

[Darby]

The sarcophagus in the King's Chamber of the Great Pyramid of Giza is a large granite box, measuring approximately 3 meters long, 1.6 meters wide, and 1.6 meters tall.

I don't follow. The comparison you originally made was made between the size of the C204 versus the size of The Ark of the Covenant. How did the sarcophagus get into the mix?

Anyway the size of Titor's 1967 Corvette was L 4.44 m x W 1.81 m x H 1.14 m. The sarcophagus is about the size of the entire Corvette. At 68 metric tons the mass of the sarcophagus it a tad more than the mass of 227 kg (~500 lbs) suggested by Titor for the C204.

 

[JudasTitor]

I don't follow. The comparison you originally made was made between the size of the C204 versus the size of The Ark of the Covenant. How did the sarcophagus get into the mix?

Anyway the size of Titor's 1967 Corvette was L 4.44 m x W 1.81 m x H 1.14 m. The sarcophagus is about the size of the entire Corvette. At 68 metric tons the mass of the sarcophagus it a tad more than the mass of 227 kg (~500 lbs) suggested by Titor for the C204.

I read a theory once that the Jews stole the Ark from long-term storage inside the Giza pyramid, hence their exit from Egypt.

 

[Darby]

I read a theory once that the Jews stole the Ark from long-term storage inside the Giza pyramid, hence their exit from Egypt

That would be a neat trick, my friend. The Great Pyramid was constructed some 4,500 years ago circa 2,500 BC. 1,300 years later, according to Exodus 25:10, God commanded the Jews, through Moses, to build The Ark of the Covenant. Moses then lead the Exodus from Egypt. Part of the Exodus itself was the building of the Ark.

 

[JudasTitor]

That would be a neat trick, my friend. The Great Pyramid was constructed some 4,500 years ago circa 2,500 BC. 1,300 years later, according to Exodus 25:10, God commanded the Jews, through Moses, to build The Ark of the Covenant. Moses then lead the Exodus from Egypt. Part of the Exodus itself was the building of the Ark.

AI Overview

According to the Bible, the Israelites, led by Moses, left Egypt around the 13th century BCE, after a series of plagues and the death of the firstborn of Egypt.
Here's a more detailed breakdown:
Biblical Account:
The story of the Israelites' liberation from slavery in Egypt, known as the Exodus, is recounted in the Book of Exodus in the Hebrew Bible.
Timeframe:
Scholars generally place the Exodus in the 13th century BCE, though there is some debate about the exact date and the scale of the event.
Key Figures:
Moses and Aaron led the Israelites out of Egypt after a series of plagues, culminating in the death of the firstborn of Egypt, which prompted Pharaoh to release them.
Passover:
The Exodus is commemorated annually by Jews during the holiday of Passover, which marks the Israelites' departure from Egypt.
Biblical Chronology:
According to the biblical chronology, the Exodus took place around 1300 BCE.
Scholarly Debate:
While the Exodus is a central event in Jewish and Christian tradition, scholars debate the historical accuracy of the Exodus story and its details.
Alternative Dates:
Some scholars propose alternative dates for the Exodus, with some placing it in the 12th century BCE, during the reign of Ramses III.
Merneptah Stele:
The Merneptah Stele, an Egyptian inscription from around 1219 BCE, mentions a people called "Israel", providing some outside evidence for the existence of a group of people who could be the Israelites.



Ever heard of the Bronze Age Collapse? It was essentially the Apocalypse around 3200 years ago. There were violent earthquakes that destroyed most cities and it allegedly didn't rain in the Mediterranean for 7 years, suggesting a mini ice age / magnetic reversal event. The israelites went to the Egyptian delta for food, the Nile is fed by a geologic spring. In most civilizations, there is no evidence of construction or writing for 400 years.....

What Caused The Bronze Age Collapse Of Civilization? (5 Theories) | TheCollector

In the 12th Century BCE, a Bronze Age civilization in the Mediterranean was suddenly extinguished. Are we any closer to solving the mystery?

www.thecollector.com

Late Bronze Age collapse - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

What Caused the Bronze Age Collapse? | HISTORY

More than 3,200 years ago, a vast, interconnected civilization thrived. Then it suddenly collapsed. What happened?

www.history.com

 

[Darby]

That's a wonderful historical review, thank you. But "Where's the Beef?" The topic that you chose was the Egyptians put the Ark inside the Great Pyramid, sealed it up and a couple thousand years later the Jews broke into the pyramid, recovered the Ark and then took it away with them during the Exodus. Nothing in your historical review addresses any of that.

