Time Traveler here!!!
- Thread starter Zech
- Start date
Warrior381
Temporal Navigator
to Zech..only..
here is my quesiton for you?? will there be a civil wars in the future can you share of what will happen in the future?? thank you. /ttiforum/images/graemlins/confused.gif
here is my quesiton for you?? will there be a civil wars in the future can you share of what will happen in the future?? thank you. /ttiforum/images/graemlins/confused.gif
Darby
Epochal Historian
Re: No Time Traveller Here!!! 
Zech,
Here's the problem, my friend. That no one understands what you are saying is not a surprise. What is it that you've said so far in your dozen or so posts on this thread?
That's it. That is the totality of your message from 6,000 years into the future.
Every other post that you've made is in response to my having engaged you in quibbling matters And that's where you made your mistake. You come from 6,000 years into our future and all you can manage to accomplish is to get distracted into quibbling.
If you're going to post a yarn and expect to have an on-going conversation you have to do some planning, have a story ready to tell that makes some sort of sense, a story that is interesting and a story that is not a simple rehash of one or more of several dozen TT Sagas that have come before..
You have to anticipate the questions that are going to be asked. For example, the "quibble" over English as the only language that far into the future is an old hat topic - we've been there many times before. With a bit of research you could have anticipated the distraction and handled it.
With some research you could have also noticed that those folks who show some talent are better tollerated. Of course we know that you, and they, are telling a tall tale. But we can usually tell when the tall tale teller is having fun and when s/he is doing it because of an underlying belief that anyone who posts here is an imbecile such that s/he will believe anything from anyone who posts. In short, they are trying to ridicule the members in order to get some perverse form of pleasure out of their game. The tip off on the latter permutation of the TT tale teller is that it usually doesn't take very long for them to start calling people names because, apparently, it frustrates them that the would-be "imbeciles" don't bite on the bait as readily as they had originally anticipated.
This is entertainment. We get our pleasure from debating a good yarn - in some cases long after the creator has left the scene. That's a damn sure sign that the author had just a bit more talent than the average story writing bear.
Had you shown some talent, planning and preparation so that your story was at least interesting I assure you that I would have asked some interesting questions, or at least questions that would have, based on my experience, some possibility of being interesting to someone.
I guess that the bottom line is that you get what you give. Tell a mindless boring story and you get mindless boring responses.
Zech,
Here's the problem, my friend. That no one understands what you are saying is not a surprise. What is it that you've said so far in your dozen or so posts on this thread?
That's it. That is the totality of your message from 6,000 years into the future.
Every other post that you've made is in response to my having engaged you in quibbling matters And that's where you made your mistake. You come from 6,000 years into our future and all you can manage to accomplish is to get distracted into quibbling.
If you're going to post a yarn and expect to have an on-going conversation you have to do some planning, have a story ready to tell that makes some sort of sense, a story that is interesting and a story that is not a simple rehash of one or more of several dozen TT Sagas that have come before..
You have to anticipate the questions that are going to be asked. For example, the "quibble" over English as the only language that far into the future is an old hat topic - we've been there many times before. With a bit of research you could have anticipated the distraction and handled it.
With some research you could have also noticed that those folks who show some talent are better tollerated. Of course we know that you, and they, are telling a tall tale. But we can usually tell when the tall tale teller is having fun and when s/he is doing it because of an underlying belief that anyone who posts here is an imbecile such that s/he will believe anything from anyone who posts. In short, they are trying to ridicule the members in order to get some perverse form of pleasure out of their game. The tip off on the latter permutation of the TT tale teller is that it usually doesn't take very long for them to start calling people names because, apparently, it frustrates them that the would-be "imbeciles" don't bite on the bait as readily as they had originally anticipated.
This is entertainment. We get our pleasure from debating a good yarn - in some cases long after the creator has left the scene. That's a damn sure sign that the author had just a bit more talent than the average story writing bear.
Had you shown some talent, planning and preparation so that your story was at least interesting I assure you that I would have asked some interesting questions, or at least questions that would have, based on my experience, some possibility of being interesting to someone.
I guess that the bottom line is that you get what you give. Tell a mindless boring story and you get mindless boring responses.
Darby
Epochal Historian
Re:Shut the [censored] up you skeptic assholes > -Zech
Zech,
It's a "high" IQ score? My friend, a Weschler IQ score of 254 is totally off the scale. An IQ score of 254 falls within the .00000001% of the general public. If your IQ score was that you'd be one of the one-in-a-billion 12 yr olds who graduated from college at that age and were in graduate school. You'd be the one person alive today who had that level of mental acumen.
