New Evidence that Helps Validate that John aka TT_0 was in Fact from the Future.

[Jay Walker]

Digital cameras were developed from the 1960's to 1980's. The first consumer models were available in the 1990's.

He probably was describing the future, but you can't prove it because one could simply argue that he made a reasonable prediction based on the 1990-2000 digital camera market.

That is true. I can't argue that example is kind of flimsy. I just thought it was neat.

However, that is what makes this story very hard to tell. It isn't so much one thing or another. For the most part, there are two or three concepts that have convinced me. Like, the accumulative factor - When you take all of the tech that he talked about that is inevitable. For instance, the iPhone I think was inevitable. If someone else invents the Iphone it might have been called something else, but that a smartphone was going to happen either way, but before it was invented, not a lot of people could envision a device like that. Not even the apple team knew exactly what the final product would be but certainly not what it could be 10 generations down the road. "
But John did see these emergent technologies a lot further than anyone at the time. For instance, the optical atomic clocks he spoke about. A handful of people would even know what a cesium atomic clock was, and a much, much smaller handful of people knew the possibility of using optical feature that would be even more accurate than the cesium, and most definitlely no one would be crazy enough to think an optical atomic clock would be small enough to be portable and fit inside a small box that could fit into a car, let alone 6 OF THEM!

No friggin way, lol.

There is also an accumulative factor of quantum mechanics that gives credence to his claims. I say that because there are two quantum concepts I found very interesting. One, being his explanation of MWI removing causality paradox from time-traveling. Not an original idea. Then there is the concept of being in between two rotating black holes. Without going too deeply into it, theoretically could allow for backwards time-travel.
Why are these two concepts important? Because, as far as I can tell are not talked about together. For example, when asked about time-travel backwards, most theoretical physicists will say that causality won't allow it to exist. However, if you ask them what is possible between two colliding black holes, they will tell you about the Einstein-Rosen Bridge.

So, jump forward to today. I watch a Youtube short from Rogan's show featuring Neil. Neil offers the Pinocchio paradox as a way to explain self-referential statements and how they interfere with causality. Neil's example is basically a version of the Liar's Paradox. In other words, you can't have an effect on yourself before you have that effect. TT_0 negates the liar's paradox.

Why would this random dude on a message board be giving all of this away for free?

I could list examples all day but I have a little bit of a life, so... Maybe later if anyone cares.

 

[The Real McZero]

That is true. I can't argue that example is kind of flimsy. I just thought it was neat.

It is neat. That's what brings us all here.

FYI, I am pretty sure that GE C204 and GE C206 are code for something, and not time machine models. The mention of six cesium clocks is probably also code talk. That doesn't mean he didn't slip and mention future technology in the process of code-talking though.

To confirm your theory means doing a lot of research into the development of the technology in question.

I KNOW Titor was involved in some kind of time travel operations. So when someone like you comes along with a reasonable theory, I give the benefit of the doubt. The expression "It figures" comes to mind. It's just one more thing to suggest he was legitimately a traveler.

 

[Jay Walker]

It is neat. That's what brings us all here.

FYI, I am pretty sure that GE C204 and GE C206 are code for something, and not time machine models. The mention of six cesium clocks is probably also code talk. That doesn't mean he didn't slip and mention future technology in the process of code-talking though.

To confirm your theory means doing a lot of research into the development of the technology in question.

I KNOW Titor was involved in some kind of time travel operations. So when someone like you comes along with a reasonable theory, I give the benefit of the doubt. The expression "It figures" comes to mind. It's just one more thing to suggest he was legitimately a traveler.

I also have another theory that might interest you.
If I were to produce a title for this theory I would call it, "Finding Virtue"

The search for this mysterious element has been far reaching throughout the millennia. Some say it can't be found. Some say the vast ocean swallowed it up centuries ago, and now it resides in the belly of the earth like a treasure that will never be exhumed and never to be seen again.
I say however, that the reason why virtue is so scarce and illusive is because people are unwilling to see it even when it is staring them right in the face. It remains shrouded in the very heart of fear. Fear of being naive. Fear of being taken advantage of, exploited, defrauded, etc. Causing it to disappear from all mankind.

There was a sort of random post that I noticed John make, to me it seemed random and out of place because was unprovoked, and not really talking to anyone. He wrote, "Even a broken clock is right twice a day."

