That is because time is RELATIVE. Maybe you should read up on Relativity, you know, Einstein? For example, light does not travel faster in different areas of the galaxy, it is a constant. Therefore the time it takes to travel a specific distance is the same nomatter where it is.
TIME
- Thread starter TURTLE
- Start date
That is because time is RELATIVE. Maybe you should read up on Relativity, you know, Einstein? For example, light does not travel faster in different areas of the galaxy, it is a constant. Therefore the time it takes to travel a specific distance is the same nomatter where it is.
AlienChild
Temporal Navigator
Light can not be a constant, once bent it does not travel at same speed. Einstein was almost right.
AlienChild
Temporal Navigator
Was edited.
RenUnconscious
Quantum Scribe
My understanding is that a photon is still going to travel at C regardless if it is bent by some major gravity source such as a nearby star. It may mean the light has to travel Further and thus Longer to reach the same distance, however its acceleration would be constant at C. Change in acceleration being a change in speed or direction, this case direction is altered but not speed.
Einstein
Dimensional Traveler
AlienChild
I do believe I probably mentioned this already in another post. I stated that the arrow of time seems to coincide with the decrease of mass during a nuclear reaction. The sun is constantly converting hydrogen to helium, and in the process, some of the mass is lost. I have a theory that mass is just compressed length. So some of the compressed length is released during the nuclear bonding. It is during the release of the compressed length that the parameters for the gravitational constant are set for this area in local spacetime. It also suggests that other suns that use different elements to fuse together may have different time flow rates in their location. The gravitational constant would also be different as well. I believe I also mentioned that the release of the compressed length is what is responcible for the expansion of our universe.
It did occur to me that if large quantities of mass were being compressed, such as in any nuclear bonding of elements above iron, time would flow the other way.
Now my latest experiments with electric fields suggest that because it appears I have a gravity like force present, I may also be creating an independant time flow in the local area. So that leads to the conclusion that the expansion of mass is not the only way to create or alter the flow of time. Apparently it can also be done with expanding and contracting electric fields as well. So it may be that the flow of time for electric fields is independant of the flow of time for nuclear energy release reactions. I have had some indications that time could be flowing at a different rate with my gravity experiments.
I do believe I probably mentioned this already in another post. I stated that the arrow of time seems to coincide with the decrease of mass during a nuclear reaction. The sun is constantly converting hydrogen to helium, and in the process, some of the mass is lost. I have a theory that mass is just compressed length. So some of the compressed length is released during the nuclear bonding. It is during the release of the compressed length that the parameters for the gravitational constant are set for this area in local spacetime. It also suggests that other suns that use different elements to fuse together may have different time flow rates in their location. The gravitational constant would also be different as well. I believe I also mentioned that the release of the compressed length is what is responcible for the expansion of our universe.
It did occur to me that if large quantities of mass were being compressed, such as in any nuclear bonding of elements above iron, time would flow the other way.
Now my latest experiments with electric fields suggest that because it appears I have a gravity like force present, I may also be creating an independant time flow in the local area. So that leads to the conclusion that the expansion of mass is not the only way to create or alter the flow of time. Apparently it can also be done with expanding and contracting electric fields as well. So it may be that the flow of time for electric fields is independant of the flow of time for nuclear energy release reactions. I have had some indications that time could be flowing at a different rate with my gravity experiments.
AlienChild
Temporal Navigator
Thus why we are here, poeple like you are accepting it as it is not as they want it to be.
By using your theory, time is irrelevent.
And to answer light traveling at C: A photon will not travel at same speed when light is bent, a light beem is a photonic mass in itself. Light has a limit when traveling through a given environment.
When you send a mnessage on one fiber optic cables, the limit is not the light but the cable itself(the environment the light is traveling in) Same theory applies to light traveling in open space.
The limit in this case would be photonic, gravitational and reflective.
By using your theory, time is irrelevent.
And to answer light traveling at C: A photon will not travel at same speed when light is bent, a light beem is a photonic mass in itself. Light has a limit when traveling through a given environment.
When you send a mnessage on one fiber optic cables, the limit is not the light but the cable itself(the environment the light is traveling in) Same theory applies to light traveling in open space.
The limit in this case would be photonic, gravitational and reflective.
Einstein
Dimensional Traveler
AlienChild
Could you elaborate more on this. I don't quite understand how you came to your conclusions. It's possible that we don't share the same base assumptions. But without clarification, it is very hard for me to decern what it is you are trying to convey.
Right here I don't think you quite comprehend what gravity is doing to the photons of light. It doesn't do anything to the photons of light. Gravity is warping the space the photons travel through. So what appears to be a bending of light is actually a bending of space instead. So the speed of light is not altered at all. The light is just traveling through an accelerating medium. The velocity of light in a gravitational reference frame is the same as it is elsewhere. So light does not have mass nor does it need to have mass when traveling through a gravitational reference frame.
Could you elaborate more on this. I don't quite understand how you came to your conclusions. It's possible that we don't share the same base assumptions. But without clarification, it is very hard for me to decern what it is you are trying to convey.
Right here I don't think you quite comprehend what gravity is doing to the photons of light. It doesn't do anything to the photons of light. Gravity is warping the space the photons travel through. So what appears to be a bending of light is actually a bending of space instead. So the speed of light is not altered at all. The light is just traveling through an accelerating medium. The velocity of light in a gravitational reference frame is the same as it is elsewhere. So light does not have mass nor does it need to have mass when traveling through a gravitational reference frame.
AlienChild
Temporal Navigator
All that you saay is correct based on earth physics. That is how it works here and what you think works everywhere. I am just pointing that it does not work quite the same eslewhere as you are so carefully ellaborating on. There is no flaw in your logic based on physics used here.
