G
Guest
Interesting web site! But I have my own theories about time travel that you may be interested in considering...
1). Time does not exist (i.e., it does not exist as a measurable force, a field, an object, an entity, a wave, a particle, nor is it anything else that we call tangible). Time is simply a matter of semantics. It is just a word that we humans have created in order that we could have a frame of reference to define the occurrances of events relative to the occurances of other events.
2). We can not travel back in time by moving at the speed of light, because speed is totally relative to an observer. For example, when Captain Kirk orders Scotty to increase the speed of the Enterprise's engines to Warp-9, what is he basing this speed on? Warp-9 relative to what? To earth? To Andromeda? I suspect it would have to be relative to their destination. But what if there were no destination? What if they were simply tooling around empty deep space? What would their Warp-9 be relative to in that case? If time were able to be altered by motion, then there would be an infinite number of different time alterations in the universe totally determined by their "relative" speeds to the traveler. So, some planets will appear to age more rapidly or more slowly than others.
3). The so-called "paradoxes" that we all enjoy discussing, are nothing more than sci-fi twaddle. The very idea of going back in time and killing your grandmother is quite imaginative, but ludicrous! We can not go back into the past any more than we can go into the future. It is, and will forever be, physically impossible only because, as I had stated above --- TIME DOES NOT EXIST!
Sorry, guys. I'm sure it's difficult for you members of the Time Travel
Institute to hear such blasphemy. But, then, there are people who still believe in Santa Claus and the Toothe Fairy!
1). Time does not exist (i.e., it does not exist as a measurable force, a field, an object, an entity, a wave, a particle, nor is it anything else that we call tangible). Time is simply a matter of semantics. It is just a word that we humans have created in order that we could have a frame of reference to define the occurrances of events relative to the occurances of other events.
2). We can not travel back in time by moving at the speed of light, because speed is totally relative to an observer. For example, when Captain Kirk orders Scotty to increase the speed of the Enterprise's engines to Warp-9, what is he basing this speed on? Warp-9 relative to what? To earth? To Andromeda? I suspect it would have to be relative to their destination. But what if there were no destination? What if they were simply tooling around empty deep space? What would their Warp-9 be relative to in that case? If time were able to be altered by motion, then there would be an infinite number of different time alterations in the universe totally determined by their "relative" speeds to the traveler. So, some planets will appear to age more rapidly or more slowly than others.
3). The so-called "paradoxes" that we all enjoy discussing, are nothing more than sci-fi twaddle. The very idea of going back in time and killing your grandmother is quite imaginative, but ludicrous! We can not go back into the past any more than we can go into the future. It is, and will forever be, physically impossible only because, as I had stated above --- TIME DOES NOT EXIST!
Sorry, guys. I'm sure it's difficult for you members of the Time Travel
Institute to hear such blasphemy. But, then, there are people who still believe in Santa Claus and the Toothe Fairy!