There were violent earthquakes that destroyed most cities and it allegedly didn't rain in the Mediterranean for 7 years, suggesting a mini ice age / magnetic reversal event.

Awww, Brother Judas. I'm disappointed. Pole reversals? You're aware, aren't you that the magnetic pole drift of 180 degrees takes tens of thousands of years to occur. It's gradual. It might disrupt electronic technology a tiny bit. But engineers would have thousands of years to contemplate the type of disruption and modify the technology to counter the effect. That's a pretty straight forward set of electrical engineering problems to solve. Could it affect weather? Sure...over the course of tens of thousands of years and very slowly. But earthquakes and other calamities proposed in pseudo-science? No. Pole sifts are a natural occurrence and they don't knock down buildings, cause earthquakes and form tsunamis. If pole reversal was an issue that causes destruction then we had better turn off every electric generation plant in America because...they pole shift 60 times per second while outputting gigawatt levels of power. So far Hoover Dam hasn't crumbled and no tsunamis have formed on the Colorado River.

 

[JudasTitor]

Santa's workshop will be located in RUSSIA by 2075 at this rate. We have lost the right of Santa Claus.

Just for fun, let's say a microsingularity passed through the Earth's core 3200 years ago. What kind of "damage" would an an insurance actuary expect to see presently for said event?

What kind of damage could I do with a particle beam weapon that fires rotating microsingularities?

The DoD loves to fund science.


View: https://youtu.be/neYzkyLHui0?si=AZrQWiOCVjZaZzmM

 

[Darby]

Just for fun, let's say a microsingularity passed through the Earth's core 3200 years ago. What kind of "damage" would an an insurance actuary expect to see presently for said event

First you might have defined what you mean by microsingularity. For the sake of argument let's just use Titor's microsingularity. We've gone through this before but I'll do it again. Titor said the mass of the twin microsingularities, the case and electronic components was about 500 lbs. I'll translate that to kilograms. Because he didn't say "exactly 500 lbs" I'll use an estimate. Let the total mass be 225 kg (500 lbs is 226.7 kg). Next I allocate 25 kg to the case and components which leaves 100 kg for each microsingularity mass.

The temperature of such a black hole, as it evaporates through Hawking Radiation, would be on the order of 10 billion degrees. It would completely evaporate in about 2 x 10^-25 seconds and have a nuclear bomb yield of about 2 million kilotons. Based on the nuclear yield alone the 100% kill radius would be about 13 km or 8 miles. But this would not be a typical nuclear explosion given the 10 billion degree temperature. In that event the 100% kill radius is 130 km or 81 miles. At 183 km, 114 miles, we would still see a death rate of 50%. For comparison, if the microsingularity was formed at the Los Angeles City Hall it would prompt kill at least 75% of the population from San Diego to Santa Barbara and out to Las Vegas. Of course everything would be on fire so the real death rate would be much closer to 100% for all of that area.

The microsingularity wouldn't exist long enough to travel even 1 meter after it was formed even if it was traveling at 99.999% the speed of light. So it would never live long enough to travel to the center of the earth. However, to give the Devil his due, if a micromass black hole was sitting in the center of some massive body like the earth it would swallow up a bunch of mass very quickly. But it would very quickly sweep clean a volume within that mass. Black holes aren't magic. It doesn't matter if a 100 kg mass is water, lead or a black hole. it only generates a gravitational field based on 100 kg. If you were sitting one meter away from a 100 kg black hole, assuming there is no such animal as Hawking Radiation, the effects on you would be no different than sitting 1 meter away from a 100 kg lead ball. After billions of years it would grow as mass trickled in across the clean sweep zone at a snail's pace. A 100 kg black hole finding itself at the center of the earth and quickly growing to a few thousand kg would not instantly destroy the earth - again assuming no Hawking Radiation. It would just slowly grow over billions of years.

