Re: Chronologically impossible
No further comment Trans? Or was this a T-K.O. punch?
But don’t get me wrong, the TTA is not without feelings when he told you the truth.
The truth of the matter was just that the TTA was simply seeing through your clever attempt of having me agree with the re-defined words you used to describe New Age theology in an attempt to have me buy into it.
It is illogical when one tries to change the wording of an idea or belief, that somehow your changing the condition and rep. of it.
Though it does happen quite often, and many fall for it. In the media, they use it to sway public opinion on issues. Some religions use it to excuse wrongdoing in their churches. Politics use it to excuse conquering another country for its oil. And Disney uses it to bail themselves out from taking responsibility for accidents in their rides.
Some may see this as sugar coating the truth, but it’s really putting a spin on it and twisting it for an agenda.
This form of reasoning is often insincere; for it simply covers what’s really beneath the surface.
It is information that needs to be known… without it we are misinformed and can accept issues that are otherwise wrong.
Without knowing the proper knowledge to understand why things are the way they are, we will continue to try and fix mistakes where all it takes is honesty and responsibility.
This is why I had been saying for years: “the ends justify the means†by New Agers and the future of mankind when Time Travel becomes implemented.
It is the re-definition of our ideals and principles that will close the gap and justify the acceptance of activities such as Time Travel & genetic manipulation.
By calling it by a different name to fit in the common interest of our affairs, we come to accept things that would in a time long past, have seemed un-natural.
For example: Some feminists have come to call pregnancy a disease. Why? What could the re-definition of a natural process, benefit their agenda? What is beneath the surface that is not clearly visible? Legal abortions perhaps? Since the pregnancy is a disease, the best course of action would be to terminate it.
This is justified reasoning to allow the murder of an unborn life to take place by simply spinning some words around until its goal is attained.
It is an idea to do something, and finding a reason and excuse to doing it despite it being wrong, doesn’t quite make it sound so bad when it is looked at in the context of different wording.
It is justification… and the ends justify it by any means, despite the fundamental truths that have simply been renamed like a file.
Don’t even get the TTA started on this whole Middle East conflict… I’ll leave that for you to ponder about.
In conclusion, the TTA feels that if someone wants to control man, you gonna have to be very clever and know how to lie through your teeth to do it. Or like an ex-girlfriend would do, be as conniving and sneaky, and when he least suspects it hurt’em where it hurts the most.
My advice to you all, is don’t trust everything you hear, don’t buy into it, but look at it critically and logically. Does it really mean what it says it means? Say’s who? If you dig deep and end up being screwed and disappointed anyways, at least you can have the assurance of knowing that you gave it some thought, instead of being made look stupid by going along with it
.
The TTA speaks from personal experience… you know who you are /ttiforum/images/graemlins/tongue.gif.
-TTA
