The 60's

Re: The 60\'s

yeah, ive got a question for you: how about going to 1999 and making a phone call for me? it would keep my mother from being murdered if you need motivation.
 
Re: The 60\'s

>yeah, ive got a question for you: how about going to 1999 and making a phone call for me? it would keep my mother from being murdered if you need motivation.<

>>That would be hard as i travel back to 1967<<

This means you would do it but you can't because it's 1967 and not 1999. So here's what.

Contact her in 1967... interact with her. That alone will cause a ripple effect that will change time from 1967 onwards to where possibly she won't die in 1999. Call her up and tell her the Mets will win two years from now then hang up or tell her to buy IBM stock- that alone will guarantee she dosen't die in 1999.
 
Re: The 60\'s

in 1967 my mother was 4 years old. but hey, if your willing to try something i am.

i sit here all the time and wonder if i'll ever get a chance to go back and do anything to change what happened, and i doubt i will. but i'll still try /ttiforum/images/graemlins/smile.gif
 
Re: The 60\'s

Ruthless, it won't work if you send other people to change the past for you. As long as you remain in this present, history will not change for you. The so called "ripple effect" you see in sci fi movies just doesn't make sense, as far as the physics is concerned.

Your only hope is to go back in time, yourself. In principle, IF you succeed in changing things in 1999 (or 1967 for that matter) and return to 2007, you will return into an alternate present which is the result of your actions. You won't return to this timeline but to a new timeline. You will be leaving all of us behind.

All this, of-course, depends on the assumption that you will be able to change the past. Merely achieving time travel is not enough to make this happen. Physicists have shown, time and again, that the default result of "time travel" is the creation of a consistent time loop rather than a paradox. For example, if you throw a billiard ball into a wormhole and the ball goes into the past and hits itself, it would still go into the wormwhole after the collision.

Note that this is just the default situation. There might be a way to override this, but I am not aware of such a way.
 
Re: The 60\'s

Doesn't mean you should give up, does it?

Remember what I said on the other thread - nobody knows everything. Not even Sigo /ttiforum/images/graemlins/tongue.gif
 
Re: The 60\'s

Know what I honestly think though? Time is a dimension in itself and only exists in the reality that we co-created by soul consensus. Right? If time is as relative as Einstein said it was, then....what is stop hinder us from toggling back and forth (as it has been claimed)....between the past and the present and maybe have a little peek into the future? Also....I think when we get back to the NOW, I believe we can come back the the same moment we left. I don't think time has to pass in the NOW while we are exploring other time eras. /ttiforum/images/graemlins/smile.gif
 
Back
Top