Very Interesting........

Oh' for the record Ray, I didn't bag your girl, as you say.

I'm sure they don't allow thousand pound horses through the scanners, at LAX as that's what I do.

She's blond.I've tried that once long ago and it did not work out.

I appreciate them, but their not my cup of tea.

Oh and the little ditty you put in fiction.DON'T.One I'll go to Raul and two there is already some guy on you, I don't even know about, that mentioned your i.p. not being invisible.

Your wimen are yours and not my digs, get it?

Also check your rear view mirror from your own people, if your going to threaten people on the i-net.

There were lot of people complaining about the harassment from the cabalist razzing them, even in aerospace rooms.

I guess this only both verifies and proves my point?
 
Mary Lake seismograph has been active since 8:30 this morning. I think it's weird because it's going on so long. The odd small rumble for a minute or two is pretty common but all day long...?

Uuss.YML_EHZ_WY.2005061500.gif
 
Maybe you should ask a geologist? As far as it being uncommon for there to be rumbling there all day long, what about the following seismograph from November 2003?
Moose11Nov.gif

RMT
 
I'm not an o-gist of any sort, but the pic from 05 appears a bit more ominous than the one from 03. Maybe its time to call prophet Yaweh out to Yellowstone and get some real shakin' goin' on.
 
Hi anoneemass,

I'm not an o-gist of any sort, but the pic from 05 appears a bit more ominous than the one from 03.
Click to expand...
Well, I would agree, but the key word you have used is "appears". Do you know how to read the magnitudes of these plots? I cannot find anything on the originating website that explains the relative magnitudes of these seismic measurements. This is why we need the expertise of a geologist to help us interpret it. It is dangerous (and alarmist) to jump to conclusions if you don't know what you are looking at.

I'm an engineer, and one thing I do know is that you cannot gauge the power of an earthquake by examining its time-domain signature alone. You need to perform a transformation called a Power Spectral Density plot, which takes the time domain plot and, using techniques such as LaPlace transforms and/or Fourier transforms, and converts them into the frequency domain. From this plot in the frequency domain you can estimate the power released at any given frequency of shaking. Based on my knowledge of these things, this is what I think would have to be done to understand what these plots are telling us.

But there is an easier way to cross check... The following URL shows the magnitudes of the quakes in the Yellowstone area over the last few days. From my inspection of this map, if it correlates at all to the shaking we are seeing in the plots, it looks pretty small. Continuous, yes...but also small.

http://quake.utah.edu/recenteqs/Maps/111-45.html

RMT
 
Back
Top