Time travel in past doesn't sound relastic

RE: Time travel in past doesn\'t sound relastic

Do we actually need to physically "travel" from Point A to Point B in order to benefit from time travel? Right now we think nothing of bouncing video, audio, and telecommunications signals back and forth across the solar system. We have already measured particles moving faster than the speed of light. If we can share information ( data, sound, and images ) with our future selves and them with us, do we have to solve the problem of how to get there? Maybe not. I know it's not very exciting to think of time travel as a "phone call" but it makes solving the problems involved a lot more solvable.
 
RE: Time travel in past doesn\'t sound relastic

That's a point. Frequencies... mmmmm.

For shure you can sent anything in the futur, it's easier to sent sounds waves or datas, but this have a similar mechanisme as sending a letter to you in the futur, it's realisable. But to get the full potential of the medium, we should also be able to send "stuff" to the past. And that's the big deal. In that case we would have more control over communication, and interaction.

If you're able to get at the other side of the galaxie, use a "major-huge-mega-big-atomic-..." telescope to point the earth, you would probably see dinosaur, but ded dinosaurs in reality. I suggest someone to figure out if black hole or some other natural device would allow us to send stuff thru time in the backward direction!
 
RE: Time travel in past doesn\'t sound relastic

I'm pretty sure there are a few points that can be established as fact. Once a stable portal is established it will have to remain "on and running" in perpetuity. Since cutting power will cut the link BACK to "our time line". We would also have to keep it running continuously for the obvious reason that we would never know when something "useful" would be coming through hopefully from the future. By creating a geo-stationary
portal that remains "on", as alluded to earlier, a temporal conduit is established so it doesn't matter that the portal will obviously occupy different "locations" in space/time based on Earth's location in the cosmos at any given point in time, since it is temporally "linked" to itself. Cut the power for even a fraction of a second and "that" link will be severed. Of course, it would be possible to establish a "new" link, but communications "from the future" would only be possible back to that point in time when a "continuous" link was established. As an example, let's say we established a stable portal in a remote location where future development is unlikely and away from prying eyes. We turn it on and....hear "nothing". This goes on for say 6 months and suddenly and without warning, a catastrophic power failure. We get that fixed, turn things back on,get another stable portal established and immediately receive a flood of messages from future time frames, "don't let that happen again!!!"
 
RE: Time travel in past doesn\'t sound relastic

You know, I've pretty much come to the same conclusions myself. Let me give you a little anectodal corroboration. Though I take Hollywood's version of the "Philadelphia Experiment" with a grain of salt, it is well documented that Tesla worked with the US Government on project "Rainbow" which supposedly evolved into the Philadelphia Experiment. The initial demonstration which piqued the government's interest was a demonstration by Tesla in which he made a small object disappear for a few seconds then reappear. The idea being, that if you could do it with a small object all you had to do was scale it all up and you could make a warship disappear from enemy view. What neither Tesla nor the Military knew at the time was what happened to that object when it disappeared. I don't know if Tesla or the Government ever determined exactly what was going on; if they determined that a dimensional portal had been opened or the object had been placed "out of phase" with their space/time, but I do know that Tesla worked the rest of his life trying to develop a perpetual non-interrupted power source. This would have been a key element to developing a stable open transdimensional portal.
 
RE: Time travel in past doesn\'t sound relastic

When John had the time machine in operation it looked like he was driving under a rainbow. Maybe they called that Philadelphia project "project rainbow" because of the way it looked.
 
RE: Time travel in past doesn\'t sound relastic

Dear Trott, Rick, and Everyone,

Thankyou Trott for the book references, and I completely agree. I have been wanting to go to school and learn trig, geometry, and all forms of calculas for a while now. I plan to start this fall. I intended most of the ideas to be applicable to the microscopic world, since that has been the focus of my thoughts since I first began theorizing. There are mathematical laws that more then satisfactorally explain the phenomenon of nuclear particals and energy. When I ran my calculations I found that my theories of varying space time density and point theory also explained the phenomenon, and I realized that the current model was correct and that my model answered in more detail the theories that already exist. It also back's up the theories and shows that there are more mechanisms at this level that are working to produce the same mathematical results. My theories have, I believe, also answered some questions that were not able to be answered with just the current theory.My next step is to learn calculas so that I can translate my entire "point theory" and " Point Theory of Gravity and "inverse space-time to energy densities at the quantum level." and "subpoint space theory, negative, superluminal space energy relations, and super-point theory to describe the infinities that describe macroscopy." and lastely, "The Unified Theory of Points" that mathematically will connect the microscopic world of quantum mechanics to the macroscopic world of astrophysical mathematical models. The best part is that the theories blends so nicely mathematically with the current models that all I have to do is learn calculas so that I can translate the theoretical math so that it can be applied to all the current theory on related physics.

What do you all think?

Based on what you have read, does this sound like a realistic goal?

Regards,


Edwin G. Schasteen

TAP-TEN Research
 
Back
Top