To me, I don't see it as a cryptic message with hidden, and nefarious purpose. I saw it as a way of saying, sometimes the most incredible things come from the most unexpected places.


I propose a challenge if you have time.
I challenge anyone actually, to find the virtue in this clip.


View: https://youtu.be/Qv1i-wYHNQ0?si=RFk62aJDyqDV8rGL

 

[The Real McZero]

To me, I don't see it as a cryptic message with hidden, and nefarious purpose. I saw it as a way of saying, sometimes the most incredible things come from the most unexpected places.

To be clear, I reserve judgement about Titor. There are so many possible explanations for the things I've discovered. I merely present the idea that maybe he isn't the good guy we'd like to think he is. The more factual info I can find and process, the better I am able to determine WTH is going on and why. This is why the inherent and intentional obfuscation of the Titor-verse is so annoying. It denies me proper judgement.

I challenge anyone actually, to find the virtue in this clip.

"Intimidating Punks"

Virtue is about high standards, and usually refers to morals/ethics. It basically means excellence as a standard.

He proposed a business deal based in voluntary cooperation and mutual benefit. They rejected it in favor of coercion/violence to their benefit and his detriment. They tried to victimize him. Then when he turned the tables and could have easily and justifiably beaten them to a bloody pulp, he chose to show restraint. What is necessary force?

Everything he did was virtuous, while they serve as the antithesis.

 

[Jay Walker]

To be clear, I reserve judgement about Titor. There are so many possible explanations for the things I've discovered. I merely present the idea that maybe he isn't the good guy we'd like to think he is. The more factual info I can find and process, the better I am able to determine WTH is going on and why. This is why the inherent and intentional obfuscation of the Titor-verse is so annoying. It denies me proper judgement.



"Intimidating Punks"

Virtue is about high standards, and usually refers to morals/ethics. It basically means excellence as a standard.

He proposed a business deal based in voluntary cooperation and mutual benefit. They rejected it in favor of coercion/violence to their benefit and his detriment. They tried to victimize him. Then when he turned the tables and could have easily and justifiably beaten them to a bloody pulp, he chose to show restraint. What is necessary force?

Everything he did was virtuous, while they serve as the antithesis.

Qualities like honesty, kindness, courage, integrity, and justice. These are examples of virtue.

I happen to agree with your assessment of the clip. I think that he also might have changed those kid's lives for the better, in more than I could predict.

However, some might argue that everything he did was actually illegal. Everything from bribing minors, to abduction, kidnapping, and even assault.
I picked out that clip randomly to prove a point.

One man's malice is another man's righteousness.

 

[Jay Walker]

There are so many possible explanations for the things I've discovered

Like what?

 

[The Real McZero]

Like what?

Like endless possibilities.

Maybe he is trying to frame someone, maybe he is the one being framed, maybe he is on a personal mission like he claims, maybe he is a detective investigating something, maybe he is a decoy, maybe he is an assassin or terrorist, maybe he saved lives, maybe anything we don't know for sure yet, etc., etc., etc...

Which is easier, recreating elemental computer technology from the past, or creating a time machine and sending someone back to retrieve a computer? Maybe he was fibbing about himself and his mission?

There are a lot of things that I am not at liberty to discuss publicly because it is potentially dangerous and problematic. So forgive me if I avoid details. But just to give a little insight, I found evidence of time travel before finding Titor world. I remembered reading about a supposed time traveler posting on the internet, so I decide to look into it. I started finding related information almost immediately, and have discovered a bit more since. That was several years ago. Where everyone is guessing, I am making informed educated guesses, but still guessing. Some things I know.

Titor was somehow a part of something big that has very little to do with any of that nonsense in the posts.

 

[The Real McZero]

Qualities like honesty, kindness, courage, integrity, and justice. These are examples of virtue.

I happen to agree with your assessment of the clip. I think that he also might have changed those kid's lives for the better, in more than I could predict.

However, some might argue that everything he did was actually illegal. Everything from bribing minors, to abduction, kidnapping, and even assault.
I picked out that clip randomly to prove a point.

One man's malice is another man's righteousness.

I almost mentioned "teaching them something valuable" , but that's more of an unintended outcome rather than a virtuous act. He wasn't really teaching them so much as he was defending his position.

Law is systematic violence, not virtue. So who cares about legality.

