Something to think about

Cant deny the fact that if it was a hoax, then he has taken a lot of pain to do it. But whats the reason? Just to get flawed in 2005?
 
Its really not much effort is it? Just get some big plastic box, don't show the insides, just a drawing.

And post your [very] opinionated views in general on all things timetravel and not. Chronohistorian put more posting effort into his stroy then titor did his.

Its really not a big deal what he did.
 
I think anyone could do it, the problem is the hoaxers stories fall apart after a few days of being bombared with questions.

I think if and when a real TT posts on this forum (or elsewhere), it will be obvious that its not a hoax. Think about this. I got a forum such as this, claim to be a time traveler, and then tell everyone all the news for the next week. So and so dies, this country attacks that country, this stock drops 25% in a week, another companies labor force goes on strike. Dates, times, details, and all of them correct. Who wouldn't believe I was a time traveler if I told everyone the entire next weeks events. Something JT had never done.
 
So and so dies, this country attacks that country, this stock drops 25% in a week, another companies labor force goes on strike. Dates, times, details, and all of them correct.

I think he gave a valid reason for not doing that.
 
I think anyone could do it, the problem is the hoaxers stories fall apart after a few days of being bombared with questions.

Why did Titor became famous while the other hoaxers never made it that far? Why did this forum discusses about Titor Most of the time?

I know that some of u guys hate Titor. I guess the time to realise the truth is not far.
 
I think he gave a valid reason for not doing that.
Click to expand...

Not really Herc. he said that multiple timelines exist and all realities happen, that our divergence from his was 2.5%. If he states everything that can happen does, then why Not tell us all this information. Because there must be a John Titor out there giving away all those details, if, timeline/worldline theory is true.

Basically I am saying because he believes all things do happen, its a fallacy to state he cannot provide more information. Because he Does in another worldline, so why not this one? See where I am going with this? The whole story has this error in it.

"Yes there are infinite realities" but then "No I can't tell you specifics" its contradictory.
 
"Basically I am saying because he believes all things do happen, its a fallacy to state he cannot provide more information. Because he Does in another worldline, so why not this one? See where I am going with this? The whole story has this error in it."

Ren u havent understood the whole story in the exact way. He said he will not reveal information cuz it is against his morality in this Worldline. He does not care about other Worldlines. I'll give u an example. If he knows someone's gonna kill u in 2006, and he told that to you in 2001, there's a possibility that you killing him and his family before he could finish you. He also gave an example of the Pearl Harbor.

When someone asked him whether he wasn't afraid of the present government tracking him, he answered that the government has to first believe that he is a time traveler.
 
He does not care about other Worldlines.
Click to expand...

And we (according to him) are another worldline, then why would he not want to tell me if I was going to die in 2006, why would he care if I killed my killer ahead of time and his whole family.

The fallacy in his argument is that he posted he was a time traveler, had information from the future, but refused to divulge it. When, his own theories prove that he already has divulged that information. Because, if all worldlines happen, then he already did tell us in another worldline.

So my question is, why not this one? If he really truly understood his argument, he wouldn't care what happened, who he told, what information he revealed, as, in another worldline he did tell us that information. So why not this one? Because its a Hoax.
 
So my question is, why not this one? If he really truly understood his argument, he wouldn't care what happened, who he told, what information he revealed, as, in another worldline he did tell us that information. So why not this one? Because its a Hoax.

It could be because he wanted to save his family in THIS worldline. He moved his family to a safe place, and he does not want competitors at that place during the disaster.
 
Basically I am saying because he believes all things do happen, its a fallacy to state he cannot provide more information. Because he Does in another worldline, so why not this one? See where I am going with this? The whole story has this error in it.

"Yes there are infinite realities" but then "No I can't tell you specifics" its contradictory.
Click to expand...

But what if Ren, A 90 minute game of soccer might need kabillions of worldlines to represent all possible outcomes of all the electrons working in your brain to make decisions. 2.5% of a kabillion would be pretty hard to guess win/loss, forget about guessing the score.

You go backwards in time over a soccer game, the chance that every process happens the same way in order to give the same score is rare. You go backwards over yellowstone eruption, the chance those processes repeat to build up enough pressure on a certain date, that is high.



Ted: OK wait. If you guys are really us, what number are we thinking of?
Bill, Ted from future: 69, dudes.
Bill, Ted: Whoa.
 
KAbillions, great word I'm adding that one.

As for the soccer game, overall if 100 soccer games were played with a 2.5% divergence, 97.5 of them out to turn out the same way, same results. only a few would be different and it might not even be enough different to alter the score of the game.

Basically I am saying, major events don't change. If according to Titor there are multiple worldlines/realities, 9/11 must have happened kabillions of times and almost ALWAYS with the same outcome. Yet he could have warned us about it, not that it would have done any good but it would have proved he was a time traveler.
 
Maybe Ren, but this worldline is based off his first visit to 1967. 1967 to 2001 leaves a lot of time for things to work out differently in the minds responsible for 911.
 
Yet he could have warned us about it, not that it would have done any good but it would have proved he was a time traveler.

JT Wrote:

Again, I do not seek to add to my credibility. There is no point to it. Actually, by providing information that was useful, I would be adding to your collective fear that I am real. In that case, this cycle we are in concerning "truth" only spirals and gets worse.
 
I also reviewed the website, seems like a lot of mumbo jumbo to me, and the register is some business in CA called "Sweet Scents" or something similar. Its just one big long webpage, very hard to read through, and its funny because most of the dates mentioned have come and passed.

I would not put a lot of weight into that website, but, as I always say, if there is a specific fact you are trying to establish, Prove it.
 
They were just rumors, I mentioned it!

I just found them interesting.

Time will prove it right or wrong!!

Just wait for 2 months.
 
They were just rumors, I mentioned it!
Click to expand...

Ahh ok, thats kewl. Feel free, just make sure everyone knows its just a link and not your personal indicitive feelings on the situation. Or like you said, that you found it interesting. Otherwise things you like to on here are the same as clothes you wear IRL. And people make assumptions based on that.
 
"This is a geologic park, and not many know it," said Robert Smith, a geophysicist at the University of Utah who has spent his career piecing together the story of the Yellowstone volcano. "It's not a bison park. Not an elk park. It's a geologic park."
Click to expand...

I disagree. It is a elk/bison park.
 
Back
Top