Physicist Proposes Solution to Arrow-of-Time Paradox
Physicist Proposes Solution to Arrow-of-Time Paradox
"(PhysOrg.com) -- Entropy can decrease, according to a new proposal - but the process would destroy any evidence of its existence, and erase any memory an observer might have of it. It sounds like the plot to a weird sci-fi movie, but the idea has recently been suggested by theoretical physicist Lorenzo Maccone, currently a visiting scientist at MIT, in an attempt to solve a longstanding paradox in physics. "
“My theory requires that the global state of the observer plus the environment be in a quantum pure state,” he said. “This means that it works only if we consider a sufficiently large system that it cannot be correlated with any other system. However, correlations (entanglement, in quantum systems) are very sticky; namely, systems get correlated very quickly also if they are very weakly interacting. This is why, when one considers macroscopic systems, the only safe choice is to consider the whole universe, which cannot be correlated with any other system, since, by definition, it comprises all physical systems.”
Read more at: [URL='http://phys.org/news170586562.html#jCp[/QUOTE']http://phys.org/news170586562.html#jCp[/URL]
which cannot be correlated with any other system, since, by definition, it comprises all physical systems
servantx
I believe it was the original McDonalds yellow arches that Darby refers to. It was Florida Jim that noticed a timeline change involving those yellow arches. Florida Jim participated in the Titor email experiment. As a result of that participation, he and other participants experienced a radical timeline shift. If you will notice, the word "Theory" appears to be synonymous with the term "Let's make believe." Keeping that in mind,will definitely aid in your understanding of what the scientific community is all about.
Hi Einstein,
Here is the history of McDonald's logo.
McDonald's - Logopedia, the logo and branding site
Did you know what logo change did "Florida Jim" noticed comparing to the logos in the link? Or is there a logo he used to know which is different to any of the logo in the link?
In my understanding, the term "make believe" in scientific community means prove it with successful peer-reviewed experiments.
This is all very interesting. I don't understand the math to any of this but someday I will. Maybe I should continue in my studies that I first showed Darby. Thanks and keep on believing because even someday Star Trek could come true. They are developing ships right now but privatized.
It could be that I'm in an alternate timeline where reality didn't play out the same. It's a fascinating amusing pastime of mine. It works by changing a personal habit in the hopes that there is an alternate version of you that is accustomed to the altered personal habit. Eventually your brain gets confused and switches places with the alternate you. Then you get to see the reality that the alternate you was accustomed to seeing. It literally blew me away when I found Rainman doing his calculus backwards. I kept quiet about it till I figured that one out. Do you differentiate or integrate velocity to get acceleration. The answer is yes to both ways. It's all in the fundamentals. Of course I suppose I know other stuff from alternate timelines as well. But this is very similar to what happened to the participants in the Titor email experiment. And I suspect it could also account for why no records exist for Bob Lazar's education.
servantx
I think Darby mentioned the term acceleration cubed. I described it in words the way I was taught to. But Rainman came back and described it using a math technique I wasn't familiar with. He was taking the derivative of velocity to get an acceleration. That's backwards to the way I was taught.
Servantx,
Suffice it to say that after taking high school calculus, when moving on to university level physics and engineering it quickly becomes apparent that the calculus involved is expanded somewhat. College level physics and engineering is not easy. Each physics and engineering class also has a calculus class that must be taken with it. After four years of ever more advanced calculus the student has a slightly better grasp on the math than the high school student. That's why einstein was familiar with neither the math techniques nor the rigorous definitions of the mechanics of displacements and accelerations.
If it comes down to calculus who would you really listen to? For me, I'm probably going to go with the person who is actually teaching the subject at the university level while also applying it as an engineer on a day-to-day basis at a major aerospace company. More to the point of your personal safety should you climb aboard a commercial aircraft, whose math and engineering do you want to be applied to the design and conctruction of the aircraft?
Thanks Darby for explaining it.
Would you mind posting that Calculus equation here again so that we can all learn about it?
Hi Darby,
I have found the old threads i was looking for. The equations about the relation of time, speed of light, matter and force.
Particularly in what you and Rainman came up with in the following 2 threads a few years back.
Fractal Time: Speed of Sound, Speed of Light | Page 2 | Time Travel Institute
Information Subsumes Physical Energy | Page 2 | Time Travel Institute
wormholes created by black holes are the key i found a very sound theory. like the other comment here it is better to stay in this time.you have a destiny here but not in the past and you cant change destiny in the past.so not much of a life there but time travel does have its benefits if you travel the universe using wormholes.