Mylo
It was a generalized prediction. Even you could do it. Using statistical data.
The location was a miss. The epicenter of the quake occurred offshore in the ocean.
Given the time span evident, roughly 22,000 earthquakes occurred across the earth.
It's just like predicting lightning strikes. They will happen statistically. But when and where?
Well, no killer earthquakes on the horizon for the next two weeks in California. But I predict there will be an earthquake in California within the next two weeks. That gives me till April 16 for my prediction to come true.
No he didn't!Again, you are trivializing his prediction. He did predict the magnitude.
As I recall the poster predicting an earthquake in Chile didn't mention the magnitude of the earthquake. Of course that can change with the edit function.
Listen, if you guys are going to make stuff up just to argue, then I'm not going to participate in this discussion anymore.
I'm not making anything up. I'm not that sort of person. If you have time, read through the posts made by IQ EQ
BIG EQ in Chile really soon
Thanks for the link Mylo. Someone claiming to be IQ EQ says a Wyoming earthquake linked to Yellowstone will trigger.
Predicting an earthquake ?somewhere" in California on any day is actually easier than predicting that the sun will rise tomorrow. It's better than shooting fish in a rain barrel.
http://www.data.scec.org/recent/req2/index.html
The map is dynamic (it is updated hourly). Whenever you happen to click on the link you'll see a typical week of data. There will be 100-200 earthquakes shown on the map of California for the past 7 days.
Mr. Thomas, if Jon Titor (or John as you spell the name)