The only place where the effects would be different between the lead ball and a black hole is if you moved closer to the 100 kg mass black hole than the physical radius of the 100 kg lead ball. That's what Surface Gravity is all about.

 

[Darby]

Edit: I gave the situation some more thought. The micromass black hole might not grow appreciably at all during those billions of years. The radius of the event horizon of a 100 kg black hole would be much, much smaller than even a hydrogen atom. The gravitational field would be there but matter at the center of the earth is extremely hot. Temperature is a function of the momentum of the atoms. Though the atoms around the BH are gravitationally attracted to the BH they would be traveling so fast that they would not become gravitationally bound and forced across the event horizon. The only matter that would fall across the event horizon would be atoms that happened to be traveling toward the event horizon rather than being "pulled" into the BH.

Just remember that this scenario does not parallel the known physics. In the known physics Hawking Radiation does exist. In that case, as I initially pointed out, this scenario never develops.

 

[JudasTitor]

First you might have defined what you mean by microsingularity. For the sake of argument let's just use Titor's microsingularity. We've gone through this before but I'll do it again. Titor said the mass of the twin microsingularities, the case and electronic components was about 500 lbs. I'll translate that to kilograms. Because he didn't say "exactly 500 lbs" I'll use an estimate. Let the total mass be 225 kg (500 lbs is 226.7 kg). Next I allocate 25 kg to the case and components which leaves 100 kg for each microsingularity mass.

The temperature of such a black hole, as it evaporates through Hawking Radiation, would be on the order of 10 billion degrees. It would completely evaporate in about 2 x 10^-25 seconds and have a nuclear bomb yield of about 2 million kilotons. Based on the nuclear yield alone the 100% kill radius would be about 13 km or 8 miles. But this would not be a typical nuclear explosion given the 10 billion degree temperature. In that event the 100% kill radius is 130 km or 81 miles. At 183 km, 114 miles, we would still see a death rate of 50%. For comparison, if the microsingularity was formed at the Los Angeles City Hall it would prompt kill at least 75% of the population from San Diego to Santa Barbara and out to Las Vegas. Of course everything would be on fire so the real death rate would be much closer to 100% for all of that area.

The microsingularity wouldn't exist long enough to travel even 1 meter after it was formed even if it was traveling at 99.999% the speed of light. So it would never live long enough to travel to the center of the earth. However, to give the Devil his due, if a micromass black hole was sitting in the center of some massive body like the earth it would swallow up a bunch of mass very quickly. But it would very quickly sweep clean a volume within that mass. Black holes aren't magic. It doesn't matter if a 100 kg mass is water, lead or a black hole. it only generates a gravitational field based on 100 kg. If you were sitting one meter away from a 100 kg black hole, assuming there is no such animal as Hawking Radiation, the effects on you would be no different than sitting 1 meter away from a 100 kg lead ball. After billions of years it would grow as mass trickled in across the clean sweep zone at a snail's pace. A 100 kg black hole finding itself at the center of the earth and quickly growing to a few thousand kg would not instantly destroy the earth - again assuming no Hawking Radiation. It would just slowly grow over billions of years.

The only place where the effects would be different between the lead ball and a black hole is if you moved closer to the 100 kg mass black hole than the physical radius of the 100 kg lead ball. That's what Surface Gravity is all about.

Those are a lot of assumptions for something we have never studied in the lab, but your math looks very sound. I feel like our assumptions of nuclear science pre 1940 didn't match our lab results post 1960. In the words of a Time Traveler, perhaps "there are unknown energy levels yet to be discovered".

I'm finally hearing rumors in the astronomy community admiting that "dark matter" might actually be microsingularities & intermediate size black holes. Go team Ghostbusters!

 

[Darby]

There's a problem with the black hole scenario. What we observe is a very smooth, homogeneous, distribution of the effects of dark matter. If the effects were the result of black holes the distribution of the effects would be granular. Lumpy-clumpy if you will.

 

[Darby]

Oh, God. I said "lumpy-clumpy" which is something that a certain Time Lord might have said.

 

[JudasTitor]

There's a problem with the black hole scenario. What we observe is a very smooth, homogeneous, distribution of the effects of dark matter. If the effects were the result of black holes the distribution of the effects would be granular. Lumpy-clumpy if you will.

What holds galaxies together?