My theory of travel

The reason I am having trouble with you, is that your a militarist.

Militarist seem to function from the stance that they are right and therefore everything that they want should be afforded.

From this goes both a misunderstanding of how time travel principles work and the need to inject ego into everything.

If you establish points A to B and then project a beam of light between these two points, you begin to found the principle that C as a pumped factor, gives off a dynamic resistance.

If you then establish light in geometric forms, what you have founded secondly, that light has pressure and can be applied universally, as utility describes.

Velocity of the person involved is not even important, if you can a'que you FTL principle, to stay in one spot.

This to my knowledge is done, but is given in an unconventional information book and if I were to ascribe to my source, then you might chide this?

You don't need FTL to time travel, if your light tensor, follows the exclusionary principle.

Gravity as part of an event sphere, as with NASAs said hidden gravity room can also be applied to this event sphere.
 
The reason I am having trouble with you, is that your a militarist.
Militarist seem to function from the stance that they are right and therefore everything that they want should be afforded.
Click to expand...
And that is what is sad, because it is your misconceptions and misperceptions that prevent you from understanding what I am saying. And in some areas we are saying the same thing, but you don't see it for your misperceptions. I am a scientist, not militarist. Technically, I am an engineer, which is an applied scientist. That means I insist on clear explanations of physical phenomenon, and part of that is expression in mathematical forms. This is the part you don't like about me, and so you label it as militarist. And all the while you are missing the mathematical description I provide, much of which describes some of the properties you describe, even in this very response...

From this goes both a misunderstanding of how time travel principles work and the need to inject ego into everything.
Click to expand...
Your judgment of ego injection can only come about from your own ego, which naturally seeks to judge others. Our egos are both very similar, Creeds, even though you seem to wish to project that you are egoless. Reflection and refraction upon this Energy you describe, Creedo. Then you will understand its closed-loop Creative principles.

If you establish points A to B and then project a beam of light between these two points, you begin to found the principle that C as a pumped factor, gives off a dynamic resistance.
Click to expand...
You see, this is where you fail to see we are saying the same thing. However, I speak of it in a mathematical sense with respect to the fractal similarity between speed of sound (a) and speed of light (c). What you describe about light in this statement, in non-standard terms, is already well known about fluids and sonic speeds in the aerospace sciences. The application of the principles of Mach are fractally self-similar in the domains of "a" and "c". The only difference between the two is that of a frequency shift. Another thing we have both agreed upon.
I think you are simply frustrated because you don't seem to "get" the connection I am making, and pointing out that the math is already available...from Mach. Closing the loop on lightspeed is simply the next step in our evolution of Energy manipulation beyond closing the loop on sound speed, which we did in the mid 1950s thanks to advances in the aerospace sciences.

If you then establish light in geometric forms, what you have founded secondly, that light has pressure and can be applied universally, as utility describes.
Click to expand...
Again, you are not saying anything that I have not described with respect to light manipulations and the Merkaba. Let's just agree with each other that sound dynamics and light dynamics are fractally self-similar in how they exhibit Energy. Can you agree with that? If so, then you know that all the equations that describe pressure forces in the sonic Energy realm (Mach) can be simply scaled-up in frequency to describe the pressure forces in the light Energy realm (Warp). Would you please agree that we are talking the same thing here? Just because I have the math and aero background on this stuff is no reason for your pride and ego to prevent you from coming to an agreement and moving forward. Don't you want to move forward, Creed?

Velocity of the person involved is not even important, if you can a'que you FTL principle, to stay in one spot.
Click to expand...
This is where I say you are mistaken, and it is because of your lack of study of the existing aerospace and physical sciences. Velocity is not only important, it is the PRIMARY non-linear factor in how Energy is manipulated. Velocity-squared IS the Power Law of Energy. The squared nature of dynamic pressure with respect to airspeed velocity if what makes the flight of aerospace vehicles possible. By fractally scaling these velocity squared relations up to the speed of light, we encounter a whole new tool for manipulating Energy. It's all the same. The universe is self-similar at multiple scales, Creedo, and I think you know that... but for some reason you do not appear ready to admit it. Perhaps this is where your ego gets in the way?

You don't need FTL to time travel, if your light tensor, follows the exclusionary principle.
Click to expand...
Again, if you read my posts in this thread, you will see I have never said FTL is needed, nor even that it would "work" for time travel. In fact, I have argued against it, and provided solid scientific evidence for why it is problematic. Hello! Creedo! Why do you insist on thinking that I disagree with you on this issue? Can't we agree on what we agree upon, and then build upon that? I'd like to do that, but you don't seem to want to, or you do not understand where our discussions are saying the same thing.

and if I were to ascribe to my source, then you might chide this?
Click to expand...
No, and I am sorry if you think this. I wil chide you if you cannot explain such theories mathematically. And I will chide you if these sources are pseudo-scientific, in that these very sources cannot describe the things they write about mathematically.

Any theory of science can always be described mathematically. Even if it means defining a new form of mathematics that have never been available to describe these theories before.

It is not militaristic to wish to see mathematical models of a proposed theory of physicality. It is nothing more than good science.