 

[JudasTitor]

What could be so bad in the future thhat the military had to use time travel as the final weapon?

 

[The Real McZero]

What could be so bad in the future thhat the military had to use time travel as the final weapon?

Why would Russia execute a first strike nuclear attack on Jacksonville? Of what strategic importance is Jacksonville?

In a nuclear war the basic idea is to cripple your enemy's ability to attack before they can do any damage. That means an expedient use of ICBM's and shooting down anything inbound. Priority targets would be whatever poses the most immediate threat; nuclear launch sites, SAM sites, command centers and Air Force bases, communications facilities, radar installations, or anything that could otherwise support or facilitate a nuclear strike or defense grid.

Secondary targets would be things like Navy or Army bases, infrastructure of strategic importance(ports, train yards, airports, dams, etc.) And may include political targets like capital cities.

Jacksonville has a Navy base with a basin and an air strip. It's for surface warfare, not nuclear war. And it's not very big. It doesn't have bombers or ballistic missile submarines. It poses no immediate threat to Russia. At best, they could launch a battle group with tactical nukes and sail across the world into firing range of Russia. How long does that take?

In almost any scenario I can think of, Russia would not be very interested in Jacksonville. Maybe it would start out as conventional warfare and escalate into a tactical nuke being launched against the base? ...which again begs the question of what strategic importance is it?

Who knows what the future holds, but it doesn't seem likely that Russia would be launching a first strike on Jacksonville. Thoughts?

 

[JudasTitor]

Why would Russia execute a first strike nuclear attack on Jacksonville? Of what strategic importance is Jacksonville?

In a nuclear war the basic idea is to cripple your enemy's ability to attack before they can do any damage. That means an expedient use of ICBM's and shooting down anything inbound. Priority targets would be whatever poses the most immediate threat; nuclear launch sites, SAM sites, command centers and Air Force bases, communications facilities, radar installations, or anything that could otherwise support or facilitate a nuclear strike or defense grid.

Secondary targets would be things like Navy or Army bases, infrastructure of strategic importance(ports, train yards, airports, dams, etc.) And may include political targets like capital cities.

Jacksonville has a Navy base with a basin and an air strip. It's for surface warfare, not nuclear war. And it's not very big. It doesn't have bombers or ballistic missile submarines. It poses no immediate threat to Russia. At best, they could launch a battle group with tactical nukes and sail across the world into firing range of Russia. How long does that take?

In almost any scenario I can think of, Russia would not be very interested in Jacksonville. Maybe it would start out as conventional warfare and escalate into a tactical nuke being launched against the base? ...which again begs the question of what strategic importance is it?

Who knows what the future holds, but it doesn't seem likely that Russia would be launching a first strike on Jacksonville. Thoughts?

I had a family member stationed at Naval Air Station JAX, it has 1st world military power. Between JAX & Newport News/Virginia Beach/Chesapeake, does the US Navy have a larger base on the East coast?

The strike on JAX would have been a 2015 strike, clearly to decapitate Naval power. How does the introduction of the X37b change this strategy? What are the Chinese & Russian equivalents to the X37b?

 

[The Real McZero]

I had a family member stationed at Naval Air Station JAX, it has 1st world military power. Between JAX & Newport News/Virginia Beach/Chesapeake, does the US Navy have a larger base on the East coast?

The strike on JAX would have been a 2015 strike, clearly to decapitate Naval power. How does the introduction of the X37b change this strategy? What are the Chinese & Russian equivalents to the X37b?

I'm not suggesting that Mayport isn't a worthy target. I'm suggesting that it isn't an immediate threat to Russia in a nuclear war scenario, and therefore would not be an immediate/priority target. Titor described a war with Russia starting with a first strike on Jacksonville, which doesn't make a lot of sense and sounds more like BS.

The first stage of a nuclear war would be with long range missiles and space-based weaponry. At any given time in the first few hours there would be thousands of missiles of all types (and lasers beaming) in the sky. The Navy's role in the initial exchange would be primarily through ballistic missile submarines already on station. There is no need to target JAX in the initial exchange.

After the initial exchange, the Navy would take their turn with more ballistic missiles and tactical nukes, cruise missiles, air strikes, etc. While the Navy is busting them up, the Air Force gears up for their second phase of attacks. Out come the long range bombers with medium range nukes.

