RainmanTime
Super Moderator
Here's a good enough reason to bump this thread. With respect to the following prediction made by informer:
http://money.cnn.com/2006/03/10/news/newsmakers/greenspan_book/index.htm?cnn=yes
From that article:
I've been a fan of Greenspan for a long time...he's a very balanced thinker. And as much as people want to credit (or blame) a president for the economy, most people that understand economics and the time spans of our economy know that the FED chairman has MUCH more power over the economy than does any sitting president!
What I think is quite amusing about this is, if a 3rd "party" (or at least an independent candidate) does win the presidency in 2008, this would actually be ONE MORE THING to prove just how wrong Boomer's assessment of our democracy was. Rather than the two parties tearing us apart into a civil war, the more appropriate mediation for such diamtetrically-opposed forces is the mediating power of a neutral force!
I'm keeping my eye on your predictions, informer!
RMT
I found the following story on CNN today about what the former FED chief Alan Greenspan is saying:A third party canidate wins the 2008 election.
http://money.cnn.com/2006/03/10/news/newsmakers/greenspan_book/index.htm?cnn=yes
From that article:
Now, I am not necessarily saying that informer is actually predicting the future. In fact, the entire issue of a 3rd major party forming in our country is something I have talked about before (and wished for quite awhile!). I can totally see this coming to pass, and I must say it is a natural evolution of systems (i.e. disparate opposing forces will often be mediated by a third, neutral force...as shown in the structure of the atom).Recently retired Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan believes that there will be a major independent candidate for president from the nation's political center, according to a published report.
I've been a fan of Greenspan for a long time...he's a very balanced thinker. And as much as people want to credit (or blame) a president for the economy, most people that understand economics and the time spans of our economy know that the FED chairman has MUCH more power over the economy than does any sitting president!
What I think is quite amusing about this is, if a 3rd "party" (or at least an independent candidate) does win the presidency in 2008, this would actually be ONE MORE THING to prove just how wrong Boomer's assessment of our democracy was. Rather than the two parties tearing us apart into a civil war, the more appropriate mediation for such diamtetrically-opposed forces is the mediating power of a neutral force!
I'm keeping my eye on your predictions, informer!
RMT