If humans go to alpha and use the same calculations as you do here, you will end up with the wrong results.
If humans go to alpha and use the same calculations as you do here, you will end up with the wrong results.
I'm curious, if what you say is correct, and in fact the laws of physics are completely different accross the universe, then how is it possible for you to visit here, how is space travel possible at all? Every destination would have completely different laws, you could not possibly account for the changes as you travel, the possibilities would be limitless. In fact, you would have no way of measuring distances since light (according to you) changes speed all over the universe.
This is amazing, because of this, our entire concept of the universe, it's size, locations of neighbouring galaxies are all completely wrong then!!
This is amazing, because of this, our entire concept of the universe, it's size, locations of neighbouring galaxies are all completely wrong then!!
AlienChild
Temporal Navigator
Rhudey, I never said that we had all the correct answers either. We are learning sush as you. We happen to discover this fact before you did. nothing more. And yes you are correct, all our initial calculations have to be redone because we first assumed the same principles as you.
Please know that the ignorance of humans in this instance is not reflective of over all intelect.
We discuss this with you in hopes to open you eyes and help you achieve full potentiel.
How is it that your military is capable of reaching 114 Gs in a craft while flying through space and you have no cleu of it!
How is it that your military flys crafts in formation of thowsands at thirty thowsand feet and you do not see it.
How is it that we are here and you still ignore us? You ridicule everything that goes against your idea of everything.
Please know that the ignorance of humans in this instance is not reflective of over all intelect.
We discuss this with you in hopes to open you eyes and help you achieve full potentiel.
How is it that your military is capable of reaching 114 Gs in a craft while flying through space and you have no cleu of it!
How is it that your military flys crafts in formation of thowsands at thirty thowsand feet and you do not see it.
How is it that we are here and you still ignore us? You ridicule everything that goes against your idea of everything.
AlienChild
Temporal Navigator
Good poeple in DOD. Be observant, read with an objective mind.
Good_Scientist
Temporal Navigator
I great way to get yourself out of that one, in future just say, I don't know. Would that really be so bad?
Anyway,
I don't trust people like you because; some ancient greek (I forget who) once said something along the lines of, 'Do not believe the words of someone who claims to know the truth, instead doubt him completely.'
Now I will apply this to you and your crazy claims of knowledge beyond any other on this planet (for that is what you are implying). You are telling us complete [censored] [censored], is it any wonder we don't believe you. Do aliens have wise, valuable philosophy? Please share some with me! I will only believe that aliens are here on earth, when one comes forward, who is more intelligent than you, and can unequivocally prove himself.
So concluding, you may carry on with your, fasade, purporting what one could call [censored]. I do not care anymore.
Good Scientist
P.s Nearly good english, you need a comma between your 'being a child' and 'I am not', otherwise it just seems idiosyncratic. However, it means very little alongside the other shinig gems of your knowledge.
AlienChild
Temporal Navigator
Being doubtfull is human nature when faced with the unknown. That is normal, we too are doubtfull, we were very boubtfull when we came here at first.
I ask not that you care, I ask that you have an open mind. I am not alone and not the only kind, humans are contacted every day by us and others, just see and listen.
My English is no good, I try to use proper English, if you correct me, that is fine.
we are not the most intelligent beings we are just more advanced in some areas than Earth.
humans like you seem to have an inferiority complex where you should not. Humans are more advanced than us in some areas. We are learning from you while we are here. Please stop judging and assuming that we are more advanced.
P.S. The English speak english and the French speak french, what we are typing her is only a basterdized version of any languages amalgamated together.
I ask not that you care, I ask that you have an open mind. I am not alone and not the only kind, humans are contacted every day by us and others, just see and listen.
My English is no good, I try to use proper English, if you correct me, that is fine.
we are not the most intelligent beings we are just more advanced in some areas than Earth.
humans like you seem to have an inferiority complex where you should not. Humans are more advanced than us in some areas. We are learning from you while we are here. Please stop judging and assuming that we are more advanced.
P.S. The English speak english and the French speak french, what we are typing her is only a basterdized version of any languages amalgamated together.
Good_Scientist
Temporal Navigator
You misundestnad the quote, basically, it says that people shouldn't believe any old fool, simply because he is trying to tell you the truth. He must prove himself. I think human nature of being doubtful of the unknown is applicable only to some now in this day and age. Could humans really have come this far if they were afraid of the unknown?
Good Scientist
Good Scientist
AlienChild
Temporal Navigator
Sometimes fear is a knowledge barrier, remember the risk takers made human kind advance in areas unproven by science at the time.
fear is a good thing by very over expressed.
fear is a good thing by very over expressed.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof, unfortunately you haven't provided any. In fact, your answer for almost every question is that you "aren't sure" or "we are learning too". I would think that you would at least have a basic knowledge of some of the basic principles for the physics that apply to your "area of the universe" but you do not. Even grade 9 students where I am know the basic principles.
I do not believe that the laws of the universe change throughout, it isn't plausible, if it originated from a singularity then your story makes no sense to me. Unfortunately I think if you wish to present a hoax like Titors you need to be a little more knowledgable first, maybe try reading some of Stephen Hawkings books.
Interesting that you have not commented on the fact that you already admitted to being a hoax before since I provided you with the quote.
I do not believe that the laws of the universe change throughout, it isn't plausible, if it originated from a singularity then your story makes no sense to me. Unfortunately I think if you wish to present a hoax like Titors you need to be a little more knowledgable first, maybe try reading some of Stephen Hawkings books.
Interesting that you have not commented on the fact that you already admitted to being a hoax before since I provided you with the quote.
AlienChild
Temporal Navigator
It was said to get a reaction and to see who would catch it!