I think another important thing to mention here is that the US Navy operates so that it always has a nearby battle group ready to respond anywhere in the world. It is divided into zones. Each zone has a rotation; a battle group patrolling, another in port resting and another getting ready to relieve the one patrolling. If You're Russia, it's pointless to target a naval base initially when the threat is a sub 200 miles from your coastline.

That's generally how it works. But according to Titor, JAX was the initial nuclear strike. Okay then,... what would have to happen in order to provoke Russia to launch a first strike nuclear assault against JAX? What situation would provoke the need to "clearly to decapitate Naval power" with a nuke?

Hypothetical Scenario: Bad relations leads to bad economic policy and trade wars, embargoes, naval blockades and confrontations at sea. Russia is pressured into an attack on Mayport. Attacks on Norfolk Charleston and Kings Bay follow in the next few hours. Okay then, ... why risk Mutually Assured Destruction over a few ships and a trade route

What could be so valuable to Russia that it would risk a nuclear war to protect? What could Russia possibly need that it would nuke another superpower over? Russia would have to be desperate and facing an existential threat in order to do that. One existential threat would have to outweigh the other.

It doesn't make a lot of sense. I think he was full of it.

OH WAIT! Titor was conveniently from ANOTHER world line where everything is completely different. I forgot that when you travel time, you become god and create a whole other universe. (Excuse my sarcasm - I digress)

 

[JudasTitor]

I'm not suggesting that Mayport isn't a worthy target. I'm suggesting that it isn't an immediate threat to Russia in a nuclear war scenario, and therefore would not be an immediate/priority target. Titor described a war with Russia starting with a first strike on Jacksonville, which doesn't make a lot of sense and sounds more like BS.

The first stage of a nuclear war would be with long range missiles and space-based weaponry. At any given time in the first few hours there would be thousands of missiles of all types (and lasers beaming) in the sky. The Navy's role in the initial exchange would be primarily through ballistic missile submarines already on station. There is no need to target JAX in the initial exchange.

After the initial exchange, the Navy would take their turn with more ballistic missiles and tactical nukes, cruise missiles, air strikes, etc. While the Navy is busting them up, the Air Force gears up for their second phase of attacks. Out come the long range bombers with medium range nukes.

I think another important thing to mention here is that the US Navy operates so that it always has a nearby battle group ready to respond anywhere in the world. It is divided into zones. Each zone has a rotation; a battle group patrolling, another in port resting and another getting ready to relieve the one patrolling. If You're Russia, it's pointless to target a naval base initially when the threat is a sub 200 miles from your coastline.

That's generally how it works. But according to Titor, JAX was the initial nuclear strike. Okay then,... what would have to happen in order to provoke Russia to launch a first strike nuclear assault against JAX? What situation would provoke the need to "clearly to decapitate Naval power" with a nuke?

Hypothetical Scenario: Bad relations leads to bad economic policy and trade wars, embargoes, naval blockades and confrontations at sea. Russia is pressured into an attack on Mayport. Attacks on Norfolk Charleston and Kings Bay follow in the next few hours. Okay then, ... why risk Mutually Assured Destruction over a few ships and a trade route

What could be so valuable to Russia that it would risk a nuclear war to protect? What could Russia possibly need that it would nuke another superpower over? Russia would have to be desperate and facing an existential threat in order to do that. One existential threat would have to outweigh the other.

It doesn't make a lot of sense. I think he was full of it.

OH WAIT! Titor was conveniently from ANOTHER world line where everything is completely different. I forgot that when you travel time, you become god and create a whole other universe. (Excuse my sarcasm - I digress)

Let's Role Play:
I am the Russian Admiral. My goal is to inflict maximum damage on you during the only window I will have to attack.

Step #1 - I'm going to detonate multiple satellite based "Goldeneye" nuclear weapons in space. EMP weapons that will blind your electronics and fry out your grid, triggering a US civil war.

Step #2 - My entire submarine fleet is going to launch its entire nuclear arsenal 30 seconds after the EMP detonation at an altitude of 30 meters above sea level to attack every seaside major city & military base, simultaneously.

Step #3 - Whatever I have left will be aimed inland at your military bases

You are confused because you have been living in relative comfort & safety. It has confused you.

I'll glass NATO before I allow the EU to invade Russia.

 

[The Real McZero]

Let's Role Play:
I am the Russian Admiral. My goal is to inflict maximum damage on you during the only window I will have to attack.

