Re: Titor Predictions - Track Record - Updated
Perhaps, then, we may also both agree that the conditions for civil war are actually closer to the truth in the EU than they are in the US?
It can't really be called a civil war, not until Europe is fully unified as one state. But yes I'd imagine that there might also be more civil unrest here in Europe, like the French riots, which most likely happened because of forced multiculturalism via too liberal immigration and refugee laws, and the welfarestate, the poor young muslims that rioted thought that the government somehow owed something to them.However, unlike the US, almost all the countries here in Europe have quite diffrent histories and cultures. For instance, people here in Finland didn't react much to the French riots.
The wonderful thing about our federal election process is that we can change our government, at will, each two years... and change our president and his administration every four years. We don't need civil wars... we just kick the bums out and change our path.
Well yes in theory that's true. But the majority of the higher echelons of both the democrats and the republicans are bought and paid for.
I seriously doubt we are going to stop doing what WE think is necessary to capture or kill terrorist elements in the world ... Whether you (or other countries) like us or not, we are going to do what it takes to wipe out Islamic Fundamentalist terror cells (and their allies), and we are going to do it BECAUSE we do NOT want the same kind of crap happening on our soil that happened in Europe...TWICE!
Well first you must realize that there is no organized international terrorist network, like the fictious al Qaeda for instance. al Qaeda was made up back in 1998 when the East African US embassy bombings took place, the whole al Qaeda myth is based on what one Sudanese militant that claimed to have been in bin Ladens posse, who was also paid a couple of hundred thousand dollars and offered safehaven in the US by the US government, said.If you go search the internet you won't find any article dated before August 7 1998 mentioning "al Qaeda" and refering to a international terrorist network. Two months before the bombings it was "Osama bin Laden and a
couple of his followers.", not "the international terrorist network al Qaeda led by Osama bin Laden", like it was about a week after the bombings.
Even the UK's prime minister Tony Blair said the following in a interview on Fox News: "Al Qaeda is not an organization. Al Qaeda is a way of working … but this has the hallmark of that approach."
So remember, when they mention "al Qaeda operatives" in the news, what they really mean is either "random Islamist militant", "random muslim who might possibly have something against the US" or "somebody that doesn't even exist."
Countries that you have more reason to worry about is China and North Korea.
Two years ago border patrol agents spotted Chinese military near the southern border of the US.
China virtually owns the Panama canal and they could already be smuggling military equipment and troops down there.
A Chinese general has already twice said that China will not hesitate to use nuclear weapons against the US, incase they interfere on plans that they might have for Taiwan.
The former Chinese Minister of Defense said in that speech I posted above, that China will specifically wage war against the US and other western countries, with inferior races, in order to among other things aquire more living space for the chinese.
China also owns a big piece of America, through numerous companies and also in US bonds etc.
North Korea has said several times that it will not hesitate to attack the US with nuclear weapons. North Korea also launched a ICBM test missile which landed in Alaska, sometime after the US invaded Iraq.