Einstein, Please nothing I have read on this forum alludes to science, Yourself and Darby attack all things scientifically related. Anyone can research what I have posted, time travel aside everything else is true and in use in our everyday lives.
If you sir understand as much as your Avatar insinuates, then explain the practical purpose of the Dirac Delta and the reason we use it.
While you are on your pedestal please explain why it is necessary for CERN-LHC and the top physicists of this day to accelerate atoms within an infrared beam at the cost of half a trillion dollars.
Then you can lean over and ask Stephen Hawking and every other genius involved with this project why they think it will lead to Time Travel.
Short of that, bantering everyone that discusses anything to do with science and Time Travel would lead me to believe you are here lead everyone down the wrong path. You would like to discuss things written in books however Einstein was frequently quoted as saying.
"Education is what remains after one has forgotten everything he learned in school." Albert Einstein
Following that explain this quote...
"Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one" Albert Einstein
Go ahead and show this forum what you have, at least present yourself with something other than nasty comments. They can do the research for themselves and see what they think.
The Dirac Delta appears to be another mathematical fiction. It will always remain so until someone can show actual physical facts to support its use. Just remember math is a language. And people can lie just as fluently with math as with any other language.
As for CERN-LHC and the top physicists of this day to accelerate atoms within an infrared beam at the cost of half a trillion dollars? All I can say is, don't believe anything you read. Unless of course you can verify it yourself.
You might notice that Darby and I are on opposite sides of the fence concerning science. I don't believe any theory out there is true. I don't believe theory even has a place in science. I used to believe that theory was synonymous with suspected fact. But now it has become apparent that theory just means; "Lets make believe!"
I didn't used to be this way. But last year I came across an anomaly in an observation concerning the equation, F=MA.
In the real world, the facts show inertial weight is present in an inertial acceleration. So why isn't the inertial weight represented in the equation? The concept of Mass seems to be taking the place of inertial weight. So right here in front of your nose it appears the real world facts have been replaced with a theory instead. So this raises a whole bunch of questions. Who did this? Why was this done? Is this an attempt to hide something about our reality? I don't know who is behind the deception. You may have seen some of my suspicions in other threads about who did it and why. But most of the framework of our theoretical science hinges on this equation. If that equation is bogus, then so is virtually all of our science as well.
The question about what is being hidden is what presently has my full attention. If weight was removed from the original equation, then it stands to reason that maybe there is something about weight that is being hidden. There is. In everyday life we are exposed to the effects of three kinds of weight. Inertial weight, gravitational weight, and centrifugal weight.
We know for a fact that time flows more slowly under the influence of gravity. And I suspect that the manipulation of the three kinds of weight may also allow for the manipulation of the flow of time. So this is the path my research has lead me down.
Would it surprise you to learn that weight can be simulated with electric and magnetic fields? It was a surprise to me. Presently I have electrical devices that make simulated weight that behave like gravitational weight and centrifugal weight.
I guess this would also explain why my cat likes lasers (see bowtiesarecool's post here on his teleporting time traveling cat: 