Step #1 - I'm going to detonate multiple satellite based "Goldeneye" nuclear weapons in space. EMP weapons that will blind your electronics and fry out your grid, triggering a US civil war.

Step #2 - My entire submarine fleet is going to launch its entire nuclear arsenal 30 seconds after the EMP detonation at an altitude of 30 meters above sea level to attack every seaside major city & military base, simultaneously.

Step #3 - Whatever I have left will be aimed inland at your military bases

You are confused because you have been living in relative comfort & safety. It has confused you.

I'll glass NATO before I allow the EU to invade Russia.

The war supposedly happened years ago in a parallel universe, so it's sort of pointless discussion. But it is fun to consider. And I should have read the posts before making that assertion anyway. After reviewing the Titor archives, I realize that I am mistaken about a claim of a first strike on JAX. According to what I could find the actual quotes about JAX are as follows:

"Jacksonville FI took a direct hit. "
"I know exactly where I was and every detail of the exact moment the first nuclear warheads began falling on Jacksonville. "

He meant when it first started happening there locally, not that it was the first target. Somehow what registered in my memory was the phrase " the first nuclear warheads began falling on Jacksonville." (lol - opens mouth, inserts foot)

That doesn't mean he wasn't full of it though. His story was fiction, a place to hide information. ...which is part of what legitimates Titor as being involved in time travel operations. (As ironic as that sounds) He was hiding legitimate evidence underneath a fib, ...and, as Jay Walker points out, making subtle comments about future technology while doing it.

 

[JudasTitor]

The war supposedly happened years ago in a parallel universe, so it's sort of pointless discussion. But it is fun to consider. And I should have read the posts before making that assertion anyway. After reviewing the Titor archives, I realize that I am mistaken about a claim of a first strike on JAX. According to what I could find the actual quotes about JAX are as follows:

"Jacksonville FI took a direct hit. "
"I know exactly where I was and every detail of the exact moment the first nuclear warheads began falling on Jacksonville. "

He meant when it first started happening there locally, not that it was the first target. Somehow what registered in my memory was the phrase " the first nuclear warheads began falling on Jacksonville." (lol - opens mouth, inserts foot)

That doesn't mean he wasn't full of it though. His story was fiction, a place to hide information. ...which is part of what legitimates Titor as being involved in time travel operations. (As ironic as that sounds) He was hiding legitimate evidence underneath a fib, ...and, as Jay Walker points out, making subtle comments about future technology while doing it.

The man accurately predicted YouTube.
Have you figured out who Heather Cole is yet?

 

[The Real McZero]

The man accurately predicted YouTube.

Please show me.

Have you figured out who Heather Cole is yet?

No. Who is Heather Cole?

 

[JudasTitor]

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.youtube.com/&ved=2ahUKEwi6t5Lr9a2MAxWrpLAFHW2FAzcQFnoECB0QAQ&usg=AOvVaw0usXxGa_x5y1xoI_LaL0-1

Please show me.

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.youtube.com/&ved=2ahUKEwi6t5Lr9a2MAxWrpLAFHW2FAzcQFnoECB0QAQ&usg=AOvVaw0usXxGa_x5y1xoI_LaL0-1

No. Who is Heather Cole?

Navy captain charged with steering defense contracts to her own company

Capt. Heather Cole is accused of steering more than $600,000 in defense contracts to her own Oklahoma business, according to Navy records.

www.navytimes.com

She was fired as commander of the Navy’s Strategic Communications Wing 1 at Tinker in 2015 after an investigation “determined that Cole had not performed up to the high standards demanded of an officer in command.”

Cole’s termination fueled conspiracy theories suggesting that she refused to transmit nuclear launch codes after the Pentagon supposedly ordered a sneak attack against Russia.

Strategic Communications Wing 1 is responsible for keeping a secure link between the nation’s leaders and the the Navy’s fleet of ballistic missile submarines.

As commander, Cole was stationed at Tinker but reported to Naval Air Forces headquarters on Naval Air Station North Island near San Diego.

 

[Jay Walker]

Let's Role Play:
I am the Russian Admiral. My goal is to inflict maximum damage on you during the only window I will have to attack.

Step #1 - I'm going to detonate multiple satellite based "Goldeneye" nuclear weapons in space. EMP weapons that will blind your electronics and fry out your grid, triggering a US civil war.