RMT
 
Ray' if going into space means so much to you, then here, take my keys to the space ship, but have it back by next week?
Click to expand...
So this is how you answer my sincere attempt to reach common ground with you, eh Creedo? Perhaps now you can see where your ego comes into play each time you poke fun at me when I am trying very hard to communicate and cooperate with you.

Perhaps you have some growing up to do. Why not go back, read that last post of mine, and be somewhat of a normal person and address these issues. We agree on more than we disagree with regard to these topics.

RMT
 
Ray, I've psychoanalyzed you and what I'm coming up with, is that for certain reasons you want to go back into space.

I'm not being funny here.
 
Ray, I've psychoanalyzed you and what I'm coming up with, is that for certain reasons you want to go back into space.
Click to expand...
Well, how about you stop changing the subject when I address something you are afraid of? I don't really care about your psychoanalysis of me. I am here for certain reasons, and I've told you what they are. We both have work to do, and the common ground I have pointed out above is part of that work.

I'd ask that you stop ignoring your appointed tasks in favor of flights of fancy and psychoanalysis. Address what I have said, or move on to another thread.

I am being totally serious here,
RMT
 
Ray what you want is realization to your life goals, which are aerospace.

What you are miffed about is that I understand you, but you are mad I am not enamorate to your cause.
 
What you have to understand about these types of posting boards, is the standard economy of everyone who uses these boards, in most cases is only modest.

The inventions are a sometimes issue, that do not work all of the time either.
 
In our private conversations we had talked about the realization of a certain invention.

You had shared confidences about some things in-particular to me, so I will honor these confidences.
 
Creedo little buddy,
Ray what you want is realization to your life goals, which are aerospace.
Click to expand...
Well this is certainly one of many areas where you underestimate me. You think you know me, but you only know part of the story. I do Aero for my job, to put food on the table. But I have goals beyond this that I would have thought you would have caught on to by now.
Maybe you're not as deep as you think. /ttiforum/images/graemlins/smile.gif
What you are miffed about is that I understand you
Click to expand...
If thinking this makes you happy, so be it. But it's quite possible there are things you don't yet understand about me. Important things.
What you have to understand about these types of posting boards, is the standard economy of everyone who uses these boards, in most cases is only modest.
Click to expand...
Yet I think you'd agree they are timeless repositories where people can come and read, and not be subject to the normal linearity of Time. This is where you do not understand the non-linear reality of our interaction. You should re-evaluate this with regard to the 3-D reality of Time.
The inventions are a sometimes issue, that do not work all of the time either.
Click to expand...
Ether is a whole separate topic that you and I have yet to dicuss in detail. /ttiforum/images/graemlins/smile.gif Why not stick with the agreements I stated with your statements above? Care to address them?
In our private conversations we had talked about the realization of a certain invention.
You had shared confidences about some things in-particular to me, so I will honor these confidences.
Click to expand...
Oh how cute and adorable, Creedo! You're using inference and allusion to "secret knowledge" to plant thoughts in other people's minds. I didn't know you cared so much about me to do so! :oops: Are you sure you weren't stickin it to my G/F?


You know, there are lots of unaddressed issues between us that you have elected to cast off to the side of the road that we are tracing here. One of them is your link to Anakin, and your refusal to go and view The Revenge Of The Sith closing of the Star Wars stories. Have you still not gone to see this movie? If so, shame on you! What are you afraid of that could be contained in simple lightspeed images of this flick? /ttiforum/images/graemlins/devil.gif

RMT
 
Answer the question counselor:

Have you or have you not viewed Star Wars: Revenge Of The Sith?

Yes or No would do, Creeds. /ttiforum/images/graemlins/tongue.gif
RMT
 
There is no past, future, or present. But there is the "Perception" of past, future, and present that can be contained and "contolled" if you will. The time travel "machine" could be as simple as a fax machine. A fax machine can send a reproduction of a "percepted" image, as long as there is "paper" to catch the "perception" and as long as there is a recepticle there to contain it. In other words, if you built a fax machine that traveled (with fiber optics) faster than the speed of light, and then had the "Time travel" wear a "receptacle" perhaps in watch form, and then set the timer so that the Timetraveler arrived at his or her destination (whatever year you wanted) say 15 minutes prior to when he left, technically he would arrive at his destination before he left and therefore would be able to "receive" the "fax" so that it was contained. You could go in the past or future, as there is no past or future, technically. The Time traveler's body would remain on our perceived "present" state, but would also be there physically at their destination, just as a fax is. Yes the speed of light code can be broken, surpassed, and contained. :D
 
The trouble is,

A fax doesnt really take anything through 'time', Again its just matter in motion, its movements can be tracked as it takes a copy of one thing, puts it through a series of actions to create another copy of it.

You could say that the energy of the original mental concept is being manoeuvred through time, But this is a different subject almost.

Fiber optics at the spead of light is a different matter. If you can achive this. Fiber Optics uses light, so i'm not to sure how you would use it to travel faster then light. Seeing as light it the method in the first place.

There is no past, future, or present. But there is the "Perception" of past, future, and present
Click to expand...

There is only 'present'. And perception of the 'past' and 'future' is only possible from the present.

kind regards,
Olly
 
That's awesome! So, if you live on a planet 4.5 billion light years away, you would theoretically be able to see the creation of Earth? I would love to see that.
 
Back
Top