Did you pick "254" off the top of your head or were you being serious? Or did you pick both "12 yrs old" and "254 IQ" off the top of your head?
As I said in the previous post, the tip-off is that people who fall within a certain class tend to get frustrated and resort to panicked name calling to justify their original position because their real agenda was to ridicule people whom they consider to be imbaciles.
My present position is that you are one of those people.
-ZechZech,
It's a "high" IQ score? My friend, a Weschler IQ score of 254 is totally off the scale. An IQ score of 254 falls within the .00000001% of the general public. If your IQ score was that you'd be one of the one-in-a-billion 12 yr olds who graduated from college at that age and were in graduate school. You'd be the one person alive today who had that level of mental acumen.
Did you pick "254" off the top of your head or were you being serious? Or did you pick both "12 yrs old" and "254 IQ" off the top of your head?
As I said in the previous post, the tip-off is that people who fall within a certain class tend to get frustrated and resort to panicked name calling to justify their original position because their real agenda was to ridicule people whom they consider to be imbaciles.
My present position is that you are one of those people.
TheCigSmokingMan
Rift Surfer
Re:Shut the [censored] up you skeptic assholes > -Zech
Ruthless and Darby,
I have noticed over the years mothers who go around telling people that the child's IQ is this or that... 140's, 160s, 180s...
I heard one mother that said it was 154 for hers... 6 below Einstein? /ttiforum/images/graemlins/smile.gif lol
And I have never seen the child read a book or talk about science or math... /ttiforum/images/graemlins/smile.gif
I think schools systems are lying to people and using these 'crazy new IQ scale tests'
But just one man's opinion...
<But I really think Zech is 'cyber poppty person' or AI artificial intelligence that thinks he is 'ALIVE' /ttiforum/images/graemlins/smile.gif>
/ttiforum/images/graemlins/smile.gif
TheCigMan
-ZechRuthless and Darby,
I have noticed over the years mothers who go around telling people that the child's IQ is this or that... 140's, 160s, 180s...
I heard one mother that said it was 154 for hers... 6 below Einstein? /ttiforum/images/graemlins/smile.gif lol
And I have never seen the child read a book or talk about science or math... /ttiforum/images/graemlins/smile.gif
I think schools systems are lying to people and using these 'crazy new IQ scale tests'
But just one man's opinion...
<But I really think Zech is 'cyber poppty person' or AI artificial intelligence that thinks he is 'ALIVE' /ttiforum/images/graemlins/smile.gif>
/ttiforum/images/graemlins/smile.gif
TheCigMan
Darby
Epochal Historian
Re:Shut the [censored] up you skeptic assholes > -Zech
CigMan,
I agree. An IQ above 250 is so off the scale that it's pure fantasy.
And IQ scores for children is a bit of a farce. It starts with adults trying to formulate a batttery of tests that a child can understand, that correctly measures "intelligence", gives it some sort of scale, is reliable and which can be properly interpreted. That's a big job for an adult who no longer has a child's mind.
And then there's always the issue that a child can take the test one day, score as a genius and the following month take a similar test and come out with the IQ of a carrot. Children are children. They day dream, they get bored, they get generally distracted. In short they are doing exactly what children do. Giving them an IQ test doesn't really predict future development. It might make a parent feel good (or bad depending on the score)...but that has nothing to do with the kid or his/her actual intelligence.
-ZechCigMan,
I agree. An IQ above 250 is so off the scale that it's pure fantasy.
And IQ scores for children is a bit of a farce. It starts with adults trying to formulate a batttery of tests that a child can understand, that correctly measures "intelligence", gives it some sort of scale, is reliable and which can be properly interpreted. That's a big job for an adult who no longer has a child's mind.
And then there's always the issue that a child can take the test one day, score as a genius and the following month take a similar test and come out with the IQ of a carrot. Children are children. They day dream, they get bored, they get generally distracted. In short they are doing exactly what children do. Giving them an IQ test doesn't really predict future development. It might make a parent feel good (or bad depending on the score)...but that has nothing to do with the kid or his/her actual intelligence.
Re:Shut the [censored] up you skeptic assholes >
if you know your IQ, then you must be joking they don't tell it to the subject, they tell it, but in categories, so they would have told you that you are above average, mentally impared, or another categorie, btw you are claiming to be smarter than Einstein, did you know that?
if you know your IQ, then you must be joking they don't tell it to the subject, they tell it, but in categories, so they would have told you that you are above average, mentally impared, or another categorie, btw you are claiming to be smarter than Einstein, did you know that?