Step #2 - My entire submarine fleet is going to launch its entire nuclear arsenal 30 seconds after the EMP detonation at an altitude of 30 meters above sea level to attack every seaside major city & military base, simultaneously.

Step #3 - Whatever I have left will be aimed inland at your military bases

You are confused because you have been living in relative comfort & safety. It has confused you.

I'll glass NATO before I allow the EU to invade Russia.

You do realize that after that much fallout, there wouldn't a United States worth conquering? No natural resources, A few million pissed off survivors, and no clean water. The stock markets would turn to ashes, and there would be retaliation from every NATO country for the sake of their own survival, the entire planet would be rendered uninhabitable for humans. Other mammals and insects would adapt similarly to the wildlife that still inhabit Chernobyl right now. From what I understand, the reason Hiroshima and Nagasaki are still habitable is because the bombs were detonated in mid-air, increasing the maximum damage while reducing fallout and any long-term radioactivity. I don't see any of these geniuses making that mistake again.

I am just saying a Russian Admiral would not want to inflict as much damage as possible. Instead, A smart Admiral would understand that wiping out the U.S economy would also wipe out the economy you were trying to inherit after the war. The GDP would still need to be functional when taking over. Therefore, conventional boots-on-the-ground invasions yield very little in the end. Destroying the U.S fom within. There was something that is said in the book/ movie "Sum of All Fears" by Tom Clancy. Something that has stuck with me. (Paraphrasing) Hitler's biggest blunder was fighting tha Americans and the Russians at the same time. Instead, he should have let the Russians and the U.S fight eachother. If he would have done that, we would all be speaking German.

From a combat scenario if push comes to shove an alternative to a massive nuclear strike would be using tactical Nukes. Just big enough to take out portions of heavily populated cities, like a nuclear blitzkrieg.

 

[Jay Walker]

The man accurately predicted YouTube.
Have you figured out who Heather Cole is yet?

Not just Youtube, but he also predicted phone service being provided through internet, that would be provided by "mobile internet nodes."
For us, that is exactly correct except the nodes aren't mobile, but stationary towers.

The problem isn't the evidence in favor of him being real. The issue becomes, "if you were in his situation, what would you say that would be convincing enough for a chat room in the early 2000s to believe?

Before you answer that, remember you have the luxury of time. Also, if anyone believes you, there are 10,000 people that will not. 1 in 10k are terrible odds.

 

[The Real McZero]

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.youtube.com/&ved=2ahUKEwi6t5Lr9a2MAxWrpLAFHW2FAzcQFnoECB0QAQ&usg=AOvVaw0usXxGa_x5y1xoI_LaL0-1

Navy captain charged with steering defense contracts to her own company

Capt. Heather Cole is accused of steering more than $600,000 in defense contracts to her own Oklahoma business, according to Navy records.

www.navytimes.com

She was fired as commander of the Navy’s Strategic Communications Wing 1 at Tinker in 2015 after an investigation “determined that Cole had not performed up to the high standards demanded of an officer in command.”

Cole’s termination fueled conspiracy theories suggesting that she refused to transmit nuclear launch codes after the Pentagon supposedly ordered a sneak attack against Russia.

Strategic Communications Wing 1 is responsible for keeping a secure link between the nation’s leaders and the the Navy’s fleet of ballistic missile submarines.

As commander, Cole was stationed at Tinker but reported to Naval Air Forces headquarters on Naval Air Station North Island near San Diego.

If she had refused to transmit the order to launch she would have been promptly relieved of duty (by force if necessary) and likely disciplined for disobeying a direct order. The missiles would have been launched anyway with little delay. So that's probably not true.

" “The charging and the firing were two completely different things,” he said. "

Part of obtaining a security clearance is allowing access to financial affairs. Shady or irresponsible business or financial practices can get a security clearance revoked. It's looked at as a potential vulnerability if they're in debt or have a failing business because it makes them susceptible to bribes. It is also a reflection of integrity. It's not abnormal to fire her from such a position over financial corruption.

"Navy Times found that one 2005 construction equipment order for $3,850 involved “nuclear bombs,” according to a summary of the Defense Logistics Agency contract."

This one sounds like sensationalism. $3800 means it was a gold plated screw or something. They make it sound like she was stealing a warhead.